format_quote Originally Posted by
Callisto
These do seem to lead me in that direction:
at least in the sense that it "the Book to 'you'" (e.i. me, you and us)
I see you quoted the exact verses from the article. Of course, the Qur'an is for each and every single person. Its guidance is to be heeded by all. But I do not see any indication in these words inviting each individual to interpret the Qur'an. It goes against common sense. If you read these verses in the article, I am sure you must have read its explanation that followed:
But this in no way implies that a person who is unaware of the numerous hadeeth of the Prophet (SAW) in explaining the Qur'aan, and of the reasons behind the revelation of specific verses, and of the intricacies of Arabic grammar and principles of rhetoric, and of the various qiraaat, and of the knowledge of the abrogated rulings, and of all of the other topics of 'uloom al-Qur aan will benefit from the Qur'aan to the same degree that a person who does know these facts will. For example, an Arabic linguist or grammarian might be able to see a certain wisdom behind the phrasing of a verse that the average person may not. A person specialised in the topics of 'uloom al-Qur aan will be better able to grasp the intended meanings of a verse, and derive rulings from it, in contrast to the average layman, who is not qualified to derive rulings from the Qur'aan.
As-Suyootee also discusses the necessity of 'tafseer in his al-Itqaan.[4] He begins by stating that it is a known fact that Allaah communicates with man in a way that the will be able to understand. This is the reason that every messenger has been sent in the language of his people. However, there are three basic reasons why tafseer is necessary despite these facts. First of all, Allaah uses the most clear, eloquent and concise language, and in doing so the meaning is clear to those who are well-grounded in the Arabic language, but not so clear to those who are not. Secondly, the Qur'aan itself does not always mention the events or references for which each particular verse was revealed, and these must be known in order for the verse to be fully and totally understood. Lastly, some words may have multiple meanings, and it is the job of the person that does tafseer to explain what is meant by the word.
It can be said that the purpose of tafseer is to elaborate the principles which the Qur'aan came to clarify:[5]
So, there is this tension between having only one interpretation of the Qu'ran, so as to not have Schism, yet there should be multiple interpretations due to Ta'weel?
No, I'm not aware of any such tension, nor did anyone say there should be any number of interpretations. I think you are reading in things into the article, which I thought explained the concept quite clearly.
So there are heretical killings of Muslims throughout its history and many of these are Sufis?
I would advise we focus on the initial questions and establish the basics before making accusations and confusing multiple issues. At least that is what people who are sincere in wanting to learn about Islam usually do.
Bookmarks