Are you trying to change the standard definition of “insurgency” to squirm your way out of my refutation?
What refutation are you talking about, what did you refute?
Soviet weaponry are very inaccurate. I dont know where you get the idea that they are accurate.
They are less accurate. It’s not as if you can’t hit what your aiming at, the toll Mujahadeen put on Soviet Armor using those same said weapons is a testament to that. Most Soviet weapons follow the mold of the AK series rifle, less accurate but much more durable and dependable.
I hope this eradicates your confusion:
Reread what I wrote slowly hero. The vast majority of the coalition combat forces are straight-legged infantry, M16’s or M4 carbines, M203 grenade launchers, M9 pistols, SAW’s or M60’s for machine guns, Mark 19 automatic grenade launchers, AT4 rocket launchers and that is more or less it. All the stupid off-topic articles you can find won’t change that fact.
Most soldiers don’t use computers or sensors or anything like that on the battlefield and are sometimes running with weapons from the Vietnam era. I donno what you expect, of if think we have X-ray vision and lasers, but that is just not reality.
These terrorists are simply tainting Muslim terms.
Don’t respond if your not going to read what I write
Let us use facts and not what you see in anonymous videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cuHVLyX6Fc
There are so many parallels between what these men do in this video and my training as a US soldier, its ridicules.
Terrorism and psychological warfare are synonymous.
Terrorism has a psychological effect, but Psychological warfare is a military discipline. The closest Psychological operations get to terrorism is when leaflets are distributed saying such and such location will be obliterated at this day and time, on that day and time, plains fly and guns roar and military might is displayed.
The difference between psychological operations and terrorism is that psychological operations seek to destroy an enemy’s will to fight, which is in line with strategic orthodox warfare.
Once again terrorism seeks inspires fear, to cause political or legal change.
The "well trained" insurgents are actually foreign fighters from Iran
Muslim’s groups have had a wide array of combat experience in relatively recent history, I do not see why Islamic veterans from places like Afghanistan, Tajjikistan, Chechnya, Bosnia and Kosovo would not wind up within the Iraqi insurgents. Furthermore I still disagree about your assessment of the Al-Qaeda organization if for no other reason than it has it's roots firmly planted with the Mujahadeen of Afghanistan.
Hezbollah has not been directly involved in a suicide bombing since 1999
Whether or not that is true, I was addressing indiscriminate bombing of Israeli civil centers, not suicide bombing.
Terrorism is not a medium to promote terror, terrorism is literally "an act of terror."
Why do you think it is called terrorism? Because it has to do with the act of intentionally causing fear.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terror
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorism