format_quote Originally Posted by
extraprogram1
Incorrect,
You are opposite.
Opposite? Unlikely. Show me some proof and then I'll believe you.
Men are stronger, their legs are stronger. Strong have an great impact on running.
Women tend to have stronger legs then men. Men tend to just work on their upper body, so you are only half right. But legs is only a part to running. Running requires the whole body. Trust me. If you just ran with your legs and if you'll ran with your arms in running motion, you will notice a difference.
Running requires a full body motion, not just legs. But legs are important.
It's not just being agile.
What did I say? Didn't I say that men are generally quick when it comes the initial sprint? And that was a factor of strength? Didn't I say that? You obviously weren't reading what I was saying, now weren't you? Give me some honesty here, okay?
Men are generally fast unless if they are extremely fat and running against a thin women.
Thin? Thin people got hardly any endurance? You need a ton of energy to run. A freaking ton. You burn yourself out to near exhaustion if you were to say run a marathon and not fit enough. Now thin isn't in shape. Thin is what is below being in shape. That's like bone dry and no meat to it. Being in shape means you got meat on those bones. You have some muscles. Sure your waist is definitely thin. But your overall body isn't. Muscle does require space, so you aren't thin, you are just in shape. And what does shape mean? It means you have the right curves of what is considered to be a normal human being. But that subject may vary between each human being.
Like you said strong woman would have trouble running against weak women, compared to weak men.
Listen to what you just said. Running is a factor of strength yes? And now you are saying that strong people have trouble running against weak people? Now what is up with that? Sound like a contradiction to me.
Wrong again! Weak men are in fact much faster.
Well you sure went in a 180 on that subject. WRONG!
Weak men aren't fast. Some of them sure can be fast for a period of time and some like those out of shape in the opposite direction (being too thin, definition of being weak) but they have no endurance to continue the race. They burn off all of their energy. You do understand people need energy to run, right? Where is energy stored? In fatty tissue, right? Sure you knew of that right? The only reason why fat people cannot run so well is because they have too much weight. It is not because they are so fat. But because they have so much fat and not enough of the right muscles to excersize that fat and move that weight that they run at such a slow speed and exhaust so quickly. If you remove that fat and still have the same puny muscles. Sure he should be able to run a bit more, but that's all. Still not enough muscle.
Now this isn't a matter of being muscler. Becuase Muscular people still have a ton of weight. So they need more muscle in the right areas like all people to move that weight. Most of them do have those muscles. Especially if they are from the military. Oh boy can muscular military personnel move like the wind.
There are certain muscles that were perfectly in the fashion needed to move weight in the running motion. Those are the muscles necessary to excercize to increase movement and speed, as well as endurance. The heart is the most important of all these muscles. Besides the heart there are small joint muscles around the ankles, knees, hips, and in the arms necessary to advance or improve running capabilities.
Again wrong, men have better endurance than women? Where did you get from that?
Don't you mean, where do I get that from? Sheesh you need to hear yourself speak. And where do I get that idea from. Aren't you aware that there is something called common sense? Endurance isn't something that is granted to someone base on their genetic qualities. It is something granted base on social differences. Men are more endurance prone, because of their social difference. I mean how often do you see a pack of boys running then do you see girls? Where does endurance come from? How do you gain it or improve it? By running, right? The more you excercize and run, the more endurance you have. And this is a general rule. Men do have more endurance. They tire out less quickly and can improve on their endurace more quicker as well. It is just a general rule. Not all men have good endurance. Many men can be beat by a girl, depending on who that girl is. I mean an olympic could probably beat just about any non-olympic guy and maybe some of the olympic guys. Those guys that aren't as focused to winning than that girl. If it was an even matter of focus, physical fitness, and among other things then an adult guy can easily out run an adult girl.
But let's say for a movement this involved just any male and female of the human species. Then I'll have to restate that, because todds shouldn't even count. I mean their small structure and endless active nature, allows them to continue running until they fall asleep, which can take hours. It is not a matter of speed or natural endurance to them. It is a matter of how long they can stay awake.
That doesn't mean a thing. You think it does. But it doesn't. In fact there are more complicated bad things that come from the association of child bearing than there are good.
For instance because women can bear children, they naturally store more fat and therefore it is harder for them to lose it. There are other things, like a woman's attitude being much more naturally aggressive and opinionated than a guy. And you would think otherwise, because women tend to act more seclusive or submissive. But in reality, they tend to demand more and want more. It is a part of their nature that allows them to be good shoppers and stylizers. Not all women are like this. But they all share some similarity that makes them equal in some degree. Just as men tend to be more independent and obsessive.
and they bear pain for 9 months due to pregnancy.
Nine months of pain? I really? Can you really say that a woman has to suffer pain for every second of every day? You make it sound like men can't do a single thing? Don't tell me that I don't know what pain is. If you want to be treated equal, then you are going to have to treat people as your equals even if they aren't the same gender.
Press your stomach for 9 months then you would know.
Stop being so full of yourself and thinking you are the only one that suffers. I bet that over sixty percent of women world wide would want you to rephrase what you had just said. It is already a problem that feminazism exists. And enough women have to deal with it everyday with their husbands, sons, brothers, friends, cousins, or distant relatives being harassed or humiliated by women in the same workplace or in other affiliations. Most women have had enough of it. There is even anti-feminist movement that is highly advocated and supported by mostly just pure women. Why would they do something like that? It is because they had enough of women that are forcing men down as being nothing at all. It is strange indeed that women might be wanting to give up their own rights. But they care enough about their men, friends, or male relatives to do something about the injustice that comes from having more rights. The injustice of having innocent men encounter the same pains that women had to encounter as they start gaining rights. So please, for your sisters, don't make life more of a hell for them. Okay?
Sorry for getting you upset. It wasn't my intention.