Peace Omar,
format_quote Originally Posted by
Omar_21:30
I wouldn't say Muslims talk down the significance of the crucifixion.
The crucifixion and resurrection are integral to Christianity. The Quran doesn't rebuke Christians for believing in the redemption, it doesn't rebuke them for believing in the resurrection. The one time the Quran denies the crucifixion is in response to Jews who were boasting that they killed him. It's strange to me, as an outside reader, that the Quran would not address the very essence of the Christian message.
The Christians have turned the crucifixion into a mechanism for God's forgiveness
Before I reverted to Christianity one of the most powerful pieces of evidence for the crucifixion and redemption were the Old Testament prophecies of the suffering Messiah. It showed me that suffering and death were something that must befall Him, and that this would somehow cleanse us of our sins.
"But he was wounded for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his stripes we are healed."
Isaiah 53:5
Clearly, the earl Christians did not add this into the book of Isaiah, it was always there and Christ fulfilled it. So again, I can't stress how significant it is that the Quran rejects the crucifixion, and does not addres the imprortance behind it.
when, in your own words, consistent with the omnipotence of God, surely He should not
need such a 'mechanism' to forgive?
We don't say He *needed* to suffer. God could have snapped his fingers, so to speak, and we would have been restored. But it is consistent with justice, and we know God loves what is right, that man's sin be somehow satisfied for and overturned. The difficulty is that Adam and Eve enjoyed a relationship with God that was a gift, a nearness that could not be earned. Since their transgression offended the infinite and perfect God, what deed could be done to satisfy for the sin? The fact is no work of man, which is finite and imperfect, could ever appease the perfect and majestic God. It would really take a God-man to offer an act of atonemen on behalf of man, and make that act infinite and perfect, so as to satisfy for sin and redeem mankind. What's interesting is that the theologians recognized that the God-man did not have suffer, He could have simply incarnated and then ascended back into heaven, and this alone would have sufficed. One tear from the Infant Christ could redeemded mankind an infinite amount of times over. So what really happened here, is that the God-man took an extra step, a step that went so far that He suffered a horrible death for our sake. Now if you believe God to be a Master and us His slaves, it will be very difficult for you to accept such a thing, because why would a Master suffer for his slaves? But Christians believe God is not merely loving, but that He *is* Love, and that His love for each and everyone us is incomprehensible. It is precisely this act of love that motived that early Martyrs to undergoe their grewling deaths, even young Christian girls were willing be torn to pieces by lions for the sake of Christ. Only God could inspire such zeal, and in the words of the Apostle John, we love God because God loved us first.
Pax,
Sojourn