Is it Allow to keep pics......?

[Slave of Rehman]

Aslaam-o-Alikum!
i know that taking the pics are Haraam in our Deen, i have taken thousands pics in my life and now i have hundrades pics in my house not open but coverd, so what should i do for it?

DO I DESTROYED IT?

I HAVE SAVED PICS IN MY LAPTOP FILES SO CAN I DESTROY THEM AS I DON,T OPEN THEM?

WHAT SHOULD I DO PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND MAKE ME SATISFY.

Jazakallah

[------]

I want an answer to that as well. Can anyone help please?

[IbnAbdulHakim]

i been thinking about this for like 2 mnths now and still no answer. I hav no prob destroying every picture but wat about passport n stuff :?

[aakhirah]

:sl:

Bismillaah.

Pictures of non-living objects (e.g. depicting scenery) are perfectly acceptable. With the rest, consult your conscience. Inshaa-Allaah, if you do it to please Allaah 'Azza wa Jall, it will be highly commendable.

:w:

A.

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up

[aakhirah]

wat about passport n stuff

This comes under necessity and is, therefore, permissible.

[cool_jannah]

LI islamic forum is not a Fatwa center.:-\

[IbnAbdulHakim]

LI islamic forum is not a Fatwa center.:-\

ye but opinions can be expressed!!!

[IbnAbdulHakim]

well heres ur answer:

som scholars of thought say that pictures r not allowed in islam of things like people, and animals etc.

the angel of rehma duz not com in a house wer ther is buth(cant translate that in english)...sorry...hope u understood

as 4 ur passport, well u dont hav much of a choice...security is too high nowadays
som relative of mine..think my great grandfather wanted to go to saudi arabia but didnt want his picture taken...so he showed his birth mark...and used that as identity....but that was ages ago.
i heard that those peopl who make, take pictures of living beings will hav to put life into them on th day of judgement
so if in doubt u shud stay away from the thing altogther
i hope i answered ur question....

ye so shud we protest against picture identification? :p

[Slave of Rehman]

Aslaam-o-Alikum Brothers and Sisters!
i thank you all to help me in my problem but
i know that taking the pics are Haraam in Islam and those Brothers and sisters ask about Identification pic (Passports, D/Licences or ID Card or on Curuncies) are allowd coz saudi Scholars and many more schlars said on it that it is not your choice to take pics so it is not Hraam but those pics that are taken by your own choice are Haraam.
i had only question that all pics are saved in my computer files should be destroyed or not?

Jazakallah

[Muezzin]

i been thinking about this for like 2 mnths now and still no answer. I hav no prob destroying every picture but wat about passport n stuff :?

Of course you don't destroy that stuff. It's a means of identification. :)

[IbnAbdulHakim]

Of course you don't destroy that stuff. It's a means of identification. :)

what if they say not wearin hijaab is a means of identification :p lol coz they cant see all of u clearly or sumthin :?

[Muezzin]

what if they say not wearin hijaab is a means of identification :p lol coz they cant see all of u clearly or sumthin :?

Bro, why are you wearing a hijab in the first place? :p

All the scholars' opinions I've read have said passport photos and other means of identification are permissible.

[IbnAbdulHakim]

Bro, why are you wearing a hijab in the first place? :p

All the scholars' opinions I've read have said passport photos and other means of identification are permissible.

lol i kno they are and LOL BRO u got sum weird mind :p mashAllah :)

well i get the idea, pictures = wrong, picture for ID = ok :thumbs_up

[aakhirah]

well i get the idea, pictures = wrong...

Wrong, brother. Not all pictures are 'wrong'. It depends on the picture. If it's of a non-living object, then it's perfectly permissible and can be plastered on your living room wall. But pictures depicting living things are highly questionable (or what you're after in your equation above).

:w:

A.

[mizan_aliashraf]

Salam
There is a difference of opinion when it comes to pictures. As for photography, some scholars say it is not allowed while other scholars say it is allowed. But as for drawings, there is clear concensus that it is NOT allowed to draw living things (people, animals) with souls in them. the main reason for this is that it eventually leads to shirk like it did the people of Nuh (AS)
And Allah knows best
Wassalam

[Malaikah]

:sl:

mate dont do anything you will regret later.. here is an article from islamtoday.com might help you make a choice.

Question: Why do some scholars claim that photography is unlawful while others consider it lawful?

Answered by the Fatwa Department Research Committee - chaired by Sheikh `Abd al-Wahhâb al-Turayrî

Al-Salâm `Alaykum wa Rahmah Allah wa Barakâtuh.

Please understand that photography did not exist at the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Therefore, scholars have to compare photography to matters that Islam has ruled about. The ruling, therefore, is not based on an explicit text but on juristic discretion (ijtihâd).

Some scholars have compared photography to hand-drawn pictures. Drawing pictures by hand of people and animals is unlawful by clear and unambiguous textual evidence. Ibn `Abbâs relates from the Prophet (peace be upon him): “Whoever makes an image in this world, he will be requested to breathe life into it on the Day of Resurrection, but he will not be able to do it.” [Sahîh al-Bukhârî and Sahih Mulsim]

Ibn Mas`ûd also relates that he heard the Prophet (peace be upon him) say: “The severest penalty on the Day of Resurrection will be given to image makers.” [Sahîh al-Bukhârî and Sahih Mulsim]

Photography resembles drawing pictures in that it is a human effort that results in a fixed image of a person or an animal on a flat surface. Therefore, some scholars ruled that photographing people and animals is unlawful, because it falls under the prohibited act of image-making.

There are, however, significant differences between drawing a picture and taking a photograph. Drawing a picture is a fully creative process on the part of the artist. Photography is capturing a reflected image on film or in digital memory. The creative contribution of the photographer is therefore quite different than the creative contribution of a portrait maker. For this reason many scholars, including Sheikh `Abd al-Wahhâb al-Turayrî, consider photography to be lawful.

And Allah knows best.

Source: Islamtoday.Com - The difference between hand-drawn pictures & photographs