View Single Post
Old
  (#32 (permalink))
Whatsthepoint
Agnostic revert
 
Whatsthepoint's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,909
Reputation: 5661
Rep Power: 15
Whatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Oct 2007
Gender:Brother In Humanity
Way of Life: Agnostic
Default Re: [EMBRYOLOGY] Bones and flesh - 03-02-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by aamirsaab View Post
I don't think I explained the verse very well. I'll repeat it: it's got nothing to do with which was formed first - bones or flesh. It's simply saying the bones were clothed in flesh aka muscles. That's the core bit of the ayat. The miracle of this, is that all embryologyical study backs it up (since they all seem to agree that the bones are clothed in flesh!) - at that time, it was not possible to investigate the claim in the ayat, yet after many many decades, it has been proven. Hence it is seen as a miracle in Islam.

P.s; I'm not a scholar or a student of embryology. Just a bacha with a lacha and internet access.
Ok, now that I think about it, the verse does not necessarily imply that the bones are clothed after they've been formed.
Well, that's one lousy miracle, no offence, The Quran can do better.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09366 seconds with 9 queries