Why 90% of science, history and the origins of men is based on major falsehood (OP)
I could even go further and say almost everything is false that is related to a specific theory? Example the Origins of men and the evolution theory is proven to actully be ibless' insult against humanity and to this day I don't understand how they managed to force this upon almost all schools to teach things like this to even kids. It seems as if they have conquered the school systems and even force this upon young generations. This is an insult clear as day from ibless' on mankind and this is a great shame to our kind and especially how they managed to enforce this upon our throats.
There is multiple of falsehoods within a falsehood like the analogy that human life existed for only 7000-10000 years ago? this is also one of the enforced theories and finally but not least the greatest myth of them all the DINOSAURS.
All the science regarding life forms is false and you may ask why? example the claim of complex life starting 500-million years ago is BS analogy and everything else that follows the evolution theory because the complex life theory is based on the Evolution theory. They have been hiding and destroying multiple ancient giant skeletons of our forefathers to hide history and keep mankind in the dark.
According to the DNA human genome project: 27% of today's current DNA is created 3-billion years ago? which means your DNA have been created 3-billion years ago and this was previously my estimation of mankind's true age. Adam was created and then Allah has created from his back all of us but Allah knows best the correct timing and this is by no means a finality but according to the tests this is how old the DNA is. Which means every single human has like multiple of hundreds of billions of forefathers in their DNA tree today.
Now that we can assume man is indeed alot older than previously thought than we come back to the dinosuars? The question to ask is did these animals exist? the answer is yes but they co-existed with humans and most of the current dinosuars are either extinct animals or living animals that have gone down in size just like us.
The biggest dinosuar was 18 meter tall and in comparison to Adam that Dinosuars could have very well been his pet-animal because he was 27.43 Meters tall. So a T-Rex is 4 Meter tall which is the most dengerous dinosuar would be nothing more than a small tiny harmless lizard in size comparison with Adam and Eva I would say like a baby monitor lizard. humans were alot taller and bigger. So now you know the dinosuars theory is also linked with the Evolution theory to back it up.
This is like a domino effect when one blok falls off in that theory everything comes down with it.
If we assume that man has walked the earth 2-3 Billion years than Civilisations have come and gone? But here comes the sad part we can never examine the existence or proof of these ancient advanced civilisations that could have existed billions or 100 millions of years ago etc etc. We can't proof of their existence because everything is bound to decay within 10.000 years. If All humans left and disappeared from the world today than everything including all of our buildings and infrastructure will vanish in 10.000 years and these people who exist in that era can't proof of our existence? That is why we can't proof of their existence because they seem to have left no traces whatsoever? It's because their traces was lost to the eons and the same will happen to us in just over 10.000 years where buildings like burj Khalifa will have no trace of it's existence nor can anyone proof of it's existence it will completely disappear.
The Quran could have technically gone deeper on this subject but it is not a historical book and never was one. The Quran is the speech of Allah and the stories he mentions is only for moral but not due to it's beauty or anything like that but only due to the morality in that story and it's like a lesson to teach you something about morality period.
If the Quran wanted to dive deep into huge historical events they would have talked about Dul-Qarnayn much more but he was not mentioned alot in the Quran and in total 7-9 verses talk about him and gog and magog because it's an event that will re-appear and if they were to not re-appear no mentions would have likely been seen of them.
The Quran mentions true and factual historical events but everything it mentions is to teach morality because this is mercy to mankind and this teaches how to behave, act and do good deeds etc etc.
Last edited by urkahnkhan; 02-11-2019 at 05:38 PM.
Thanks for the clarification and feedback, was just wondering how you came across as so certain though it was apparently an opinion with which you agree rather than hold to be undebunkable.
Me was just amused when imagining a chain of narration from brittanica
Edit: in my defence, i'd mention that i use a phone whilst lying hunched on the pillow so i usually can't get a one piece visual of my longass texts and just write whatever's going thru my mind at the time and hope people can make sense of it - though i do often go back and edit when i see typos or cringeworthy repeats or incoherent ramblings in posts.
Re: Why 90% of science, history and the origins of men is based on major falsehood
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
Thanks for the clarification and feedback, was just wondering how you came across as so certain though it was apparently an opinion with which you agree rather than hold to be undebunkable.
Me was just amused when imagining a chain of narration from brittanica
Edit: in my defence, i'd mention that i use a phone whilst lying hunched on the pillow so i usually can't get a one piece visual of my longass texts and just write whatever's going thru my mind at the time and hope people can make sense of it - though i do often go back and edit when i see typos or cringeworthy repeats or incoherent ramblings in posts.
I try (and fail) to consider all of my knowledge to be debunkable. It's good to be reminded that, although I may at times feel wise, my brain is a tiny, tiny speck in a vast universe. Stay humble, Dan! Stay!
Re: Why 90% of science, history and the origins of men is based on major falsehood
Yeah, humility.... if you go back and see my anti-evolution taunts and flawed logic thrown at pygo back in 2011 you'll know that this is more than that, it's more like a dawning realisation of my own fallibility when i go back and read that stuff.
But hey, at least i'm trying to get it right. God knows if i'm succeeding though.
Re: Why 90% of science, history and the origins of men is based on major falsehood
Interesting thread and banter.
- - - Updated - - -
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
Thanks for the clarification and feedback, was just wondering how you came across as so certain though it was apparently an opinion with which you agree rather than hold to be undebunkable.
Me was just amused when imagining a chain of narration from brittanica
Edit: in my defence, i'd mention that i use a phone whilst lying hunched on the pillow so i usually can't get a one piece visual of my longass texts and just write whatever's going thru my mind at the time and hope people can make sense of it - though i do often go back and edit when i see typos or cringeworthy repeats or incoherent ramblings in posts.
Re: Why 90% of science, history and the origins of men is based on major falsehood
Consider also:
Some narrations indicate that Jesus will live for 7 years, other narrations indicate he will live for 40 years.
There is a narration in Nuaim bin Hammad's Kitab Al-Fitan that specifies that after Jesus returns to Earth, he will get married, have children, and will live for a period of 19 years after his marriage. According to this narration, he may live more than 19 years.
So..... if he re-lands as an adult and takes 21 years to get married .... then lives another 19 years to complete 40, that's quite an old age.
But if he is expected to only re-appear suddenly as the flying adult messiah leaning on two angels (like the jews expected last time too - to the extent that they with the roman leadership depicted a dude with a bloody face and thorns on his head, his arms outstretched between two thieves (lestai) - in order to raise doubts) , without being RE-BORN, and dajjal also lives 40, but melts away under the focus of jesus, then dajjal would be older in age (the angels and demons image where theres a battle between good and evil within every soul - would disappear, and the "kingdom of heaven is within you" quote wouldn't hold the same value).
Therefore ..... expect a natural birth and a fragile messiah whose lack of grandeur is purposeful for the sake of God's glory, for He shall not give His glory to another - and your Master is NOT one-eyed.
Whether the romans invade syria with a million strong coallition, or repent from corruption and unjust bloodshed like the people of Jonah .... is a question for themselves to consider.
Natural births of celebrity figures is not an alien concept, regardless of whether they existed before - or not.
And they ask you about the soul, say: the soul comes by command of my Master , and knowledge of it is not given to yous - except a little.......
Last edited by Abz2000; 02-16-2019 at 03:17 PM.
Reason: Added source link
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts.
Sign Up
Bookmarks