Quote:
Originally Posted by crayon  You can actually tell the difference between the words more in arabic, so it is clearer. But meh, suit yourself. :P
But what do you mean by "abusing science"? How was it abused? |
It was abused on many levels.
The leech is intentionally drawn in a way that resembles the embrio (even that way, it does not quite resemble it, but anyway the shape of a leech resembling the shape of an embrio has no significance whatsoever, as it is a completely different type of animal.
The suspension of the embryo. I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean. If it means that the mebryo "hangs" from something, it's wrong. If it means the embryo is suspended (as in located) in the uterus, there's nothing miraculous about it.
Blood clot. The presence of uncirculating blood in an embryo does not make the embryo any like a blood clot. And I don't know where did they get the idea that blood does not circulate until the third week. The embryo mighnt not have its own fully developed cardiovascualr system by that time, but that doesn't mean the same blood stays in it for three weeks.
The chewed substance... I don't think I need to comment on this one.
Quote:
|
Ever think of the possibility that they may actually be miracles? ;)
|
Why of course! I am an agnostic. What I am saying is that the probability of the verses in question being miraculous is very low indeed.
I may be utterly mistaken.