/* */

PDA

View Full Version : What really happened in Bahrain



ابن آل مرة
09-26-2011, 02:07 PM
This is what really happened in bahrain (with clear video footage). Rafidah thugs hijacked arab spring to start their own dirty rafidi sectarian revolution which had nothing to do with govt as much as it had to do with innocent sunnis. Sunnis were the major target of this devilish revolution. And this is the reason why I kept on saying that these criminal dogs should be shot at site.

This is another solid proof to shut the mouths of dirty rafidi agent who kept barking on this forum in support of rafidi criminals calling them oppressed.
May the curse of Allah be upon each one of those Shia who hurt our brothers during the protests. The brother who runs this channel was severely beaten also INSIDE a Masjid. To those who think that the Shias are in the fold of Islam, then read what the scholars said about it. Fear Allah and stop confusing the people even more by saying we need unity with such dogs.

(Then Ibn Taymiyah discussed the two misguided groups who were in Koofah, Iraq, both of whom took ‘Aashooraa’ as a festival because of their bid’ah). The Raafidi group made an outward show of allegiance to the Ahl al-Bayt although inwardly they were either heretics and disbelievers or ignorant and bound by whims and desires. The Naasibi group hated ‘Ali and his companions, because of the troubles and killings that had occurred. It is reported in Saheeh Muslim that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “In (the tribe of) Thaqeef there will be a liar and an oppressor [???].” The liar was al-Mukhtaar ibn Abi ‘Ubayd al-Thaqafi, who made an outward show of allegiance to and support of the Ahl al-Bayt, and killed ‘Ubayd-Allaah ibn Ziyaad, the governor of Iraq, who had equipped the party that killed al-Husayn ibn ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with them both); then he (al-Mukhtaar) made it clear that he was a liar, by claiming to be a prophet and that Jibreel (peace be upon him) brought revelation to him. People told Ibn ‘Umar and Ibn ‘Abbaas about this, and said to one of them, “al-Mukhtaar ibn Abi ‘Ubayd is claiming to receive revelation [annahu yanzilu ‘alayhi].” He said, “He is telling the truth, for Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): ‘Shall I inform you (O people) upon whom the shayaateen (devils) descend [tanazzalu]? They descend upon every lying, sinful person.’ [al-Shu’ara’ 26:221].” [Translator’s note: the words translated as “receive revelation” and “descend” both come from the same root in Arabic]. They said to the other: “Al-Mukhtaar is claiming that he receives inspiration.” He said, “he is telling the truth. ‘… And certainly, the Shayaateen (devils) do inspire their friends (from mankind) to dispute with you…’ [al-An’aam 6:121 – interpretation of the meaning].” As for the oppressor , this was al-Hajjaaj ibn Yoosuf al-Thaqafi, who was opposed to ‘Ali and his companions. Al-Hajjaaj was a Naasibi and al-Mukhtaar was a Raafidi, and this Raafidi was a greater liar and more guilty of fabrication and heresy, because he claimed to be a prophet…
It is reported in al-Saheeh that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “he is not one of us who strikes his cheeks, rends his garments and prays with the prayer of Jaahiliyyah.” And he said: “I have nothing to do with those who strike [their cheeks], shave [their heads] and rend [their garments].” And he said: “If the woman who wails does not repent before she dies, she will be raised up on the Day of Resurrection wearing trousers made of tar and a shirt of scabs.”
The Shaytaan made this attractive to those who are misled, so they took the day of ‘Aashooraa’ as an occasion of mourning, when they grieve and wail, recite poems of grief and tell stories filled with lies. Whatever truth there may be in these stories serves no purpose other than the renewal of their grief and sectarian feeling, and the stirring up of hatred and hostility among the Muslims, which they do by cursing those who came before them, and telling many lies, and causing much trouble in the world. The various sects of Islam have never known any group tell more lies or cause more trouble or help the kuffaar against the Muslims more than this misguided and evil group. They are even worse than the Khawaarij who went beyond the pale of Islam. They are the ones of whom the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “They will kill the people of Islam and will leave alone the people who worship idols.” This group cooperated with the Jews, Christians and mushrikeen against the members of the Prophet’s household and his believing ummah, and also helped the mushrik Turks and Tatars to do what they did in Baghdaad and elsewhere to the descendents of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), i.e., the ‘Abbaasid rulers and others, and the believers; the Turks and Tatars killed them, enslaved their women and destroyed their homes.
Distortion of The Qur'an by the Rafidis.
With regard to Soorat al-Wilaayah, some of the Shi’ah scholars and imams have stated that it exists. Any of them who denies that does so by way of taqiyah (dissimulation). One of those who clearly stated that it exists is Mirza Hussein Muhammad Taqiy al-Noori al-Tubrusi (d. 1320 AH). He wrote a book in which he claimed that the Qur’aan had been distorted and that the Sahaabah has concealed some parts of it, including Soorat al-Wilaayah. The Raafidis honoured him after his death by burying him in al-Najaf. This book by al-Tubrusi was published in Iran in 1298 AH, and when it was published there was a great deal of controversy because they wanted the doubts about the validity of the Qur’aan, which were known only to their leaders, to remain scattered throughout hundreds of their major books, and they did not want that to be compiled in one book. At the beginning of his book he said:
Islam-QA

Rafidis on Sahih Al-Bukhari
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/20153/
The differences between the Ahl al-Sunnah (Sunnis) and the Raafidis are very great and are fundamental. For example, the Raafidis say that the Qur’aan was altered, and they condemn most of the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them) and think that they went astray; they exaggerate about their imaams and worship them, and give them precedence over the Prophets and angels; they go on pilgrimages to mashhads (shrines) and graves, where they do all kinds of actions of shirk, associating others in worship with Allaah. They also believe in hypocrisy (as a tenet of faith) and call it taqiyah (dissimulation), and they believe in al-badaa’(the notion that Allaah “changes His mind”), al-raj’ah (the Return, i.e., the raising of the dead to life again for some time in the same form as they were before) and absolute infallibility of their imaams, and in prostrating on a handful of clay…
We advise you to read "Al-Khutoot al-‘Areedah" by Muhibb al-Deen al-Khateeb [this book is available in English – Translator], or Mukhtasar al-Tuhfat al-Ithna’ ‘Ashariyyah by al-Dahlawi, or Fikrat al-Taqreeb bayna Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Shee’ah by Naasir al-Qaffaari.
The Raafidis, Imamis or Ithna ‘Asharis (“Twelvers”) are one of the branches of Shi’ism. They are called Raafidis because they rejected (rafada) most of the Sahaabah and they rejected the leadership of the two Shaykhs Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, or because they rejected the imamate of Zayd ibn ‘Ali, and deserted him. They called Imamis because they are primarily focused on the issue of imamate, and they made it a basic principle of their religion, or because they claim that the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) stated that ‘Ali and his descendents would be imams. They are called Ithna ‘Asharis (“Twelvers”) because they believe in the imamate of twelve men from the Prophet’s family (ahl al-bayt), the first of whom was ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with him) and the last of whom was Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-‘Askari, the supposed hidden imam, who they say entered the tunnel of Samarra’ in the middle of the third century AH and he is still alive therein, and they are waiting for him to come out!
They regard most of the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them) as kaafirs, and disavow them, and they seek to draw closer to Allaah by cursing and reviling them. They claim that they apostatized after the death of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) except very few (only seven). This is a rejection of the Qur’aan which affirms their virtue, and says that Allaah was pleased with them and chose them to accompany His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). It also implies a slur against the Qur’aan itself, because it was transmitted via them; if they were kuffaar then there is no guarantee that they did not distort it or change it. This is what the Raafidis believe anyway, as stated above. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: As for the one who goes further and claims that they apostatized after the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) died, apart from a small number, no more than ten or so, or that they became evildoers, there is no doubt that he is a kaafir, because he is rejecting what it says in the Qur’aan in more than one place, that Allaah was pleased with them and praised them. Indeed, the one who doubts that such a person is a kaafir is to be labelled as a kaafir himself, because what this view implies is that those who transmitted the Qur’aan and Sunnah were kuffaar or rebellious evildoers. The verse says “You (true believers in Islamic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم and his Sunnah) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind” [Aal ‘Imraan 3:110], and the best of them were the first generation. But according to this view, most of them were kaafirs and rebellious evildoers, and this ummah is the worst of nations and the earliest generations of this ummah were the most evil of them. The fact that this is kufr is something that no Muslim has any excuse for not knowing. End quote from al-Saarim al-Maslool ‘ala Shaatim al-Rasool (p. 590).

قال عبدالله بن أحمد: قلت لأبي: من الرافضة؟ قال: الذي يشتم ويسب أبا بكر وعمر. [السنة للخلال].
"Abdullah ibn Ahmad (ibn Hanbal) said: I asked my father: "Who are rafidha?". He said: People who abuse and curse Abu Bakr and Umar". (Reported by Hallal in "Sunnan")

قال طلحة بن مصرف رحمه الله [المتوفى سنة 112هـ]: "الرافضةلا تُنكح نساؤهم ولا تؤكل ذبائحهم؛ لأنهم أهل ردة" [الشرح ابن بطة].
"Talha ibn Musreef rahimuhullah (d 112 h) said: Rafidha. Their women shouldn't be marry, and their sacrifices shouldn't be eaten, they apostated". (see Sharh ibn Battah)

وقال ابن شهاب الزهري رحمه الله [المتوفى 124هـ]: "مارأيت قوما أشبه بالنصارى من السبئية". قال أحمد بن يونس رحمه الله: "هم الرافضة" [الشريعة للآجري].
"Ibn Shihab az-Zuhri rahimuhullah (d 124 h) said: I haven't seen any people that lresemble to christians more than sabaiiyah". Ahmad ibn Yunus rahimuhullah said: (Sabayiyah) they are rafidha". (see Ajuree "Shariah")

قال الأوزاعيُّ رحمه الله [المتوفى سنة 157]: "من شتم أبا بكرالصديق رضي الله عنه فقد ارتدَّ عن دينه وأباح دمه". [الشرح والإبانة لابن بطة] .
"Imam Awzai rahimuhullah (d 157 h) said: Whoever would abuse (curse) Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with him) apostated from religion, and his blood is permitted to shed". (see Sharh wal Ibana by ibn Battah)

قال عبد الرزاق الصنعاني رحمه الله [المتوفى 211هـ]: "الرافضي كافر". [السّير 14/ 178]
"Abdurrazaq as-San`ane rahimuhullah (d 211 h) said: Rafidha disbelivers". (see Siyar 14/178)


قال الإمام البخاري [المتوفى 256هـ] رحمه الله: "لا أبالي صليت خلف الجهمي والرافضي أم صليت خلف اليهودي والنصراني، ولا يسلم عليهم ولا يعادون ولا يناكحون، ولا تؤكل ذبائحهم". [خلق أفعال العباد]
Imam Buhari rahimuhullah (d 256 h) said:“I don’t see any difference between praying Salah behind a Jahmi or a (Shia) Rafidhi and a Christian or a Jew. They (Jahmis/Rafidhis) are not to be greeted, nor are they to be visited, nor are they to be married, nor is their testimony to be accepted, nor are their sacrifices to be eaten.”(Khalq Af’aalul-’Ibaad, p.14)
Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
ابن آل مرة
09-26-2011, 06:19 PM
This is the video
Reply

Ghazalah
09-26-2011, 07:53 PM
Omg. Poor guy imsad nobody helped him imsad

Well that changes a lot of perspectives.
Reply

MSalman
09-27-2011, 12:04 AM
May Allah destroy the rafidha and grant protection and victory to Ahlus Sunnah in Baharin, Iraq, Iran and other parts of the world, ameen.
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
ابن آل مرة
09-27-2011, 06:06 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by MSalman
May Allah destroy the rafidha and grant protection and victory to Ahlus Sunnah in Baharin, Iraq, Iran and other parts of the world, ameen.
Ameen Thumma Ameen..
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!