View Single Post
Old
  (#35 (permalink))
Grace Seeker
LI Oldskool
 
Grace Seeker's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,829
Reputation: 5783
Rep Power: 21
Grace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond reputeGrace Seeker has a reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Gender:Brother In Humanity
Way of Life: Christian
Default Re: I have a few questions - 08-07-2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by ummzayd View Post
I think it is legitimate to point out that according to the bible Ishmael is cast out and disinherited, and the scribes drive home the point that he and his descendents have no part in the spiritual inheritance of Prophet Abraham (pbuh) either. so he is quite a despised person, notwithstanding God's promise to grant him a great number of descendants.

Why would anyone have a problem with that? well, for a start it falls short of a human standard of basic decency, never mind divine grace. nowhere in the bible is it suggested that Ishmael was cast out and disinherited because he was evil or was deserving in any way of such harsh treatment - it was instigated by Sarah's petty jealousy on behalf of her son and portrayed as a kind of snobbishness that Ishmael, although a son of Abraham pbuh, was also a son of a slave and therefore inferior. the idea that God would condone this kind of thinking (which is implicit in the scriptures) is amazing.

Furthermore, according to Deuteronomy, the firstborn is owed a double portion of inheritance, no matter whether his mother is despised or not. 'For (the firstborn) is the beginning of his strength.' Elsewhere in the Torah Israel (the Israelites) are called by God 'my son, my firstborn son'. And when God punished the Egyptians he struck down their firstborn sons. To be the firstborn son is an honourable distinction elsewhere in the bible, so perhaps that is why Muslims feel it is worth mentioning.

as for the story of Ishmael, I'm afraid I don't have much time but I can tell you that he was brought as a baby to the valley of Mecca by Hagar and Abraham pbuh, who left them there to establish a settlement but returned regularly and when Ishmael was old enough they rebuilt the Ka'aba together (it had originally been built by Adam pbuh but evidently had disappeared). as stated in the bible, Ishmael was sufficiently close to his father's heart that he was informed of Abraham's pbuh final illness and together with his brother Isaac he buried him. Which fact jars a bit when you read it first because up till then the bible tell us a story of a son cast out and disinherited - I remember the first time I read it as a Christian I was startled and actually thought 'how did he get back into the story? I thought he was long gone!'. Did Abraham have a change of heart? How did he know where to find Ishmael? We are not told.

I hope this answers your question about the firstborn issue, sorry if it's all a bit garbled I'm in a rush!

peace
Thank-you for filling in some of the blanks. So, you view that Ishmael should get a double portion. And if one looks at the landmass that Ishmael's descendants are spread over, verses those of Isaac, does it not appear that they have that and more?

Do Muslims, (whether they be descendants of Ishmael or not) view as true or false that God made a special covenant with the son of Abraham through Sarah? Is this significant?
   
 
Page generated in 0.09832 seconds with 9 queries