/* */

PDA

View Full Version : can some one explain chirstianity ..



syed1
11-24-2011, 03:44 AM
I am trying to educate myself more about christiantiy and what they believe but I am not quite sure where to start..


what is the holy book they refer to ... i know it is the bible, but which one? why are there different books by matthew or paul etc?

Where should I start?
Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
Ali_008
11-24-2011, 03:56 AM
:sl:

Bro, I like your enthusiasm for knowledge but considering the other questions you've asked previously, I wouldn't really encourage you to go towards the Bible. Now is not the time for you to go that lane. Use all of this time with either the Qur'an or the Ahadeeth or sayings/events of our righteous ancestors. When I started researching, for the outside of Islam part, I relied only on Dr. Zakir Naik and Ahmed Deedat for it. Don't start reading the Bible, watch lectures by those two extraordinary gentlemen.

:w:
Reply

جوري
11-24-2011, 04:08 AM
Christians worship Isa (PBUH) as God, if that doesn't satisfy your heart or mind then I wouldn't waste my time on a religion of contradiction, pagan practices and no real sense of jurisprudence.
The so-called 'death of Jesus' has different accounts in each of their bibles, his last words the same story, half of the actions attributed to him are made up by scribes whose writing isn't congruent.

:w:
Reply

syed1
11-24-2011, 04:08 AM
I just want to know purely for comparative purposes... I have watched zakir naik and ahmad deedat and their debates against Christians but I just want to get an understanding of it for my own...

I was on a chirstian forum earlier just going through some of the stuff they talk about and they seem so convinced with their religion while making claims about islam that it is a religion of hate/violence..

i just want too see the common ground between the 2 religions and where we part...

Mashallah i am very content and firmly believe in Islam and Inshallah that will never change.
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
جوري
11-24-2011, 04:10 AM
try youtubing Bart Eherman he's a christian scholar and historian he'll teach you alot, or the converts on the board. Like br. Mustafa

:w:
Reply

syed1
11-24-2011, 04:13 AM
okay, but could you explain why there are many different books? do they all mean the same things?

what is the psalms? or the book of matthews or james or paul, the new testament the OT?

is there one main book i can pick up and read to understand chirstianity? or do I have to go searching different books to get its meaning?
Reply

جوري
11-24-2011, 04:16 AM
different books is your best bet. The psalms are from the old testament they're what the Quran refers to as Zabur.. some are ok, the rest are filled with filthy sexual content.
Reply

Tyrion
11-24-2011, 04:16 AM
Don't ask about Christianity on an Islamic forum if you're serious about learning the details of what Christians actually believe... I mean, you wouldn't go to Christians for info on Islam would you? You already mentioned that the ones you've spoken to said Islam was a religion of hate and violence... The best way to learn is to ask Christians AND go to their sources (since some Christians aren't very well versed in their own texts/history, just as some Muslims aren't)... Also understand that there are tons of different Christian sects, and each has its own beliefs. You'll have a hard time finding any two Christians that believe exactly the same thing. :p: I'd recommend going to a few churches and talking to people there.
Reply

syed1
11-24-2011, 04:25 AM
ahhh ... seems like a lot of work.. can some one just tell me one book that i should read .. can't be that hard..

what is the MAIN book.. the MAIN BIBLE -
Reply

Tyrion
11-24-2011, 04:29 AM
^Haha, if you really want to learn the religion you can't take any easy roads. :p: The bare bones could be summed up by most Christians though, so I suggest you ask them (preferably someone who works in a church). You might be confused if you just consult the Bible on your own, but most of Christianity is based on the New Testament, so if you want you could read that... Although you don't seem to be too interested in something that would require actual studying.

From what I know and have studied, the basic idea behind Christianity is that sin was brought into the world through Adam and Eve's transgression in the Garden. Because of this, all humans are tainted with sin, and the price of sin in the eyes of god is death... To fix this broken relationship between God and mankind, God sends his son (Jesus) to earth so that he can die for the sins of humanity. People are saved if they believe in and accept Christs death on the cross and his sacrifice for humanity. Christians also believe Jesus is God, since in Christianity God is one and three at the same time. He's one God, but in three persons: The Father, the son, and the holy spirit. That's the basic idea.
Reply

جوري
11-24-2011, 04:33 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
the MAIN BIBLE
Take your pick, there's no such thing. Everyone claims their version is correct..
Reply

syed1
11-24-2011, 04:34 AM
oh the new testament... I think I have a copy of that somewhere lying around.. I shall go find it

peace
Reply

Ali_008
11-24-2011, 10:20 AM
To put some of the differences between Islam and Christianity briefly:

  • Christians believe Eesa (AlayhiSalaam) is the only "begotten son" of Allah (nauzbillah) and Muslims don't believe so because "begetting" a child involves an act as low as sex and we don't believe Allah to have animal instinct of sex like humans do. More importantly, Allah says in Surah Ikhlas (Chapter 112) that He doesn't beget.
  • Christians believe Christ died on the cross for the sins of humans and whoever believes in him shall attain salvation whereas Muslims believe he never died on the cross because the Qur'an says so in Surah Nisa 4:157 and was lifted up to the heavens alive.
  • Christians attribute the most disgusting and heinous stories to the pure prophets whom Islam holds in high regard such as accusing Ayub (Job) of having lost faith in Allah's mercy. Accusing Lut (Lot) of incest with his daughters. Solomon/David of polytheism. NAUZBILLAH. And other such ridiculous stories.
  • Christians believe there are 3 gods in 1 : Allah, Eesa (The Son) and the Holy Ghost whereas Muslims believe purely and totally in one and only Allah. No son or ghost.


There are more differences but I need my blood to cool down before I go any further. :raging:

Why are you researching Christianity in the first place?
Reply

Ramadhan
11-24-2011, 01:37 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
ahhh ... seems like a lot of work.. can some one just tell me one book that i should read .. can't be that hard..

what is the MAIN book.. the MAIN BIBLE -
There is no main bible, there are literally thousands of different versions of bibles.

You can start by reading some basic past threads in the comparative religion section of this forum.

A lot of info already in this forum.
Reply

Ramadhan
11-24-2011, 01:45 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
oh the new testament... I think I have a copy of that somewhere lying around.. I shall go find it
you need to learn the history of new testament to get to know why/how christians became what they are.

some of the best books on new testaments are written by one of the most important NT scholars: Bart Ehrman.

http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Christian...2142055&sr=1-4
http://www.amazon.com/Forged-Writing...2142055&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Interrup...2142055&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Misquoting-Jes...2142055&sr=1-3
http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Scripture...2142055&sr=1-6
http://www.amazon.com/Orthodox-Corru...2142055&sr=1-9

read those books, and you'll have much better idea what christianity is.
Reply

missy
11-24-2011, 06:12 PM
:sl:

Hey, I know that guy, Bart D. Ehrman, I’ve listened to some of his lectures on the NT, and I’ve got one of his books, “Misquoting Jesus: The story behind who changed the Bible and why” , I still have to check it out…haha.

But I don’t understand; he doesn’t believe the Bible to be the Word of God like the other Christians do, he calls it a “human book”…..then why is he still a Christian?
I guess he's Agnostic though….

format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
I just want to know purely for comparative purposes... I have watched zakir naik and ahmad deedat and their debates against Christians but I just want to get an understanding of it for my own...
There are some really good books written by Shk. Ahmed Deedat on the similarities and differences between Islam and Christianity...
I'd suggest....


wassalam.
Reply

serena77
11-25-2011, 02:09 AM
umm ... the main bible? I wish i could help on this... there are so many different bibles... Ive read many times that the jerusalem bible is one of the more correct as far as how many translations it goes from the original to the current. the king james... i used to hate... mainly because it was one that was made for the common person who may not have a lot of education during king james' time.

as far as just one book though.... you have to look at all of the denominations... often times they go for one particular translation .... and of course... you know... when you translate something from one language to another no matter how careful you are... the words are just not going to keep their originial meaning....

i haven't reverted yet but the koran makes so much more sense to me....
serena
Reply

Amigo
11-25-2011, 02:20 AM
The best and basic first step comparison of two religions is to hear converts stories on both side of the traffic and compare them.
Reply

Abz2000
11-25-2011, 06:06 AM
i'll be honest - i sometimes read the bible for knowledge and comparison and do find some amazing prophecies in there - but i also find much which i can prove has been adulterated and outright fabricated.
still the prophecies and history (what little we can still find) are useful and these were our prophets, so it is not "their" book, - the corrupt scholars and politicians changed it.

when i do read it and am not looking for a specific verse, i just open anywhere randomly with eyes closed and start reading from the first verse or chapter if on that page.
that way - i let Allah choose what knowledge (good or bad) He wants me to gain.
Reply

Grace Seeker
12-10-2011, 01:18 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by missy
:sl:

Hey, I know that guy, Bart D. Ehrman, I’ve listened to some of his lectures on the NT, and I’ve got one of his books, “Misquoting Jesus: The story behind who changed the Bible and why” , I still have to check it out…haha.

But I don’t understand; he doesn’t believe the Bible to be the Word of God like the other Christians do, he calls it a “human book”…..then why is he still a Christian?
I guess he's Agnostic though….



There are some really good books written by Shk. Ahmed Deedat on the similarities and differences between Islam and Christianity...
I'd suggest....

wassalam.
I don't believe that he considers himself a Christian anymore. I could be wrong on that, but he certainly doesn't believe very many of the things that would be considered a mainstays of orthodox Christian beliefs.
Reply

Grace Seeker
12-10-2011, 01:26 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
ahhh ... seems like a lot of work.. can some one just tell me one book that i should read .. can't be that hard..

what is the MAIN book.. the MAIN BIBLE -
The Bible is not a single book. It is actually an entire library, a collection of books. Hence, one cannot simply read one book of the Bible and say that they understand Christianity (or, for that matter, Judaism either). About the closest thing for what you are looking for that I could recommend is the two-volume work reportedly by Luke known to us today as Luke and Acts. If you are looking for a summary of Christian beleifs that encompass and summarize the whole of the Bible, you might want to read some written especially for that purpose; there are several options I could recommend if you're really interested.
Reply

جوري
12-10-2011, 04:55 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Grace Seeker
I don't believe that he considers himself a Christian anymore. I could be wrong on that, but he certainly doesn't believe very many of the things that would be considered a mainstays of orthodox Christian beliefs.
His lack of belief stems from his scholarship of the all too frequent fabrications that aren't found in the so-called earlier texts.. one rather loses faith when one doesn't understand what God wants or what the hell the convoluted charade is all about...

best,
Reply

Ramadhan
12-10-2011, 09:05 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by ßlµêßêll
His lack of belief stems from his scholarship of the all too frequent fabrications that aren't found in the so-called earlier texts.. one rather loses faith when one doesn't understand what God wants or what the hell the convoluted charade is all about...

best,
Exactly.

Why would Bart remain believing in something that he has proved with evidence based on lies and fabrications?
Reply

Mikayeel
12-10-2011, 09:31 AM
What i always advice is to master your own religion first, and only then can you go ahead and look at other religions. Brother, am not saying that you lack in your islamic knowledge, what am trying to get at is for you to find out what you can improve on your deen and improve on that. I can tell you now, that is a much better way to spend your time.
Reply

MustafaMc
12-10-2011, 04:50 PM
Regarding the Bible, don't expect to read it (even the New Testament part) and come away with a clear understanding of basic Christian articles of faith. Brother Tyrion provided a good overview of basic Christian belief in post #10. The Nicene Creed is the best single explanation of Christian belief copied from the 'Catholic Encyclopedia' below:

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, and born of the Father before all ages. (God of God) light of light, true God of true God. Begotten not made, consubstantial to the Father, by whom all things were made. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven. And was incarnate of the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary and was made man; was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate, suffered and was buried; and the third day rose again according to the Scriptures. And ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father, and shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead, of whose Kingdom there shall be no end. And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceeds from the Father (and the Son), who together with the Father and the Son is to be adored and glorified, who spoke by the Prophets. And one holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. We confess one baptism for the remission of sins. And we look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.

GraceSeeker is a minister of the Methodist denomination and would be able to provide answers to specific questions you may have from a Protestant perspective.

I have read Bart Ehrman's book, "Lost Christianities" and I found it to be very well researched and scholarly, but a bit too much detail for the average person.

I have also read "MisGod'ed: A Roadmap of Guidance and Misguidance in the Abrahamic Religions" by Laurence Brown and found it be be an excellent book on comparative religion. I also highly recommend his companion book, "God'ed?: The Case for Islam as the Completion of Revelation". If I were to recommend a single book on comparative religion, it would be "MisGod'ed", which is a play off the word "misguided", but I would also recommend "God'ed" which is a play off the word "guided".

http://www.amazon.com/MisGoded-Guida...3533901&sr=1-1

http://www.amazon.com/Goded-Case-Islam-Completion-Revelation/dp/1419684604/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1323533901&sr=1-5
Reply

Pygoscelis
12-12-2011, 05:28 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
I am trying to educate myself more about christiantiy and what they believe but I am not quite sure where to start..


what is the holy book they refer to ... i know it is the bible, but which one? why are there different books by matthew or paul etc?

Where should I start?
There are a lot of differences in particular doctrine between Christianity and the other monotheistic faiths (Islam and Judaism) but the one thing that really sets it apart is the idea of vicarious redemption through faith. They believe that we are born sinful and that nothing we can do will redeem us. They believe that it is not our works that will save us, but our faith and acceptance of Jesus' "gift" of being killed for our sins. They some how see it as moral and just and good for a perfect innocent being (Jesus) to suffer in our place so that we can be whiped clean of sin and go to heaven no matter what evil things we've done. That's the core of it, and that is why of the monotheistic religions I find it the most distasteful.

If you want to get a full understanding of the actual doctrine, I'd advise you to start with gaining an understanding of Judaism, as Christianity is an offshoot.
Reply

Al-manar
12-12-2011, 07:52 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pygoscelis
If you want to get a full understanding of the actual doctrine, I'd advise you to start with gaining an understanding of Judaism, as Christianity is an offshoot.
That is true ... the theology of the new testament ,at most ,is nothing but a radical,creative development of old testament themes ... eg: the concept of blood atonement (Islam opposes it totally) that clearly has a Jewish background ....
Christians inherited the gross errors of the Jews ,developing them into disasters, in both theory and practice !..
Reply

Al-manar
12-12-2011, 08:11 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by missy
:sl:

Hey, I know that guy, Bart D. Ehrman, I’ve listened to some of his lectures on the NT, and I’ve got one of his books, “Misquoting Jesus: The story behind who changed the Bible and why” , I still have to check it out…haha.

But I don’t understand; he doesn’t believe the Bible to be the Word of God like the other Christians do, he calls it a “human book”…..then why is he still a Christian?
I guess he's Agnostic though….
Ehrmans' books among those of the most popular in the field of new testament ,they are very readable ,clear and straight ,though I find out that sometimes you will find very few contradictions between his points in his early works compared to the new ...
I read all his books , I would recommend:

1- The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings .(the one that benefited me most)
2- Misquoting Jesus.
3- Jesus, Interrupted
4- Forged: Writing in the Name of God--Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are.
5- Lost Christianities
Reply

Grace Seeker
12-12-2011, 10:36 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by MustafaMc
GraceSeeker is a minister of the Methodist denomination and would be able to provide answers to specific questions you may have from a Protestant perspective.
Notice that Mustafa acknowledges that I would be able to provide answers to questions from a Protestant perspective, but he does not recommend me when it comes to speaking to questions regarding Catholicism. Why is that, especially when I have studied both Catholic history and Catholic theology? The answer is simple: I myself am a protestant, not a Catholic.

For the same reason, I suggest you get your answers vis-a-vis Christianity from those who actually profess and believe the things you are asking questions about.
Reply

MustafaMc
12-12-2011, 11:26 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Grace Seeker
Notice that Mustafa acknowledges that I would be able to provide answers to questions from a Protestant perspective, but he does not recommend me when it comes to speaking to questions regarding Catholicism. Why is that, especially when I have studied both Catholic history and Catholic theology? The answer is simple: I myself am a protestant, not a Catholic.
Actually, I didn't know you were so well versed in Catholicism as I would venture to say that most Protestant ministers are not. You are welcome to correct me in any errors that I made in what I have written.
Reply

Grace Seeker
12-13-2011, 12:37 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by MustafaMc
Actually, I didn't know you were so well versed in Catholicism as I would venture to say that most Protestant ministers are not. You are welcome to correct me in any errors that I made in what I have written.
No, I agree with you. No matter how much I may be educated with regard to Catholicism, I still view it all through my protestant lens. I can, and do, try to be as objective as possible. But there is no way that I can be objective enough to not let my some personal bias come through.

I feel the same with regard to Bart Ehrman. He is, and deserves to be, a respected scholar with regard to the history of Christianity and the Bible. He is well informed. But like any other person, he also has preconceived ideas with regard to those topics. Thus, if one is wanting to know what and why believing Christians think on a matter, he has (if I am properly informed with regard to his present set of beliefs) basically disqualified himself because of his lack of belief in the very things that one is asking about. That doesn't mean that his views wouldn't ultimately be more correct, but it does mean that they don't represent what a believer believes. For that, I would suggest just as credible of a scholar, equally recognized in all the same areas that Bart Ehrman is, but who is himself a practicing believer: N.T. Wright. Books and audio available here. But as with Ehrman (several of whose books I also have), I caution that he is not always the easiest read -- though I have been privileged to hear him lecture in person, and even my wife (whose education is not in any field of religious studies) was as equally able to follow him as I.

Another well-qualfied contemporary Christian author, perhaps a bit easier for the uninitiated to read, is Scot McKnight.

For someone wishing to understand the core of the Christian faith at its simplest I recommend McKnight's book, The Jesus Creed or Wright's book Simply Jesus.
For someone wishing to better understand the Bible I recommend Wright's book, Scripture and the Authority of God or perhaps a Bible survey such as Henrietta Mears' classic, What The Bible Is All About. For someone who is brand new to it, I would even recommend the kid's version of it as being especially helpful.
Reply

Ramadhan
12-13-2011, 04:22 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Grace Seeker
I feel the same with regard to Bart Ehrman. He is, and deserves to be, a respected scholar with regard to the history of Christianity and the Bible. He is well informed. But like any other person, he also has preconceived ideas with regard to those topics. Thus, if one is wanting to know what and why believing Christians think on a matter, he has (if I am properly informed with regard to his present set of beliefs) basically disqualified himself because of his lack of belief in the very things that one is asking about. That doesn't mean that his views wouldn't ultimately be more correct, but it does mean that they don't represent what a believer believes.
Bart ehrman presents facts and evidence, hard cold findings from his scholarships.
Reply

Tyrion
12-13-2011, 04:50 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
Bart ehrman presents facts and evidence, hard cold findings from his scholarships.
But the OP is asking about Christianity, not the historicity of the Bible. To learn about Christianity, he needs to ask Christians and look at their books himself. Scholars like Ehrman are knowledgeable, but they look at religious texts as if they were only historical documents, so what they say isn't necessarily taken by believing Christians. You wouldn't be saying this if we were talking about other historians that dismissed the Qur'an as the writings of a man in ancient Arabia... Would you?

Also, I've found that the points about the Bible's historicity, while interesting and helpful for Muslims, usually aren't particularly troublesome for Christians nowadays. Many Christians don't subscribe to the concept of Biblical inerrancy anymore... (Which, by the way, is something a practicing Christian could do, while a practicing Muslim could not)
Reply

Ramadhan
12-13-2011, 07:29 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Tyrion
Scholars like Ehrman are knowledgeable, but they look at religious texts as if they were only historical documents, so what they say isn't necessarily taken by believing Christians.
Through his scholarships, Ehrman addressed individual, specific claims by christians, and proved with evidence about veracity of such claims such as: John couldn't have written the gospel of John in the bible.
Also, which believing christians are we talking about?

format_quote Originally Posted by Tyrion
You wouldn't be saying this if we were talking about other historians that dismissed the Qur'an as the writings of a man in ancient Arabia... Would you?
Ehrman rejected many specific claims made by christians with specific evidence and proof.
Can you please showed me a scholar who, based on evidence and scholarships equal to that of Ehrman, has proven that Qur'an was the writings of a man in ancient Arabia?
I'd really like to know.
We know that prophet Muhammad (saw) was conveyed with Qur'an, we don't need a "scholar" to tell us that. But we also make the claim that it originate from God (swt), now I'd like to see if there's a scholar who has proven Qur'an is not from God.
Remember, Ehrman does not just say "bible is error!" or that "bible is fabrication!"

format_quote Originally Posted by Tyrion
Also, I've found that the points about the Bible's historicity, while interesting and helpful for Muslims, usually aren't particularly troublesome for Christians nowadays. Many Christians don't subscribe to the concept of Biblical inerrancy anymore... (Which, by the way, is something a practicing Christian could do, while a practicing Muslim could not)
That's right.
That's why I'm surprised that you say believing christians do not necessarily subscribed to Ehrman's findings and evidence.
It seems for christians what matters is just faith. No evidence nor logic is necessary.
Reply

melonkali
12-13-2011, 08:29 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
I am trying to educate myself more about christiantiy and what they believe but I am not quite sure where to start..


what is the holy book they refer to ... i know it is the bible, but which one? why are there different books by matthew or paul etc?

Where should I start?
As a Christian who is visiting this forum to learn more about Islam, perhaps I can help. I'd start with a front to back read of the New Testament -- if using an English translation, I recommend the NIV (New International Version) as it was compiled over several years from the earliest extant text documents by a team of international biblical text and language scholars. A solid NIV study bible gives a summary and analysis of each New Testament book and its author.

Some Christians consider the present New Testament text infallible. I don't, since we have none of the original autographs of any of the books, only copies -- and text criticism hints at editing in those. There are four gospels -- three "synoptics", Matthew, Mark, Luke, which largely overlap but are addressed to different audiences, Matthew to a Jewish audience, Luke to Gentiles, and the shortest, Mark, perhaps one of the sources for the other two. The fourth gospel, John, was the last one written, and has a more Greek/Hellenistic tone and emphasis. The Acts of the Apostles was once a part of Luke, and is believed to have the same author. The Apostle Paul's epistles were the earliest written Christian texts. There are epistles of others, such as John, Peter and James, and finally the controversial Book of Revelation (end-times) attributed to the same Apostle John who wrote the Gospel of John and Johannine Epistles.

There is a fairly large volume of Christian Apocrypha, books which were rejected for the New Testament canon (which was established at the Council of Nicea in the 4th century), many for good reason. However, some of the Apocryphal books were widespread and widely accepted in the early Church, and reading these can give you a better idea of early Church beliefs; I and II Clement, The Shepherd of Hermas, The Didache, The Gospel of Thomas, The Epistle of Barnabas, The Odes of Solomon, The Wisdom of Solomon.

IMO, reading the works of the very early Church fathers is essential for understanding how the early Christians interpreted the New Testament teachings and practiced their beliefs. In the West (Rome), Clement of Rome, Ignatias, Polycarp. In the East (Alexandria), Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, Origen and Athenagoras. You'll find different expressions of Christian beliefs, perhaps because they were speaking to different audiences, and in some ways they actually held slightly different understandings, but all resulted in similar practices, rules of living, lifestyles, so these very early Christians were essentially unified in spirit and practice.

The first real schism was with Judaism (in areas where Judaism was practiced), the next with the gnostic sects, who taught a matter/spirit dualism which de-emphasized the need for "doing good works" in this life, since only the spirit and knowledge, not matter and this earthly life, were important -- or, as the more orthodox church fathers complained, they were lazy... We still have a lot of those, although many don't self-designate themselves as such.

Iraneus was the first of the church fathers to suggest the need for a more unified theology, and his writings about "heresies" ignited a new movement toward that goal. St. Augustine's writings are considered the essential primer on what became the official orthodox theology of the early Christian Church, in the 4th century, AD.

As you probably know, since that time, the Christian Church has split into factions upon factions, beginning with the Roman Catholic split from the Orthodox Church (usually referred to, in Western countries, as the Greek or Eastern Orthodox Church), then the Protestant movement's split from the Roman Catholic Church, beginning with Martin Luther (from what I've read, the Catholic Church was badly corrupted at that time), and since then it all cascaded to the point that today there are so many conflicting and contradictory Christian theologies, there is no such thing as "A" Christian theology, there are dozens -- hundreds, if you count all the smaller sects and factions. That's why many of us Christians go back and study these very early writings, to better understand how the contemporaries of Jesus (the Apostles) and their students/disciples understood and practiced Christianity.

Hope this helps. Sorry to be so wordy, but this is the only subject on this forum I know a little something about -- most of the time I'll be a lurking reader and asking questions. rebecca
Reply

syed1
12-16-2011, 07:48 PM
Hi there Rebecca, thanks for your help. will definitely grab a hold of the NT and give it a read.
Reply

GuestFellow
12-16-2011, 11:35 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
I am trying to educate myself more about christiantiy and what they believe but I am not quite sure where to start..


what is the holy book they refer to ... i know it is the bible, but which one? why are there different books by matthew or paul etc?

Where should I start?
Salaam,


BBC Christianity...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/

There is a book called teach yourself Christianity. You should read it. Google it.
Reply

Pen
12-19-2011, 04:28 AM
Ironically Christianity and their their scriptures, The Bible, are too very different things.

Christianity usually includes the belief in original sin, that Jesus was sacrificed to save mankind from its sins, and the trinity, including the idea of the manhood of God/Godhood of a man in the form of Jesus.

The concept of the Trinity and Jesus being God are concepts that weren't yet around for the earliest Christians, whose belief was still inherently Judaic and unitarian therefore they aren't found in the Bible. The notions of original sin and Jesus being sacraficed to save mankind from its sin come from the the Epistles by Paul of Tarsis, concepts/teachings which aren't found in the rest of the Bible (The Old Testament and the Gospels). Therefore, though one would expect reading The Bible would teach one a lot about Christianity, it doesn't because the majority of scriptures aren't ingrained with the kind of concepts that are later became embedded in Christianity.
Reply

Ramadhan
12-19-2011, 08:12 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pen
Ironically Christianity and their their scriptures, The Bible, are too very different things.

Christianity usually includes the belief in original sin, that Jesus was sacrificed to save mankind from its sins, and the trinity, including the idea of the manhood of God/Godhood of a man in the form of Jesus.

The concept of the Trinity and Jesus being God are concepts that weren't yet around for the earliest Christians, whose belief was still inherently Judaic and unitarian therefore they aren't found in the Bible. The notions of original sin and Jesus being sacraficed to save mankind from its sin come from the the Epistles by Paul of Tarsis, concepts/teachings which aren't found in the rest of the Bible (The Old Testament and the Gospels). Therefore, though one would expect reading The Bible would teach one a lot about Christianity, it doesn't because the majority of scriptures aren't ingrained with the kind of concepts that are later became embedded in Christianity.
First post, and yet already wrote such a clear, succinct and yet complete brief about christianity.
I'm impressed.
Reply

kaijia
12-27-2011, 10:41 PM
Salam! At least one other person on here has written that you should read and study the Qur'an and hadiths. Do that. Don't get into studying the bible until you have the Qur'an and hadiths firmly in you. I studied the bible for years as a christian. I was a 'born-again' christian for years and wanted to go to bible college to learn biblical hebrew so I could read the old testament in its original language. There's a lot to study in the bible and the fact that there are thousands of denominations in christianity shows that they don't even agree on what things exactly are taught. I gave all that up when I left christianity for several different reasons. You've been told about Bart Ehrman who regrettably became an atheist. Others you can research are Dr Gary Miller (ex Canadian missionary), Sheikh Yusuf Estes, and Dr Laurence Brown. Keep going with those guys and they won't put you wrong.
Reply

CuriousIncident
01-07-2012, 06:48 AM
Wow. Reading this thread made me realise how simple and straightforward Islam is. Unlike Christianity.
Reply

serena77
01-09-2012, 11:26 PM
islam is extremely straightforward. So much of it has to w/ intentions.... and the information is so easy to find online.
I agree.. christianity was anything but.
Serena
Reply

Good brother
01-09-2012, 11:35 PM
i suggest this books (available online )
The True Message of Jesus Christ
JESUS : A PROPHET, NOT A SON, OF GOD
Reply

Burninglight
02-08-2012, 02:57 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by syed1
I am trying to educate myself more about christiantiy and what they believe but I am not quite sure where to start..


what is the holy book they refer to ... i know it is the bible, but which one? why are there different books by matthew or paul etc?

Where should I start?
I usually tell people to begin with the book of John
Reply

Burninglight
02-08-2012, 03:15 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Pen
Ironically Christianity and their their scriptures, The Bible, are too very different things.

Christianity usually includes the belief in original sin, that Jesus was sacrificed to save mankind from its sins, and the trinity, including the idea of the manhood of God/Godhood of a man in the form of Jesus.

The concept of the Trinity and Jesus being God are concepts that weren't yet around for the earliest Christians, whose belief was still inherently Judaic and unitarian therefore they aren't found in the Bible. The notions of original sin and Jesus being sacraficed to save mankind from its sin come from the the Epistles by Paul of Tarsis, concepts/teachings which aren't found in the rest of the Bible (The Old Testament and the Gospels). Therefore, though one would expect reading The Bible would teach one a lot about Christianity, it doesn't because the majority of scriptures aren't ingrained with the kind of concepts that are later became embedded in Christianity.
You almost have it figured but there are some hits and misses there. The early Christians have the same theology, Paul just made it crystal clear. If you look as far back as Isaiah 53 it prophecies concern why Jesus was to come and die for our sin and how we all have gone astray turning everyone to his own way and how none are right. John 3:16 speaks of how God loves us and gave us His son to save us from sin. I can agree with dropping the term Christianity and follow the Bible if you want to live for God. But the Bible will show you that Christ is its message even without Paul, but Paul galvanized the message. Luke work with Paul. Read Luke 1, and see how carefully you get the full message from Luke.
Reply

Burninglight
02-08-2012, 03:24 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Good brother
i suggest this books (available online )
The True Message of Jesus Christ
JESUS : A PROPHET, NOT A SON, OF GOD
He is a prophet yes, but more than one. Then why did God say, "This is my beloved son in whom I am well please listen to Him?" If God called Him son, who are we to say different than what God spoke an an audible voice in front of witnesses recorded in the Bible?
Reply

Ramadhan
02-08-2012, 03:57 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
The early Christians have the same theology,
Early christians did not have the same theology.

format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
Paul just made it crystal clear.
Paul was the one who created the whole "god came down to earth and died because that is the only way god can redeem humans sins, and yet sins remain". This concept is never in the OT nor in the four canonical gospels and nor in any other hundreds gospels that were burned down and destroyed by nicea council and constantine.
Reply

Ramadhan
02-08-2012, 04:05 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
He is a prophet yes, but more than one. Then why did God say, "This is my beloved son in whom I am well please listen to Him?" If God called Him son, who are we to say different than what God spoke an an audible voice in front of witnesses recorded in the Bible?

According to bible, Jesus is not the only son of God:


  1. Jacob is God's son and firstborn: "Israel is my son, even my firstborn" Exodus 4:22.


  1. Solomon is God's son "He shall build an house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son": 2 Samuel 7:13-14.


  1. Ephraim is God's firstborn: "for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn." Jeremiah 31:9 (who is God's firstborn? Israel or Ephraim?).


  1. Adam is the son of God "Adam, which was the son of God." Luke 3:38.


  1. Common people (you and me) are the sons of God: "Ye are the children of the LORD your God" Deuteronomy 14:1. "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God" Romans 8:14. "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name:" John 1:12. "That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;" Philippians 2:15. "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: ... now are we the sons of God" 1 John 3:1-2. "When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" Job 38:7. "Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD," Job 2:1. "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD," Job 1:6. "when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men," Genesis 6:4. "That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair" Genesis 6:2

As we can see, the use of the term "son of God" when describing normal human beings was not at all an uncommon practice among Jesus' people.
Well then, was Jesus the only begotten son of God? Read Psalms 2:7
"I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me (King David, King), Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.".
Reply

Burninglight
02-08-2012, 06:32 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
According to bible, Jesus is not the only son of God:
True, but Jesus was unique in that God spoke saying Jesus is His "Beloved Son in whom (He) I AM is well pleased hear ye Him." he never said that about the other prophets. He told us to listen to Jesus.
Last post for now, good night
Reply

Tyrion
02-08-2012, 07:15 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
True, but Jesus was unique in that God spoke saying Jesus is His "Beloved Son in whom (He) I AM is well pleased hear ye Him." he never said that about the other prophets. He told us to listen to Jesus.
Last post for now, good night
Try watching some debates on youtube to get a clearer picture of all the criticisms being laid out. Also, don't be afraid to use your intellect when thinking about these things. Does it really make sense to YOU that an almighty God would have a son (who was also somehow Himself), and then send that son to die a painful death for one of his creations? Does vicarious redemption even sound remotely just to you? Also remember that the Bible may not be as well preserved or free of error as you might have been told...
Reply

Ramadhan
02-08-2012, 08:24 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
True, but Jesus was unique in that God spoke saying Jesus is His "Beloved Son in whom (He) I AM is well pleased hear ye Him." he never said that about the other prophets.
You keep shifting your stance and argument. Before this, you said that Jesus was special because he is God's son. And I have shown you from bible that God's sons is not only Jesus (pbuh). You call yourself "true biblical christian" and why is it that you are reluctant in obeying and listening to the bible verses that we showed you?


format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
He told us to listen to Jesus.
And Jesus never told you to worship him, and yet christians worship him.
Does christians listen to Jesus(pbuh)?
Reply

Burninglight
02-08-2012, 06:30 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
You keep shifting your stance and argument. Before this, you said that Jesus was special because he is God's son. And I have shown you from bible that God's sons is not only Jesus (pbuh). You call yourself "true biblical christian" and why is it that you are reluctant in obeying and listening to the bible verses that we showed you?
I didn't shift my stance. I am simply elaborating on why he is special for being the son of God.
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
And Jesus never told you to worship him, and yet christians worship him.
Does christians listen to Jesus(pbuh)?
That is true, but he never told me not to,. and he didn't stop others from worshipping him. Angels have stopped people from worshipping them, and the apostles have stopped people from trying to worship them, because of the miracles they did in the name of Jesus.
Reply

Burninglight
02-08-2012, 06:45 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Tyrion
Try watching some debates on youtube to get a clearer picture of all the criticisms being laid out. Also, don't be afraid to use your intellect when thinking about these things. Does it really make sense to YOU that an almighty God would have a son (who was also somehow Himself), and then send that son to die a painful death for one of his creations? Does vicarious redemption even sound remotely just to you? Also remember that the Bible may not be as well preserved or free of error as you might have been told...
I do use my intellect, and I can say honestly it doesn't make sense; it is not reasonable, and I think and wonder why God could not just have given all forgivness without the death of Jesus. However, it is not logical that God always was having no beginning or end. It is not logical that God can see the past, present and future all at the same time. It is not logical that God can speak the worlds into existence and create life from nothing.

Don't forget the OT shadow representation of the Passover and of the sacraficed lambs for the sin of the people; Jesus is considered the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world for those that meet God on His terms. He fufills the shadow of the OT practice of shedding blood for atonement. The blood on the door post spared death to the first born from the death angel. Without the blood of Christ sprinkled on our hearts the death angel claims for hell.

So, if I throw out God's message of redemption through and only through Christ, how shall I escape the judgment as the Scriptures say of God if I neglect so great a salvation? If I don't believe and meet God on His terms, I might as well eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow I die.

It is written "God's ways are not our ways and as high as the heavens are from the earth are His ways from ours." So in all my intellect I don't care to lean to my own understanding, but I rather trust the word of God over man. For it is written: "There is a way that seems right to a man but that way leads to death" It is written: "He that has the son has life; he that has not the son has not life, but the wrath of God abides on him" my intellect tells me I don't want the wrath of God hanging over my head. Do you?
I can see why your mood is stressed :)
Reply

Ramadhan
02-09-2012, 01:27 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
I didn't shift my stance. I am simply elaborating on why he is special for being the son of God.
Ephraim is also special for being the son of God, as he was the Firstborn.
so, are you going to worship him as well?

format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
That is true, but he never told me not to,. and he didn't stop others from worshipping him.
Please show me the verses where he didn't stop others from worshipping him, the way christians are worshipping Jesus (pbuh) now.
Just because people fell at his feet does not mean they worshipped him, let alone worshipped him as God.

i can show you biblical verses where people "worshipped" other prophets such as David and Solomon (pbut).
Reply

Burninglight
02-09-2012, 07:02 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
Ephraim is also special for being the son of God, as he was the Firstborn.
so, are you going to worship him as well?
God didn't say of Ephraim "This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well please hear Him" Ephraim didn't give his life on the cross for the sin of the world; Ephraim wasn't without sin and the list can go on and on. Ephraim wasn't prophecied to be the Messiah and Everlasting father & Mighty God etc etc etc- Jesus was
Reply

Burninglight
02-09-2012, 07:05 AM
Really, good night
:exhausted
Reply

MustafaMc
02-09-2012, 10:10 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
I think and wonder why God could not just have given all forgivness without the death of Jesus.
What about Matthew 6:12 in the Lord's Prayer And forgive us our debts (Luke 11:4 says 'forgive us our sins'),as we also have forgiven our debtors. What debt could we owe to God except that of sin? In verse 14 Jesus is quoted as saying For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father (God) will also forgive you. He did not say, "If you believe that I am God in the flesh and that I will die on the cross for your sins, then your heavenly Father will forgive you your sins."

A very similar passage follows Jesus apparently cursing a fig tree in Mark 11:24-25 Therefore I say to you, all things for which you pray and ask, believe that you have received them, and they will be granted you. Whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone, so that your Father who is in heaven will also forgive you your transgressions.

Not that I believe Jesus said this, but he is quoted as saying 'uour sins are forgiven in Matthew 9:2 and Mark 2:5 And they brought to Him a paralytic lying on a bed. Seeing their faith, Jesus said to the paralytic, “Take courage, son; your sins are forgiven.” There is no indication that the man even repented of his sins, but he was forgiven before Jesus' supposed death. If Jesus could forgive sins (I don't believe he can), then surely the Father could forgive sins per the Lord's Prayer.

Surely every Christian knows that 'blasphemy against the Spirit' will not be forgiven, but do they also know that every other sin shall be forgiven, presumably with repentance? Matthew 12:31 Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven people, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. Note that blasphemy is an impious utterance or action concerning God or sacred things. The Quran says in 19:88-92 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" Indeed you have put forth a thing most monstrous! At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin, that they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious. For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

Luke 7:46-47 gives another instance of forgiveness You did not anoint My head with oil, but she anointed My feet with perfume. For this reason I say to you, her sins, which are many, have been forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little.”

Not that I believe Jesus was crucified, but he is quoted as saying on the cross, But Jesus was saying, “ Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.” And they cast lots, dividing up His garments among themselves. Luke 23:34.
So, if I throw out God's message of redemption through and only through Christ, how shall I escape the judgment as the Scriptures say of God if I neglect so great a salvation?
Where besides the letters of Paul is the doctrine of 'redemption through Christ' taught? Surely not on the lips of Jesus!
Reply

Ramadhan
02-09-2012, 04:05 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
Ephraim didn't give his life on the cross for the sin of the world;
neither did Jesus (pbuh)

format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
Ephraim wasn't prophecied to be the Messiah and Everlasting father & Mighty God
neither was jesus (pbuh).
are you saying jesus (pbuh) is everlasting father and mighty god?
please provide evidence.

format_quote Originally Posted by Burninglight
Jesus was
provide evidence that jesus explicitly said those things without any question.
Reply

Ramadhan
02-09-2012, 04:05 PM
Burninglight, why are you ignoring your own biblical verses that we have shown you?
Reply

Burninglight
02-13-2012, 11:20 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
Early christians did not have the same theology.
Forgive my ignorance, but what was different? I thought that during Paul's life time is all early Christianity all the way until the time of Constantine. So what is specifically different before and after?
format_quote Originally Posted by Ramadhan
Paul was the one who created the whole "god came down to earth and died because that is the only way god can redeem humans sins, and yet sins remain". This concept is never in the OT nor in the four canonical gospels and nor in any other hundreds gospels that were burned down and destroyed by nicea council and constantine.
Paul got all his information from the Scriptures Look at Isaiah 53 and look at 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Is 53 : Who has believed what he has heard from us?[a]
And to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?
2 For he grew up before him like a young plant,
and like a root out of dry ground;
he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
and no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He was despised and rejected[b] by men;
a man of sorrows,[c] and acquainted with[d] grief;[e]
and as one from whom men hide their faces[f]
he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
5 But he was pierced for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his wounds we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted,
yet he opened not his mouth;
like a lamb that is led to the slaughter,
and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent,
so he opened not his mouth.
8 By oppression and judgment he was taken away;
and as for his generation, who considered
that he was cut off out of the land of the living,
stricken for the transgression of my people?
9 And they made his grave with the wicked
and with a rich man in his death,
although he had done no violence,
and there was no deceit in his mouth. 10 Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him;
he has put him to grief;[g]
when his soul makes[h] an offering for guilt,
he shall see his offspring; he shall prolong his days;
the will of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
11 Out of the anguish of his soul he shall see[i] and be satisfied;
by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant,
make many to be accounted righteous,
and he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore I will divide him a portion with the many,[j]
and he shall divide the spoil with the strong,[k]
because he poured out his soul to death
and was numbered with the transgressors;
yet he bore the sin of many,
and makes intercession for the transgressors.
Reply

Burninglight
02-13-2012, 11:38 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by MustafaMc
What about Matthew 6:12 in the Lord's Prayer And forgive us our debts (Luke 11:4 says 'forgive us our sins'),as we also have forgiven our debtors. What debt could we owe to God except that of sin? In verse 14 Jesus is quoted as saying For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father (God) will also forgive you. He did not say, "If you believe that I am God in the flesh and that I will die on the cross for your sins, then your heavenly Father will forgive you your sins."

A very similar passage follows Jesus apparently cursing a fig tree in Mark 11:24-25 Therefore I say to you, all things for which you pray and ask, believe that you have received them, and they will be granted you. Whenever you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone, so that your Father who is in heaven will also forgive you your transgressions.

Not that I believe Jesus said this, but he is quoted as saying 'uour sins are forgiven in Matthew 9:2 and Mark 2:5 And they brought to Him a paralytic lying on a bed. Seeing their faith, Jesus said to the paralytic, “Take courage, son; your sins are forgiven.” There is no indication that the man even repented of his sins, but he was forgiven before Jesus' supposed death. If Jesus could forgive sins (I don't believe he can), then surely the Father could forgive sins per the Lord's Prayer.

Surely every Christian knows that 'blasphemy against the Spirit' will not be forgiven, but do they also know that every other sin shall be forgiven, presumably with repentance? Matthew 12:31 Therefore I say to you, any sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven people, but blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven. Note that blasphemy is an impious utterance or action concerning God or sacred things. The Quran says in 19:88-92 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" Indeed you have put forth a thing most monstrous! At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin, that they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious. For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.

Luke 7:46-47 gives another instance of forgiveness You did not anoint My head with oil, but she anointed My feet with perfume. For this reason I say to you, her sins, which are many, have been forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little.”

Not that I believe Jesus was crucified, but he is quoted as saying on the cross, But Jesus was saying, “ Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.” And they cast lots, dividing up His garments among themselves. Luke 23:34.
Where besides the letters of Paul is the doctrine of 'redemption through Christ' taught? Surely not on the lips of Jesus!
The way I see this is if we do believe he died for our sin or as you said, "If you believe that I am God in the flesh and that I will die on the cross for your sins...." then it will do you NO good if you don't forgive others for their sins against you. We are constantly sinning against God. Jesus said, in other places that "You will all die in your sin if you do not believe I am He"

A person can be forgiven by me or by God for certain sins but not others. For instance, Jesus said forgive for they know not what they do, God will forgive them for what they did to Jesus but not the rest of their sins unless they repent and do the will of God whch is to believe on Him whom He sent
Reply

Burninglight
02-13-2012, 11:49 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by MustafaMc
Where besides the letters of Paul is the doctrine of 'redemption through Christ' taught? Surely not on the lips of Jesus!
Read Isaiah 53
Look at John and can get others;16 “For God so loved the world,[i] that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. 19 And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. 20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. 21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”
Reply

MoreInfo:)
04-24-2012, 09:16 PM
Hi. Perhaps I can explain where Christians are coming from, so you will see the roots :)... This is the PROPHET HOSEA--I do not know whether Hosea is RECOGNIZED BY YOU, but HERE IT IS:--FROM THE HEBREW BIBLE, Hosea 2:16...And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, [that] thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali. For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name. The prophecy goes on to say that those WHO WERE NOT HIS PEOPLE, WOULD BE HIS PEOPLE. Not JEWS in name only would be His, but those WHO OBEYED HIM would be--CIRCUMCISED IN HEART. <3+WENDY
Reply

Al-manar
04-25-2012, 12:19 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by MoreInfo:)
Hi. Perhaps I can explain where Christians are coming from, so you will see the roots :)... This is the PROPHET HOSEA--I do not know whether Hosea is RECOGNIZED BY YOU, but HERE IT IS:--FROM THE HEBREW BIBLE, Hosea 2:16.. The prophecy goes on to say that those WHO WERE NOT HIS PEOPLE, WOULD BE HIS PEOPLE. Not JEWS in name only would be His, but those WHO OBEYED HIM would be--CIRCUMCISED IN HEART.


Greetings


I think you should have noted that your explanation of Hosea 2:16 ,is based on the Pauline Hermeneutic of

Romans 9:25 even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles? 25 As he says in Hosea:“I will call them ‘my people’ who are not my people;and I will call her ‘my loved one’ who is not my loved one,”26 and, “In the very place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’there they will be called ‘children of the living God .....

The Pauline exegesis of that passage of Hosea (and all the passages he quouted from the old testament) ,is nothing but a misapplication !

To begin with ,If you study the Hosea passages in their original contexts, the clear and unmistakable antecedent of the “people” in question is the ten tribes of the Northern Kingdom of ethnic Israel. not the Gentiles !

there are more problems with assuming the passage to be a prophecy of christianity ,but let's save it to another post...

regards
Reply

Eric H
04-25-2012, 04:20 AM
Greetings and peace be with you all,

First a short story to explain Judaism.

A secular Jew said to the Rabi, if you can recite the entire Jewish scriptures the Tanakh, standing on one leg, then I shall renounce my ways and return to the synagogue.

The Rabi lifted one leg of the ground and said, ‘Hear o Israel the Lord your God is one. Thou shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength, and love your neighbour as you love yourself, all the rest is commentary, and he put his foot down.

Jesus went on to say about the two greatest commandments, all the law and the prophets of God hang and depend on these two commandments. He gave the parable of the Good Samaritan, to explain these commandments, the Jews and the Samaritans were considered enemies.

Luke 10; 25-37

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...37&version=NIV

In the spirit of praying for a greater interfaith friendship and understanding

Eric
Reply

GodIsAll
04-25-2012, 04:09 PM
Don't we all get so caught up in what isn't that important?
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!