bro Jedi, I am not saying that Assad is a Muslim leader, but the point i am trying to drive in is that this is all instigated by NATO, UN and the Dajjal media, none of this happened until the U.S began to instigate tensions in the region, and they have been working on it for quite a while now. so the last thing we should be doing is asking them to sort out the problem which they themselves are creating and rubbing their hands in glee at.
next they will create sectarian violence:
Verily. the turmoil would come from this side, from where appear the horns of Satan and you would strike the necks of one another;
and i don't think we should be falling for it, NATO will not give us a solution, only more death and destruction.
the solution will come when when we unite under Khliafah, and all the peoples of those lands automatically accept it rather than the authority their current Kafir governments. then those kafir governments will be facing a united front instead of a few people in their respective "dominions".
while at the same time, the U.N controllers are offering their "new world order" as the solution.
right now, from the political situation in libya, tunisia, egypt and iraq, it seems we are inclining towards the "new kafir order" solution.
which is headed in the total opposite direction from where we're already at.
follow the links and dates in this timeline:
US will allocate $5m to finance Syria opposition
February 18, 2006
The United States will allocate $5 million to finance the Syrian opposition, the State Department said yesterday, two days after announcing a similar initiative for the Iranian opposition.
The State Department said in a statement that it will give the money
“to accelerate the work of reformers in Syria.”
The money would come from the department’s Middle East Partnership Initiative, it said.
The State Department announced on Wednesday that it would seek $75 million to step up efforts — through extra broadcasts and other activities — to influence democratic change in Iran.
Meanwhile, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that the United States wants to strengthen its sanctions against Syria and is trying to convince other nations to follow suit.
“We intend to use the Syrian Accountability Act and use it to its fullest,” the top US diplomat told Congress, referring to a 2003 law that allows the US administration to impose sanctions against Syria. The law, which provides for a series of six diplomatic, economic and financial sanctions, was partially applied in May 2004 by President George W. Bush, but some sanctions have yet to be used.
“The Syrian Accountability Act is a very important tool,” Rice told the House of Representatives International Relations Committee.
“We’ve used a great deal of it,” she recalled.
the uk government seems to have plotted against itself when it made a law defining itself as a terrorist:
Since 1993, regime change by the use of force has been deemed an act of terrorism in UK law.
Section 2(2) of the Reinsurance (Acts of Terrorism) Act 1993 states:
"In this section 'acts of terrorism' means acts of persons acting on behalf of, or in connection with,
any organisation which carries out activities directed towards the overthrowing or influencing,
by force or violence, of Her Majesty's government in the United Kingdom or any other government de jure or de facto."
Given that they readily admit to leading regime change in Iraq, libya, and others, they leave themselves open to prosecution under section 56 of the Terrorism Act 2000, for which the punishment, on conviction, is life imprisonment.
and anyone who works for the british government or encourages them would also become one under the terrorism act of 2006
This section applies to a statement that is likely to be understood by some or all of the members of the public to whom it is published as a direct or indirect encouragement or other inducement to them to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism or Convention offences.
(2)A person commits an offence if—
(a)he publishes a statement to which this section applies or causes another to publish such a statement; and
(b)at the time he publishes it or causes it to be published, he—
(i)intends members of the public to be directly or indirectly encouraged or otherwise induced by the statement to commit, prepare or instigate acts of terrorism or Convention offences; or
(ii)is reckless as to whether members of the public will be directly or indirectly encouraged or otherwise induced by the statement to commit, prepare or instigate such acts or offences.
(3)For the purposes of this section, the statements that are likely to be understood by members of the public as indirectly encouraging the commission or preparation of acts of terrorism or Convention offences include every statement which—
(a)glorifies the commission or preparation (whether in the past, in the future or generally) of such acts or offences; and
(b)is a statement from which those members of the public could reasonably be expected to infer that what is being glorified is being glorified as conduct that should be emulated by them in existing circumstances.
(4)For the purposes of this section the questions how a statement is likely to be understood and what members of the public could reasonably be expected to infer from it must be determined having regard both—
(a)to the contents of the statement as a whole; and
(b)to the circumstances and manner of its publication.
(5)It is irrelevant for the purposes of subsections (1) to (3)—
(a)whether anything mentioned in those subsections relates to the commission, preparation or instigation of one or more particular acts of terrorism or Convention offences, of acts of terrorism or Convention offences of a particular description or of acts of terrorism or Convention offences generally; and,
(b)whether any person is in fact encouraged or induced by the statement to commit, prepare or instigate any such act or offence.
They swore their strongest oaths by Allah that if a warner came to them,
they would follow his guidance better than any (other) of the Peoples:
but when a warner came to them, it has only increased their flight (from righteousness) -
On account of their arrogance in the land and their plotting of Evil.
But the plotting of Evil will hem in only the authors thereof.
Now are they but looking for the way the ancients were dealt with?
But no change wilt thou find in Allah's way (of dealing):
no turning off wilt thou find in Allah's way (of dealing).
Do they not travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those before them - though they were superior to them in strength?
Nor is Allah to be frustrated by anything whatever in the heavens or on earth:
for He is All-Knowing, All-Powerful.
Fatir - 35:42-44