dunno if it reads a bit obvious like a scam email - but could it have been a sell-out agreement?
An ancient document has revealed how Sultan Abdul Aziz, the founder of Saudi Arabia assured Britain of creating a Jewish state on Palestinian lands, a news report says.
The document, expose the deep commitment of first Saudi King to the United Kingdom and his assurance to British authorities to give Palestine to the Jews.
The controversial document, written as a notice to then British delegate Major General Sir Percy Zachariah Cox, is yet another proof of Saudi royal family's hostile approach to the Palestinian nation.
"I am the Sultan Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul Rahman Al Saud al-Faisal and I conceded and acknowledged a thousand times to Sir Percy Cox, delegate of Great Britain, that I have no objection to giving Palestine to the poor Jews or even to non-Jews, and I will never ever violate their [the UK] orders," read the note signed by King Abdul Aziz.
The note also expose the extent of Saudi royals' fidelity to the UK government.
Britain used to attaché great importance to Saudi Arabia in 1930s, as it was located along the shortest seaway to India and Australia throughout the Red Sea and shortest air route to the east. Saudi Arabia was also close to the main British motor route and oil pipeline between Iraq and Palestine through Transjordan.
The ruling of Al Saud family also added to the importance of Saudi Arabia for Britain, as the UK believed ibn-e Saud kings could greatly influence the Arab countries.
Yup, after the fall of the ottoman empire the west placed puppets(Al-saud family) to rule what we now know as Saudi-arabia. With a dictatorship. Not only in KSA tough, all countries of the middle east are ruled by puppets
This the al-saud folks are remnants of Banu Quryzaah, walhi someone should look into their ancestry.
the document says that they're indeed to give Palestine to the Jews.. but Palestine belongs to Muslims not to some unscrupulous 'elite'
Text without context is pretext If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him
Unless the Saudis actually practice Judaism, I don't see how this alleged descent carries much meaning, unless you want to argue that descendents of Jews are genetically predisposed to nefarious conspiracies.
I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. "Children," I say plainly, "watch out for the baobabs!"
Unless the Saudis actually practice Judaism, I don't see how this alleged descent carries much meaning, unless you want to argue that descendents of Jews are genetically predisposed to nefarious conspiracies.
The meaning is summed up in the first post.. do you otherwise have a reading comprehension & deductive reasoning impediment?
best,
Text without context is pretext If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him
The meaning is summed up in the first post.. do you otherwise have a reading comprehension & deductive reasoning impediment?
Yes, I'm very simple. Please be patient, talk slowly, and use small words with me. I'm trying to understand what the alleged "Jewish descent" and the Banu Qurayzah have to do with this.
I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. "Children," I say plainly, "watch out for the baobabs!"
Yes, I'm very simple. Please be patient, talk slowly, and use small words with me. I'm trying to understand what the alleged "Jewish descent" and the Banu Qurayzah have to do with this.
Then enroll in some basic vocational course & keep the hell away from us, we're not here to be patient or teach you anything, if you don't get it then don't gauge the topic all together!
best,
Text without context is pretext If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him
Unless the Saudis actually practice Judaism, I don't see how this alleged descent carries much meaning, unless you want to argue that descendents of Jews are genetically predisposed to nefarious conspiracies.
You don't have to be a Jew to be nefarious, it doesn't have to be that way, as long as people have similar nefarious motives and agendas, they can belong to any race or group and be united over their mutual interests, which can range from global domination to mass murder to economic monopolization to anything.
You don't have to be a Jew to be nefarious, it doesn't have to be that way, as long as people have similar nefarious motives and agendas, they can belong to any race or group and be united over their mutual interests, which can range from global domination to mass murder to economic monopolization to anything.
This my dear sis is what we call leading questions & ready made conclusions.. He wants to hijack the thread and have it go in a particular direction. I wouldn't humor him!
Text without context is pretext If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him
You don't have to be a Jew to be nefarious, it doesn't have to be that way, as long as people have similar nefarious motives and agendas, they can belong to any race or group and be united over their mutual interests, which can range from global domination to mass murder to economic monopolization to anything.
I agree. So why do we need to invent theories about the Saudis being descendents of Banu Qurayzah?
I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. "Children," I say plainly, "watch out for the baobabs!"
It isn't theories.. & it isn't banu quryzah rather banu qanyunqa .. do you read and watch everything before you write or just came to mark the spot with your all too frequent micturate?
best,
Text without context is pretext If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him
This the al-saud folks are remnants of Banu Quryzaah, walhi someone should look into their ancestry.
But all the same I defer to your peerless YouTube scholarship.
I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. "Children," I say plainly, "watch out for the baobabs!"
But all the same I defer to your peerless YouTube scholarship.
I am well aware of what I'd written, and it has evolved from a speculation to a very strong possibility, you catching on last minute with a quip makes you none the wiser, just cements your gadfly status. As for scholarship, well my God, a guy who gets his through a cesspool is really in no position to question where others do their research!
best,
Text without context is pretext If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
Abz2000 liked this post
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks