Ibn Syed
05-12-2005, 01:03 AM
:sl:
Here is some garbage Abu Ghraib prison stuff. :mad: :mad:
Another image shows that the man, an Iraqi prisoner, is naked. His hands are clasped behind his neck and he is leaning against the door to a cell, contorted with terror, as the dogs bark a few feet away. Other photographs show the dogs straining at their leashes and snarling at the prisoner. In another, taken a few minutes later, the Iraqi is lying on the ground, writhing in pain, with a soldier sitting on top of him, knee pressed to his back. Blood is streaming from the inmate’s leg. Another photograph is a closeup of the naked prisoner, from his waist to his ankles, lying on the floor. On his right thigh is what appears to be a bite or a deep scratch. There is another, larger wound on his left leg, covered in blood.
Needless to say, you should read Hersh's entire article, but this paragraph at the end is especially chilling on a variety of levels:
The photographing of prisoners, both in Afghanistan and in Iraq, seems to have been not random but, rather, part of the dehumanizing interrogation process. The Times published an interview last week with Hayder Sabbar Abd, who claimed, convincingly, to be one of the mistreated Iraqi prisoners in the Abu Ghraib photographs. Abd told Ian Fisher, the Times reporter, that his ordeal had been recorded, almost constantly, by cameras, which added to his humiliation. He remembered how the camera flashed repeatedly as soldiers told to him to masturbate and beat him when he refused.
In other words, there might very well be a nearly complete documentary record of what happened at Abu Ghraib. What happens when the pressure to make it public becomes irresistible?
:thumbs_do :thumbs_do :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
This stuff just makes me really mad. I found some more stuff and I will post that later.
:w:
ReplyMr. Baldy
05-14-2005, 03:00 PM
aslaam alykum,
and americans say that they went to 'liberate' iraq, but in actuall fact they went to rape and murder, id have to say that life was probably better under sadamm, at least then people could walk downt the street without having fear of getttign caught in cross fire, sure sadamm was a dog, but can someone remind me why im supposed to think democracy is any better?
wa alykum aslaam
ReplyIbn Syed
05-14-2005, 03:45 PM
Yeah, the US had to destroy a whole country trying to kill one guy. And the Iraqis didn't know why the Americans were coming. That's why they set their oil on fire. And they are still in Iraq and they have already caught Saddam.
:w:
ReplyHey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.