View Single Post
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
amirah_87
Account Disabled
 
amirah_87's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,320
Reputation: 18127
Rep Power: 0
amirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond reputeamirah_87 has a reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 16°53'39.06"N 43°48'5.35"E
Gender:Sister In Islam
Way of Life: Muslim
Default Re: Question About Surah An-Nisa Verse 157...... - 09-14-2006

As salaamu alaykum,

Quote:
wa lakin shubbiha lahum”

but so it was made to appear to them
I studied that this meant, when the disbeliever gathered round Isaa alayhis salaams house one of

them was told to enter and bring him out, so one man went in..it was then that Allahu subhanuu wa ta

3aalaa raised him!!

the disbeliver was then made to look like Isaa alayhis salaam so when he went back out he appeared

to be in Isa's form.. and the others ended up killing him!!

Quote:
2) The second key point is that the word مَا صَلَبُ “ Ma-Salaboohu” means to have died from
crucifixion, the lexicon in Taj al Uroos gives us the following meaning for “ Ma-Salaboohu”:


'Saleeb' means fat. In Sehah the marrow of the bones is called 'saleeb'. One crucified is called 'Maslub' because the marrow of his bones exudes. 'Salab' is derived from "the known way of killing". For the marrow and other fluids exude foth from the bones of a crucified person.


So “ Ma-Salaboohu” means that they failed to kill him on the cross, not that he wasn't put on the cross because the word means to die on the cross.
No, "wa maa qataluuhu wa maa salabuhuu" means: That they did not kill him, NOR did they crucify him!!

Wallahu A3lam..

Check in Tafseer Ibnu Katheer InshaAllah!

Last edited by amirah_87; 09-14-2006 at 02:36 PM..
   
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09114 seconds with 9 queries