Should Shows like "SOUTH PARK" be banned?

No, just don't watch it if it offends you.

I like south park, don't watch it much, but they should keep religion out of it

Offensive shouldn't be the norm and if you don't like it turn off your set.. it should be the other way around.. you won't have so many pathetic hateful turds roaming the earth because bad behavior and offensive material was spoon fed them from childood's hour!

Of course that such shows should be banned. Censorship should back, total freedom of speech is a huge heretical idioticism.

Not all of south park should be banned just some episodes which are insensitive to religious beliefs

format_quote Originally Posted by aadil77

Not all of south park should be banned just some episodes which are insensitive to religious beliefs

but when they are not slagging off religion they slag off other things bro you might think its innocent to laugh at it... but its actually real life people they make fun of.

Do the proponents of totalitarianism believe also that comedy shows such as Have I Got News For You, Mock The Week etc are also offensive and ought to be banned?

format_quote Originally Posted by Skavau

Do the proponents of totalitarianism believe also that comedy shows such as Have I Got News For You, Mock The Week etc are also offensive and ought to be banned?

Go make fun of this:
http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/photo/86705095.html

it seems right up your alley.. and it is precisely why I believe that atheists have no morals, no conscious, have no idea where to draw the line at humor vs. denigratory and libelous.. everywhere atheists have been, have left the world with their spawn not unlike the cruel ***** in those photos.. she found it amusing I am sure.. alot of things are amusing indeed.. go be amused with folks like yourself.. there is no room for animals and animalistic behavior amongst civilized citizens!

format_quote Originally Posted by τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ

Go make fun of this:
http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/photo/86705095.html

I believe I know what that is. I have seen it before. Several internet groups (primarily consisting of the non-religious) attempted to take action against her for doing that. She was arrested eventually I believe. I do not condone the killing or harming of animals for entertainment and never have. That is hardly comparable to Mock The Week and Have I Got News For You - which I asked, would others here have banned for being offensive (and they can be, the panelists actually outright mock real people every week).

it seems right up your alley.. and it is precisely why I believe that atheists have no morals, no conscious,

It isn't up my alley at all. How do you get from crude humour and black humour to gaining enjoyment and amusement out of the killing of life?

have no idea where to draw the line at humor vs. denigratory and libelous.. everywhere atheists have been, have left the world with their spawn not unlike the cruel ***** in those photos.. she found it amusing I am sure.. alot of things are amusing indeed.. go be amused with folks like yourself.. there is no room for animals and animalistic behavior amongst civilized citizens!

Of course, you claim I'd find this funny without even bothering to actually ask if I would. You would do well to note of course, that there are millions and millions of atheists in the prosporous states of Northern Europe such as Sweden, Norway, Finland, Netherlands, Denmark etc that have not melted down into civil war, nor seen their governments capitulate. Of course given that you refuse to check Vexen.co.uk because of a faulty Firefox addon that claims the website is infected, you'd never know.

format_quote Originally Posted by τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ

Go make fun of this:
http://bbs.news.163.com/bbs/photo/86705095.html

it seems right up your alley.. and it is precisely why I believe that atheists have no morals, no conscious, have no idea where to draw the line at humor vs. denigratory and libelous.. everywhere atheists have been, have left the world with their spawn not unlike the cruel ***** in those photos.. she found it amusing I am sure.. alot of things are amusing indeed.. go be amused with folks like yourself.. there is no room for animals and animalistic behavior amongst civilized citizens!

I Want to kill that ***** i hope she burns in hell

format_quote Originally Posted by Skavau

I believe I know what that is. I have seen it before. Several internet groups (primarily consisting of the non-religious) attempted to take action against her for doing that. She was arrested eventually I believe. I do not condone the killing or harming of animals for entertainment and never have. That is hardly comparable to Mock The Week and Have I Got News For You - which I asked, would others here have banned for being offensive (and they can be, the panelists actually outright mock real people every week).

what do you condone for entertainment-- I have no idea where your lines start or end frankly.. it would seem hypocritical to condone one type of disgusting humor and not another!

It isn't up my alley at all. How do you get from crude humour and black humour to gaining enjoyment and amusement out of the killing of life?

see above!

Of course, you claim I'd find this funny without even bothering to actually ask if I would. You would do well to note of course, that there are millions and millions of atheists in the prosporous states of Northern Europe such as Sweden, Norway, Finland, Netherlands, Denmark etc that have not melted down into civil war, nor seen their governments capitulate. Of course given that you refuse to check Vexen.co.uk because of a faulty Firefox addon that claims the website is infected, you'd never know.

I guess anymore than you refuse to look at the New science article that I have posted about how the majority of statistics are misinterpreted and manipulated to echo the outcome that is needed to present a particular point of view?

all the best

format_quote Originally Posted by cat eyes

I Want to kill that ***** i hope she burns in hell

insha'Allah she will and others like her.. I have to believe in divine justice when there is no other form to be had.. although to be honest as much as I couldn't sleep yesterday thinking of that poor kitten clinging on to her boots in sheer horror and unable to mouth her fear that I got a joy thinking of crushing that ***** in a similar fashion. Some people aren't fit to be human or a part of society, yet they insist that their criminality is protected under some sort of man made law!

what do you condone for entertainment-- I have no idea where your lines start or end frankly.. it would seem hypocritical to condone one type of disgusting humor and not another!

Pretty much anything that does not involve deliberate physical harm to people or animals, or harassment towards the lives of others. Why is it hypocritical to not condone sadism in the name of humour?

I guess anymore than you refuse to look at the New science article that I have posted about how the majority of statistics are misinterpreted and manipulated to echo the outcome that is needed to present a particular point of view?

Oh, I have (which is more than you did with my link). Keep in mind that even if you assume the statistics are inaccurate, you have no way of knowing how the highly irreligious nations of Scandinavia and Northern Europe function. You then cannot claim that atheists bring turmoil everywhere they go.

format_quote Originally Posted by τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ

insha'Allah she will and others like her.. I have to believe in divine justice when there is no other form to be had.. although to be honest as much as I couldn't sleep yesterday thinking of that poor kitten clinging on to her boots in sheer horror and unable to mouth her fear that I got a joy thinking of crushing that ***** in a similar fashion. Some people aren't fit to be human or a part of society, yet they insist that their criminality is protected under some sort of man made law!

i cant stand this type of cruelty. kittens must be the most innocent little creatures on the face of this planet.

this is bloody sick how anybody could watch this for enjoyment. how could humans be so stone hearted? i don't get it. this is a question that keeps on bugging me. me and my brother were talking about this too long ago and he said its probably because these people were abused or molested or something then they take there anger out on the creation because they are angry at god and the world. but still how many people go through trials in life and they dont turn out to be evil *****es

id probably risk my own life to rescue an animal from a bunch of thugs

format_quote Originally Posted by Skavau

Pretty much anything that does not involve deliberate physical harm to people or animals, or harassment towards the lives of others. Why is it hypocritical to not condone sadism in the name of humour?

so in your book harm has to be physical to be condemned?

Oh, I have (which is more than you did with my link). Keep in mind that even if you assume the statistics are inaccurate, you have no way of knowing how the highly irreligious nations of Scandinavia and Northern Europe function. You then cannot claim that atheists bring turmoil everywhere they go.

Are theists surveyed in these claims or just atheists rating themselves as usual? Frankly I don't think you understand what havoc and turmoil constitute to others when you live in your own lala land!

all the best

format_quote Originally Posted by cat eyes

i cant stand this type of cruelty. kittens must be the most innocent little creatures on the face of this planet.

this is bloody sick how anybody could watch this for enjoyment. how could humans be so stone hearted? i don't get it. this is a question that keeps on bugging me. me and my brother were talking about this too long ago and he said its probably because these people were abused or molested or something then they take there anger out on the creation because they are angry at god and the world. but still how many people go through trials in life and they dont turn out to be evil *****es

id probably risk my own life to rescue an animal from a bunch of thugs

I don't think she was abused or molested, I think people like to make excuses to why they are so vile, but the reality is some folks are plain evil without excuses .. was cain molested and abused by his parents before killing his brother? These are the sins and evils of the soul that has no harness and no boundaries.. Frankly I don't think any minor arrest to that woman can undo what she has done.. I don't think any sort of apology or retraction if at all can undo the damage done.. human life and dignity that is God bestowed is cheap for some, because they believe in none of those variables! It is all just tissues that have self assembled and cheap and 'fun' to take apart!

so in your book harm has to be physical to be condemned?

In general, yes it does. We're not talking about whether physical violence to those who do not consent should be tolerated in the name of entertainment. Of course it should not, and I don't think you will find anyone on here that would disagree with that. The thread is about what sort of comedy is acceptable under the umbrella of free-speech. You know, that I effectively believe there to be as little limit in terms of what should be acceptable in terms of free speech in entertainment.

Are theists surveyed in these claims or just atheists rating themselves as usual? Frankly I don't think you understand what havoc and turmoil constitute to others when you live in your own lala land!

Neither theists or atheists are surveyed. It is a rundown of what countries set the best examples in many areas of society.