format_quote Originally Posted by
asadxyz
:sl:
W.Wright gives four method to express Plureperfect i.e past perfect: (Volume ii page 4-5)
- Simple Past tense like ذهب
- By adding قد before simple past tense
- By adding كان before simple past tense
- By adding كان قد before simple past tense
:sl:
If we add قد before the a past simple verb ,it express past perfect only if exists in the context another past simple verb
eg;
أقـبـل الصبي و قد ابتسم
the boy came after he had smiled
if not then قد only affirms the action
علمت موعد الامتحان
I knew the time of the exam
قد علمت موعد الامتحان
I knew the the time of the exam
both sentences are Past simple in meaning, by adding قد the speaker affirms the verb علمت
ذاكرت دروسى وقد
علمت موعد الامتحان
I studied my lessons after I had known the time of the exam.
you can't add قد to a past verb and automatically claims it to be past perfect
format_quote Originally Posted by
asadxyz
You are talking "laam maksoor with saakin word ending" while I am talking about "laam maftooh with mazmoom word ending".
لامُ الابتِداء : هي اللاَّم التي تُفِيدُ تَوكِيدَ مَضمُونِ الجُملَةِ، وتَخلِيصَ المُضَارِعِ لِلحَا لِ، ولا تَدخُلُ إِلاَّ عَلَى الاسم نحو: {لأَنتُم أَشَدُّ رَهبَةً} (الآية "13" من سورة الحشر"59") والفعلِ المضارع نحو قولك {لَيُحِبُّ اللَّهُ المُحسنِينَ}
Ref: Alqawaid by Abdul Ghani Dukkar
:w:
You see how adding (laam) to the present verb makes it with lots of meaning, which we know according to the context?
if someone to find
ليذهب
he will guess which meaning is it intended?
is it he should go
or he goes
or in order to go
or to remove !!!
the context and (tashkeel)is very important....
:w: