/* */

PDA

View Full Version : The Prophet SAWS raiding caravans?



Michael
09-18-2007, 10:44 PM
I was reading the biography of the Prophet Muhammad SAWS in the front of the Pickthall Qur'an translation. In it it talked about the Prophet's SAWS intention to capture the caravan led by Abu Sufyan returning from Syria. I have also read in other books about Islam that the Prophet SAWS used to raid caravans. This seems to me like nothing more than highway robbery, and that is very dishonest. I know that the Prophet SAWS was called Al-Amin, meaning "The trustworthy", so it seems completely out of character for him to lead raids on caravans.

Can anyone explain this for me? Plus the book also talks about the Prophet SAWS leading armies into battle, and the context that it seems to be in doesn't seem defensive, as I have been told fighting is permitted in.
Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
- Qatada -
10-13-2007, 11:24 AM
Asalaamu alaikum [peace be upon you] :) bro michael.


I was reading the biography of the Prophet Muhammad SAWS in the front of the Pickthall Qur'an translation. In it it talked about the Prophet's SAWS intention to capture the caravan led by Abu Sufyan returning from Syria. I have also read in other books about Islam that the Prophet SAWS used to raid caravans. This seems to me like nothing more than highway robbery, and that is very dishonest. I know that the Prophet SAWS was called Al-Amin, meaning "The trustworthy", so it seems completely out of character for him to lead raids on caravans.

Can anyone explain this for me? Plus the book also talks about the Prophet SAWS leading armies into battle, and the context that it seems to be in doesn't seem defensive, as I have been told fighting is permitted in.


Sorry for the late reply.


What happened is that there was a continuous warfare and threat from the Quraysh, and i assume you've read the Makkan era. Since many of the companions fled/emigrated [made hijrah] from Makkah empty handed, their wealth and houses were occupied and taken over by the disbelievers within Makkah.

When the believers emigrated to Madina, they were still chased after by Quraysh [as you'll read that when the muslims chase the caravan - the Quraysh are already sending an army to destroy and eradicate the muslims from Medina. This later becomes the battle of Badr] So why do they chase the caravans?



During warfare, many campaigns take place. Whether they are physical warfare, financial, and even of propaganda and talk. The Quraysh did this to the believers throughout their lives, and therefore muslims are permitted to do similar in an equal manner. The muslims weren't able to do that within Makkah, however - now that they are in Medina, they have to defend themselves and show that we are a worthy opponent. So they did similar to the Quraysh. Why is this justified?



1) To show their strength to the Quraysh aswell as surrounding tribes - so no-one messes with them, as many of the surrounding tribes (who were polytheists) were threatening muslims.

2) To get back their own wealth [which the Quraysh is now spending and using unjustly, and may even be using the muslims wealth in this caravan for their own benefit!]

3) It shows that it is permitted in warfare to get the enemy back, through different means [whether its through physical war, financially, aswell as doing other campaigns - the arabs media was poetry, so the Prophet, peace be upon him would get some companions (i.e. one of the best poets Hasan ibn Thaabit) to recite poetry in the muslims defence and support.)


Ever since the muslims reached Medina, the Quraysh and the surrounding tribes [throughout that time - uptill the battle of Al-Ahzab/Khandaq (the confederates/trench) which was about 6 years after Hijrah] were threatening the muslim state. Compared to the event which you described which was only 2nd year after Hijrah (at this stage - the muslims were such a small minority compared to the rest of the polytheists in arabia who had respect for Quraysh and their forefathers religion - polytheism.) So it wouldn't be surprising if the muslims did many campaigns throughout this time to defend themselves aswell as harm the enemy.


You will also read campaigns which take place after the battle of ahzaab [after 6AH], and many of them will be when the muslims will leave Medinah and face the enemy head on, the reason for this is because the enemy has threatened them, or is preparing to fight the believers, so the believers reach them since this is known as the best form of defense - to surprise the enemy without them expecting it, which usually leads to them fleeing.

Putting fear into the heart of the enemy and making them flee is better. The believers are more pleased with less harm and more benefit.




Some useful links insha allah:

http://www.islamtoday.com/show_sub_s...5&sub_cat_id=0
http://www.load-islam.com/artical_de...Misconceptions
http://www.islamonline.net/English/In_Depth/Violence/



Allah knows best.
Reply

Malaikah
10-13-2007, 01:45 PM
:sl:

- Qatada - explained it well... I just wanted to emphasis that the Quraish stole the wealth of the Muslim who were forced to leave Makkah with none of their possessions and had no way of getting it back from the Quraish, other than raiding the caravans.

(The caravans, by the way, should be no seen as being run by innocent business men, that is certainly not the case).
Reply

Md Mashud
10-13-2007, 02:11 PM
Well said above already. Remember, our Prophet :saw: never did unjustice - for if he did, all who believed in him would have given it up over him if they saw him doing evil or being hypocritical which he wasn't. All his actions have reasoning - so its good to see you asking for the full context - I know many people who just read 1-2 hadiths and think that he is evil - which is indeed ignorant of them...
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
tarek29
10-17-2007, 04:24 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Michael
I was reading the biography of the Prophet Muhammad SAWS in the front of the Pickthall Qur'an translation. In it it talked about the Prophet's SAWS intention to capture the caravan led by Abu Sufyan returning from Syria. I have also read in other books about Islam that the Prophet SAWS used to raid caravans. This seems to me like nothing more than highway robbery, and that is very dishonest. I know that the Prophet SAWS was called Al-Amin, meaning "The trustworthy", so it seems completely out of character for him to lead raids on caravans.

Can anyone explain this for me? Plus the book also talks about the Prophet SAWS leading armies into battle, and the context that it seems to be in doesn't seem defensive, as I have been told fighting is permitted in.

I would like to add to Brother Qatada some points:

1- For first 13 years Muslims were not allowed to use any violence to defend themselves!

2- In all wars between Muslims and Arab Pagan killed 1018 men from both sides!

3- When Muslims Had permission to fight Arab Pagans due to their thread and attacks on Muslims, Muslims attacked this caravan and I see it from another point view and that this is normal during war to attack enemy supplies and to attack his sources, taking in Cinsideration the instruction during battles not to kill women, childrend, old men not even hurt a Tree, stop fighting if they stop etc...!

4- Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) were rich before Islam like most of companions but all his wealth and what he earned went to Islam and Muslims and He died having only old cloths that he had on him!

5- caravan became caravans in Anti Islamic web sites and thats it!

May Allah (swt) guide us all!

Peace
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 06:51 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Michael
I have also read in other books about Islam that the Prophet SAWS used to raid caravans. This seems to me like nothing more than highway robbery, and that is very dishonest. I know that the Prophet SAWS was called Al-Amin, meaning "The trustworthy", so it seems completely out of character for him to lead raids on caravans.

Can anyone explain this for me? Plus the book also talks about the Prophet SAWS leading armies into battle, and the context that it seems to be in doesn't seem defensive, as I have been told fighting is permitted in.

We should give some right to those who were forced to leave their homes bare-handed. In war-like situations, it is permissible to attack logistic supplies of the enemy, while ensuring, non-combatants are not harmed. Making use of the captured material is legitimate and by no means is a violation. The war was already declared, when Muslims were forced to migrate.

In such situations, at the tactical level, you have to take such minor initiatives like blocking the supply/reinforcement routes, capturing enemy troops and material and destroying the reaction capability of the enemy, even if you are fighting a defensive battle.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 06:58 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by tarek29
I would like to add to Brother Qatada some points:

1- For first 13 years Muslims were not allowed to use any violence to defend themselves!

2- In all wars between Muslims and Arab Pagan killed 1018 men from both sides!

3- When Muslims Had permission to fight Arab Pagans due to their thread and attacks on Muslims, Muslims attacked this caravan and I see it from another point view and that this is normal during war to attack enemy supplies and to attack his sources, taking in Cinsideration the instruction during battles not to kill women, childrend, old men not even hurt a Tree, stop fighting if they stop etc...!

4- Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) were rich before Islam like most of companions but all his wealth and what he earned went to Islam and Muslims and He died having only old cloths that he had on him!

5- caravan became caravans in Anti Islamic web sites and thats it!

May Allah (swt) guide us all!

Peace
It is my understanding and I have read several times, the fighting started because of the raiding, not visa versa.
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 07:19 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
It is my understanding and I have read several times, the fighting started because of the raiding, not visa versa.

As if 12 years long sufferings and atrocities faced by the Muslims in Mecca and their forced migration didn't contribute towards initiation of hostilities, but a little pricking by the Muslims became the basis of fighting.

Strange :embarrass
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 07:27 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by ahsan28
As if 12 years long sufferings and atrocities faced by the Muslims in Mecca and their forced migration didn't contribute towards initiation of hostilities, but a little pricking by the Muslims became the basis of fighting.

Strange :embarrass
Are you saying that it was the caravan owners that caused the 12 long years of suffering and forced migration?
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 07:41 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
Are you saying that it was the caravan owners that caused the 12 long years of suffering and forced migration?

Can we have second opinion about the reality?
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 07:47 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by ahsan28
Can we have second opinion about the reality?
Hardly an Islamic source, but this is what I found.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamad
Economically uprooted and with no available profession besides that of arms, the Muslim migrants turned to raiding Meccan caravans for their livelihood, thus initiating armed conflict between the Muslims and Mecca.
Reply

islamirama
10-17-2007, 08:28 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
Hardly an Islamic source, but this is what I found.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamad
Forget Islamic, it's hardly a reliable non-Islamic source. Any laymen can go edit and put what they want in there. Did you not read this statement on that page....

The neutrality of this section is disputed.
The original post "raiding caravans" was an ill informed post to begin with. Rather then fighting here back n forth without any real knowledge, it would be wise to go out and read a book on the biography of the Prophet(saws) and birth/rise of Islam. There's plenty of good books out there, even some by non-muslims.

Here's a start...

http://muhammad.net/j/index.php

http://www.allaahuakbar.net/muhammad/index.htm (This one has military activities and conquests info)
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 08:31 PM
Wilberhum


We have several sources suggesting otherwise. I would like to quote from only one:-

A group of the Ansar( natives of Medina) came to the Prophet (Pbuh) and said: "Divide our date trees between ourselves and our brethren." The Prophet (Pbuh) said: "No." They said, "Then, will you be responsible for the work involved and we will share the fruits with you?" They answered: "We willingly accept." . Thus, we find the whole community of the Ansar coming with an offer of sharing their main assets with their brothers. The Prophet, however, did not like that the Ansar should part with half of their property in this way. He wanted to deepen the concept of mutual responsibility and cooperation. Hence, he accepted the offer of sharing in the work and in the fruit. The Muhajireen (those who migrated from Mecca to Medina) would be responsible for the necessary work in the date farms and, as such, they would be entitled to half the fruits yielded.


The narration has the authenticity from our most credible sources, known as Bukhari and Muslim.


Those who didn't accept anything in charity, can not be accused of raiding the caravan, just to become economically viable at a new place.

Even if I accept your argument for a while, the fact remains that the non-believers of Mecca had conficated the entire wealth, business and property of the Muslims at Mecca and Muslims retaliation was perfectly legitimate and justified.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 08:37 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by ahsan28
.................................................
Even if I accept your argument for a while, the fact remains that the non-believers of Mecca had conficated the entire wealth, business and property of the Muslims at Mecca and Muslims retaliation was perfectly legitimate and justified.
Were the non-believers of Mecca that conficated the entire wealth, the caravan owners?
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 08:44 PM
Of course, the same non-believers, who tried every possible dirty trick with Muslims, in order to force them to either leave Islam or leave Mecca. The caravan had not come from heavens.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 08:54 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by ahsan28
Of course, the same non-believers, who tried every possible dirty trick with Muslims, in order to force them to either leave Islam or leave Mecca. The caravan had not come from heavens.
I think that is one of the most unsupportable statement I have ever read.
Reply

islamirama
10-17-2007, 09:02 PM
Muhammad The Prophet (by Hindu professor)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dawaah/message/727
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 09:06 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by islamirama
Forget Islamic, it's hardly a reliable non-Islamic source. Any laymen can go edit and put what they want in there. Did you not read this statement on that page....
The old evil wikipedia stuff. People keep telling me about all the errors, but no one ever seams to be able to point to one.

The original post "raiding caravans" was an ill informed post to begin with. Rather then fighting here back n forth without any real knowledge, it would be wise to go out and read a book on the biography of the Prophet(saws) and birth/rise of Islam. There's plenty of good books out there, even some by non-muslims.

Here's a start...

http://muhammad.net/j/index.php

http://www.allaahuakbar.net/muhammad/index.htm (This one has military activities and conquests info)
I looked at both sights. I could not come to a clear conlusion.

My searches don't seam to turn up any (IMHO) reliable information.
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 09:09 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
I think that is one of the most unsupportable statement I have ever read.
I think you are not familiar with those named as Quryaish of Mecca. Try exploring more, instead of relying on one source. In that era, the tribes didn't have the luxury of keeping a separate fighting force for the battles. Those who used to fight, had to work also to earn their livelihood and merchants of Mecca were no different.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 09:13 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by islamirama
Muhammad The Prophet (by Hindu professor)

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dawaah/message/727
Come on Islmirama. :hiding:

That sight does not address the subject and the word "caravan" isn't even contained within the artice.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 09:17 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by ahsan28
I think you are not familiar with those named as Quryaish of Mecca. Try exploring more, instead of relying on one source. In that era, the tribes didn't have the luxury of keeping a separate fighting force for the battles. Those who used to fight, had to work also to earn their livelihood and merchants of Mecca were no different.
I keep looking and keep ending up with no real information that would bring me to any confortable conclusion.
I would love to find something that showed the caravan owners were the bad guys.
Reply

islamirama
10-17-2007, 09:48 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
Come on Islmirama. :hiding:

That sight does not address the subject and the word "caravan" isn't even contained within the artice.
It demonstrates the character of the Prophet (saws), something that is being questioned here with "raiding caravans" inquiry.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 09:56 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by islamirama
It demonstrates the character of the Prophet (saws), something that is being questioned here with "raiding caravans" inquiry.
I'm not questioning his character. :?
I'm looking for information about the topic of the thread. :thumbs_up

Every thing I find says the fighting started because of the raiding not visa versa.

So I'm trying to find justification for that.
(But I'm not buying that it was the caravan owners that caused the 12 long years of suffering and forced migration)
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 10:01 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
I keep looking and keep ending up with no real information that would bring me to any confortable conclusion.
I would love to find something that showed the caravan owners were the bad guys.
We have sufficiently proved that tribes of those era didn't have exclusive armies to fight. Infact fighting was considered an obligation for Arabs, irrespective of the fact whether someone was a carpenter, a farmer or a merchant. Contrary to their customs and traditions, how can you conlude that the merchants of the caravan belonging to Qurayaish of Mecca were not amongst those, responsible for the atrocities and forced migration of the Muslims.

And why not ask you to show us that the merchants were good guys having soft and tender hearts towards the Prophet (pbuh) and his companions.
Reply

wilberhum
10-17-2007, 10:39 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by ahsan28
We have sufficiently proved that tribes of those era didn't have exclusive armies to fight. Infact fighting was considered an obligation for Arabs, irrespective of the fact whether someone was a carpenter, a farmer or a merchant. Contrary to their customs and traditions, .
You have proved nothing. But none of that has anything to do with the discussion.

how can you conlude that the merchants of the caravan belonging to Qurayaish of Mecca were not amongst those, responsible for the atrocities and forced migration of the Muslims.
I would assume that some of the caravan owners were among the "bad guys".
But I would never assume that all the caravan owners were "bad guys".
So quite rapidly we enter the realm of “Collective Punishment”.

[
B]And why not ask you to show us that the merchants were good guys having soft and tender hearts towards the Prophet (pbuh) and his companions[/B].
I never said they were so I have nothing to show.
I’m not the one making unsupportable statements.
I’m only asking questions.

So what it really comes down to is I keep asking for evidence to show that I am wrong and all I get are links that don’t address the issue and personal opinions.

This all ends up making me look like the bad Muslim hater.

Well that not the case and I not going to go back and forth in pointless debates that will only leave that negative opinion.

Peace
Wilber
Reply

ahsan28
10-17-2007, 10:44 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
I would assume that some of the caravan owners were among the "bad guys".
But I would never assume that all the caravan owners were "bad guys".
So quite rapidly we enter the realm of “Collective Punishment”.

You can even assume that all were good guys, we don't mind. The purpose was to convey, not to convince :D
Reply

Muezzin
10-17-2007, 10:50 PM
The thread starter was not asking about who started what. The thread starter was questioning how the conduct he read about was consistent with the Prophet (SAW)'s character.

Check it out:

I was reading the biography of the Prophet Muhammad SAWS in the front of the Pickthall Qur'an translation. In it it talked about the Prophet's SAWS intention to capture the caravan led by Abu Sufyan returning from Syria. I have also read in other books about Islam that the Prophet SAWS used to raid caravans. This seems to me like nothing more than highway robbery, and that is very dishonest. I know that the Prophet SAWS was called Al-Amin, meaning "The trustworthy", so it seems completely out of character for him to lead raids on caravans.

Can anyone explain this for me? Plus the book also talks about the Prophet SAWS leading armies into battle, and the context that it seems to be in doesn't seem defensive, as I have been told fighting is permitted in.
Of course, this was all answered in the first reply in the thread, but hey, what are forums for if not crazy bickering? :p
Reply

Malaikah
10-18-2007, 06:17 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
Are you saying that it was the caravan owners that caused the 12 long years of suffering and forced migration?
Actually, yes. The caravan was lead by Abu Sufyan, one of the leaders of Quraish who was involved in anti-Muslim activities when they lived in Makkah.

format_quote Originally Posted by wilberhum
I keep looking and keep ending up with no real information that would bring me to any confortable conclusion.
I would love to find something that showed the caravan owners were the bad guys.
The above should be enough for you.
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-07-2010, 07:48 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2009, 01:10 PM
  3. Replies: 81
    Last Post: 04-17-2008, 07:27 PM
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!