View Single Post
Old
  (#80 (permalink))
Whatsthepoint
Agnostic revert
 
Whatsthepoint's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,923
Reputation: 5661
Rep Power: 15
Whatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond reputeWhatsthepoint has a reputation beyond repute
Join Date: Oct 2007
Gender:Brother In Humanity
Way of Life: Agnostic
Default Re: [EMBRYOLOGY] Bones and flesh - 05-08-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skye Ephémérine View Post
Adam being 60 feet tall, isn't from the Quran.. it is a hadith..
There is a criteria against which the accuracy of hadiths are measured, and based on that people can choose to reject or accept it.. the Quran however is unaffected by that criteria given the nature of both.. The Quran (the word of God) hadiths, the words of the prophet SAS, and subjected to weak or strong narrative... I am sure the criteria is listed some where on this forum..

I am post call and I need a long snooze...

laters
cheers
Oops, my mistake. And I've only just realized the actual height was 90 feet.
The hadith was narated by Abu Huraira who I read is considered trustworthy.
If you remember we have quite a history of arguing about quranic flaws, mostly ones concerning astronomy.
Neither of us reached any progress in convincing the other if I remmber correctly. It's like that with every religion, as well as irreligion I guess. Religious people will not admit their religion is flawed, nor will the irreligious admit any religion is flawless or perfect. Every religion has its share of apologetics claiming there's not a single mistake in their holy text, refuting every allegation and dispute. Some people are convinced and some aren't.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09688 seconds with 9 queries