Undermining Islamic text and trying to present a metaphoric explanation to it is an insult to Islam, the prophet, and muslims. If someone is unknowledgable and asks or mentions something, we can have a calm friendly conversation, when someone claims being knowledgable and heading Islamic conferences and says those things, he is a delibarate mixer of truth and respect is not something I am willing to extend at this time. Let's get to specifics:
"These people, behind the barrier, are Gog and Magog, and it is expected that in the Last Age that barrier is broken, and Gog and Magog are released into the world, using their power to oppress people of faith and control the entire world, politically, economically and culturally.... For this reason Shaikh Imran believes that Gog and Magog are not a race of people or an army, as many have argued in the past, but a global society. In this way an African, or Indian or Chinese man, who may have no ancestral roots in the Caucus Mountains may still be from among the people of Gog and Magog by dressing and acting and thinking like they do. Eventually all of mankind will be carbon copies of one way of life." That is direct contradiction to the letter of the prophet's hadith, in them being barbaric non-sensible warring hordes who will control nothing. Children know this.
"The Hadith Qudsi tell us that Allah will command Adam to select out the people for the Hellfire. Out of every 1,000 Adam will take 999, and they would all be the people of Gog and Magog." Wrong ta'weel of the hadith. Gog and Magog were never mentioned in it to start with, and Adam was not asked to select anything, this goes against the very basics of faith that people would go to heaven or hell because of Adam's selection, rather than God's or their own actions.
This is just from one page. The others seem to be political commentary suggesting (but not explicitly saying so will not debate) that the dajjal is a metaphoric power, with all the discussion of Riba being the dajjal's strongest weapon.
I'm not sure which part your talking about, but I don't recall saying that Jesus would form a State of Israel
Then what exactly is: "The oppression of the Anti Christ will continue throughout the world until the return of Jesus, the true Messiah, who will take up the sword and destroy the Dajjal.
After this he will establish the True state of Israel and rule with peace and justice from Jerusalem."?
but that the aim of the Dajjal is to claim to be the Messiah so he has to lead the State of Israel before people will believe him.
Where did you get that? The hadiths specifically say that he will claim to be GOD! The only way this could be mixed up along with the thought that Jesus will establish the true state of Israel is that he (or you) are mixing up his readings with Israelite twisted material.
This is not a debate with your views, for modernist philosophy application to Islam is a field of its own whose adopters like and believe in and I am not here to show the errors of their ways, but what you wrote and published is so baseless it is insufficient and unworthy of mention.
Peace