He continues saying:
As we know now why He had to explain the Passover to His disciples and established the "Lord's Supper", we come to the question "Was the lamb slain for Passover killed over and over as in the 'offering' of the mass as a continued sacrifice?" No.
The lamb died only once. Just as Jesus offered Himself ONLY once. We see this explained in the letter to the Hebrews. The book explains Jesus' death on the cross, then, puts that sacrifice in spiritual perspective in regard to blood atonement.
(The Old Testament of Blood)
"For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the people, Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you. Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry."
(The need for Blood Atonement for Sins)
"And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission. It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these."
(Jesus is in Heaven not in an earthly temple)
"For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:"
(He offers sacrifice ONLY ONCE!)
"Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; "
(WHY NOT MORE THAN ONCE?)
"For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: so Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation."
Heb 9:19-28 (Parenthetical and underlines added)
We see in this passage that a sacrifice must be a blood offering to atone for sins. That means that if the Eucharist is a sacrifice, it is useless on its face because there is no blood. Secondly, the entire passage absolutely refutes any claim that a man can call the body of our Lord down from Heaven and offer Him again unto God. By definition, this is blasphemy because we see in this passage and throughout the book of Hebrews that Jesus is our high priest ("Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." Hebrews 6:2).
And, in the passage above He is the one offering Himself to God the one time, anyone else trying to offer Jesus as a sacrifice is blaspheming God. That is because Jesus is God and you cannot take on the title or right of God. (I will not argue for the deity of Christ here because if you do not believe the Jesus is the "I am", you are not a Christian and you will die in your sins (John 8:24).
Also, we see that He suffered from the foundation of earth and must suffer if there is additional sacrifice. A second or repeat sacrifice is absolutely unscriptural. Look to Revelations and the name of Jesus to confirm the statement above...
"And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." Revelations 13:8
Jesus is the Lamb and the Lamb of the Lamb's Book of Life (Jesus book of the names of the children of God) is the "Lamb that was slain from the foundation of the earth". He is eternal and was already the victim of our sins from the beginning of this world. If that isn't enough, I cite more scripture once for all offering and on the open shame of a repeat sacrifice of the Lamb.
"For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:" 1Peter 3:18 (Underline added)
"If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame." Hebrews 6:6 (Underline added)
Jesus suffered the death of the cross once and only once. So, if Jesus were crucified or offered a second time, He is openly shamed by it. The sad thing is that we have to give a written explanation of the obvious truth of the direct statements that contradict Roman Catholic teachings on the Eucharist. Not only that, we have to quote a second passage that directly contradicts the teachings and traditions of the Mass. To re-affirm the obvious.
For he that is dead is freed from sin. Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him: knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him. For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. Rom 6:7-10 (Underline added)