View Single Post
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
azim
LI Oldtimer
 
azim's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 700
Reputation: 987
Rep Power: 22
azim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to beholdazim is a splendid one to behold
Join Date: Aug 2005
Gender:Brother In Islam
Way of Life: Muslim
Default Re: Dhul Qarnayn: Quranic Error? - 04-21-2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage41 View Post
Yusuf Ali is not a scholar? The man translation is the most widespread Quran in the world, I would take the word of an Arabic-English professional that Dhul Qarnayn is Alexander the Great. Nearly all the evidence points to him being Alexander the Great. The greeks used the "two-horned one" and dhul qarnayn means two horned. Ibn Ishaq wrote the Sira of the Prophet, he even regarded it as Alexander. Even Imam Al-Ghazali regarded the story to be Alexander.

Nearly all of the Medieval Islamic scholar (during Islam's so called 'golden' age) regarded as Alexander the Great! How much more evidence do you need? It seems that suddenly in the 20th century all the Muslims after learning the facts about Alexanders, "suddenly" changed their mind to 'interpret' dhul qarnayn as someone else. Rather disingenuous dont you think?
You're original accusation was against the Quran. Yet you are now levelling accusations against the opinion of scholars.

Ansar al Adl already refuted your claim. The Quran does not say Dhul Qarnayn is Alexander. So where is the error or major inaccuracy in the Quran?
   
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08616 seconds with 9 queries