50 posts. spam control?

[vorx]

Hi,

I am just wondering why is there a 50 posts limit to achieve the full member? I would like to reply to people's posts but i can't because i am new here. 10 to 15 posts should be maximum to check if someone isn't an idiot spaming here. But won't it be just stupid if you ban me trying to keep posting bogus posts to raise my numbers.. c'mon geez.. common sense admins..

[aamirsaab]

:sl:
We as admins/mods weighed up the pros and cons before issuing the 50 post rule out. The comments you have raised are valid and the moderating team will take these into account.

[.:Mustapha:.]

:sl:

Brother vorx is right. Simple features like editing your posts, custom avatars & using sigs should be there from the start. I have used many forums & having 50 posts to be a full member is a bit too much, 25 would be reasonable. Or limited posting rights on certain high profile sections of the forum until you reach 50 posts is fair. Don't you think? :?

:w:

[smile]

I agree about the editing and stuff
i also found it hard in the start when i was not a full member