Police protesters clash in Iraqi town

[Ummu Amatullah]

About 1000 protesters have clashed with Iraqi police in the town of Samawa, south of Baghdad, leaving at least one person dead and about 60 others injured, police say.

The protest on Sunday was over the poor state of water and power supplies.

Witnesses said police opened fire on the crowd.

At least one person was killed and 46 civilians injured in the fighting, said Captain Hussein Manwar. Thirteen police officers were injured, he said.

Witnesses said the demonstration in front of the governor's offices began peacefully, but when it grew larger, government security guards fired shots into the air to disperse the crowd.

Clashes with police began after demonstrators threw rocks
and attacked a police vehicle, setting it on fire, witnesses said.

Iraq's new Shia-led government took power in January elections promising to end violence and restore public services. But frustrations are running high with electricity shortages and high unemployment.

Samawah, 370km southeast of Baghdad, is where about 600 Japanese troops are based.

They have been involved in a series of reconstruction efforts
since arriving in the area in January 2004, including paving roads, rebuilding schools and providing hospitals with medical supplies and equipment.

Troops killed

Elsewhere, a roadside bomb killed two US soldiers and injured three others in central Iraq, while in southern Baghdad three Iraqi soldiers were killed.


Two US soldiers were killed in
the city of Samarra

A US patrol with Task Force Liberty was hit at about 6pm on Saturday in the city of Samarra, about 95km north of Baghdad, the US military said.

All the soldiers were transported to a medical facility, where two of them died from wounds suffered in the attack, a statement said.

On Sunday, three Iraqi soldiers were killed in a drive-by shooting in southern Baghdad, hospital officials said.

The soldiers, who were in civilian clothing, were gunned down as they were heading to work, said Dr Muhammad Jawad of Yarmuk hospital.

A fourth soldier was injured in the morning attack in the southern neighbourhood of Saydida, he added.

Officials shot dead

Also on Sunday, armed men killed two employees of Iraq's Ministry of Oil and wounded two others, police said.


Iraqi oil pipelines and officials
often have been targeted

The assailants opened fire on their car in the New Baghdad district of the capital.

Armed groups have assassinated scores of government officials and ministry employees in an effort to topple the fledgling government.

They also frequently blow up pipelines, depriving the government of millions of dollars of crude oil revenues.

US troop reduction

Meanwhile, in a classified briefing to senior Pentagon officials last month, the top American commander in the Middle East outlined a plan that would gradually reduce US forces in Iraq by perhaps 20,000 to 30,000 troops by next spring, The New York Times reported on its website late on Saturday.

Citing unnamed senior military officers and Defence Department officials, the newspaper said the assessment by General John Abizaid, head of the US Central Command, followed a statement made last week by the top American soldier in Iraq, General George Casey.


General John Abizaid assessed
US troop levels in Iraq


Casey said the Pentagon could make "some fairly substantial reductions" in troops by next spring and summer, if the political process in Iraq remained on track and Iraqi forces assumed more responsibility for securing the country.

Together, the generals' appraisals offer some of the most concrete indications yet that the Pentagon is moving towards reducing US forces in Iraq, the report said.

They also reflect the Bush administration's growing concerns over how the country's involvement in Iraq is influencing domestic considerations.

Increase before polls

In his assessment, given as part of a larger regional analysis, Abizaid also warned that it was possible that the Pentagon might have to keep the current levels of about 138,000 American soldiers in Iraq throughout 2006 if security and political trends were unfavourable for a withdrawal, The Times said.

The number of soldiers will temporarily increase this December to provide security for Iraqi elections.

And some troops leaving Iraq could be held in Kuwait as a reserve force, the paper added.

It said senior administration and Pentagon officials, as well as political leaders in both parties, say there is mounting anxiety over the $5-billion-a-month cost of the war.

There are also concerns about an overtaxed military, dismal recruiting in the army and national guard, dwindling public support for the operation, and a steadily growing number of casualties.

[imaad_udeen]

:sl:

Subhanallaah. The result of 'liberation'.

:w:

:sl:

Ah, the freedom to demonstrate against the government 'peacefully' is a wonderful thing.

I wonder how many protests were allowed against Saddam's government? I wonder what happened to those who dared to try?

Rhetorical questions, of course.

[imaad_udeen]

:sl:

Mash'allaah, good valid points. Yet you fail to remember that saddam was a agent of west, just another enemy of islaam.

:w:

:sl:

Indeed, Saddam was, for a time, an important part of US/NATO strategy in the Middle East, mainly during the Cold War and to counter Iran.

However, I don't think that has anything to do with how Saddam treated his people. The US needed an allie in Iraq no matter who it was or how he kept himself in power. Realpolitik.

Anyways, it's sad that a person died in this protest.

:w:

[Ummu Amatullah]

There's only one thing I have to say,"Alhamdullilah" this is the first time you guys weren't arguing. :applaud:

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up

[Ummu Amatullah]

Don't think there's many.

[imaad_udeen]

:sl:

Subhanallaah, sister we do not argue, just sometimes we have heated discussions! :D . Nevertheless he is my elder and i should show more respect in our discussions even when we dissagree (which is most of the time) i should show respect to him. But yes maybe shukri if we all discuss in a more polite manner maybe there wont be so much disunity in our ranks and bitterness amonsgt each other. I for one need to change urgently the way i interact with my fellow brothers and my approch in general, i apoligise to all who i have offended on this forum.

:w:

:sl:

Indeed. These are passionate topics and we are passionate men. But I think that we can continue to discuss these matters in a civilized way. We will never learn from each other or understand each other if all we do is scream.

:)

:w: