Moderator's note
10. Racist remarks will not be permitted since racism doesn't hold a place in Islam
:sl:
Since the 2003 U.S.-led INVASION, BUSH's speeches never meant what he says. His lies and false accusations are essential in order to achieve the unconstitutional goals of the current neocon-filled administration, control the public and keep the U.S. engaged in war.
Despite the growing IRAQI and U.S. casualties, the AMERICAN PRESIDENT recently praised the continued progress in the war-torn country. In a classic Bushspeak, he declared in pure delusion that “when victory comes and democracy takes hold in IRAQ, it will serve as a model for freedom in the broader Middle East”.
Can we really believe that INVASION and occupation of a sovereign state for fabricated reasons ever lead to freedom and democracy?
In a Jan. 10 speech, BUSH made clear that war opponents who continue to raise questions about legality of the INVASION can expect to pay a price. “We must remember there is a difference between responsible and irresponsible debate,” he said.
According to an article on Counterbias.com, BUSH’s “irresponsible” debates include questions about whether IRAQ’s oil supplies and Israel’s security were primary reasons for the INVASION. Off the table, too, is whether Washington lied in citing IRAQ’s WMD and alleged ties to AL-QAEDA as justifications for WAR, despite growing evidence that the “intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy,” as the head of the MI-6 concluded in the so-called “Downing Street Memo” in July 2002.
In another speech, given on Jan. 11, the U.S. President repeated one of his favorite lies about IRAQ WAR; that SADDAM HUSSEIN chose WAR when he refused to let UN arms inspectors search his country. (In reality, SADDAM opened up his country to UN inspectors in November 2002 and allowed them to search wherever they wanted for the WMD that even BUSH’s own inspectors later concluded wasn’t there.)
“I felt it was important to say to the world that this international body (The United Nations), that we want to be effective, spoke loud and clear not once, but 15 odd times to SADDAM HUSSEIN – said, ‘disarm, get rid of your weapons, don’t be the threat that you are, or face serious consequences’…. We gave the opportunity to SADDAM HUSSEIN to open his country up. It was his choice. He chose war, and he got war.” BUSH here repeats a fictional account of the run-up to WAR. The fake story also suggests that the INVASION was sanctioned by the UN, rather than in violation of its Charter.
The President also repeated the greatest lie of our times when he stressed that IRAQ WAR was a response to the Sept. 11 attacks. This lie was revealed after Jerry Caufield, a BUSH campaign aide who later worked at the White House, said that the President was obsessed with "getting SADDAM," even before he came into office. "We'd be on the campaign plane talking about domestic issues and he'd change the subject and start rattling on about what a great evil SADDAM HUSSEIN was and how if he won the election he'd finish what his father failed to do -- topple SADDAM," Caufield said.
“War on Terrorism”
In an older speech on the U.S.’s “WAR On TERRORISM", given on October 6, 2005, and repeated on October 28, BUSH said: "All these separate images of destruction and suffering that we see on the news can seem like random and isolated acts of madness… Yet while the killers choose their victims indiscriminately, their attacks serve a clear and focused ideology, a set of beliefs and goals that are evil, but not insane. "
This only could be interpreted the opposite way. One question needs to be answered; How is it possible to choose victims more indiscriminately than by bombing residential areas?
The U.S. army doesn’t even attempt to count CIVILIAN CASUALTIES in Iraq. Since the WAR began, two serious efforts have been made to count the civilian death toll of the barbarism called “Shock and Awe”; the first counted bodies all over Iraq hospitals and came up with more than 30,000 killed. The second is a more scientific study of Iraq's national mortality tables, published in the British medical journal Lancet, which said that more 100,000 died since the U.S.-led INVASION.
"Now they've set their sights on IRAQ. BIN LADEN has stated: "The whole world is watching this war and the two adversaries. It's either victory and glory, or misery and humiliation." The terrorists regard IRAQ as the central front in their war against humanity. And we must recognize IRAQ as the central front in our war on terror."
BUSH here uses a dubious quote from BIN LADEN with an absurd conclusion. The U.S. President always confuses the Iraqi resistance with terrorism in other places. In fact, before the INVASION, there were no terrorists in IRAQ, and the toppled Iraqi leader had no ties whatsoever with the AL-QAEDA network. By invading the country, the U.S. created the enemy that it wanted to eliminate. The head of Canada's intelligence service, CSIS, said that post-war IRAQ has become a training ground for thousands who will threaten Western security for years to come. We all have BUSH to thank for such a development.
“[President BUSH] is trying to fight this war with rhetoric. IRAQ is not where the center of terrorism is,” said Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.), the former Marine who is an outspoken critic of the war. “We’re inciting terrorism there....We’re destabilizing the area by being over there,” he added.
In the same speech, BUSH said that the terrorists are exploiting “local conflicts to build a culture of victimization, in which someone else is always to blame and violence is always the solution."
A culture of victimization; One cannot come up with anything that better describe the U.S.‘s reaction to the Sept. 11 attacks. Some twenty people committed a horrible crime. Instead of seeking those responsible, BUSH launched two wars he promises to continue for years to come.
"He (BIN LADEN) assures them that his -- that this is the road to paradise -- though he never offers to go along for the ride." This quote is coming from someone who avoided combat in VIETNAM, someone whose National Guard records have been mutilated, presumably to hide failings.
"With every random bombing and with every funeral of a child, it becomes more clear that the extremists are not patriots, or resistance fighters -- they are murderers at war with the Iraqi people, themselves." These people are mainly on one side in a civil war created by the INVASION, and history proves that civil wars are always the worst wars.
"Iraqi soldiers are sacrificing to defeat al Qaeda in their own country." AL-QAEDA? Is this the real enemy the U.S. is fighting in IRAQ? Of course not, even BUSH doesn’t believe this. The occupation often leads to retaliation against a clearly-defined target. BUSH’s enemies in IRAQ include resistance fighters, native minority groups whose interests are threatened by the puppet government he installed, and of course, many angry young men who condemn the illegal INVASION.
Finally, the term "WAR On TERRORISM" is perhaps the darkest example of Bushspeak. One cannot launch war on ideas, beliefs, or feelings of grievance and injustice. The "WAR On TERRORISM" is code for interference in the Middle East. "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy,” -- James Madison, the fourth President of the United States. By launching the "WAR On TERRORISM", the U.S produced an abundant supply of the so-called “foreign enemies”.
Brought 2 You by Yo official Newzreporter
:w: