![]() | | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Notices |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links |
| |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 466 Reputation: 361 Rep Power: 28 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | keltoi, terrorism takes many forms, look up the definition of terrorism please, because its very insulting to hear that blowing up a mosque is not in itself terror. and by your definitio of what terror is today, the west are the biggest terrorist. they go one further, they drop bombs the size of cars out of planes. |
| | |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 466 Reputation: 361 Rep Power: 28 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | you also frgot to mention hiroshima, lebanon, iraq, afghanistan. Oh hold on that wasnt terror, just a military strategy. Disgusting to say the least, that you forget about the victims of the holacus who were subjected to terror, hioroshim, the worlds deadliest terror attack, coninious bombarding if iraq, aka shock and awe. |
| | |
| IB Oldskool Status: Offline Posts: 5,376 Reputation: 9281 Rep Power: 39 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oklahoma, USA Gender: Way of Life: Christian | lol...nice try bringing the Holocaust and WWII into the conversation, but completely off point. I stated that arson itself is an act of terrorism, just like the church burnings in the American south recently were acts of terrorism. I simply pointed out that it wasn't the murderous form of terrorism that is on the minds of people, journalists, etc who report on the issue. |
| | |
| Account Disabled Status: Offline Posts: 795 Reputation: 237 Rep Power: 0 Join Date: Aug 2006 Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | Quote:
There is no need to go back to history. Muslims would need to destroy Israel hundreds of times to come to the level of murder by Christians. | |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| |
| IB Oldskool Status: Offline Posts: 5,376 Reputation: 9281 Rep Power: 39 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oklahoma, USA Gender: Way of Life: Christian | I find this comment rather puzzling. I made no connection between Islam and the terrorist acts I mentioned, in fact, I would like to believe they are mutually exclusive. This was a thread about an arson attack, and why the attack wasn't called terrorism by whatever article was sited. I believe the reason is that this attack wasn't the "terrorism" that is on the minds of people lately. Of course burning down a place of worship is terrorism, it was during the 1960's, and it remains so. However, in the context of current events and the terrorist acts being committed globally, it doesn't surprise me that a journalist didn't use the label "terrorist act". It is about the meaning of word in the minds of most people in 2006, which is suicide bombings, hijackings, beheadings, etc. |
| | |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 466 Reputation: 361 Rep Power: 28 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | So as you define it terrorism is fasion, just call it terrorism when it suits the masses and sounds negative and ill towards a minoirty group. I can ever remember the transgression at the hands of the IDF terror, i can remeber the US marine that raped and killed a muslim girl terror, i can remember Hiroshima ever beeing called terror. So whats in next week, perhaps muslims being called immoral murders for using the knife instead of the stun gun to kosher their meat?? |
| | |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 466 Reputation: 361 Rep Power: 28 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | One question keltio, and please give an honest answer, and i promise ill leave it at that. !!!!!!!!!!!!do you think the bombings of lebabon, to be more specific the bombing of 13+ children in an aprtment block was a terroris attack. the same terror that is defined in 2006 which include hijackings, mass murder, use of explosives?!!!!!!!!!!!! Please take ur time to answer, as your answer will make me get a better picure of who im communication with |
| | |
| IB Oldskool Status: Offline Posts: 5,376 Reputation: 9281 Rep Power: 39 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oklahoma, USA Gender: Way of Life: Christian | It isn't about fashion or attacking minority groups. It is about an arson attack which didn't kill anyone. This happens in the U.S. on a daily basis. Mostly to Christian churches. When this happens and I read the story it never says "terrorist attack", it says "arson attack". It is a matter of semantics in many ways, but I don't think there is some orchestrated effort to not use the word "terrorism" because it was a mosque, since it happens quite often to Christian churches and the word isn't used in that context either. |
| | |
| Full Member Status: Offline Posts: 466 Reputation: 361 Rep Power: 28 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London Gender: Way of Life: Muslim | do you mind answeing my question. On a serious note, i can understand if it puts you on the sppot and you feel uncomfortable answering. |
| | |
| IB Oldskool Status: Offline Posts: 5,376 Reputation: 9281 Rep Power: 39 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Oklahoma, USA Gender: Way of Life: Christian | Quote:
If John Doe is walking through a crowded street market with a nailbomb under his jacket, walks up to family of five ordering orange soda from a street vendor, then blows himself up and takes them with him, that is the basic definition of "terrorism". If a pilot is in a war, and comes under anti-aircraft fire from a structure on the ground, or locks on to the source of rocket or missile fire, and fires upon that position, and the end result is civilian casualties, that is awful and unfortunate, for both the victims and the pilot. However, that isn't the definition of terrorism. Does it make any difference to the family in the structure or the family getting blown apart by the nailbomb? No. | |
| | |
| Khazan Shel Hakardo Status: Offline Posts: 1,097 Reputation: 866 Rep Power: 25 Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Haifa, Israel Gender: Way of Life: Jewish | Quote:
| |
| | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |