maasha'Allaah thanks for that i was stressin over that guy's name! jazaaki Allaahu khayraa

wassalamu alaykum

Oooh...terima kasih ukhti But finally I found it in ushulusunnah Imam Ahmad bin Hambal. About the hadith that we can do something which bring more reward than sahabah. The hadith explain that if we can istiqomah in this kinda day which is full with fitnah, and we can be sabr facing it, then we can have 50 or 100 rewards of someone who is saheed. Then sahabah asked:"yaa Rasulullah, do U mean this saheed is from them self or even from us", and then Rasulullah said "whoever sabr and istiqomah in days of fitnah, they will have rewards 50 or 100 rewards of someone who is saheed even from you. Cause if you have problems, then you have me who will protect you, but they have no one to hang on to".....yee kurang lebih begitulah hadithnye...masha Allah, my worse English But you can check it your self, its hadith from At Thabrani.

Quote:

Question: When are we going to start up the bayquuniyah revsion again Ppl?

Face it gals, you guys are nothing without me.






Yeah it is pretty disorganised in here. Sorry for taking the thread off track.

is this book anywhere in English???

You can only get part of it online in english. Flick through the first few pages of this thread to get the link for that.

found them:
http://www.ifol.org/e_library/bayqe....11c209beaace9a
http://www.dkh-islam.com/Content/Art...x?ATID=24&PG=1

if u find the other parts, don't hesitate to post the links. LI offers free posts.

ook after alot of digging up, i finally figured out where we left off from..

We're currently on:

Question is:

What's the definiton for the hadeeth that its Sanad's "Munqati"?

And give an example please.

From what I understand, Munqati' can be used in a general sense and a specific sense. In its specific sense it refers to any type of break in the chain, apart from mursal, mu'allaq and mu'dhal. However, in its general sense, it refers to any break in the chain.

This is what I learnt from Yasir Qadhi's talk. I might be wrong though.

Example.... someone in the middle of the chain is missing.

In addition, Munqati is a 'broken' hadeeth, where a link is missing. Imam as-suyuti (rahimullaah) was one of the scholar whom termed munqati to a narration where a reporter says " A man narrated to me..." without stating the authority. The hadeeth by Al-Hakim (the one about the prophecy of fatimah radiallaahu anha having Huseein or to that affect, can't remember its wording) was deemed a munqati and da'eef by Ad-dhahabi (rahimullaah) in his Talkhis Al-Mustadarak for the reason being that Shaddad had never met Umm Al-Fadl while Muhammad Mus'aab was da'eef.

Allaahu'3llaam.

Isn't that a form of tadlees, i.e. tadlees-ul-Isaad? (I think)

Tadlees al-Isnaad, As far as I know yep, Allaahu'3llaam.

Well... were we correct? Please tell us Ustaadhah wa Mu'allimah (sp?).

Yea, we been waiting for ages.

I found the hadeeth last night!

‘The Prayed one of the ‘Isha prayed in his last days and after finishing it with Tasleem, he stood up and said, “Do you realise (the importance of) this night? Nobody present on the surface of the earth tonight would be living after the completion of one hundred years from this night.”
[Al Bukhari, Vol.1, Book 10, No. 575]

I feel like i'm following in the footsteps of shaykh al-Albaanee... searching for days and days for a single hadeeth.