Quote:
Originally Posted by
fschmidt
Evolution is falsifiable. Just google "evolution falsifiable" and find numerous examples of how evolution could be falsified. The only reason that evolution doesn't qualified as hard science is because it is not EXPERIMENTALLY falsifiable. But evolution is science because it is falsifiable by discovered evidence.
The scientific evolution:
'change over time', 'descent with modification', or 'the change of allele frequencies of a population over time'.
This is well established, testable, falsifiable and provable.
"Evolution" according to neo-darwinian scenario:
'the idea that all life has descended from a single common ancestor over millions of years via a net gain in new genetic information'.
This is a speculation; not testable, not falsifiable and not provable.
Fallacy of equivocation:
Atheists & Darwinists use undeniable examples of 'change over time' (variation) to prove 'the idea that all life has descended from a single common ancestor over millions of years via a net gain in new genetic information' (microbe-like-to-man evolution).
This inexcusable logic is called equivocation or the bait-and-switch fallacy, and occurs when someone changes the definition of a word halfway through an argument.
The supposed Evidence for Evolution is full of examples of 'change over time' as evidence for microbes-to-man evolution.
http://quranscientificerror.blogspot.com/2013/08/re-quran-scientific-errors-on-evolution.html