View Full Version : The Miracle of Splitting of the Moon
10-26-2013, 02:32 AM
In the Name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.
The Hour is nigh, and the moon is split. * But if they see a sign, they turn away, and say: "This is evident magic."
Philosophers and their unreasoning imitators, who want to eclipse with their vicious delusions the Splitting of the Moon, which is a miracle of Muhammad (PBUH) that shines like the moon, say: "If the Splitting of the Moon had occurred, it would have been known to the whole world and would have been related throughout the subsequent history of man."
there was, therefore, nothing to necessitate that it should have been seen all over the world and passed into the general histories. For now, listen to Five Points out of many that will scatter those clouds of delusion concerning the Splitting of the Moon.
- Since the Splitting of the Moon was demonstrated as an evidence of prophethood before a gathering who denied it, and happened instantaneously, at night when people were asleep;
- and since there were obstacles hindering the sighting of it such as mist, clouds, and time-differences between different parts of the world;
- and since at that time science and civilization were not widespread, and observation of the skies was very limited, and the event itself was exceptional,
The extreme stubbornness of the unbelievers there at that time is well-known and is recorded in history. And yet, when the All-Wise Qur'an announced this event to the whole world through saying:
And the moon is split,
not one of those unbelievers, who denied the Qur'an, spoke up to give the lie to this verse; that is, not one of them denied the event it was announcing. If the event had not been considered as a definite fact by the unbelievers at that time, they would have taken the verse as a pretext, denied it in a most fearsome manner, and tried to attack and overthrow Muhammad's (PBUH) claim to prophethood. However, the biographies of the Prophet and histories mentioning the event relate nothing to suggest that the unbelievers denied it. The only thing that history relates is, as the verse:
And [they] say, "This is evident magic,"
points out, the unbelievers who saw the event declared it to be magic, and said that if the caravans in other places had seen it, it was true, otherwise he had bewitched them. The caravans arriving the following morning from the Yemen and other places announced that they had seen such a happening. So the unbelievers then said of the Pride of All the Worlds (PBUH) that, God forbid, the magic of Abu Talib's orphan had affected the heavens.2
The majority of the most illustrious scholars, like Sa'd al-Din Taftazani, declared that like the Prophet had satisfied the thirst of a whole army with water flowing from his fingers, and the whole congregation had heard a dry wooden post against which Muhammad (PBUH) had leant while delivering the sermon weep on being separated from him, the Splitting of the Moon, too, was mutawatir,3 that is, had been transmitted by numerous authorities. That is to say, these events had been passed down from group to group forming such a vast congregation that a conspiracy to lie would have been impossible. Like the appearance of the famous Haley's Comet a thousand years ago had been unanimously reported, and the existence of the island of Ceylon was certain due to unanimous reports, although we had not seen it.
And so, it is unreasonable to foster baseless doubts in such certain, witnessed matters. It is enough that they are not impossible. And as for the Splitting of the Moon, it is quite as possible as a mountain's splitting with a volcanic eruption.
Miracles are for proving claims to prophethood and for convincing those who deny those claims, they are not for compelling people to believe. Therefore, miracles have to be manifested to those who hear claims to prophethood at a degree that will persuade them. Just as it would be contrary to the All-Wise and Glorious One's wisdom to display them all over the world or in so self-evident a manner that all would be compelled to believe, so would it also be contrary to the mystery of man's accountability. For this accountability requires "opening the door to the reason and not removing the power of choice." If the All-Wise Creator had left the moon split for one or two hours in order to show it to the whole world as the philosophers wished, and it had been recorded in all the general histories of man, then it would have been like all other occurrences in the heavens and would not have been an evidence to Muhammad's (PBUH) claim to prophethood nor been special to his messengership. Or else it would have been such a self-evident miracle that it would have negated the power of choice, a part of man's reason, compelling it to accept it; willy-nilly, it would have had to assent to his prophethood. Someone with a coal-like spirit like Abu Jahl would have remained at the same level as someone with a diamond-like spirit like Abu Bakr the Veracious; the mystery of man's accountability would have been lost. It was due to this mystery that, being both instantaneous, and at nighttime, and at a time of sleep, and time differences, mist, and cloud and other obstacles concealing it, it was not shown to the whole world and did not pass into the histories.
Since this event occurred instantaneously at night while everyone was sleeping, of course it was not seen all over the world. Even if some people had seen it, they would not have believed their eyes. And even if it had made them believe, such a significant event would not have become a permanent source for future histories through isolated individual reports.
In some books it is written that after the moon split into two halves, it fell to earth, but veracious scholars have rejected such additions, saying that they were perhaps added by dissemblers with the intention of reducing to nothing the value of this evident miracle.
And, for example, just as the same time in England and Spain, which were then enveloped in mists of ignorance, would have been just after sunset, in America daytime, and in China and Japan morning, so too in other places there would have been other obstacles preventing it being seen. Now consider these unreasoning objectors who say that the histories of peoples like the English, Chinese, Japanese, and Americans do not mention it, and that therefore it did not occur. A thousand curses be on the heads of those who toady to Europe and repeat such things.
The Splitting of the Moon happened neither of its own accord in consequence of certain causes, nor as a result of chance, nor was it a natural event that occurred through the ordinary laws of nature. Rather, the All-Wise Creator of the Sun and the Moon caused it to happen as something out of the ordinary in order to confirm His Messenger's messengership and to illuminate his claim.
As the mystery of guidance, the mystery of human accountability, and the wisdom of messengership required, it was demonstrated as a convincing proof to certain people specified by dominical wisdom. The mystery of wisdom required that it was not shown to people in every region of the world, who had not yet heard of Muhammad's (PBUH) claim to prophet-hood. Numerous obstacles prevented them, therefore, such as mist, cloud, and time-differences, and the fact that in some countries the moon had not risen, and in others the sun had risen, while in others it was morning, and in yet others the sun had just set.
If it had been shown to all and sundry, it would have been shown as a result of the Sign of Muhammad (PBUH), and a miracle of prophethood, in which case his messengership would have been so manifest that everyone would have been compelled to affirm it. No choice would have remained for the reason. And belief is attained through man's power of choice and his reason. The mystery of human accountability would have gone for nothing. And if it had been shown merely as an occurrence in the heavens, its connection with Muhammad's (PBUH) messengership would have been severed, and it would have retained no peculiarity to him.
To Conclude:There is no longer any doubt concerning the possibility that the Splitting of the Moon occurred; it has been proved decisively. And now we shall mention six4 of the many evidences pointing to its occurrence.
These six evidences prove the Splitting of the Moon as clearly as the sun.
- The concurrence of the Companions of the Prophet, who were all men ofjustice, on its occurrence.
- Their agreement in expounding the verse, And the moon is splitof all exacting commentators on the Qur'an.
- The fact that, relying on numerous different chains of authorities and lines of transmission, all the scholars of the Prophetic Hadiths and transmitters of the sound narrations narrated the event.5
- The testimony of all the saints and the veracious, those who receive inspiration, and uncover the mysteries of the creation.
- The confirmation of learned scholars and theologians, whose ways differ greatly from one another.
- The fact that the Community of Muhammad (PBUH) accepted its occurrence, which, on an established principle, never agrees upon error.6
Up to here this Addendum has been in the name of establishing the truth, and for the sake of silencing those enemies who deny it. Its concluding sentences will now be in the name of the truth and for the sake of belief. Indeed, establishing the truth spoke as above, now the truth speaks.
The Seal of the Office of Prophethood, who was the luminous moon of its heaven, proved his sainthood through his Ascension. This was the greatest wonder and supreme miracle of sainthood, achieved through his worship, which was so elevated as to make him God's beloved. That is to say, by travelling with his earthly body through the heavens, his superiority and his being God's beloved were demonstrated to the dwellers of the heavens and inhabitants of the lofty worlds. So too, through the moon, which is bound to the earth and suspended in the heavens, being split into two halves at the sign of an inhabitant of the earth, a miracle indicating to that earth-dweller's messengership was displayed to the other inhabitants of the earth. Thus, the person of Muhammad (PBUH) flew to the very summit of perfections on the two luminous wings of messengership and sainthood — like the two luminous unfolded wings of the moon; he ascended to the distance of two bow-lengths', he became the cause of pride of both the inhabitants of the heavens and the inhabitants of the earth.
Upon him and upon his Family be blessings and peace such as will fill the earth and the heavens.
Glory be unto You! we have no knowledge save that which You have taught us; indeed, You are All-Knowing, All-Wise,7
O God! For the sake of the one at whose sign the moon split make my heart and the hearts of all true believers like the moon in the face of the Sun of the Qur'an. AMEN. AMEN.
~Bediuzzaman Said Nursi - Addendum to the Thirty-First Word
1. Qur'an 54:1-2
2. Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari, vii, 145; Bayhaqi, Dalail al-Nubuwwa, ii, 266, 268.
3. Bukhari, ii, 251; v, 62; vi, 178; al-Hakim, al-Mustadrak, ii, 472; Suyuti, Nazm al-Mutanathir fi'l-Hadith al-Mutawatir, 135; Bayhaqi, Dalail, i, 279-81.
4. That is to say, there are six proofs concerning the event in the form of a sixfold consensus. Unfortunately, the explanation of them is brief, although they deserve more.
5. Musnad, i, 377, 413, 447, 456; iii, 207, 220, 275, 278; iv, 81; Tafsir Ihn Kathir, vi, 469.
6. Suyûtï, Nazm al-Mutanàthir fi'l-Hadith al-Mutawätir, 180; Tabarânî, al-Mu'jam al-Kablr, xii, 13623-4; xvii, 666-7; Ibn 'Adï. al-Kämilfïl-Du'afa, iii, 1307.
7. Qur'an 2:32
Login/Register to hide ads.
Scroll down for more posts
10-27-2013, 09:14 AM
Firstly: Some Muslims interpret this verse to mean that when the moon splits, Judgment Day is very close. In other words, it is in the future.
Secondly: If the moon really did split why do you think it split at that specific date? It could have been a million years before! The Koran is not clear on the exact date.
Thirdly: It ispossible there was a partial eclipse of the moon. At that time nobody had heard of this so people thought they saw the moon split.
When there is an eclipse of the moon it cannot be seen from everywhere on the earth. It can only be seen from limited places. That would explain why the phenomenon was not seen by the Chinese, Japanese or American Indians. And why it was only seen on the Arabian Peninsula.
11-08-2013, 07:03 AM
If it didn't happen at the time of the Prophet (s.a.w.), don't you think the nonbelievers would definitely ask about it and make it an excuse to refute his prophethood as they tried so in every single opportunity? None of them even uttered a word of denial. Besides, why didn't any of the companions ask about its meaning if it didn't happen even though they would ask about anything that they didn't know or understand from the Qur'an? And why do you think there would be so many narrations about the splitting of the moon, and an overwhelming majority of the hadith narrators and Qur'an interpreters would agree on it along with the other proofs stated in the first post?
Originally Posted by Logikon
Please, read the post carefully first; and then ask your questions. Don't waste my time. It seems that you didn't even read the whole post, if any.
Originally Posted by Logikon
11-08-2013, 07:36 AM
Many points are covered here too:
Moon split in two
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2021 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.