Originally Posted by Junon
Originally Posted by Junon
Firstly to refer to those killed by people acting under the banner of "ISIS" in a negative way without mentioning the fact that secularist soldiers and mercenaries have killed people under the banner is quite deluded - considering the aims of "low intensity operations".
Secondly - it would be appropriate to explain accurately and truthfully what you mean when you say "Islamic armies of conquest" - are you referring to mujahideen in Allah's path who found themselves under oppression and being violated -and stood to implement the laws of Allah :swt: as guided to in the Quran and Sunnah of the Seal of the Prophets Muhammad :saws: whilst seeking to obey Allah and in submission to Him? - or is it simply an allusion with secularist false propaganda against Islam and Muslims in mind?
My reason for mentioning this is that we have been recently noticing meaningless words thrown out with no respect for their actual meanings or anything legally solid - but rather as labels to use as an umbrella for multiple allusions and false constructs.
It has even come to an extent where using constructs and labels such as "bin ladin supporter" in front of a jury doesn't raise any questions from either the lawyer or the objections from a judge in a jew media deluded society - despite the fact that anybody who cares to research will find that the events of 9/11 were planned and orchestrated by jewish usurers who have made puppets, pawns, and slaves out of secularist leaders and their constituents who are more concerned about the next dance or sports event and the next bottle of alcohol than what is really being done to society and future generations via falsehood, corruption, and deceit.
The fact that the secularist mass media raise questions about the loyalty of Muslims who are not defined by relationship to foreign countries, just as those who claim to obey Christ are not defined by their loyalty to foreign countries, yet the same journalists/news reporters remain tight-lipped and deafeningly silent about jews whose loyalty is to a foreign country which actually sees all those born as non-jewish by blood as being animals with the false assertion that Godless "jews" are "chosen of God" due to blood heritage, the fact that these racists claim that it's ok to unlawfully exploit and consume usury from non-jews and not from jews, the fact that they put each other in positions of power based on racial bond whenever they get an opportunity, the fact that the same media who questions why Muslims believe that only those who obey God and conduct their lives in obedience to Him will go to paradise - whilst never questioning why jews claim that only people born into jewish families will go to paradise and all non-jews inherit hell by birthright, and how "Muslims are taking over" despite the fact that Islam is not racist along with the fact that jews who run their societies and appoint jews and pro-zionists only as their leaders and people in positions of power in order to exploit them and send their resources to fake israel - and shout them down as "anti-semites" or drag them through the mud and ruin them if they so much as dare to question racist jewish policies, how christians are duty bound to support fake rothsvhild worshipping israel due to the fact that they are tied through the bible, yet how the Muslims have harsh laws despite the bible having much harsher laws, then how the jews aren't really jews but are jews since they don't follow the bible and are secular (wtf?)...... and so much more i could mention - is evidence of the fact that much of the secular media is complicit and reporters are acting like beat down hookers for the miserable price they get in return as their future generations face worse treatment.
What an informative rant ..... but i hope you understand my reasoning when i ask for clarification.