Greetings,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Battle_4_Peace
[COLOR="indigo"]firstly, the odds i gave you are facts.
No they aren't. They are estimates.
Quote:
Non of your Darwinists can say anything about it. They have accepted it.
Nonsense.
Quote:
Fill the state of Texas with silver dollars two feet deep (wonder how that feels?). Having only one dollar marked with the letter X, ask a blind man to find the marked dollar with one try. He would have one chance out of 10^17 chances to find it, (one with 17 zeros behind it). Now imagine the odds for forming a simple cell, one with 40,000 zeros? You would have to fill an area the size of our sun with quarters and find one with the mark while being blindfolded, and on just the first try! This is what he believes haha
What on Earth are you ranting about?
Quote:
You don't even know the basics of science.
Thanks for telling me what I know and what I don't. You must be omniscient!
Quote:
Well, the odds for these are better that the odds for the evolutionists’ one "simple" cell being created by blind chance.
Who says cells are created by blind chance?
Quote:
All scientists know that the cell of an ameba is more complex than the Nassau’s space station.
Do you mean Nassau, the capital of the Bahamas? I didn't know they'd created a space station there.
Quote:
I am asking you a question. Can that OK come into existence by chance? Yes or no?
Maybe.
Quote:
If 2 letters cannot come into existence without a Creator then how can the complete Encyclopedia Britannica (DNA) come into exitstence by chance? Use your logic. Is it possible?
First of all, the Encyclopedia Britannica is not the same as DNA. Secondly, the Encyclopedia Britannica did not come into existence by chance, and no-one claims that it did. What point are you trying to make?
Quote:
Why is the right one created and the left one not? Answer me? The left one can walk, laugh, love, play, talk and the right one cannot. How can the left one come into existence without a Creator and the right one cannot?
A baby is created by its parents. A sculpture of the serene primordial Buddha is created by a sculptor. That's simple enough, no?
Quote:
You don't know anything about how complicated a cell is.
How do you know what I know and what I don't?
Quote:
Cannot come into existence without a creator, then how can a cell come into existence without a creator? See, this is logic.
What exactly do you know about logic? Have you ever studied it?
Quote:
Which scientists do you know that don't agree with the numbers i gave you?
It's not a question of agreeing with the numbers. It's whether or not scientists would agree with the use they've been put to in that article.
Quote:
They accept that the probability of the coincidental formation of a single protein is "as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes". (Ali Demirsoy, Kalýtým ve Evrim (Inheritance and Evolution), Ankara: Meteksan Publishing Co., 1984, p. 64).
You're asserting that all scientists accept this arbitrary comparison. How do you know this to be the case?
Quote:
Look at this fool.
You're calling me a fool now? Charming. What excellent debating skills you have!
Quote:
People tell him that his father was a frog and a monkey and he is smiling.
No-one's ever told me that.
Quote:
We do not believe in that theorie, like thousands of other scientists.
Who are vastly outnumbered by those scientists who accept evolution as a reality.
Quote:
Dr. David Berlinsky said, 'There are gaps in the fossil graveyard, places where there should be intermediate forms, but where there is nothing whatsoever instead. No paleontologist, denies that this is so. It is simply a fact, Darwin's theory and the fossil record are in conflict'.
Wrong. Lots of paleontologists would dispute this, given that transitional forms have been found.
Quote:
They will laugh at you, because you don't know about this things.
I'm happy to be laughed at, but, again, please don't tell me what I know or don't know.
Quote:
Show me who is wrong. Show me which calculation is wrong.
You're missing the point. These calculations are neither right nor wrong, because we don't know what criteria have been used.
Quote:
You did not answer any of my points, you are only showing how brainless you are.
You're just great! Keep up with the insults - that's bound to convince me...
Quote:
You don't even know the scienists i quote.
Right - most of them haven't made much impact on the scientific community, have they?
Quote:
Why do you think no Evolutionist dares to debate an Creationist? hehe he will be humiliated in a few minutes.
Haven't you ever seen these debates? They happen all the time. There are many on this very forum. Here are two of them:
Creationists dealt a blow
Creationist arguments vs. Evolution arguments
Quote:
Louis Bounoure said, 'Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless'. (Prof. Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research).
Presumably this guy thinks all of modern biology is useless too?
Quote:
HAHAHAHAHA this man is lauging at us hahahahhaa read above and tell me if you still laugh haha
I'm laughing at the pathetic article you posted, and at anyone who takes it seriously. I'm sure the majority of Muslims would be far more sensible than that, though.
Peace