Ahmad Deedat vs American Army officers.
Dr. Zakir Naik
Here we can post vids of lectures in any language of Dr. Zakir Naik
this next one is a bit blurry but we can still here it...
:thankyou:
thats all i got for now .. i gotta go continue school, sorry.. feel free to post more vids.
Ahmad Deedat vs American Army officers.
Last edited by sur; 01-27-2008 at 05:58 PM.
^^^ u gotta put the link in qoutes but change the word qoute into MEDIA... i just figured out how to do it...lol thanks bro
salam nice idea sister truemuslim
Terrorism and Islam by Dr. Zakir Naik (11th Sept 2006)
Last edited by krypton6; 01-27-2008 at 08:04 PM.
A religious debate between a christian (Dr.William Campbell) and a muslim (Dr.Zakir Naik) in the light of science. (Sometime in year 2000)
Last edited by krypton6; 01-27-2008 at 08:08 PM.
Been watching the 'Terrorism and Islam by Dr. Zakir Naik' and the Khalistanis, and indian TADA = Killing of innocent Sikhs & Torture!!!
Jihad And Terrorism (They should all be in the right order I apologize if some are not)
format_quote Originally Posted by SHAH G
I think he is giving opinions of other shaykhs, he is a very well known and he has traveled around to various parts of the world, so i think he just says what he hears from other scholars, and even if it is the case that he makes the rulings himself i don't see no harm in that, because he knows the quran and the books of ahadeeth very well, and im sure whatever rulings he makes is according to the Qur'an and sunnah.
Quoting somebody in this way is often misleading because we cannot see the context in which they made that statement, nor can we be sure of the exact words used.format_quote Originally Posted by SHAH G
Regarding Yazeed bin Mu’aawiyah, there are different extremes to how people view him. Perhaps Zakir Naik did not want to cause conflict among Muslims and therefore he did not go into details about this topic, as far as I know. Based upon that, we should not be so quick to judge him. To read a bit more about the topic of Yazeed, you can see:
http://www.islamqa.com/index.php?ref...eng&txt=yazeed
Let us keep this thread for Zakir Naik's comparative religion debates, which usually only mention basic issues of Islam, and avoid discussing his aqeedah unless we have solid evidence and reason to doubt him. Any further off-topic posts shall be deleted - if you have any concerns, please contact a moderator through pm.
^^^ thank you brother muhammed jazakallah
ive noticed a lot of people love taking this brother out of context and attacking him behind curtains, may Allaah reward him.
The amount of things i heard, it would be funny to see people approach him with it!
yeh i too was shocked when i heard him say so and refer to him as radhiallahu anhu. and further justified it later in an open letter saying it was perfectly fineDr zakir nalayk said that the battle of karbala was political (siyasi jung) and said yazeed (lanaat) may allah be pleased with him. Now that's bad.
Salaam/peace;
format_quote Originally Posted by AvarAllahNoor
nuh.....
i can't watch video online. Will u pl. explain what u want to say ??
if u mean , Prophet Muhammed (p) is the last abatar of Hindus , still he can't be a Hindu . I heard Zakir saying something like that --Hindu is a geographical norm.
Those who live in Hindustan / India , they are called Hindu. So , even Muslims in India can be called as hindu by geographically.....not by religion.
Last edited by Muslim Woman; 01-28-2008 at 05:30 PM.
naik is cool
now lets be done with that
This is going to be... unless people have respect for him. People you are not scholars, so you have no right to judge him!
^^ gosh u scared me there for a sec sis lol...i was wondering how long u been a mod but guess u juss warning us boutthe other real mods..hehe..lol..anyway nobody fight here just post the GOOD vids by him not the bad. kk
last time i checked the title was: Dr. Zakir Naik
not : Debate: Is Zakir Naik good or bad?
hehe
thank you anwarica and everyone ... i kno mr.naik got some dumb things but his other speeches are pretty good...
muhammed this has been too much trouble for u feel free to close this thread.
You don't have to be a alim to find faults in him if yot just researched instead of just following people like ants then you would of got some where, far as i know i did the right thing telling you that he has no knowlegd of islam, thats why the ulema go against him b'cos he says stupid things. This is no debate yeah! I know it's hard to accept but you have to live it, thatz life
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks