![]() | | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Notices |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 140 Reputation: 209 Rep Power: 22 Join Date: Jul 2006 Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | I've been hearing and seeing lately a lot of drama about weather Jesus actually existed or not. The core argument I suppose would be that there are no historical records of him, and that there are no written journals, (records) or documents from anyone about him, only the Bible. But there is a lot more to the argument than that. These links are just some examples; http://mwillett.org/atheism/jesusmyth.htm http://www.sullivan-county.com/news/paul/j_myth.htm Then I found this article from www.thetruthcenter.com : THE TRUTH OF THE HISTORICAL JESUS & THE MYTHICAL CHRIST -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Prepared by Pastor Ray Hagins, Ph.D.) Over 90% of people (in the Christianized Western world) believe that “Jesus Christ” was an actual historical figure. For these people, the only point of controversy about “Jesus” is whether or not he was (or is) the Son of God and the Messiah. However, as never before, there is a great deal of controversy about whether or not a person named Jesus Christ ever really existed. According to publications readily found in Christian bookstores, Jesus Christ DID exist! But, I dare you to go to other books stores!!! You will find volumes of literature that clearly reveals, logically and intelligently, time and again that Jesus Christ is a mythological character along the same lines as the Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Sumerian, Phoenician, Indian or other god-men, who are all presently accepted as myths rather than historical figures. My sincere and exhaustive research has shown me that the Jesus character is based upon much older myths and heroes from all over the world. I have found that this story about “Jesus Christ” was invented in the year 325 A.D. at the Nicean Council and did not exist as real person who was (or is) the “son of God.” Historically speaking, my research Jewish literature has revealed to me that approximately 100 years B.C.E., there was a person named Jeshua Ben-Pandira, whose who was a “*******” (illegitimate) child. His mother was named Mary. His father, named whose name was Joseph Pandira, lived next door to Mary. One night he came home drunk and encountered Mary and raped her. She conceived and according to so-called Jewish custom would have been put to death, but the man that she was engaged to (Joseph Ben Stada) married her to take away her reproach. Because this child was conceived in such a manner and was therefore seen as a “******* child;” Joseph Ben Stada took his wife, Mary, and her son Jeshua and moved to Egypt where this child received his education. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, literary prevarication was used quite a bit from the first though the 5th and 6th centuries. Eusebius, a so-called “church father” is said to have been “an unbelievable liar who regularly wrote his own fictions about the life and deeds of “the Lord. Jesus.” Pope Leo X, who was one of the most powerful Popes in the history of the Roman Catholic Church made this curious declaration, “What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!” Yet, many “dissenters” (those who differed in belief and rejected the doctrines of the Established Church in England or Scotland) were viciously refuted or murdered for exposing those religious leaders who were fooling the masses with their fictional teachings. It is important that we understand that the ONLY literary evidence of the existence of a so-called “Jesus Christ” is in the four gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John) of the New Testament. Any and all other references, ideas, imaginations, movies, etc., are taken from these writings. Ask yourself why the so-called “Paul,” never discussed an historical background of Jesus, but rather only about a spiritual being who he called “Christ” (who was known to all gnostic sects for hundreds to thousands of years). The few supposed historical references to an actual life of Jesus mentioned in the Pauline Epistles are interpolations and forgeries, as are the Epistles themselves, as they were not written by Paul. It is also very interesting that the Pauline literature does not refer to Pilate or the Romans, or Caiaphas, or the Sanhedrin, or Herod or Judas, or the holy women, or any person or event in the gospels’ account of the Passion, and never makes any allusion to them. It is even more interesting that Paul never quotes from Jesus’ purported sermons and speeches, parables and prayers, nor does he mention Jesus’ supernatural birth or any of his alleged wonders and miracles. THERE IS NO NON-BIBLICAL EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF A JESUS CHRIST!!! There are no non-biblical references to a historical Jesus by any known historian of the time during and after Jesus’ purported advent. No literate person of his (Jesus’) own time mentioned him in any known writing. The eminent Hellenistic Jewish historian and philosopher Philo (20 B.C.E.-50 C.E.), who was alive at the purported time of Jesus, makes no mention of him. Nor do any of the some 40 other historians who wrote during the first one to two centuries of the Common Era. Enough of the writings of [these] authors . . . remain to form a library. In the entire works of the Jewish historian Josephus, which constitute many volumes, there are only two small paragraphs that supposedly refer to Jesus. Although much has been made of these “references,” they have been dismissed by all scholars and even by Christian apologists as forgeries. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof; yet, no proof of any kind for the historicity of Jesus has ever existed. My research has brought me to the conclusion that THERE WAS NO SINGLE HISTORICAL PERSON UPON WHOM THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION WAS FOUNDED, and that “Jesus Christ” is a compilation of legends, heroes, gods and god-men. Time will not permit us to go into detail about each god or god-man that plagiarists and copyists used to contribute to the formation of the Jewish Jesus character; however, there is plenty of documentation to show that this issue is not a question of “faith” or “belief.” The fictionalized story of Jesus nearly identically parallels the stories of Horus, Krishna, Buddha, Mithra, Prometheus, and many others ALL of whom predate the Romanized Jesus story by hundreds to thousands of years. EVERY CULTURE HAD A SAVIOR BUT THE ROMAN EMPIRE!!! HENCE, THE ROMANIZED CHRIST! The following world saviors and “sons of God,” were crucified or executed and was resurrected from the dead and ascended to heaven. AND they predate the so-called “Jesus Christ.” 1. Adad of Assyria 2. Adonis, Apollo, Heracles (“Hercules”) and Zeus of Greece 3. Alcides of Thebes 4. Attis of Phrygia 5. Baal of Phoenicia 6. Bali of Afghanistan 7. Beddru of Japan 8. Buddha of India 9. Crite of Chaldea 10. Deva Tat of Siam 11. Hesus of the Druids 11. Horus, Osiris, and Serapis of Egypt, whose long-haired, bearded appearance was adopted for the Christ character 12. Indra of Tibet/India 13. Jao of Nepal 14. Krishna of India 15. Mikado of the Sintoos 16. Mithra of Persia 17. Odin of the Scandinavians 18. Prometheus of Caucasus/Greece 19. Quetzalcoatl of Mexico 20. Salivahana of Bermuda 21. Tammuz of Syria (who was, in a typical mythmaking move, later turned into the disciple Thomas 22. Thor of the Gauls 23. Universal Monarch of the Sibyls 24. Wittoba of the Bilingonese 25. Xamolxis of Thrace 26. Zarathustra/Zoroaster of Persia 27. Zoar of the Bonzes THE MAJOR PLAYERS Horus of Egypt(ca. 10,000 B.C.E.) The stories of Jesus and Horus are VERY similar, with Horus even contributing the name of Jesus Christ. Horus and his once-and-future Father, Osiris, are frequently interchangeable in the mythos (“I and my Father are one”). The legends of Horus go back to ca. 10,000 B.C.E. 1. Horus was born of the virgin Isis-Meri on December 25th in a cave/manger, with his birth being announced by a star in the East and attended by three wise men. 2. He was a child teacher in the Temple and was baptized when he was 30 years old. 3. Horus was baptized by “Anup the Baptizer,” who becomes “John the Baptist.” 4. He had 12 disciples. 5. He performed miracles and raised one man, El-Azar-us, from the dead. 6. He walked on water. 7. Horus was transfigured on the Mount. 8. He was crucified, buried in a tomb and resurrected. 9. He was also the “Way, the Truth, the Light, the Messiah, God’s Anointed Son, the Son of Man, the Good Shepherd, the Lamb of God, the Word” etc. 10. He was “the Fisher,” and was associated with the Lamb, Lion and Fish (“Ichthys”). 11. Horus’s personal epithet was “Iusa,” the “ever-becoming son” of “Ptah,” the “Father.” 12. Horus was called “the KRST,” or “Anointed One,” thousands of years before the Romanized Christ. In fact, in the catacombs at Rome are pictures of the baby Horus being held by the virgin mother Isis - the original “Madonna and Child. Krishna of India (ca. 5,000 B.C.E.) Gerald Massey finds over 100 similarities between the Hindu and Christian saviors, and Kersey Graves, who includes the various non-canonical gospels in his analysis, lists over 300 likenesses. 1. Krishna was born of the Virgin Devaki (“Divine One”) 2. His father was a carpenter. 3. His birth was attended by angels, wise men and shepherds, and he was presented with gold, frankincense and myrrh. 4. He was persecuted by a tyrant who ordered the slaughter of thousands of infants. 5. He was of royal descent. 6. He was baptized in the River Ganges. 7. He worked miracles and wonders. 8. He raised the dead and healed lepers, the deaf and the blind. 9. Krishna used parables to teach the people about charity and love. 10. “He lived poor and he loved the poor.” 11. He was transfigured in front of his disciples. 12. He died on a tree or was crucified between two thieves. 13. He rose from the dead and ascended to heaven. 14. Krishna is called the “Shepherd God” and “Lord of lords,” and was considered “the Redeemer, Firstborn, Sin Bearer, Liberator, Universal Word.” 15. He is the second person of the Trinity, and proclaimed himself the “Resurrection” and the “way to the Father.” 16. He was considered the “Beginning, the Middle and the End,” (“Alpha and Omega”), as well as being omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent. 17. His disciples bestowed upon him the title “Jezeus,” meaning “pure essence.” 18. Krishna is to return to do battle with the “Prince of Evil,” who will desolate the earth. Mithra, Sun-god of Persia (ca. 600 B.C.E.) 1. Mithra was born of a virgin on December 25th. 2. He was considered a great traveling teacher and master. 3. He had 12 companions or disciples. 4. He performed miracles. 5. He was buried in a tomb. 6. After three days he rose again. 7. His resurrection was celebrated every year. 8. Mithra was called “the Good Shepherd.” 9. He was considered “the Way, the Truth and the Light, the Redeemer, the Savior, the Messiah.” 10. He was identified with both the Lion and the Lamb. His sacred day was Sunday, “the Lord’s Day,” hundreds of years before the appearance of Christ. 11. Mithra had his principal festival on what was later to become Easter, at which time he was resurrected. 12. His religion had a Eucharist or “Lord’s Supper.” Buddha (ca. 500 B.C.E) 1. Buddha was born of the virgin Maya, who was considered the “Queen of Heaven.” (cf. Jer 44:25). 2. He was of royal descent. 3. He crushed a serpent’s head. 4. He performed miracles and wonders, healed the sick, fed 500 men from a “small basket of cakes,” and walked on water. 5. He abolished idolatry, was a “sower of the word,” and preached “the establishment of a kingdom of righteousness. 6. He taught chastity, temperance, tolerance, compassion, love, and the equality of all. 7. He was transfigured on a mount. 8. Sakya Buddha was crucified in a sin-atonement, suffered for three days in hell, and was resurrected. 9. He ascended to Nirvana or “heaven.” 10. Buddha was considered the “Good Shepherd”, the “Carpenter”, the “Infinite and Everlasting.” 11. He was called the “Savior of the World” and the “Light of the World.” Prometheus of Greece 1. Prometheus descended from heaven as God incarnate as man, to save mankind. 2. He was crucified, suffered and rose from the dead. 3. He was called the Logos or Word. The “Son” of God is the “Sun” of God The reason why all these narratives are so similar, with a god-man who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astro-theological development that can be found throughout the planet because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel story is an account of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. For instance, most of the world’s crucified god-men have their traditional birthday on December 25th (“Christmas”). This is because the ancients recognized that (from an earth-centric perspective) the sun makes an annual descent southward until December 21st or 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops moving southerly for three days and then starts to move northward again. During this time, the ancients declared that “God’s sun” had “died” for three days and was “born again” on December 25th. The ancients realized that they needed the sun to return every day and that they would be in big trouble if the sun continued to move southward and did not stop and reverse its direction. Thus, these many different cultures celebrated the birthday of the “sun of God” on December 25th. The following are the characteristics of the “sun of God”: 1. The sun “dies” for three days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops in its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. NOTE: In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and therefore, the sun would be “born of a Virgin.” 2. The sun is the “Light of the World.” 3. The sun “cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him.” 4. The sun rising in the morning is the “Savior of mankind.” The sun wears a corona, “crown of thorns” or halo. 5. The sun “walks on water.” 6. The sun’s “followers,” “helpers” or “disciples” are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the “Most High”; thus, “he” begins “his Father’s work” at “age” 12. 7. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30°; hence, the “Sun of God” begins his ministry at “age” 30. It exits each sign of the zodiac at 33°; hence Jesus dies at the age of 33 years old. 8. The sun is hung on a cross or “crucified,” which represents its passing through the equinoxes, the vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. Contrary to popular belief, the ancient Africans were not an ignorant and superstitious lot who actually believed their deities to be literal characters. Indeed, this slanderous propaganda has been part of the conspiracy of psychopathic racism and cultural supremacy to make the ancient Africans appear as if they were truly the “dark and dumb savages” that was in need of the “light of Jesus.” The reality is that the ancient Africans were no less advanced in their morals and spiritual practices, and were far more advanced, than the Euro-Gentile Christians in their own supposed morality and ideology, which, in its very attempt at historicity, is in actuality a degradation of the ancient mysteries. Indeed, unlike the “superior” Euro-Gentile-Greco-Roman Christians, the true intelligentsia amongst the ancient Africans were well aware that their gods were astronomical and atmospheric in nature. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't know if Jesus truly existed or not, because I wasn't there...but do you believe absolutely without a doubt that this man is not a myth? Or is? I just want your opinions... What do you think? |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| |
| a.k.a. steve Status: Offline Posts: 1,900 Reputation: 11628 Rep Power: 45 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Belgium, Gent Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*Lamb of god - dalai lama (deus lama) this religion originated around the year 1400A.D. How can this have been an influence? It’s more likely the other way around wouldn’t you agree? A.c.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalai_lama *Thulis ->search turned out blank *Coite -> search turned out blank *Thammuz -> Babylonian God, not a son of god no analogy with Jesus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tammuz *Atys -> not son of a god, son a of a king. Are all princes a reference to Jesus? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atys_father_of_Lydus *Hesus only link is the similar name, a simple coincidence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesus *Bali is an ancient king who opposed the 5th incarnation of vishnu, no similarity. *Indra is the chief deity of the Rig-Veda, and the god of weather and war, and Lord of Svargaloka in Hinduism. no parallelism. *Iao Sabaoth is applied together or seperately as Gnostic archons; the Gnostic Iao is associated with both Abraxas and the seven headed dragon; he is sometimes referred to as the "Father of Lies". There is no simularity *Mitra has again no simularities , but zoroastrism does carry traces of this deity, and there we see simular aspects like trinity. But there’s no indication Mitra has anything to do with that. *Sakia -> search turned out blank *Alceste was a princess in Greek mythology, Alcestis ("might of the home") was known for her love for her husband. Their story was popularised in Euripides's tragedy Alcestis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcestis *Quexaicote was Mexican God, I didn’t even search this one. The ancient tribes in America didn’t have ships, only small canoes, they were isolated from other continents, and therefore couldn’t have influenced Christianity. *Prometheus the human who stole the fire from the Gods, again no similarity. *Wittoba was another incarnation of Vishnu, the avatar named Wittoba or Vithoba ... This incarnation of Vishnu or CRISTNA is called Wittoba or Ballaji *Quirinus a god in the polytheistic Roman mythology. No similarities. *Chrisna -> here there actually are some good example of similarities. Probably the reason why they focussed on this one rather then the other examples. However most references are slightly changed and taken out of context to accentuate the similarity, this to hide the fact that it’s a stretch. *Adonis, Apollo, Heracles (“Hercules”) and Zeus of Greece only simularity was that they were sons of gods, hardly enough simularity, it's only natural that polytheistic religions have sons and fathers that doesn't mean Jesus (pbuh) is likely to be inspired by it. Afterall Jesus (pbuh) was only considered to be son of God many centuries later. *Thor of the Gauls Thor was the supreme god, not the son, not human no simularitys. *Odin of the Scandinavians was god of warriors, again no simularities. I'm getting tire of looking these things up it's to futile, you get the general idea right? It's a complete bogus list. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Jesus was not born on 25 dec. The actual birthday is unknown as far as I know. When Catholics concurred northern Europe; in order to convert the Celtics they would have to give up there holiday “Yule” which was a festivity to celebrate the shortest day of the year (latest dawn and earliest dusk). So the Catholics cooked up a birthday celebration of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) to compensate. The similarities between the Celtic belief and the Egyptian was not because one influenced the other, but rather because they both based their religion on the course of the sun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yule No similarity between the star Sirius and the star in the bible showing Jesus (pbuh) birth Sirius was a deity in the Egyptian mythology called sopdeth in the older mythology which later on assimilated with Isis, Horus’ mother. also, whether or not there was actually a star pronouncing Jesus (pbuh) birth, or wheter this was added afterwards is debated. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sopdet No similarities between three kings, and three deities visiting after birth There weren’t 3 deitys but only 2. Isis herself (his mother) was the third one. Quote:
Horus wasn’t even baptised since it was not a custom. Eridanus is not even a river. It’s a constellation wich according to Greek mythology symbolises a river. Anubis was not a baptiser but a different Deity. He is also a son of Osiris, but the two deitys never met. Horus replaced Annubis as the myth evolved. Actually the erason Horus was considered son of Osiris was because he was he replaced Annubis in the mythology. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anubis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osiris Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Then there's the freemasons. As Christianity came to Egypt, a small sect was created that had both Christian and ancient Egyptian concepts combined. This sect was first allowed in Christianity but in the dark ages when Christianity started with it’s crusade the sect was labelled heretic and was persecuted. The sect had to flee underground, it is the beginning of the freemasons. But from this underground position they didn't just sit and tell each other stories. They seized power by placing members in certain positions throughout history. These many influential people throughout history that were a member of this sect placed references to this sect in honour of it. The dollar bill, the obelisk in Washington, the pyramid in front of the Louvre in France, the obelisk a couple meters away from it. All referring to their ancient Egyptian heritage. Now I think that since the bible has been altered so much, and since the freemasons mixed Catholicism with the ancient Egyptian culture that it is more likely for the fake similarities to have been added afterwards into the factual stories about prophet Jesus (pbuh); rather then one story being a knock off of the other altogether. More detail about simularity with horus: http://www.islamicboard.com/370168-post14.html Quote:
As for most of the arguments mentioned, they don't seem that strong. Maybe someone with a more profound knowledge on khrisna could answer here. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for the rest of the argument; I'm to tired of looking up lies. Quote:
most of these arguments don't seem to show parelelism with christ how odd And even then some of them are false. I'm not gonna run by them one by one again, look here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The “Son” of God is the “Sun” of God Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
More about this at :http://www.islamicboard.com/359351-post22.html Quote:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | |
| a.k.a. steve Status: Offline Posts: 1,900 Reputation: 11628 Rep Power: 45 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Belgium, Gent Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | There were thousands of messengers. There wasn't a nation that has not recieved messages. As for your demand, it's unfair. For god to make religion obvious (to make it a no-brainer) would go in against the whole idea of testing mankind.
__________________ |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| |
| IB Oldtimer Status: Offline Posts: 1,615 Reputation: 23290 Rep Power: 60 Join Date: Apr 2005 Gender: Way of Life: Christian | Greetings in peace Les_Nubian; I believe that Jesus is the Son of God and that he died to forgive us our sins and rose again on the third day. Is there proof and I would have to say no, not in the sense that Joe would like. But somehow the message of Jesus is believable to some, and it inspires us and gives us hope. In the spirit of searching in hope Eric |
| | |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 334 Reputation: 152 Rep Power: 23 Join Date: Jun 2006 Gender: Way of Life: Christian | I agree. This thread was started with a long, long article by written by some "Pastor" with a PhD degree spouting terrible things that neither Christian nor Muslim would agree with, as far as Jesus not existing, etc. WHY would anyone start such a thread? And why would the moderators permit it. It is VERY "demeaning and offensive" to me as a Christian and does not really promote Islam, just attacks Christianity. I had my avatar removed because it originally said "Jesus is Lord!" and some Muslim said it was "demeaning and offensive". And yet a Muslim can post that long article and it is just fine. Again, it does NOT promote Islam. And it certainly does not foster peace and understanding between Muslims and Christians. So what gives? |
| | |
| Account Disabled Status: Offline Posts: 8,355 Reputation: 37858 Rep Power: 0 Join Date: Jul 2005 Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | Quote:
-Peace | |
| | |
| a.k.a. steve Status: Offline Posts: 1,900 Reputation: 11628 Rep Power: 45 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Belgium, Gent Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | As Umm_Shaheed already explained, muhammed (pbuh) was the last. We do not know the names of al the prophets thousands of prophets we know their number from a hadeeth, but we only know the names of those who are mentioned in the Qur'an:
__________________Adam Idris (Enoch) Nuh (Noah) Hud (Eber) Saleh (Shelah) Ibrahim (Abraham) Lut (Lot) Ismail (Ishmael) Ishaq (Isaac) Yaqub (Jacob) Yusuf (Joseph) Ayub (Job) Shoaib (Jethro) Musa (Moses) Harun (Aaron) Dhul-Kifl (possibly Ezekiel) Dawood (David) Sulayman (Solomon) Ilyas (Elijah) Al-Yasa (Elisha) Yunus (Jonah) Zakariya (Zacharias) Yahya (John the Baptist) Isa (Jesus) Muhammad Peace and blessings be upon all of them Hope I didn't miss one out |
| | |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 140 Reputation: 209 Rep Power: 22 Join Date: Jul 2006 Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | Quote:
There is nothing wrong with a little bit of discussion/debate about an issue such as this. Again, I'm not 100% sure if Jesus did or did not exist, and I'm not going to sit here and lie to you, and act as if I am. If you are so offended, why can't you just not participate in this discussion? I'm sure that there are many threads on this forum (as with any discussion in the world) to which some are offended. Are we going to delete all of them now? Just because they don't agree with YOUR personal opinion? Is that not the very point of this forum? The comparative religion section? I meen sheesh, why get so sensitive on this subject? I didn't imply that Jesus doesn't exist...I just encouraged some healthy curiosity and debate on the matter. Is that so wrong? | |
| | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |