wrong question.
the hypothesis is that we all live in a computer simulation.. the reason being is that at some point in time, humans pass the limit of technology required to achieve such a feat.
well basically what sort of technology is required for such a thing? whats the limiting factors? cumputer chips? ram? the fundamental process by which processes are processed? lol.
in the end you would probably be better off creating a "biological" mechanism.. a piece of machinery that runs processes specifically and efficiently..
maybe even to the point that it can repair itself and regulate itself so that minimal external upkeep is required.
...because who wants to be sat infront of a computer all day.
so now you have a biological simulation of reality, its exactly the same as your computer simulation of reality except much more efficient.. its just using a different word for "computer"
...its one step away from believing in a creator.
which the computer simulation theory also does..
except one believes man to be the creator and the other...something else.
i dont know what the point of even making the comparison is?
how would i prove we are not in a computer program? ...i wouldnt even put my mind to the task, more important questions would arise if i felt something existed beyond what most people recognise as reality.
..im not watching the matrix again T_T
maybe a change of media is required... although it was probably watched by millions upon millions of people, and it didnt even offend your sensibilities chalk!! (of offending your personal religion...al rights and views...dont push your religon on me! ...you probably never said)
in conclusion....monotheism pretty much implies that we are living in a computer simulation..
....it just doesnt know what a computer is yet.
plz click the link...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7jRWvdR5XQ
i hope you understand.
edit,
..i didnt even read eric's post until after i had posted, its much the same thing..
its often a case of perspective, we all live in the same world.