/* */

PDA

View Full Version : Why they hate us (II): How many Muslims has the U.S. killed in the past 30 years?



Ramadhan
01-06-2011, 09:29 AM
I find the author of this article very modest in admitting that the US has indeed made mistakes after mistakes in the middle east and the fact that the US has killed millions of muslims, directly and indirectly. But at least it's a start.
I wished this guy had a column in a mainstream media like New York Times instead of crazy zionist like Thomas Friedman.

From http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/..._past_30_years

Posted By Stephen M. Walt Monday, November 30, 2009 - 5:38 PM



Tom Friedman had an especially fatuous column in Sunday's New York Times, which is saying something given his well-established capacity for smug self-assurance. According to Friedman, the big challenge we face in the Arab and Islamic world is "the Narrative" -- his patronizing term for Muslim views about America's supposedly negative role in the region. If Muslims weren't so irrational, he thinks, they would recognize that "U.S. foreign policy has been largely dedicated to rescuing Muslims or trying to help free them from tyranny." He concedes that we made a few mistakes here and there (such as at Abu Ghraib), but the real problem is all those anti-American fairy tales that Muslims tell each other to avoid taking responsibility for their own actions.

I heard a different take on this subject at a recent conference on U.S. relations with the Islamic world. In addition to hearing a diverse set of views from different Islamic countries, one of the other participants (a prominent English journalist) put it quite simply. "If the United States wants to improve its image in the Islamic world," he said, "it should stop killing Muslims."

Now I don't think the issue is quite that simple, but the comment got me thinking: How many Muslims has the United States killed in the past thirty years, and how many Americans have been killed by Muslims? Coming up with a precise answer to this question is probably impossible, but it is also not necessary, because the rough numbers are so clearly lopsided.

Here's my back-of-the-envelope analysis, based on estimates deliberately chosen to favor the United States. Specifically, I have taken the low estimates of Muslim fatalities, along with much more reliable figures for U.S. deaths.



To repeat: I have deliberately selected "low-end" estimates for Muslim fatalities, so these figures present the "best case" for the United States. Even so, the United States has killed nearly 30 Muslims for every American lost. The real ratio is probably much higher, and a reasonable upper bound for Muslim fatalities (based mostly on higher estimates of "excess deaths" in Iraq due to the sanctions regime and the post-2003 occupation) is well over one million, equivalent to over 100 Muslim fatalities for every American lost.

Figures like these should be used with caution, of course, and several obvious caveats apply. To begin with, the United States is not solely responsible for some of those fatalities, most notably in the case of the "excess deaths" attributable to the U.N. sanctions regime against Iraq. Saddam Hussein clearly deserves much of the blame for these "excess deaths," insofar as he could have complied with Security Council resolutions and gotten the sanctions lifted or used the "oil for food" problem properly. Nonetheless, the fact remains that the United States (and the other SC members) knew that keeping the sanctions in place would cause tens of thousands of innocent people to die and we went ahead anyway.

Similarly, the United States is not solely to blame for the sectarian violence that engulfed Iraq after the 2003 invasion. U.S. forces killed many Iraqis, to be sure, but plenty of Shiites, Kurds, Sunnis, and foreign infiltrators were pulling triggers and planting bombs too. Yet it is still the case that the United States invaded a country that had not attacked us, dismantled its regime, and took hardly any precautions to prevent the (predictable) outbreak of violence. Having uncapped the volcano, we are hardly blameless, and that goes for pundits like Friedman who enthusiastically endorsed the original invasion.

Third, the fact that people died as a result of certain U.S. actions does not by itself mean that those policy decisions were wrong. I'm a realist, and I accept the unfortunate fact that international politics is a rough business and sometimes innocent people die as a result of actions that may in fact be justifiable. For example, I don't think it was wrong to expel Iraq from Kuwait in 1991 or to topple the Taliban in 2001. Nor do I think it was wrong to try to catch Bin Laden -- even though people died in the attempt -- and I would support similar efforts to capture him today even if it placed more people at risk. In other words, a full assessment of U.S. policy would have to weigh these regrettable costs against the alleged benefits to the United States itself or the international community as a whole.

Yet if you really want to know "why they hate us," the numbers presented above cannot be ignored. Even if we view these figures with skepticism and discount the numbers a lot, the fact remains that the United States has killed a very large number of Arab or Muslim individuals over the past three decades. Even though we had just cause and the right intentions in some cases (as in the first Gulf War), our actions were indefensible (maybe even criminal) in others.

It is also striking to observe that virtually all of the Muslim deaths were the direct or indirect consequence of official U.S. government policy. By contrast, most of the Americans killed by Muslims were the victims of non-state terrorist groups such as al Qaeda or the insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan. Americans should also bear in mind that the figures reported above omit the Arabs and Muslims killed by Israel in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank. Given our generous and unconditional support for Israel's policy towards the Arab world in general and the Palestinians in particular, Muslims rightly hold us partly responsible for those victims too.

Contrary to what Friedman thinks, our real problem isn't a fictitious Muslim "narrative" about America's role in the region; it is mostly the actual things we have been doing in recent years. To say that in no way justifies anti-American terrorism or absolves other societies of responsibility for their own mistakes or misdeeds. But the self-righteousness on display in Friedman's op-ed isn't just simplistic; it is actively harmful. Why? Because whitewashing our own misconduct makes it harder for Americans to figure out why their country is so unpopular and makes us less likely to consider different (and more effective) approaches.

Some degree of anti-Americanism may reflect ideology, distorted history, or a foreign government's attempt to shift blame onto others (a practice that all governments indulge in), but a lot of it is the inevitable result of policies that the American people have supported in the past. When you kill tens of thousands of people in other countries -- and sometimes for no good reason -- you shouldn't be surprised when people in those countries are enraged by this behavior and interested in revenge. After all, how did we react after September 11?
Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
GuestFellow
01-06-2011, 12:10 PM
:sl:

It has not included Muslims killed in Pakistan. :/
Reply

~Raindrop~
01-06-2011, 01:36 PM
And of those killed, I wonder how many 'unofficial' ones there must be. Like they record the murder of every man, woman and child! :/
Reply

Ramadhan
01-06-2011, 01:38 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
It has not included Muslims killed in Pakistan. :/
True.
But this was written in 2009, so I think he missed all the drones or bombings in pakistan.
But it is very rare for a mainstream US academic/scholar to have the gut to write something like it, and publishing it in a premium journal like FP (foreign policy).
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
GuestFellow
01-06-2011, 01:57 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
True.
But this was written in 2009, so I think he missed all the drones or bombings in pakistan.
But it is very rare for a mainstream US academic/scholar to have the gut to write something like it, and publishing it in a premium journal like FP (foreign policy).
:sl:

Yes, it was a great article. Stephen M. Walt has a lot of guts, he even wrote the The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. I bet he receives thousands of threatening emails.
Reply

aadil77
01-06-2011, 02:13 PM
These independant journalists will never have a voice in mainstream media - governments will never allow it.
Reply

Perseveranze
01-06-2011, 04:42 PM
Asalaamu Alaikum,

This is good, I always see ignorants on Youtube saying "Muslims are the killers, their all terrorists", my usual reply is "Yes, all Muslims are terrorists except for the 94% that aren't (link them to the study)", now I can source them to this interesting article too :)
Reply

سيف الله
01-06-2011, 07:34 PM
Salaam

Thanks for the article. Like bro Naidmar said the figures are definitely at the 'low end'. Though for me the USA intervention, manipulation and interference etc in the affairs of the Middle East began seriously post 1945. So it goes way back.

Short video that gets straight to the point

Reply

جوري
01-06-2011, 07:54 PM
where are the warmongers to comment on how justifiable it is to go killing civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan or or or ? sob7an Allah.. may Allah dam n those warmongering murderers to hell- they've been killing Muslims east and west for centuries with everyone's approval and aid! imsad
Reply

GuestFellow
01-06-2011, 11:05 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by aadil77
These independant journalists will never have a voice in mainstream media - governments will never allow it.
:sl:

Forget that, many members of the public don't want to hear the truth or any criticism about their troops. They want to be brainwashed, misled or lied to. It is like the government pisses on their legs, tells them its raining and they accept it. >_>
Reply

Ramadhan
01-07-2011, 02:35 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
Forget that, many members of the public don't want to hear the truth or any criticism about their troops. They want to be brainwashed, misled or lied to. It is like the government pisses on their legs, tells them its raining and they accept it. >_>

Ain't this the truth!

In a sports forum recently, there was an outrage at the news that some israeli athletes could not get "early" visas to travel to a gulf state for a sports tournament. (by early, was 2 or 3 days. And all those israeli athletes did get their visas anyway and were able to travel and arrived in the gulf state a couple of days BEFORE the tournament started).
I was pointing out at the bureacracy difficulty of getting visas in general, especially between two countries that don't have diplomatic relations like Israel and the gulf state.
(you can ask US consuler in Jakarta how many percent of visa applicants they approve each year. miniscule!). Of course those majority american members are ignorant of this fact, seeing how they require NO visa to go to most places on earth.
As soon as I defended the Gulf state, the rest of the forum members jumped on me, calling the gulf state racist and dishing out stupid remarks against muslims and muslim countries in general, and how palestinians have equal rights and freedom in Israel (!!!!!).
When I wrote (in mild tone, much milder than how I normally write here) about the facts of Palestine and middle east conflict, EVERYBODY started calling me names, from "anti-semite" to "mozlem fundamentalist" to "terrorists" and they started to give me "facts" and "lectures" about Israel and Palestinians which can normally be found on FoxNews.

Mind you, most members of that forum are NOT hillbillies, and in fact they are highly educated americans (on average, the members hold master degrees), and yet they all succumbed to the idea of middle east presented by US mainstream media, and find it offensive that ANYONE could possibly criticize Israel.
Reply

aadil77
01-07-2011, 02:31 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
:sl:

Forget that, many members of the public don't want to hear the truth or any criticism about their troops. They want to be brainwashed, misled or lied to. It is like the government pisses on their legs, tells them its raining and they accept it. >_>
Maybe in america, but I feel the british are more open to the truth - more able to think for themselves, this is why you have so many documentries being made here about what really goes on in the world.
Reply

GuestFellow
01-07-2011, 03:51 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by aadil77
Maybe in america, but I feel the british are more open to the truth - more able to think for themselves, this is why you have so many documentries being made here about what really goes on in the world.
:sl:

I agree, in Britain, the people are more open to the truth.
Reply

Muezzin
01-08-2011, 07:18 PM
Excellent article. Stephen M. Walt, Robert Fisk and John Pilger are all great journalists in respect of exposing these sorts of tragedies to audiences who may not otherwise hear the other side of the story.
Reply

Mike3449
01-09-2011, 04:07 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Muezzin
Excellent article. Stephen M. Walt, Robert Fisk and John Pilger are all great journalists in respect of exposing these sorts of tragedies to audiences who may not otherwise hear the other side of the story.

How many Muslims has America saved?

Like in Bosnia, Kosovo?

I agree that America should not have involved itself in Kuwait, Iraq, Kosovo.

So, we what would be talking about today had America not saved Kuwait?

Instead of Saudi Arabia...

Saddam Arabia.

Sounds the same to me.
Reply

GuestFellow
01-09-2011, 05:09 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
How many Muslims has America saved?

Like in Bosnia, Kosovo?
It does not change the fact that America has done bad things and its military killed loads of Muslims and non-Muslims.

Instead of Saudi Arabia...

Saddam Arabia.
Saudi Arabia and Saddam Arabia? What do you mean by this? O_o
Reply

Mike3449
01-09-2011, 05:36 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
It does not change the fact that America has done bad things and its military killed loads of Muslims and non-Muslims.



Saudi Arabia and Saddam Arabia? What do you mean by this? O_o

America has killed many Muslims and Non-Muslims. I'm not going to justify any of it. N or, am I gonna justify saving people.

What I meant by Saudi Arabia or Saddam Arabia... it does not matter to me which one of those controls Arabia.

Not one American life is worth deciding on that matter.
Reply

malez
01-11-2011, 09:23 AM
even america is done a good jobe in so many countries like the nation feild(somalia) there were alot of somali people who lived in u s a and have their life there.
and doing well.
Reply

GuestFellow
01-12-2011, 12:54 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
America has killed many Muslims and Non-Muslims. I'm not going to justify any of it. N or, am I gonna justify saving people.
Saving who?

What I meant by Saudi Arabia or Saddam Arabia... it does not matter to me which one of those controls Arabia.
lol Saddam Arabia.
Reply

Mike3449
01-12-2011, 01:45 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
I wish the world would change.

America is my country... but, if I were in charge I would not bomb people. I would not do that. I'm against it. Because you kill innocents on many occasions. Usually. Always.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8jw-...eature=related
Reply

Muezzin
01-12-2011, 06:35 PM
I just deleted a chain of posts which discussed other members personally rather than the topic at hand. General notice to nobody specifically: Please keep discussion to the topic, and thank you to those who are doing so.
Reply

Pygoscelis
01-14-2011, 08:57 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Muezzin
I just deleted a chain of posts which discussed other members personally rather than the topic at hand. General notice to nobody specifically: Please keep discussion to the topic, and thank you to those who are doing so.
And yet you left up a post calling explicitly for the torture of Mike3449?
Reply

Pygoscelis
01-14-2011, 09:00 PM
The actions of the USA and England interfering in the middle east is most certainly part of "why they hate us". But it is also most certainly not the only factor. People on both sides of this issue too often try to whitewash their side.
Reply

GuestFellow
01-14-2011, 09:15 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis
The actions of the USA and England interfering in the middle east is most certainly part of "why they hate us". But it is also most certainly not the only factor. People on both sides of this issue too often try to whitewash their side.
Give the other reasons please.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-14-2011, 10:30 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis
And yet you left up a post calling explicitly for the torture of Mike3449?
I did not see any, so this post by pygoscelis should be deleted.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-14-2011, 10:35 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis
The actions of the USA and England interfering in the middle east is most certainly part of "why they hate us". But it is also most certainly not the only factor. People on both sides of this issue too often try to whitewash their side.
uh... this article is written by a mainstream american journalist for an american media.

Isn't it interesting how you spinned it as if the article were written by bin laden for baghdad times?
Reply

Pygoscelis
01-14-2011, 10:46 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
I did not see any, so this post by pygoscelis should be deleted.
Post #18 above. "You deserve this [insert photo of person being tortured]". You can't be so stuck in tribal alliance with this poster not to see how hateful that post is.

uh... this article is written by a mainstream american journalist for an american media. Isn't it interesting how you spinned it as if the article were written by bin laden for baghdad times?
I did no such thing.
Reply

Pygoscelis
01-14-2011, 11:00 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Guestfellow
Give the other reasons please.
I'd really rather not get into them too much, as it would no doubt prompt a lot of hate speech in my direction and I don't have the time or energy right now to address that.

But surely you must realize that this conflict, as is the case with a lot of conflicts, is not entirely one sided. Regimes in the middle east depend on hatred of the west to keep themselves in power (and to keep the people from turning on them), just as much as the western regimes depend on the Muslim Terrorist bogeyman (which leads to attacks on freedom in the name of "security", such as the patriot act). Regimes from both sides fan the flames and people from both "sides" (artificial sides designed to turn us against each other) have done some unspeakable things. If we can get both "sides" to admit that, we may find room to fix things, or at least calm them down. If we can get people to stop seeing us as on "sides", even better. If we accomplish neither, the radicals from both sides will envelop the rest of us in flames, be they by suicide bomber or laser guided missile.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-14-2011, 11:05 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis
Post #18 above. "You deserve this [insert photo of detainee being tortured]". You can't be so stuck in tribal alliance with this poster not to see how hateful that post is
I don't see it as "calling explicitly for the torture of Mike3449" as you charged in the earlier post.
And as for the tribal alliance comment by you, you can't be so stuck inside the part of your own body where the sun dont shine not to see how hateful your post is.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-14-2011, 11:08 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis
I did no such thing.
well, we are discussing the article that I posted in the thread. Unless you specify any other articles or sources, I would keep assuming you were talking about the op.
Reply

GuestFellow
01-14-2011, 11:33 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis

But surely you must realize that this conflict, as is the case with a lot of conflicts, is not entirely one sided.
Yes I agree.

Regimes in the middle east depend on hatred of the west to keep themselves in power (and to keep the people from turning on them)
Which regimes did you have in mind?
Reply

Mike3449
01-23-2011, 10:30 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
uh... this article is written by a mainstream american journalist for an american media.

Isn't it interesting how you spinned it as if the article were written by bin laden for baghdad times?


Maybe it should have been.

Maybe Muslims should ask themselves the question... Why do they hate us?

Instead of America... because I think most of us don't care why the Islamic World hates us. Some do, most don't.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 11:01 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
Maybe Muslims should ask themselves the question... Why do they hate us?
It should come as a surprise to you, but yes we definitely have asked the question, and find the answers.
I don't blame you though, I'm sure you don't get much news about muslims in some backwater area that you live in.


format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
Instead of America... because I think most of us don't care why the Islamic World hates us. Some do, most don't.

You are right.
Most americans are just ignoramus who do not even know the difference between Islam and muslim.

This also should come as another surprise to you: we don't really care about what backwater hillbillies think about muslims.
We only care about the actions of those in positions of power and influence who have made many muslims live miserable or even ceased to exist.
Reply

Mike3449
01-23-2011, 11:08 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
It should come as a surprise to you, but yes we definitely have asked the question, and find the answers.
I don't blame you though, I'm sure you don't get much news about muslims in some backwater area that you live in.





You are right.
Most americans are just ignoramus who do not even know the difference between Islam and muslim.

This also should come as another surprise to you: we don't really care about what backwater hillbillies think about muslims.
We only care about the actions of those in positions of power and influence who have made many muslims live miserable or even ceased to exist.

Not caring does not equal ignorance.

And, it's not just backward hillbillies.

You have asked the question? Why do they hate us?

Wonderful.

Did the word "Jihad" enter the conversation?
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 11:27 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
Not caring does not equal ignorance.
And, it's not just backward hillbillies.
Forgive me, you are right.
Of course not only backwater hillbilies are ignoramus, but random americans who have access to internet are also not only ignoramus, but clearly out of their depth when discussing world affairs.


format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
You have asked the question? Why do they hate us?
Wonderful.
Did the word "Jihad" enter the conversation?
Whats's jihad?
I understand the meaning of jihad, but maybe coming from you, I could totally miss the mark (pun not intended)
Reply

Mike3449
01-23-2011, 11:37 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
Forgive me, you are right.
Of course not only backwater hillbilies are ignoramus, but random americans who have access to internet are also not only ignoramus, but clearly out of their depth when discussing world affairs.




Whats's jihad?
I understand the meaning of jihad, but maybe coming from you, I could totally miss the mark (pun not intended)

'But maybe coming from you...'

But?

That is your response?

But?

I feel your pain.

How about attacks all over the world? From the Philippines to Algeria... and Europe, Russia, America. Why do you hate all of us?

And, within the Islamic World... Terror everywhere.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 12:05 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
'But maybe coming from you...'
But?
That is your response?
But?
If you object, I could totally re-phrase the sentence to "coming from you..."
Sorry for overestimating your knowledge.


format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
I feel your pain.
Do you really?
I didn't expect that, as I see you have no pain for the women, children and old people slain and women raped by american soldiers.

format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
How about attacks all over the world? From the Philippines to Algeria... and Europe, Russia, America. Why do you hate all of us?
can you specifiy which attacks and evidence who did what and why?

format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
And, within the Islamic World... Terror everywhere.
you are right.
Isnt disgusting how the US has spread such terror within islamic world... terror everywhere.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Reply

Mike3449
01-23-2011, 12:10 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
If you object, I could totally re-phrase the sentence to "coming from you..."
Sorry for overestimating your knowledge.




Do you really?
I didn't expect that, as I see you have no pain for the women, children and old people slain and women raped by american soldiers.



can you specifiy which attacks and evidence who did what and why?



you are right.
Isnt disgusting how the US has spread such terror within islamic world... terror everywhere.
Thanks for pointing this out.

Denial is wonderful... it however is no way to keep the faith or way of life.
Reply

Mike3449
01-23-2011, 12:13 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
If you object, I could totally re-phrase the sentence to "coming from you..."
Sorry for overestimating your knowledge.




Do you really?
I didn't expect that, as I see you have no pain for the women, children and old people slain and women raped by american soldiers.



can you specifiy which attacks and evidence who did what and why?



you are right.
Isnt disgusting how the US has spread such terror within islamic world... terror everywhere.
Thanks for pointing this out.

American soldiers raped women?

Maybe we should build a fake religion around that...

It would not be the first time.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 12:20 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
Denial is wonderful... it however is no way to keep the faith or way of life.
Are you talking about yourself?
The first step to remedy it is to get an education, if you could.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 12:23 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
American soldiers raped women?
This just proves my earlier post about ignoramus :)


format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
Maybe we should build a fake religion around that...

It would not be the first time.
You are right.
saul of tarsus and priests and rabbis have done it by creating christianity after the departure of Jesus (as).
Reply

Mike3449
01-23-2011, 12:24 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by naidamar
Are you talking about yourself?
The first step to remedy it is to get an education, if you could.
Is education the answer? Of Islam?...

I don't think so.
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 12:26 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mike3449
Is education the answer? Of Islam?...

I don't think so.
Thank you.
Another proof of my point I made earlier.
:)
Reply

M.I.A.
01-23-2011, 12:50 PM
AMERICA is not ignorant or stupid, i doubt that the people are either.
i think that it has made a concious decision to troll the ever living crap out of everything that gets in its way, im not a conspiracy theorist but even i can see that a manufactured situation is as easy to come by as a sound plan of attack.
..and you have enough money to make very sound plans of attack.

you mention jihad.. like it is justification for war.

i mention collateral damage.. like it is a justification for war.. it is a very sound strategy.

i had not heard of collateral damage before america and i doubt you had heard of jihad..
all i know is that america has betrayed the moral code that governs humanity... the constitution of the soul.

to me you are the ones who let the government become nazi like without batting an eyelid.. except you are not nazis, the salutes would have made the media by now. you have taken the gold from the jews and removed them from there homes.. now all thats needed is concentration camps to finish them off..

i know i know... all very far fetched.. i doubt all this could happen while the world looks on at there tv sets.

anyway America, truth and justice for all, land of the free and home of the brave.. to paraphrase G.W im gonna go get a burger
watch this drive..
Reply

Pygoscelis
01-23-2011, 04:42 PM
Mike! Naidamar! Lily leaves so now the two of you feel you have to be extra rude and combative with each other to fill the void? :p
Reply

Ramadhan
01-23-2011, 04:54 PM
Pygo, after more than 4 years on this forum I thought you finally have something positive to contribute to this forum.
I thought wrong.
Reply

Woodrow
01-23-2011, 07:38 PM
Not another war zone.

When are people going to understand this is a forum, not a battlefield. Thread is now Defused until I get time to go through it and throw out the off topic posts.

:threadclo:
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!