I'll agree with you on this

It is not hypocrisy to support nuclear technology for a friendly government and oppose it to an unfriendly one. It is simply politics.

Kinda proves the point that it isn't about keeping down Muslims, but rather about keeping down regimes that are hostile towards the US.

Salaam,

You are correct keeping down regimes that are hostile towards the US ..

But these regimes are also hostile to ITS OWN PEOPLE....

So Hyprocrisy,democracy for US ,,,suffering and oppresion for the inhabitant of that land..

Is this democracy?Your desire ,your want,your wishes,,,at the cost of the lands inhabitants?

Salams very intresting indeed

Hi
Yes,it is simply politics,the word 'politics' comes from the Greek 'poly' meaning 'many', and 'tics' of course are bloodsucking parasites.Just for info.

What is Democracy? Giving the people a choice to decide what they want. Now if they decide bad, then they pay for what they get.

It's very simple... your just in need of 1st grade vocab.

Hi
The fact that the US is governed for the richest,big multinational corporation,the exploiters,the bankers etc.So all the decision which connected to foreign policy must be made to become friendly to the title that i mentioned above.And all of them are try to make a friendship with a few wealthy families who control the world natural resources.

And the real threat to US decision is nuclear power ownership by other country whose not aligned with them, because if every little country has a nuclear weapons it becomes very hard for the US to engage in military action,like what they just did to Iraq and Afghanistan.See how easy for them to bent down those both country.The worse part is,they also act like they already achieve the nation of ideal.Unfortunate for the US soldiers,citizen,workers and all for those whose died in war,they are actually die for some industrialist and profit seekers.

It is Hypocrisy,but not at the first place to me.Believe it or not all the action seems done by a blood sucking parasites.

I think everyone should restrain from making comments like this in the future. It's rude and the poster usually ends up making a grammatical error in some ironic twist of fate.

how long do u think it will take for iran to get attacked?

If the US attacked Iran,the consequences would be catastrophic, including a possible American retreat under fire in Iraq.But they are not going to attack on Iran in the current situation,unlike Iraq the Iran regimes have more superiority in military power and not totally isolated from world.When i heard "Iran" another words also cross in my mind is Hezbollah and Iraqis shiite.There are also significance numbers of Iranian spread all around US.Of course Bush administration already knew this thing.

The only thing US have to do for now is waiting for a perfect condition.They also working hard from diplomatic table with intention to fluence and promote their agenda to other nations and security council.

Many people do not know,the Iran regimes is almost to achieve a self sufficiency in military stuff producing.They also produced from small to medium armed product like shoulder rocket launcher,man portable air defence system,mine layer and unguided artilery rocket system in large scale.We have seen it been used effectively against IDF by Hezbollah in asymmetrical war.



Another advantage for Iran is their Missiles System capability,and some of them could reach the european nations,thats not a good situation to start a war.The only safe way for US is to influence the security council in order to isolate Iran Regime totally from the world societies.The same tactics they had applied to Iraq after the 1st Gulf War.

Salaam,,

You eman it is the people choice to install Shah who oppress them?

Wow,wonder why the Iranian made a popular uprising.