/* */

PDA

View Full Version : Question about BBC World and its new SOUTH ASIAN OBSESSION.



Karl
12-28-2009, 10:29 AM
I was wanting to know if anyone had any idea why BBC World News (virtually the British equivalent of Fox News), if it is not bleating and moaning about Iran, it is preoccupied and utterly obsessed 80% or 90% of the time with South Asian countries such as Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and especially India. This has become extremely noticeable over the last few years. Bearing in mind Britain's diabolical centuries long track record, my mind automatically believes it is their neo imperialism and their hell-bent wish for their New World Order to materialize. I strongly suspect this is their agenda especially when I consider that a very large amount of the news and current affairs from those areas are replete with British criticisms of one aspect or another of these Asian cultures. The world is a big place with many countries but BBC World News' utter obsession with South Asia represents a huge disproportionate under reporting of countries elsewhere around the world. One could go for days without it mentioning practically anything about current affairs and news from Europe (one of the most important parts of the world today). Even its stooge the USA, not all that much news from that direction is reported. I feel utterly convinced this is to do with Britain's new busybody communism, global social engineering programmes etc, but perhaps there are some here with some other ideas as well? Remember the British were doing this very same sort of thing way back during the old British Raj. Old ways die hard I guess.
Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
AlHoda
12-28-2009, 04:49 PM
Maybe more things happen in Asia than in other parts of the world, I don't think they are obsessed with Asia. ;D
Reply

GuestFellow
12-28-2009, 04:53 PM
BBC is obsessed with anything to do with Islam, Iran and Pakistan.
Reply

noorseeker
12-28-2009, 04:55 PM
If you watch at the opening credits for bbc news world, you know where theres a 30 second countdown, that show like 10 -15 clips of their reporters from all around the world, you will notice nearly all are muslim countries
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
AlHoda
12-28-2009, 05:22 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by nightstar
If you watch at the opening credits for bbc news world, you know where theres a 30 second countdown, that show like 10 -15 clips of their reporters from all around the world, you will notice nearly all are muslim countries
That is true, but more things happen in muslim countries than europian countries.
Reply

Raaina
12-28-2009, 06:02 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
BBC is obsessed with anything to do with Islam, Iran and Pakistan.
I thought that was most of the media/ the westen world, not just the BBC :p
Reply

GuestFellow
12-28-2009, 06:32 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by mystical_moon
I thought that was most of the media/ the westen world, not just the BBC :p
Your right, its the entire Western world. Western countries create the problem, moan about it like a wounded hippo and then expect someone else to solve their problems.
Reply

AlHoda
12-28-2009, 09:57 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
Your right, its the entire Western world. Western countries create the problem, moan about it like a wounded hippo and then expect someone else to solve their problems.
That is true you know, ;D Btw, I liked the way you described their moaning.:bravo:
Reply

- Qatada -
12-28-2009, 10:21 PM
:salamext:


The majority of Muslims in UK are south asians, if south asians gain the trust of the media, they'll fall for anything the media says.

So if the media [which is controlled by non muslims] says that one version of Islam is correct and other ways are false, then the muslims unaware of true islam will trust the media and prefer its teachings over Qur'an and Sunnah.


you'll probably see its effects quite soon.


so eastenders promotes a 'homosexual muslim', so muslims who are into eastenders will gradually accept homosexuality is normal etc. there are other programs too where muslim women get married to non muslims, and these are shown on bbc. this makes a muslim watching it question his faith and wonder; what's so wrong with muslim women marrying a non muslim then anyway?



things work gradually. you'll see the results in the near future. And those who follow pure Quran and Sunnah are extremists to them.
Reply

JoshuaD
12-28-2009, 10:51 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
I was wanting to know if anyone had any idea why BBC World News (virtually the British equivalent of Fox News), if it is not bleating and moaning about Iran, it is preoccupied and utterly obsessed 80% or 90% of the time with South Asian countries such as Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and especially India. This has become extremely noticeable over the last few years. Bearing in mind Britain's diabolical centuries long track record, my mind automatically believes it is their neo imperialism and their hell-bent wish for their New World Order to materialize. I strongly suspect this is their agenda especially when I consider that a very large amount of the news and current affairs from those areas are replete with British criticisms of one aspect or another of these Asian cultures. The world is a big place with many countries but BBC World News' utter obsession with South Asia represents a huge disproportionate under reporting of countries elsewhere around the world. One could go for days without it mentioning practically anything about current affairs and news from Europe (one of the most important parts of the world today). Even its stooge the USA, not all that much news from that direction is reported. I feel utterly convinced this is to do with Britain's new busybody communism, global social engineering programmes etc, but perhaps there are some here with some other ideas as well? Remember the British were doing this very same sort of thing way back during the old British Raj. Old ways die hard I guess.
This post was a joke wasn't it? :hmm:
Reply

GuestFellow
12-28-2009, 11:10 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by JoshuaD
This post was a joke wasn't it? :hmm:
With regards to New World Order, the politicians are saying it themselves. Gordon Brown, George Bush, Tony Blair and I think Obama too.
Reply

Karl
12-28-2009, 11:25 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by - Qatada -
:salamext:


The majority of Muslims in UK are south asians, if south asians gain the trust of the media, they'll fall for anything the media says.

So if the media [which is controlled by non muslims] says that one version of Islam is correct and other ways are false, then the muslims unaware of true islam will trust the media and prefer its teachings over Qur'an and Sunnah.


you'll probably see its effects quite soon.


so eastenders promotes a 'homosexual muslim', so muslims who are into eastenders will gradually accept homosexuality is normal etc. there are other programs too where muslim women get married to non muslims, and these are shown on bbc. this makes a muslim watching it question his faith and wonder; what's so wrong with muslim women marrying a non muslim then anyway?



things work gradually. you'll see the results in the near future. And those who follow pure Quran and Sunnah are extremists to them.
Aha! An assimilation programme. The British government tried that during it's rule in India but it failed because the Anglo Saxons sent to India to inhabit and marry the natives instead became polygamous and adopted Hindu and Muslim ways.

Maybe they have reversed course and have invited South Asians to Britain to be assimilated into British/Zionist ways and to send some back to their native lands as NGO agents to convert the masses. This treacherous tactic could however backfire ...look what happened to Gandhi, he was a model assimilant to the British but he eventually woke up to their Imperialist treachery and preached passive resistance in defiance of the British.
Things seem to be going wrong for the British Neo Imperialist Order already as their worst enemies seem to be coming from within by home grown terrorists and dissidents.
Reply

Woodrow
12-28-2009, 11:35 PM
all media that is not State or country owned exists for only one purpose. That purpose is to make money for the owners.

They make money by selling advertising. They charge for the advertising. The people with money to spend on advertising want their ads to be seen by the most people. The media is always competing to get the most viewers, to do this they focus on what they believe most people want to see. At the present time the BBC believes that South Asia is what most people in the viewing area want to see. They will continue focusing on South Asia until the number of viewers drops.
Reply

Supreme
12-28-2009, 11:40 PM
The BBC are nothing like Fox News. Fox News is the media embodiment of Republican bias. The BBC I believe is rather liberal.

Bearing in mind Britain's diabolical centuries long track record, my mind automatically believes it is their neo imperialism and their hell-bent wish for their New World Order to materialize. I strongly suspect this is their agenda especially when I consider that a very large amount of the news and current affairs from those areas are replete with British criticisms of one aspect or another of these Asian cultures. The world is a big place with many countries but BBC World News' utter obsession with South Asia represents a huge disproportionate under reporting of countries elsewhere around the world. One could go for days without it mentioning practically anything about current affairs and news from Europe (one of the most important parts of the world today). Even its stooge the USA, not all that much news from that direction is reported. I feel utterly convinced this is to do with Britain's new busybody communism, global social engineering programmes etc, but perhaps there are some here with some other ideas as well? Remember the British were doing this very same sort of thing way back during the old British Raj. Old ways die hard I guess
Where do you people get this stuff from? No seriously, I'm trying to impress someone, and I need to know which joke site this stuff is borrowed from. You could have at least have posted a link.
Reply

Supreme
12-28-2009, 11:41 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Woodrow
all media that is not State or country owned exists for only one purpose. That purpose is to make money for the owners.

They make money by selling advertising. They charge for the advertising. The people with money to spend on advertising want their ads to be seen by the most people. The media is always competing to get the most viewers, to do this they focus on what they believe most people want to see. At the present time the BBC believes that South Asia is what most people in the viewing area want to see. They will continue focusing on South Asia until the number of viewers drops.
And there was me thinking it was some covert operation in order to change the world order and to gain control of India and her resources. Silly me!
Reply

cat eyes
12-28-2009, 11:48 PM
:sl:

yeah its making me sick now man imsad its the only thing they talk bout

theres loads of things going on in the world also

I just get really sick and i switch over quickly imsad
Reply

Supreme
12-29-2009, 12:08 AM
Their main news story tonight was of the hilarious flop of a bomb plot by that Nigerian chap, and the second one was of a British man about to be executed. Nothing about the South Asia there.
Reply

GuestFellow
12-29-2009, 12:10 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
Their main news story tonight was of the hilarious flop of a bomb plot by that Nigerian chap, and the second one was of a British man about to be executed. Nothing about the South Asia there.
That is true I guess but the Nigerian individual was a Muslim. The BBC does report a lot of activities that take place in the Middle East, South Asia and Muslims.
Reply

Woodrow
12-29-2009, 12:52 AM
Be happy you get news. Out here in the boonies the closest news source is the Rapid City news from the Rapid City Journal

This seems to be the top news in this area:

Greenpeace to pay more than $30,000 for Rushmore protest

Greenpeace USA has agreed to pay more than $30,000 in civil penalties for its global warming protest last July 8 on Mount Rushmore National Memorial.
Reply

noorseeker
12-29-2009, 01:00 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
Their main news story tonight was of the hilarious flop of a bomb plot by that Nigerian chap, and the second one was of a British man about to be executed. Nothing about the South Asia there.

China is in asia, and the guy about to get is south asian

and the nigerean is muslim
Reply

Supreme
12-29-2009, 02:08 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by nightstar
China is in asia, and the guy about to get is south asian

and the nigerean is muslim
China is in East Asia, not South Asia, the man was British South Asian so the story was very relevant to a British news broadcaster, and the Nigerian was Muslim, but he was African, not South Asian.
Reply

Supreme
12-29-2009, 02:10 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
That is true I guess but the Nigerian individual was a Muslim. The BBC does report a lot of activities that take place in the Middle East, South Asia and Muslims.
That's because South Asia and the Middle East are where most 'interesting' (ie wars and killing and terror) take place. It's either that or report on Islington's council's plans to ban cars stopping in the middle of the road outside of Arsenal's Emirates football stadium.
Reply

noorseeker
12-29-2009, 02:33 PM
^^^^ Would you agree with me , where i get the impression they love bad news, wheter south asia or not,

When i watch the bbc or itv, i get the impression they cant wait FOR A TERROR ATTACK TO HAPPEN,

They will want to get there first , and get the exclusives like hungry dogs,.
They dont care about the people, they just want their story.

They cant wait to put john simpson on a plane .

Dont get me wrong they have to report the story, but they seem to enhusiastic.
Reply

Raaina
12-29-2009, 03:44 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by nightstar
^^^^ Would you agree with me , where i get the impression they love bad news, wheter south asia or not,

When i watch the bbc or itv, i get the impression they cant wait FOR A TERROR ATTACK TO HAPPEN,

They will want to get there first , and get the exclusives like hungry dogs,.
They dont care about the people, they just want their story.

They cant wait to put john simpson on a plane .

Dont get me wrong they have to report the story, but they seem to enhusiastic.
Of course they can't wait for something bad to happen.

Bad news, sells more papers. More papers = More money :p
Reply

Supreme
12-29-2009, 04:35 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by nightstar
^^^^ Would you agree with me , where i get the impression they love bad news, wheter south asia or not,

When i watch the bbc or itv, i get the impression they cant wait FOR A TERROR ATTACK TO HAPPEN,

They will want to get there first , and get the exclusives like hungry dogs,.
They dont care about the people, they just want their story.

They cant wait to put john simpson on a plane .

Dont get me wrong they have to report the story, but they seem to enhusiastic.
Bad news, much like sex, sells. You're rarely going to encounter a happy story that doesn't depress, because they're just not interesting. And of course the reporters don't care about the people involved. They're exposed to tragedy and murder and bad news daily, it's part of their job not to care. I suppose if they did care they might be biased.
Reply

Supreme
12-29-2009, 04:36 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by mystical_moon
Of course they can't wait for something bad to happen.

Bad news, sells more papers. More papers = More money :p
We're talking about the BBC here, the BBC don't sell papers, neither do they accept advertising revenue.
Reply

Italianguy
12-29-2009, 04:42 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Aha! An assimilation programme. The British government tried that during it's rule in India but it failed because the Anglo Saxons sent to India to inhabit and marry the natives instead became polygamous and adopted Hindu and Muslim ways.

Maybe they have reversed course and have invited South Asians to Britain to be assimilated into British/Zionist ways and to send some back to their native lands as NGO agents to convert the masses. This treacherous tactic could however backfire ...look what happened to Gandhi, he was a model assimilant to the British but he eventually woke up to their Imperialist treachery and preached passive resistance in defiance of the British.
Things seem to be going wrong for the British Neo Imperialist Order already as their worst enemies seem to be coming from within by home grown terrorists and dissidents.
I married a south Indian woman, and we're both Christian.......although i have no Britisher ties?....I'm Italian.......never mind my opinion doesn't count anywayimsad
Reply

Woodrow
12-29-2009, 06:40 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
We're talking about the BBC here, the BBC don't sell papers, neither do they accept advertising revenue.
I was going to disagree with you. But, I did a quick search for the annual revenue sources for the BBC and was surprised to discover they are funded by the UK government. Government funding of news media is an alien concept to me and I view it as immoral.

You are correct in your post and I found verification of your post in what I found while trying to prove they depended on advertising.
Reply

noorseeker
12-29-2009, 06:46 PM
bro woodrow, they are funded by everyone who owns a t.v in uk

the t.v license fee, it all goes to the bbc. Because they dont have advertising

thet do waste it on as lot of things.. If you dont pay , you can get a £1000 fine
Reply

Karl
12-29-2009, 10:44 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
With regards to New World Order, the politicians are saying it themselves. Gordon Brown, George Bush, Tony Blair and I think Obama too.
Absolutely. And notice that they all incessantly employ that new popular expression-- "The International community". This vile expression has global socialism/communism/fascism written all over it! There is simply no such thing as "The International Community". The world consists of freestanding sovereign nations with hundreds of independently diverse communities (not to mention smaller units such as individualists who don't see themselves as fitting into ANY "community"). The "International Community" is merely an expression not for what IS, but for what the Anglo-Amercian alliance WANT (a one world government with one homogenous culture and one set of laws, Jew York being at the helm). And at the moment the phrase in actuality only really represents Britain and the USA (and sometimes with their French, German and South Korean bootlickers). The selfrighteous and arrogant USA and UK (Romeo and Juliet) try to speak on behalf of all nations, most of whom simply never give any indication of ratification to what the US and UK moot, want or do. You know, sometimes it makes me wonder why the American War of Indepenence even HAPPENED.
Reply

Supreme
12-29-2009, 11:08 PM
a one world government with one homogenous culture and one set of laws, Jew York being at the helm
That's not what I want, and please refrain from using phrases such as 'Jew York'. I'm sure you don't mean to, but it sounds anti semitic.

And at the moment the phrase in actuality only really represents Britain and the USA (and sometimes with their French, German and South Korean bootlickers).
Not to mention Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Japan, etc...

The selfrighteous and arrogant USA and UK (Romeo and Juliet) try to speak on behalf of all nations, most of whom simply never give any indication of ratification to what the US and UK moot, want or do. You know, sometimes it makes me wonder why the American War of Indepenence even HAPPENED.
Strong relations between two powerful nations is never a bad thing. Would you rather the UK and USA were on a brink of a nuclear world war and you had to run to your shelter every five minutes?
Reply

GuestFellow
12-29-2009, 11:38 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
That's not what I want, and please refrain from using phrases such as 'Jew York'. I'm sure you don't mean to, but it sounds anti semitic.
I agree. I hope members will not insult those of other religions.

format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Absolutely. And notice that they all incessantly employ that new popular expression-- "The International community". This vile expression has global socialism/communism/fascism written all over it! There is simply no such thing as "The International Community". The world consists of freestanding sovereign nations with hundreds of independently diverse communities (not to mention smaller units such as individualists who don't see themselves as fitting into ANY "community"). The "International Community" is merely an expression not for what IS, but for what the Anglo-Amercian alliance WANT (a one world government with one homogenous culture and one set of laws, Jew York being at the helm). And at the moment the phrase in actuality only really represents Britain and the USA (and sometimes with their French, German and South Korean bootlickers). The selfrighteous and arrogant USA and UK (Romeo and Juliet) try to speak on behalf of all nations, most of whom simply never give any indication of ratification to what the US and UK moot, want or do. You know, sometimes it makes me wonder why the American War of Indepenence even HAPPENED.
Hmmm

We have the European Union, Northern American Union, African Union and some day Asian Union. The European Union is heading towards a single currency if Britain and Sweden adopt the Euro. I do see nations coming closer and closer.

The International Community consist of Western nations and those who support them. It does not fairly represent the views of other countries such as Iran or Cuba. It is a form of segregation. Those countries that do not comply with the super powers will face sanctions and threats.

From the evidence, the politicians speak of this New World order and we have 3 Unions established. The media does not speak of these Unions. These are the problems with NWO, firstly not many are aware of it, secondly the public have less control who makes decisions for them and lastly, it is too much power for a group of people representing these unions.

Can you see everything binding together....
Reply

GuestFellow
12-29-2009, 11:41 PM
Strong relations between two powerful nations is never a bad thing. Would you rather the UK and USA were on a brink of a nuclear world war and you had to run to your shelter every five minutes?
It does become a problem when the relationship becomes too strong. America went to war with Iraq with not evidence of WMD, Britain supported America without even questioning their motives. Blindly supporting a country is dangerous.
Reply

Karl
12-30-2009, 12:05 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
The BBC are nothing like Fox News. Fox News is the media embodiment of Republican bias. The BBC I believe is rather liberal.
Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!
Reply

JoshuaD
12-30-2009, 12:57 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!
Your post contains nothing more than buzzwords which you appear to have the most minimal of understanding about. Do you even know what Communism is?
Reply

GuestFellow
12-30-2009, 01:03 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by JoshuaD
Your post contains nothing more than buzzwords which you appear to have the most minimal of understanding about. Do you even know what Communism is?
I'm know I'm not Karl but my understanding of Communism is...

classless political system: the political theory or system in which all property and wealth is owned in a classless society by all the members of that society.
It sounds like a nice idea but unfortunately its not practical. Just curious whats your view on Communism?
Reply

JoshuaD
12-30-2009, 01:03 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!
Which reporters in particular were you referring to? I just looked at the list of reporters and not a single one of them is Jewish.
Reply

Supreme
12-30-2009, 07:09 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!
I wanted a response, not an essay you copy and pasted from a jokes website.
Reply

Muezzin
12-30-2009, 09:50 PM
I always thought Sky News was the British answer to Fox News...

On the other hand, if BBC World News coverage is really bothering you as a viewer, you could do a lot worse than complaining to the BBC directly.
Reply

Karl
12-31-2009, 01:12 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
That's not what I want, and please refrain from using phrases such as 'Jew York'. I'm sure you don't mean to, but it sounds anti semitic.


Strong relations between two powerful nations is never a bad thing. Would you rather the UK and USA were on a brink of a nuclear world war and you had to run to your shelter every five minutes?
Sorry about offending you with Jew York, I picked it up on this forum from a brother and thought it was a joke name for New York. I am not very politicaly correct so I don't have a problem using it. BTW I thought Protestants hated Jews? What about the old British inquisitions trying to rid England of Jews, also the KKK, Nazis etc. Don't get me wrong I am not anti semitic, Semites are ok by me, I do have trouble sexing them at times but that goes for a lot of Asians. LOL

UK and USA on brink of nuclear war? USA would win with nukes to spare. Everyone would say Hooray USA and have a freedom burger with extra large fries. UK is old and crusty and USA can take over the North Sea Oil. British Petroleum would be absorbed by Exxon Mobile. Surviving British insurgents will fight back but US drones will find them and they will be mopped up by US forces. Remember "might makes it right" that's the American way. With this extra conquest Americans will grow richer and more obese and have Limeys as slaves at their feet. :awesome:

And by some miraculous coincidence all the devout brothers and sisters in the UK will be attending the Hajj.
Reply

Karl
12-31-2009, 01:37 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by JoshuaD
Which reporters in particular were you referring to? I just looked at the list of reporters and not a single one of them is Jewish.
You mean Fox or BBC? I said before that the main bulk of BBC reporters were Middle eastern or South Asian Occidentalised puppets. If you are referring to Fox, well not to mention the fact they LOOK Jewish...and don't be fooled by surnames. Jews are notorious for discarding their old names and adopting names that attempt to disguise themselves in foreign lands. In the USA Jews are well known to either adopt Anglo names, or they carry on with the German names they adopted before fleeing Germany. Millions of Jews have also converted to Christianity especially in the form of Zionist-Christianity, a now very prevalent religious order in the US and adhered to by the likes of G.W Bush. Don't try and tell me that the news readers at Fox don't have the classic unmistakable Jew look.
Reply

Karl
12-31-2009, 02:02 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by JoshuaD
Your post contains nothing more than buzzwords which you appear to have the most minimal of understanding about. Do you even know what Communism is?
Ok then, Global SOCIALISTS if that makes you happier. I don't care to distinguish between commies and socialists. They're both a bunch of arrogant selfrighteous lefty meddlers who try to impose themselves on the whole world. Not just in terms of economics alone but in every facet of peoples daily private lives. They pick on Islam 'cos it has a few rules of guidance, but the socialists impose more rules and regulations than a million Holy books combined. The kafirs who rave on about "Islamo-fascism" are the pot calling the kettle black, absolute hypocrites.
Reply

Woodrow
12-31-2009, 02:10 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
It does become a problem when the relationship becomes too strong. America went to war with Iraq with not evidence of WMD, Britain supported America without even questioning their motives. Blindly supporting a country is dangerous.
The relationship between the US and the UK is very strange. At the time when the US was predominatly people of British Ancestry we fought our bloodiest wars against each other. But now that WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) are a minority, we seem to be conjoined twins.

Very strange phenomena, it seems the further apart from each other we become, the closer the ties become.

Perhaps it was because of the generation that lived through the cold war and remembering how close the US and the USSR were to mutual annihilation, we both fear doing anything that may lead to another "Cold War"
Reply

KAding
12-31-2009, 08:24 AM
The BBC is a Western broadcasting organization with reporters and editors who are mainly, but not exclusively, from the West. The BBC exists to provide news to the British people. As such, it obviously has a liberal Western point of view and I believe is fairly representative of 'Western' opinion. That does, however, not mean it is 'imperialist'. There is more to imperialism than just voicing an opinion.
Reply

CosmicPathos
12-31-2009, 08:26 AM
most of the editors on BBC who write on South Asia have vested interests in India. Maybe they are of Indian origins. This is very similar to the phenomenon one can observe on the website of The Economist and their forums.
Reply

CosmicPathos
12-31-2009, 08:26 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by KAding
The BBC is a Western broadcasting organization with reporters and editors who are mainly, but not exclusively, from the West. The BBC exists to provide news to the British people. As such, it obviously has a liberal Western point of view and I believe is fairly representative of 'Western' opinion. That does, however, not mean it is 'imperialist'. There is more to imperialism than just voicing an opinion.
lol. Made my day.
Reply

GuestFellow
12-31-2009, 08:44 AM
I stop trusting the BBC after when they reported falsely of what President of Iran stated. You might as well do your own research and find out the truth.
Reply

Karl
01-02-2010, 02:51 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
And there was me thinking it was some covert operation in order to change the world order and to gain control of India and her resources. Silly me!
Too bad you just let the cat out the bag. Watch out for MI5, they've probably got a bullet with your name on it. So sad, never mind.

:scared:?
Reply

Karl
01-02-2010, 03:40 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by KAding
The BBC is a Western broadcasting organization with reporters and editors who are mainly, but not exclusively, from the West. The BBC exists to provide news to the British people. As such, it obviously has a liberal Western point of view and I believe is fairly representative of 'Western' opinion. That does, however, not mean it is 'imperialist'. There is more to imperialism than just voicing an opinion.
Maybe its not always about direct hard power imperialism but it IS CULTURAL imperialism, and it is zealous in spreading its broadcast to as many corners of the planet as it can to spread the Anglo-American way. Don't be fooled into thinking that BBC World News is only for British consumption. It broadcasts to many reaches of the planet and obsessively focuses its content 80% of the time on India. BBC is beamed over the world and the British government is responsible for having arm twisted countries like Iran to have BBC broadcast there in Farsi in order to foment rebellion. The BBC is the proverbial propaganda machine which enthusiastically attempts to change the whole world's psyche to conform to contemporary mainstream British and American mentality. The BBC is an unmistakable advocate of New World Order, and has a zealous vision of "international community". It acts as if any single country's internal affairs are automatically the "international community's" affair as well. They are global socialists in the purest sense.
Reply

JoshuaD
01-02-2010, 05:24 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Maybe its not always about direct hard power imperialism but it IS CULTURAL imperialism, and it is zealous in spreading its broadcast to as many corners of the planet as it can to spread the Anglo-American way. Don't be fooled into thinking that BBC World News is only for British consumption. It broadcasts to many reaches of the planet and obsessively focuses its content 80% of the time on India. BBC is beamed over the world and the British government is responsible for having arm twisted countries like Iran to have BBC broadcast there in Farsi in order to foment rebellion. The BBC is the proverbial propaganda machine which enthusiastically attempts to change the whole world's psyche to conform to contemporary mainstream British and American mentality. The BBC is an unmistakable advocate of New World Order, and has a zealous vision of "international community". It acts as if any single country's internal affairs are automatically the "international community's" affair as well. They are global socialists in the purest sense.
Are you sure that's the BBC you're watching? I see no greater focus on India than on any other country in the world on BBC news channel or on its website.

The top stories today:

- Charges for cartoonist 'attacker'
- Motorists face £15 'victims levy'
- Karzai cabinet nominees rejected
- Major criticises Blair over war
- Npower's bulb giveaway attacked
- Pirates seize UK ship off Somalia
- Obama links al-Qaeda to jet plot
- Increase in rail fares criticised

Most shared stories:

- Teen depression 'linked to sleep'
- Five Minutes With: Omid Djalili
- 'Sexercise' yourself into shape
- In pictures: Gaza children suffer in wake of conflict
- The best albums you never heard in 2009

Most read:

- Npower's bulb giveaway attacked
- Motorists face £15 'victims levy'
- Fry retreats to pen autobiography
- Threat to chip-and-pin terminals
- Charges for cartoonist 'attacker'
- Doctor Who finale watched by 10m
- Dead bomb disposal expert named
- The best albums you never heard in 2009
- Islamic group plans Wootton march
- Teen depression 'linked to sleep'

There is clearly absolutely no focus on India, the last time I can remember India having a significant amount of coverage on the BBC was during its elections - and that was months ago.
Reply

Karl
01-03-2010, 12:59 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by JoshuaD
Are you sure that's the BBC you're watching?...There is clearly absolutely no focus on India, the last time I can remember India having a significant amount of coverage on the BBC was during its elections - and that was months ago.
Well clearly the BBC news I'm getting here is not what you are viewing there. You would have your local BBC there for British consumption, but don't confuse BBC with BBC WORLD. The list of news items you gave there is nothing like the kind of BBC I'm used to seeing, so yes we are viewing VERY different BBC.
Reply

KAding
01-03-2010, 10:50 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
Well clearly the BBC news I'm getting here is not what you are viewing there. You would have your local BBC there for British consumption, but don't confuse BBC with BBC WORLD. The list of news items you gave there is nothing like the kind of BBC I'm used to seeing, so yes we are viewing VERY different BBC.
What BBC World are you getting exactly? Perhaps there are some regional differences?
Reply

Joe98
01-03-2010, 11:34 PM
Where we live, our TV's and radios have "ON" and "OFF" buttons.

-
Reply

Karl
01-04-2010, 01:12 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by KAding
What BBC World are you getting exactly? Perhaps there are some regional differences?
As far as I was aware, there was only one edition of BBC World which is beamed live over the planet, but perhaps you're right that there may be several different broadcasts nowadays? But as Joe98 said, there's the "OFF" button and there's a change chanel button too, so I just flick over to a movie instead of watching news spoken in the English language. That's pretty well my general way of working out whether or not bias and propaganda will be present.
Reply

Supreme
01-04-2010, 04:28 PM
Just the notion of the thread is stupid, let alone the thread itself.
Reply

Karl
01-04-2010, 11:16 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Supreme
Just the notion of the thread is stupid, let alone the thread itself.
If my thread was so stupid why would I get so many replies? Some posters agree, that's probably what's upsetting you.

Bag the question, bag the truth, that's the English way.
Poms are so hard wired patriots that they can't take any criticism, they get all flustered like Daleks.
Reply

JoshuaD
01-05-2010, 09:13 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Karl
If my thread was so stupid why would I get so many replies? Some posters agree, that's probably what's upsetting you.

Bag the question, bag the truth, that's the English way.
Poms are so hard wired patriots that they can't take any criticism, they get all flustered like Daleks.
Yes, your paranoid criticism of a news channel in our country is just so hard to take!
Reply

Supreme
01-05-2010, 04:37 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by JoshuaD
Yes, your paranoid criticism of a news channel in our country is just so hard to take!
Lol.

If my thread was so stupid why would I get so many replies? Some posters agree, that's probably what's upsetting you.
Stupidity is appealing. Look at the Americans- they were so appealed to the stupidity of Bush they voted for him twice!

are so hard wired patriots that they can't take any criticism, they get all flustered like Daleks.
Haha, we're no where near as patriotic as the Americans or Australians.
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-24-2014, 09:39 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-09-2013, 12:45 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-11-2012, 03:27 PM
  4. Replies: 42
    Last Post: 07-13-2010, 08:01 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-12-2006, 06:26 PM
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!