Oh Syria the victory is coming

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN1JK00W

The hypocrisy is more than real, if this was the Kurds or Shias instead of Sunni Arabs the west would be all over it and what a "disgrace" it is but because it's Sunni Arabs defending their land from Nusayris and Rawafids they don't deserve any help or justice. If this was Rojava the US would deploy its entire military to defend them from Assad.

Syrian rebels say U.S. won't intervene in south Syria | Reuters The United States has told Syrian rebel factions they should not expect military support to help resist a Russian-backed government offensive to regain opposition-held parts of Syria bordering Jordan and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights....

format_quote Originally Posted by JustTime

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN1JK00W

The hypocrisy is more than real, if this was the Kurds or Shias instead of Sunni Arabs the west would be all over it and what a "disgrace" it is but because it's Sunni Arabs defending their land from Nusayris and Rawafids they don't deserve any help or justice. If this was Rojava the US would deploy its entire military to defend them from Assad.

Syrian rebels say U.S. won't intervene in south Syria | Reuters The United States has told Syrian rebel factions they should not expect military support to help resist a Russian-backed government offensive to regain opposition-held parts of Syria bordering Jordan and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights....

A reminder: It's not about race, it's about ideology/religion. There are also many Muslim Kurds and others fighting on the side of the Syrian Opposition.

format_quote Originally Posted by Yahya.

A reminder: It's not about race, it's about ideology/religion. There are also many Muslim Kurds and others fighting on the side of the Syrian Opposition.

The overwhelming majority of Kurds are not Muslim

format_quote Originally Posted by Yahya.

A reminder: It's not about race, it's about ideology/religion. There are also many Muslim Kurds and others fighting on the side of the Syrian Opposition.

Syrian "opposition" - or Syrian mujahideen seeking to establish Islam for Allah's sake?

It is true that there are some decent kurds who trust in Allah and believe with certainty in the last day - however, those who have usurped control over resources and taxation ability in the place called Kurdistan have been nurtured by the western kuffar leadership for a very long time.

format_quote Originally Posted by JustTime

The overwhelming majority of Kurds are not Muslim

Statistics?

format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000

Syrian "opposition" - or Syrian mujahideen seeking to establish Islam for Allah's sake?

It is true that there are some decent kurds who trust in Allah and believe with certainty in the last day - however, those who have usurped control over resources and taxation ability in the place called Kurdistan have been nurtured by the western kuffar leadership for a very long time.

It is the same case in nearly all Muslim countries. And Kurdistan is not an exemption.

format_quote Originally Posted by Yahya.

It is the same case in nearly all Muslim countries. And Kurdistan is not an exemption.

True - although Kurdistan is a little different in that it has become a recent western secularist mercenary state openly churning out soldiery and intelligence assets for secularist invaders on a national level unsimilar to most other governorates in the region - its dealing with the secularist extremist American government has been so "atta boy" like that it has been propped up and assisted openly and helped to expand directly with almost every haraam illegal and immoral American invasion in the region.

---At the San Francisco Peace Conference of 1945, the Kurdish delegation proposed consideration of territory claimed by the Kurds, which encompassed an area extending from the Mediterranean shores near Adana to the shores of the Persian Gulf near Bushehr, and included the Lur inhabited areas of southern Zagros.[41][42]

At the end of the First Gulf War, the Allies established a safe haven in northern Iraq. Amid the withdrawal of Iraqi forces from three northern provinces, Iraqi Kurdistan emerged in 1992 as an autonomous entity inside Iraq with its own local government and parliament.

A 2010 US report, written before the instability in Syria and Iraq that exists as of 2014, attested that "Kurdistan may exist by 2030".[43] The weakening of the Iraqi state following the 2014 Northern Iraq offensive by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant has also presented an opportunity for independence for Iraqi Kurdistan,[44] augmented by Turkey's move towards acceptance of such a state although it opposes moves toward Kurdish autonomy in Turkey and Syria.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdistan


I acknowledge that the people of the region have been traumatized and confused to such an extent that any straw presented as being possible to clutch at has appeared appealing - and geo-nationalistic slogans of jaahiliyyah have been promoted via an endless massively funded barrage of unrelenting propaganda - but their gullibility does them no credit.

I have zero respect for people who shed the blood of others under slogans of secular jaahiliyyah for the sake of creating an ummah based - not on justice, but on an empty and ignorant namesake





.قَالَ أَنَا خَيْرٌ مِّنْهُ خَلَقْتَنِي مِن نَّارٍ وَخَلَقْتَهُ مِن طِينٍ

Yusuf Ali (Saudi Rev. 1985)
(Iblis) said: "I am better than he: thou createdst me from fire, and him thou createdst from clay.

Quran 38:76



قَالَ مَا مَنَعَكَ أَلَّا تَسْجُدَ إِذْ أَمَرْتُكَ قَالَ أَنَا خَيْرٌ مِّنْهُ خَلَقْتَنِي مِن نَّارٍ وَخَلَقْتَهُ مِن طِينٍ

Yusuf Ali (Saudi Rev. 1985)
(Allah) said: "What prevented thee from prostrating when I commanded thee?" He said: "I am better than he: Thou didst create me from fire, and him from clay."

Quran 7:12





Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:By Him in Whose Hand is my life, a time would come when the murderer would not know why he has committed the murder, and the victim would not know why he has been killed.

وَحَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ أَبِي عُمَرَ الْمَكِّيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا مَرْوَانُ، عَنْ يَزِيدَ، - وَهُوَ ابْنُ كَيْسَانَ - عَنْ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ وَالَّذِي نَفْسِي بِيَدِهِ لَيَأْتِيَنَّ عَلَى النَّاسِ زَمَانٌ لاَ يَدْرِي الْقَاتِلُ فِي أَىِّ شَىْءٍ قَتَلَ وَلاَ يَدْرِي الْمَقْتُولُ عَلَى أَىِّ شَىْءٍ قُتِلَ ‏"‏‏.‏

Reference : Sahih Muslim 2908 aIn-book reference : Book 54, Hadith 69USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 41, Hadith 6949- (deprecated numbering scheme)

https://sunnah.com/muslim/54/69






Narrated Jarir:The Prophet (ﷺ) said to me during Hajjat-al-Wida`: Let the people keep quiet and listen. Then he said (addressing the Muslims), "Do not (become infidels) revert to disbelief after me by striking the necks (cutting the throats) of one another (killing each other).

حَدَّثَنَا حَجَّاجٌ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُدْرِكٍ، عَنْ أَبِي زُرْعَةَ، عَنْ جَرِيرٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ لَهُ فِي حَجَّةِ الْوَدَاعِ ‏"‏ اسْتَنْصِتِ النَّاسَ ‏"‏ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ لاَ تَرْجِعُوا بَعْدِي كُفَّارًا يَضْرِبُ بَعْضُكُمْ رِقَابَ بَعْضٍ ‏"‏‏.‏

Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 121In-book reference : Book 3, Hadith 63USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 1, Book 3, Hadith 122 (deprecated numbering scheme)




An-Nawwas b. Sam`an reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) made a mention of the Dajjal one day in the morning. He (ﷺ) sometimes described him to be insignificant and sometimes described (his turmoil) as very significant (and we felt) as if he were in the cluster of the date-palm trees. When we went to him (to the Holy Prophet) in the evening and he read (the signs of fear) in our faces, he (ﷺ) said:What is the matter with you? We said: Allah's Messenger, you made a mention of the Dajjal in the morning (sometimes describing him) to be insignificant and sometimes very important, until we began to think as if he were present in some (near) part of the cluster of the date-palm trees. Thereupon he (ﷺ) said: I harbor fear in regard to you in so many other things besides the Dajjal. If he comes forth while I am among you, I shall contend with him on your behalf, but if he comes forth while I am not amongst you, a man must contend on his own behalf and Allah would take care of every Muslim on my behalf (and safeguard him against his evil). He (Dajjal) would be a young man with twisted, contracted hair, and a blind eye. I compare him to `Abd-ul-`Uzza b. Qatan. He who amongst you would survive to see him should recite over him the opening verses of Sura Kahf (xviii). He would appear on the way between Syria and Iraq and would spread mischief right and left. O servant of Allah! adhere (to the path of Truth). We said: Allah's Messenger, how long would he stay on the earth? He (ﷺ) said: For forty days, one day like a year and one day like a month and one day like a week and the rest of the days would be like your days. We said: Allah's Messenger, would one day's prayer suffice for the prayers of day equal to one year? Thereupon he (ﷺ) said: No, but you must make an estimate of time (and then observe prayer). We said: Allah's Messenger, how quickly would he walk upon the earth? Thereupon he (ﷺ) said: Like cloud driven by the wind. He would come to the people and invite them (to a wrong religion) and they would affirm their faith in him and respond to him. He would then give command to the sky and there would be rainfall upon the earth and it would grow crops. Then in the evening, their pasturing animals would come to them with their humps very high and their udders full of milk and their flanks stretched. He would then come to another people and invite them. But they would reject him and he would go away from them and there would be drought for them and nothing would be left with them in the form of wealth. He would then walk through the waste land and say to it: Bring forth your treasures, and the treasures would come out and collect (themselves) before him like the swarm of bees. He would then call a person brimming with youth and strike him with the sword and cut him into two pieces and (make these pieces lie at a distance which is generally) between the archer and his target. He would then call (that young man) and he will come forward laughing with his face gleaming (with happiness) and it would be at this very time that Allah would send Jesus, son of Mary, and he will descend at the white minaret in the eastern side of Damascus wearing two garments lightly dyed with saffron and placing his hands on the wings of two Angels. When he would lower his head, there would fall beads of perspiration from his head, and when he would raise it up, beads like pearls would scatter from it. Every non-believer who would smell the odor of his self would die and his breath would reach as far as he would be able to see. He would then search for him (Dajjal) until he would catch hold of him at the gate of Ludd and would kill him. Then a people whom Allah had protected would come to Jesus, son of Mary, and he would wipe their faces and would inform them of their ranks in Paradise and it would be under such conditions that Allah would reveal to Jesus these words: I have brought forth from amongst My servants such people against whom none would be able to fight; you take these people safely to Tur. And then Allah would send Gog and Magog and they would swarm down from every slope. The first of them would pass the lake of Tiberias and drink out of it. And when the last of them would pass, he would say: There was once water there. Jesus and his companions would then be besieged here (at Tur, and they would be so much hard pressed) that the head of the ox would be dearer to them than one hundred dinars and Allah's Apostle, Jesus, and his companions would supplicate Allah, Who would send to them insects (which would attack their necks) and in the morning they would perish like one single person. Allah's Apostle, Jesus, and his companions would then come down to the earth and they would not find in the earth as much space as a single span which is not filled with their putrefaction and stench. Allah's Apostle, Jesus, and his companions would then again beseech Allah, Who would send birds whose necks would be like those of Bactrian camels and they would carry them and throw them where God would will. Then Allah would send rain which no house of clay or (the tent of) camels' hairs would keep out and it would wash away the earth until it could appear to be a mirror. Then the earth would be told to bring forth its fruit and restore its blessing and, as a result thereof, there would grow (such a big) pomegranate that a group of persons would be able to eat that, and seek shelter under its skin and milch cow would give so much milk that a whole party would be able to drink it. And the milch camel would give such (a large quantity of) milk that the whole tribe would be able to drink out of that and the milch sheep would give so much milk that the whole family would be able to drink out of that and at that time Allah would send a pleasant wind which would soothe (people) even under their armpits, and would take the life of every Muslim and only the wicked would survive who would commit adultery like asses and the Last Hour would come to them.

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو خَيْثَمَةَ، زُهَيْرُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ، بْنُ يَزِيدَ بْنِ جَابِرٍ حَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى بْنُ جَابِرٍ الطَّائِيُّ، قَاضِي حِمْصَ حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ، جُبَيْرٍ عَنْ أَبِيهِ، جُبَيْرِ بْنِ نُفَيْرٍ الْحَضْرَمِيِّ أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ النَّوَّاسَ بْنَ سَمْعَانَ الْكِلاَبِيَّ، ح وَحَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مِهْرَانَ الرَّازِيُّ، - وَاللَّفْظُ لَهُ - حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ يَزِيدَ بْنِ جَابِرٍ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ جَابِرٍ الطَّائِيِّ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ جُبَيْرِ بْنِ، نُفَيْرٍ عَنْ أَبِيهِ، جُبَيْرِ بْنِ نُفَيْرٍ عَنِ النَّوَّاسِ بْنِ سَمْعَانَ، قَالَ ذَكَرَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم الدَّجَّالَ ذَاتَ غَدَاةٍ فَخَفَّضَ فِيهِ وَرَفَّعَ حَتَّى ظَنَنَّاهُ فِي طَائِفَةِ النَّخْلِ فَلَمَّا رُحْنَا إِلَيْهِ عَرَفَ ذَلِكَ فِينَا فَقَالَ ‏"‏ مَا شَأْنُكُمْ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قُلْنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ذَكَرْتَ الدَّجَّالَ غَدَاةً فَخَفَّضْتَ فِيهِ وَرَفَّعْتَ حَتَّى ظَنَنَّاهُ فِي طَائِفَةِ النَّخْلِ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ غَيْرُ الدَّجَّالِ أَخْوَفُنِي عَلَيْكُمْ إِنْ يَخْرُجْ وَأَنَا فِيكُمْ فَأَنَا حَجِيجُهُ دُونَكُمْ وَإِنْ يَخْرُجْ وَلَسْتُ فِيكُمْ فَامْرُؤٌ حَجِيجُ نَفْسِهِ وَاللَّهُ خَلِيفَتِي عَلَى كُلِّ مُسْلِمٍ إِنَّهُ شَابٌّ قَطَطٌ عَيْنُهُ طَافِئَةٌ كَأَنِّي أُشَبِّهُهُ بِعَبْدِ الْعُزَّى بْنِ قَطَنٍ فَمَنْ أَدْرَكَهُ مِنْكُمْ فَلْيَقْرَأْ عَلَيْهِ فَوَاتِحَ سُورَةِ الْكَهْفِ إِنَّهُ خَارِجٌ خَلَّةً بَيْنَ الشَّأْمِ وَالْعِرَاقِ فَعَاثَ يَمِينًا وَعَاثَ شِمَالاً يَا عِبَادَ اللَّهِ فَاثْبُتُوا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قُلْنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا لَبْثُهُ فِي الأَرْضِ قَالَ ‏"‏ أَرْبَعُونَ يَوْمًا يَوْمٌ كَسَنَةٍ وَيَوْمٌ كَشَهْرٍ وَيَوْمٌ كَجُمُعَةٍ وَسَائِرُ أَيَّامِهِ كَأَيَّامِكُمْ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قُلْنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ فَذَلِكَ الْيَوْمُ الَّذِي كَسَنَةٍ أَتَكْفِينَا فِيهِ صَلاَةُ يَوْمٍ قَالَ ‏"‏ لاَ اقْدُرُوا لَهُ قَدْرَهُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قُلْنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا إِسْرَاعُهُ فِي الأَرْضِ قَالَ ‏"‏ كَالْغَيْثِ اسْتَدْبَرَتْهُ الرِّيحُ فَيَأْتِي عَلَى الْقَوْمِ فَيَدْعُوهُمْ فَيُؤْمِنُونَ بِهِ وَيَسْتَجِيبُونَ لَهُ فَيَأْمُرُ السَّمَاءَ فَتُمْطِرُ وَالأَرْضَ فَتُنْبِتُ فَتَرُوحُ عَلَيْهِمْ سَارِحَتُهُمْ أَطْوَلَ مَا كَانَتْ ذُرًا وَأَسْبَغَهُ ضُرُوعًا وَأَمَدَّهُ خَوَاصِرَ ثُمَّ يَأْتِي الْقَوْمَ فَيَدْعُوهُمْ فَيَرُدُّونَ عَلَيْهِ قَوْلَهُ فَيَنْصَرِفُ عَنْهُمْ فَيُصْبِحُونَ مُمْحِلِينَ لَيْسَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ شَىْءٌ مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ وَيَمُرُّ بِالْخَرِبَةِ فَيَقُولُ لَهَا أَخْرِجِي كُنُوزَكِ ‏.‏ فَتَتْبَعُهُ كُنُوزُهَا كَيَعَاسِيبِ النَّحْلِ ثُمَّ يَدْعُو رَجُلاً مُمْتَلِئًا شَبَابًا فَيَضْرِبُهُ بِالسَّيْفِ فَيَقْطَعُهُ جَزْلَتَيْنِ رَمْيَةَ الْغَرَضِ ثُمَّ يَدْعُوهُ فَيُقْبِلُ وَيَتَهَلَّلُ وَجْهُهُ يَضْحَكُ فَبَيْنَمَا هُوَ كَذَلِكَ إِذْ بَعَثَ اللَّهُ الْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ فَيَنْزِلُ عِنْدَ الْمَنَارَةِ الْبَيْضَاءِ شَرْقِيَّ دِمَشْقَ بَيْنَ مَهْرُودَتَيْنِ وَاضِعًا كَفَّيْهِ عَلَى أَجْنِحَةِ مَلَكَيْنِ إِذَا طَأْطَأَ رَأَسَهُ قَطَرَ وَإِذَا رَفَعَهُ تَحَدَّرَ مِنْهُ جُمَانٌ كَاللُّؤْلُؤِ فَلاَ يَحِلُّ لِكَافِرٍ يَجِدُ رِيحَ نَفَسِهِ إِلاَّ مَاتَ وَنَفَسُهُ يَنْتَهِي حَيْثُ يَنْتَهِي طَرْفُهُ فَيَطْلُبُهُ حَتَّى يُدْرِكَهُ بِبَابِ لُدٍّ فَيَقْتُلُهُ ثُمَّ يَأْتِي عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ قَوْمٌ قَدْ عَصَمَهُمُ اللَّهُ مِنْهُ فَيَمْسَحُ عَنْ وُجُوهِهِمْ وَيُحَدِّثُهُمْ بِدَرَجَاتِهِمْ فِي الْجَنَّةِ فَبَيْنَمَا هُوَ كَذَلِكَ إِذْ أَوْحَى اللَّهُ إِلَى عِيسَى إِنِّي قَدْ أَخْرَجْتُ عِبَادًا لِي لاَ يَدَانِ لأَحَدٍ بِقِتَالِهِمْ فَحَرِّزْ عِبَادِي إِلَى الطُّورِ ‏.‏ وَيَبْعَثُ اللَّهُ يَأْجُوجَ وَمَأْجُوجَ وَهُمْ مِنْ كُلِّ حَدَبٍ يَنْسِلُونَ فَيَمُرُّ أَوَائِلُهُمْ عَلَى بُحَيْرَةِ طَبَرِيَّةَ فَيَشْرَبُونَ مَا فِيهَا وَيَمُرُّ آخِرُهُمْ فَيَقُولُونَ لَقَدْ كَانَ بِهَذِهِ مَرَّةً مَاءٌ ‏.‏ وَيُحْصَرُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهُ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ حَتَّى يَكُونَ رَأْسُ الثَّوْرِ لأَحَدِهِمْ خَيْرًا مِنْ مِائَةِ دِينَارٍ لأَحَدِكُمُ الْيَوْمَ فَيَرْغَبُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ فَيُرْسِلُ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهُمُ النَّغَفَ فِي رِقَابِهِمْ فَيُصْبِحُونَ فَرْسَى كَمَوْتِ نَفْسٍ وَاحِدَةٍ ثُمَّ يَهْبِطُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ إِلَى الأَرْضِ فَلاَ يَجِدُونَ فِي الأَرْضِ مَوْضِعَ شِبْرٍ إِلاَّ مَلأَهُ زَهَمُهُمْ وَنَتْنُهُمْ فَيَرْغَبُ نَبِيُّ اللَّهِ عِيسَى وَأَصْحَابُهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ فَيُرْسِلُ اللَّهُ طَيْرًا كَأَعْنَاقِ الْبُخْتِ فَتَحْمِلُهُمْ فَتَطْرَحُهُمْ حَيْثُ شَاءَ اللَّهُ ثُمَّ يُرْسِلُ اللَّهُ مَطَرًا لاَ يَكُنُّ مِنْهُ بَيْتُ مَدَرٍ وَلاَ وَبَرٍ فَيَغْسِلُ الأَرْضَ حَتَّى يَتْرُكَهَا كَالزَّلَفَةِ ثُمَّ يُقَالُ لِلأَرْضِ أَنْبِتِي ثَمَرَتَكِ وَرُدِّي بَرَكَتَكِ ‏.‏ فَيَوْمَئِذٍ تَأْكُلُ الْعِصَابَةُ مِنَ الرُّمَّانَةِ وَيَسْتَظِلُّونَ بِقِحْفِهَا وَيُبَارَكُ فِي الرِّسْلِ حَتَّى أَنَّ اللِّقْحَةَ مِنَ الإِبِلِ لَتَكْفِي الْفِئَامَ مِنَ النَّاسِ وَاللِّقْحَةَ مِنَ الْبَقَرِ لَتَكْفِي الْقَبِيلَةَ مِنَ النَّاسِ وَاللِّقْحَةَ مِنَ الْغَنَمِ لَتَكْفِي الْفَخِذَ مِنَ النَّاسِ فَبَيْنَمَا هُمْ كَذَلِكَ إِذْ بَعَثَ اللَّهُ رِيحًا طَيِّبَةً فَتَأْخُذُهُمْ تَحْتَ آبَاطِهِمْ فَتَقْبِضُ رُوحَ كُلِّ مُؤْمِنٍ وَكُلِّ مُسْلِمٍ وَيَبْقَى شِرَارُ النَّاسِ يَتَهَارَجُونَ فِيهَا تَهَارُجَ الْحُمُرِ فَعَلَيْهِمْ تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏

Reference : Sahih Muslim 2937 aIn-book reference : Book 54, Hadith 136USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 41, Hadith 7015 (deprecated numbering scheme)https://sunnah.com/urn/270150




The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 – 17 January 1991) for operations leading to the buildup of troops and defense of Saudi Arabia and Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991) in its combat phase, was a war waged by coalition forces from 35 nations led by the United States against Iraq with the claim that the planned invasion was a response to Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait.



A treacherous distraction and pincer attack during a fake ceasefire as propaganda for a world disgusted by the crimes of their governments


The 1991 uprisings in Iraq were a series of popular rebellions in northern and southern Iraq in March and April 1991 in a cease fire of the Persian Gulf War. The "mostly uncoordinated insurgency", often referred to as the Sha'aban Intifada among Arabs and as the National Uprising among Kurds, was fueled by the perception that then Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was responsible for systemic social repression and had become vulnerable to regime change. This perception of weakness was largely the result of the outcome of two prior wars: the Iran–Iraq War and the invasion of Kuwait, both of which occurred within a single decade and devastated the economy and population of Iraq


........The Persian Gulf War Coalition established Iraqi no-fly zones over northern and southern Iraq, and the Kurdish opposition established the Kurdish Autonomous Republic in what is now commonly referred to as Iraqi Kurdistan.


Territorialchanges
Establishment of the Kurdish Autonomous Republic, as well as the Iraqi no-fly zones.


After all that blood and sweat of others, you can now proudly call yourselves by an insignificant name that neither Allah, nor most of the people around the world care about, that doesn't really make a worthy difference .....want a blue peter badge to go with it?

Salaam

Another update

Some commentary

Ajmal Hussain

The treachery the Syrian people faced was multi faceted, the so called ‘world policeman’ America, Muslim Rulers, Turkey, Saudi, Iran, ‘Rebels’ more interested in cash and controlling checkpoints than removing Asad. But what was the end point sought by ‘rebels’, the removal of Asad and replacing with another stooge?, ‘an emirate’ where punishments are conducted devoid of all the Systems of Islam?

If you don’t have a defined end point which is comprehensive , ie the type of society you wish to create, the system you wish to live by, the key principles that all must unite on etc.. then no real Unity can ever be achieved and the ‘revolution’ is bound to fail. Just like the rest in the ‘Arab Spring’

If however people are united behind a common endpoint and system then as the saying goes ‘no army can stop and Idea whose time has come ‘.

@Abz2000 We should be careful in equalling peoples with their respective administrations. You have almost exclusively addressed the state of the Autonomous Kurdistan Administration in Northern Iraq, whereas the Kurdish population there is but a minor part of the whole. But apart from that, it is indispensable to discern that Kurds have not incurred the present political entities themselves, rather these were established through external support (as you have already stated functionally). Hence Kurds are not represented by these entities, even if they may be overwhelmed by them and often compelled to choose one of the lesser evils. For instance the elections in Northern Iraq had a participation rate of 74%. Of course, the proper way would be to organise an independent Islamic movement, but this seems to be an apparent lack although some attempts were made and are still being made in loose manners.

Beyond all this, there is no point in chiding a whole nation which has been afflicted with unfortunate conditions since decades. This is very arrogant of some people (I exclude you), whereas the jahili nationalism of Kurds was only formed as a reaction to Turkish and Arabic nationalism. There was no nationalist revolt by the Kurds during Ottoman rule, this only commenced following the establishment of the nationalistic Turkish Republic. The same goes for the Kurds in other modern countries; Kurdish nationalism only developed as a(n ill) response to the authoritarian, chauvinist politics of the ruler "ethonations". So, before moving on to the Kurds, one has to ponder over one's own people. It is easy to judge others, especially when one doesn't have any knowledge. I ask you, @JustTime foremost, what do you know about the Kurdish people, their culture and history, besides modern politics and political history? Yet even the last is most probably not exclusively centred around the Kurdish people. Then you even dare to say "the overwhelming majority" of Kurds weren't Muslims! Using such an emphasis, where do you get this self-confidence from? Allah will held you accountable for this. This is the minor level of what your master Saddam has done. First you oppress, then forget the oppression and blame the oppressed for their reaction. No matter how wrong this reaction may be, it is very shameful that you overlook your own deeds and concentrate on the victims, whereas a great part of the Kurdish people does not even support the political agendas of the West as a blessing of Allah despite being oppressed from all sides for a long time and being forsaken by the ummah the same while.

Leaving behind such pro-Saddamist thoughts, neutral people must also consider the psychological condition of the Kurds before making any judgements about them.
I am not into discussing which people were more virtuous. That would be nonsense. I just want to halt such ethnocentric, counterproductive attitudes. What do you think would be the reaction of a Kurd like reading such statements about his people? A Kurd who is already rejected by most of his neighbours. They will just distance themselves further from the ummah and start believing that "they only have themselves as a nation", raising to the bait of Western ideologies. If you know about Kurds, this is actually one of the reasons why some of them distance themselves from non-Kurdish Muslims/Islamic organisations; because they feel themselves to be ill treated and seen as a second class people among the peoples of the Islamic naiton. And such arrogant statements like the one above are but confirming this notion in their minds.

format_quote Originally Posted by Yahya.

@Abz2000 We should be careful in equalling peoples with their respective administrations. You have almost exclusively addressed the state of the Autonomous Kurdistan Administration in Northern Iraq, whereas the Kurdish population there is but a minor part of the whole. But apart from that, it is indispensable to discern that Kurds have not incurred the present political entities themselves, rather these were established through external support (as you have already stated functionally). Hence Kurds are not represented by these entities, even if they may be overwhelmed by them and often compelled to choose one of the lesser evils. For instance the elections in Northern Iraq had a participation rate of 74%. Of course, the proper way would be to organise an independent Islamic movement, but this seems to be an apparent lack although some attempts were made and are still being made in loose manners.

Beyond all this, there is no point in chiding a whole nation which has been afflicted with unfortunate conditions since decades. This is very arrogant of some people (I exclude you), whereas the jahili nationalism of Kurds was only formed as a reaction to Turkish and Arabic nationalism. There was no nationalist revolt by the Kurds during Ottoman rule, this only commenced following the establishment of the nationalistic Turkish Republic. The same goes for the Kurds in other modern countries; Kurdish nationalism only developed as a(n ill) response to the authoritarian, chauvinist politics of the ruler "ethonations". So, before moving on to the Kurds, one has to ponder over one's own people. It is easy to judge others, especially when one doesn't have any knowledge. I ask you, @JustTime foremost, what do you know about the Kurdish people, their culture and history, besides modern politics and political history? Yet even the last is most probably not exclusively centred around the Kurdish people. Then you even dare to say "the overwhelming majority" of Kurds weren't Muslims! Using such an emphasis, where do you get this self-confidence from? Allah will held you accountable for this. This is the minor level of what your master Saddam has done. First you oppress, then forget the oppression and blame the oppressed for their reaction. No matter how wrong this reaction may be, it is very shameful that you overlook your own deeds and concentrate on the victims, whereas a great part of the Kurdish people does not even support the political agendas of the West as a blessing of Allah despite being oppressed from all sides for a long time and being forsaken by the ummah the same while.

Leaving behind such pro-Saddamist thoughts, neutral people must also consider the psychological condition of the Kurds before making any judgements about them.
I am not into discussing which people were more virtuous. That would be nonsense. I just want to halt such ethnocentric, counterproductive attitudes. What do you think would be the reaction of a Kurd like reading such statements about his people? A Kurd who is already rejected by most of his neighbours. They will just distance themselves further from the ummah and start believing that "they only have themselves as a nation", raising to the bait of Western ideologies. If you know about Kurds, this is actually one of the reasons why some of them distance themselves from non-Kurdish Muslims/Islamic organisations; because they feel themselves to be ill treated and seen as a second class people among the peoples of the Islamic naiton. And such arrogant statements like the one above are but confirming this notion in their minds.

The Kurdish history of deviance is ancient, considering their vile culture for that pathed the way for their vile Ocalan-PKK ideology that pollutes their people today. If you review Kurdish history and their people today, the concept of Jineology which is a very extreme form of feminism isn't knew or Ocalan's creation, it goes back to Kurdish tribes encouraging their women to fight wars, which is ubsurd.

Then in the 19th century you will find that their leaders in Northeastern Iraq collaborated closely with the British against Turkish rule, and some of their leaders were even women, then you will also find in the early 20th century in Iraq the devil worshipping Yazidis and so called "Muslim" Kurds fought Arabs and Turks alike with aid from Europe, collaborating with Satanists against Muslims is a major act of disbelief, and today in Iraq you see them collaborating with Iran and the Rafida against the Muslims, against Arab Muslims.

In Syria when the Turkish invaded Afrin, though I am not a fan of Erdogan, but in their invasion of Afrin the Kurdish YPG rallied together with Atheists from Europe and America that fight for the sake of Anarchism, Communism and Feminism, they also rallied together with Iran which supplied them with Anti-Tank missiles and jeeps, and they fought side by side with the Nusayris and Rafida militias of "National Defense Force" and the Rafidi "Liwa al-Baqir" against mostly Sunni Arab groups, and after Afrin was liberated from those YPG dogs and geopolitical whores, they began murdering displaced Sunni Arabs from East Ghouta and the Yarmouk camp after everything they endured.

In Raqqa these animals forced Arabs to join their ranks, with threats of arrest, seized their properties, and evicted thousands just for being Arabs, and the media never reports this but there have been protests since the so-called "liberation" by the coalition of Sodomites, Communists, Feminists and Kurdish nationalists, and the YPG has used live fire on unarmed civilians just because they demand YPG leaves the city, and prior to "liberating" Raqqa they excluded Liwa Jabhat Thuwar ar-Raqqa, a group of locals from Raqqa, just because they were Arabs.

In Hasakah they are now seizing more Sunni Arab villages with assistance from the so called "Popular Mobilization Forces" which everyone knows is a collection of Iranian death squads that rampaged their way through northern and western Iraq killing everyone they saw, and this is who the Kurds take as allies.

In 2004 after the US invasion of Iraq, in Qamishili they rioted attacking Sunni Arabs and proudly proclaimed that they'd die for Bush and celebrated the overthrow of Saddam.

In the 1970s and 80s during Saddam's war on Iran they sided with Iran, and Iraqi Rafidi militias that today compose the "Popular Mobilization Force", against Saddam they worked with the CIA, IRGC and Syrian governement of Hafez al-Assad who murded the Muslims of Hama against Saddam.

When the US invaded Iraq they were on the frontlines yet again with Rafidi militias and "Operation 'Iraqi Freedom'" coalition fighters against Saddam's government.

During Maliki's sectarian rule in Iraq, after all the years he oppressed Sunni Arabs and Kurds alike in 2014 the Kurds yet again proudly collaborated with the Rafidi Mobilization Forces against the Arab revolution against Iran and their puppets in Iraq.

If these "Muslim" Kurds truly opposed the oppression and deviant ways of their rulers like Barzani and Rojava where is the rebellion? Where is the opposition? In 2011 the world witnessed the mass Pan-Arab revolution against the most corrupt and vile and sadistic of leaders, like in Tunisia and Egypt, and the world has witnessed the Iraqi, Syrian, Libyan and Yemeni revolutions against oppression and the misguided ways of Assad, Maliki, Hezbulshaytan, Ghaddafi, and the Houthis.

The only Kurdish rebellions have been those against the Muslims inspired by the most irrational and fanatical level of arrogance in race known to man, that would put some Neo-Nazi white nationalist movements to shame, all the Kurdish rebellions have been against Muslim Arabs and Muslim Turks with aid from foreign powers and fought side by side with open Satanists like Yazidis and Rafidi groups.

In Afghanistan when their king was deposed and replaced by a Communist with a very similar ideology to that of the YPG in Syria, he began revoking and changing laws either derived or inspired by the Sharia of Allah (AWJ), and the Afghan people unanimously rebelled, and the Afghans are ethnically diverse Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks and more all took up what arms they could and mobilized in rebellion to the point that the Soviets had to intervene, in Somalia likewise there was a rebellion against Communist rule there in the 70s and 80s by masses of the population.

Yet among the Kurds we see no similar movement or opposition to the vile, degenerate and corrupt ways of Rojava and Barzani we only see the populace rallying for them and dying for the sake of them.

The Kurdish population as a whole are the most irrational, deluded, and misguided people on Earth, there's no way to describe these geopolitical whores aside from stupid, all them are idiots, their race is collectively a populace of idiots. They have murdered, pillaged, stolen, displaced, evicted thousands of people for nothing more than the sake of their enormous arrogance, they are the most vile and twisted group of people on Earth, and the only reason they are blessed with the privilege to call themselves "Muslims" is because Allah blessed them with the honor of living with Arabs, yet instead they are unappreciative and commit the worst of crimes and atrocities against them, yet again for the sole purpose of their toxic and sickening level of arrogance.

So yes, I reaffirm my stance the overwhelming majority of Kurds are not Muslim.

Ya Rahman, bless the people of Sham with an army of the upmost sincere and righteous, Ya Rahman eradicate the vile sadistic Bashar, Ya Rahman end the terror of the Safawis in the Mashriq region, Ya Rahman punish the Rafida, punish them with suffering and pain thousands of times more intense and harsher than anything they've done until the scales are imbalanced, Ya Rahman make Daraa an oven from the Nusayris, Ya Rahman make Idlib a volcano for the Nusayris, Ya Rahman make Julan and Yarmouk the land of thousands of Khalid Ibn Walids, Ya Rahman make Dier az Zor a second red sea and drown them with your punishment, Ya Rahman make Damascus the glory of our Ummah, Ya Rahman make Aleppo the biggest regret for the Russians, Ya Rahman make Qalamoun a mountain for the sincere, Ya Rahman make Latakia the forests of the angles, Ya Rahman make the deserts of Homs and Tadmur an ocean of tragedies for the Iranians and Russians, Ya Rahman make Hama a spring of glory,
Ya Rahman do not abandon the people of Sham

@JustTime

I will not try defending a race, because discussing about the virtue of races is forbidden. The Prophet (peace be upon him says):

Even if your "analysis" were true, there is no point in demoting a particular race, because it is counterproductive to dawah efforts. Did the prophet slander the Arabs in such a way, although they were firm disbelievers? No, instead his praised their good aspects to win over their trust. Now it's your choice whether you are going to stick to your conviction (true or not) and propagate the disbelief of Kurds, or turn away from that and adopt a more subtle approach.

Below is an interview with a Kurd on the Kurdish people, maybe it will give you an insight.

format_quote Originally Posted by Yahya.

@JustTime

I will not try defending a race, because discussing about the virtue of races is forbidden. The Prophet (peace be upon him says):

Even if your "analysis" were true, there is no point in demoting a particular race, because it is counterproductive to dawah efforts. Did the prophet slander the Arabs in such a way, although they were firm disbelievers? No, instead his praised their good aspects to win over their trust. Now it's your choice whether you are going to stick to your conviction (true or not) and propagate the disbelief of Kurds, or turn away from that and adopt a more subtle approach.

Below is an interview with a Kurd on the Kurdish people, maybe it will give you an insight.

This video has many flaws and you can't blame Muhaysini, Abu Hasan or the Kurdish man interviewed as they don't know any better, but the reality is the Kurdish man they interviewed even stated he supported Masoud Barzani and Barzani supports the PKK-PYD/Rojava they disagree politically but the reality is he favors them, and the dispute is no different than the traditional Liberal-Conservative political dispute that exists in most Democratic countries like the United States with the Republican and Democrats or UK with Labour and Conservatives and so on, admittedly yes, Barzani is a lesser evil to the Leftists from PKK-PYD and KCK organization as a whole but the facts are that Barzani's hands are wet with the blood of Arab Muslims just like Rojava.

This video is exaggerating and excluding a lot of important details, for example Muhaysini asked "Who would let their wives fight this is contrary to Kurdish culture" when history shows that Kurdish tribes in Northeastern Iraq would encourage their women to fight in place of men and this goes back to the 1500s, and their greater history of using women in battle goes back further just read about it here,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdish_women_in_warfare
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdish_women

And yes the Prophet (SAAWS) did condemn the barbaric and vile ways of the Jahil Arabs on many occasions, and yes he did praise aspects of the Arab culture even the Jahils, because for one he was an Arab and secondly Arabs are descendants of Ibrahim and retained a lot of his virtues in their culture.

The video also claims that Kurds never fought Muslims when many Kurds did in fact support the Byzantine and Zoroastrian empires that ruled over the Jazeera region of Iraq and Sham and you can look it up too.

The video also claims that Kurdish nationalism is a Zionist invention yet the history of the Kurdish nationalist movement as we know it today goes back far before Israel was a country, and what enabled the groups like the PKK was actually the Soviet Union and other Communists. Again with Barzani he presents himself as a 'Conservative' even though he was born in a short lived Soviet puppet state created in Northern Iran after World War 2 and his family/clan after the Soviet puppet state was annexed by Iran moved into Iraq and worked closely with Iraqi Communists and Leftists by gathering a large amount of Kurdish support to overthrow the Iraqi king.

And when Iraq was a Communist country the Kurds had total power over the state even though the leader of the country was Abd al-Karim Qasim who was an Arab, under his rule the Kurds had so much power they replaced Arabic as the official language of the country with Kurdish and during the rule of Qasim his policies were so unpopular and the Kurds had so much influence in the country's politics that there was a popular Arab uprising led by Saddam Hussein and his family and friends to restore proper order to Iraq, it was in fact Arabs who saved Iraq from a Kurdish attempt to change Iraq's demographics from Arab majority to Kurdish majority with support from Israel and the Soviet Union, and when the Iraqi Baath Party saved Iraq this outraged the Israelis and the Soviets and other Communist movements and states and this prompted the Kurds to yet again rebel with Israeli and Iranian (Shah era) support.

This video has many inaccuracies and is incorrect in many ways

Here is a list of individuals who support Assad, it's something worth noting,

Richard Spencer - Atheist
Tucker Carlson - Hates Islam supports Homosexuality and Gay marriage
Tulsi Gabbard - Supports Abortion and drugs and fought Muslims in Iraq
Mike Cernovich - Fornicator/Rapist
Milo Yiannopoulos - Homosexual and Hates Islam
Hassan Nasrallah - Rafidi
Nikolaos Michaloliakos - Greek Nationalist calls for every Mosque in Greece to be shut down, hates Islam
Kim Jong Un - Mushrik
Abdal Fattah al-Sisi - Taghout
Ali Khamenei - Rafidi
Larry Holmes - Communist

Allah (Ta'Ala) said:

بِسْمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحْمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لَا تَتَّخِذُوا۟ عَدُوِّى وَعَدُوَّكُمْ أَوْلِيَآءَ تُلْقُونَ إِلَيْهِم بِٱلْمَوَدَّةِ وَقَدْ كَفَرُوا۟ بِمَا جَآءَكُم مِّنَ ٱلْحَقِّ يُخْرِجُونَ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَإِيَّاكُمْ ۙ أَن تُؤْمِنُوا۟ بِٱللَّهِ رَبِّكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ خَرَجْتُمْ جِهَٰدًا فِى سَبِيلِى وَٱبْتِغَآءَ مَرْضَاتِى ۚ تُسِرُّونَ إِلَيْهِم
بِٱلْمَوَدَّةِ وَأَنَا۠ أَعْلَمُ بِمَآ أَخْفَيْتُمْ وَمَآ أَعْلَنتُمْ ۚ وَمَن يَفْعَلْهُ مِنكُمْ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ سَوَآءَ ٱلسَّبِيلِ

O believers, take not My enemy and your enemy for friends, offering them love, though they have disbelieved in the truth that has come to you, expelling the Messenger and you because you believe in God your Lord. If you go forth to struggle in My way and seek My good pleasure, secretly loving them, yet I know very well what you conceal and what you publish; and whosoever of you does that, has gone astray from the right way.

Quran 60:1

Syria’s Assad Has Become Israel’s Ally

https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/.premium-syria-s-assad-has-become-israel-s-ally-1.6240499
Israel wants Assad to remain in power. Both Israel and the Syrian president now depend on Russia, and when Israel threatens Syria over Iran, it should know it's threatening Putin, too














Zvi Bar'el







Jul 03, 2018 2:44 PM
6comments

Subscribe now

• Shareshare on facebook
• Tweet
• send via email
• reddit
• stumbleupon

Syrian President Bashar Assad, left, greeting Syrians following the prayers of the first day of Eid al-Fitr, in Tartous, Syria, June 15, 2018. Sana/AP

• Assad forces roll through rebel-held towns near Israeli border as some 160,000 civilians flee the fighting
  
  
• Everything you need to know about the Syrian refugee crisis on Israel's doorstep
  
  
• Israel fears Iran may target senior officials abroad
  
  

Early in 2012, the year after the outbreak of the civil war in Syria, the Foreign Ministry drafted recommendations on Israel’s position regarding Syrian President Bashar Assad.
As Haaretz reported at the time, the ministry said Israel should denounce the slaughter in Syria and call for Assad’s ouster. It argued that Israel shouldn’t be the only Western country not to condemn Assad, since that would feed conspiracy theories that Israel preferred the mass murderer to remain in power.
The Israeli foreign minister at the time, Avigdor Lieberman, accepted this recommendation, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposed it. Netanyahu denounced the slaughter and the Syrian army and charged that “various leaders have no moral qualms about killing their neighbors and their own people as well.” But he never mentioned Assad as the person responsible or demanded his ouster. Israel’s UN ambassador during that period, Ron Prosor, said Assad has “no moral right to lead his people,” but that was it.
>> To Get Iran out of Syria, Israel and the U.S. must cooperate with Putin
These diplomatic acrobatics and the Lieberman-Netanyahu dispute only fed the conspiracy theories, and Syrian rebel leaders were convinced that Israel wanted Assad to remain in power. They were right.
Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter

Email*







Now that Assad has regained control of most of Syria and is waging a final battle against rebels in the south, Israel is acting as if it is now reformulating its policy and becoming “reconciled” to Assad’s continued rule. Several weeks ago, Israel reportedly told Russia it wouldn’t oppose that, as if the decision were in its hands or as if Israel even had any leverage over what kind of government is in power in Syria after the war ends.
But Israel isn’t merely “reconciled” to rule by Assad. It also feared the prospect that the various rebel militias might succeed in ousting him, sparking a new civil war among the rebels themselves.
Position papers drafted by the Israeli army and the Foreign Ministry over the past two years didn’t actually voice support for the Syrian president, but their assessments show that they viewed his continued rule as preferable or even vital for Israel’s security. Israel’s close cooperation with Russia, which gave Israeli forces a free hand to attack Hezbollah and Iranian targets in Syria, added the Israelis to the unofficial coalition of Arab states that support Assad’s continued rule.
>> Israel delivers Arab humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees
Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi, who met with the head of Syrian intelligence in 2015, said that same year that “Egypt and Syria are in the same boat.” Egyptian delegations visited Damascus despite Syria’s ouster from the Arab League, and in a 2017 interview, Al-Sissi even said that “Egypt supports the armies of states like Iraq, Libya and Syria.”
King Abdullah of Jordan was one of the first leaders to denounce Assad and demand his ouster. But he later reversed himself, thereby angering Saudi Arabia. And following conversations between Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Russian officials, even Riyadh is no longer publicly opposing Assad’s continued tenure.


Russia’s military intervention in Syria, which began in 2015, was initially viewed by Israel as ineffective and doomed to fail. But in reality, it bolstered Assad’s status domestically, created a coalition with Iran and Turkey and neutralized the intervention of Arab states such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. And since the United States had withdrawn from the arena even before that, Israel ostensibly had to make do with the lesser evil.
>> Assad is preparing to retake Southwest Syria and Israel will have to decide whether to intervene | Analysis
But the Russian coalition is no love affair. Tehran and Moscow are at odds over control of the de-escalation zones. Turkey, which invaded Kurdish areas of northern Syria, threatens Russia’s desire for a united Syrian state.
Therefore if Israel’s goal is to oust Iran from Syria, Russia — rather than the United States or the Arab states — is the only power capable of limiting Iran’s operations there and perhaps even getting it to leave.
Assad is deeply dependent on Russia, even more than on Iran. And that’s convenient for Israel, because it means Syria’s foreign policy, including its future policy toward Israel, will be vetted by the Kremlin, thereby at least ensuring coordination with Israel and a reduction in the threat from Syria. In exchange, Israel has committed not to undermine Assad’s rule.


Moreover, Israel has insisted that the 1974 Separation of Forces Agreement that followed the Yom Kippur War remains in effect, meaning Israel won’t accept Syrian forces in parts of the Golan Heights demilitarized under that agreement. Officially, UN observers oversee the agreement’s implementation. But in practice, it was the Assad regime that ensured that Syria upheld the agreement and that kept the border quiet for decades. Israel, which has a low opinion of UN observers, also used its military deterrence to persuade Assad that upholding the agreement served his interests.
Now Russia is effectively joining this supervisory force, and it sees eye to eye with Israel about the need to keep the border quiet. Therefore Israel ought to wish Assad sweeping success and a long life. And when Israeli ministers threaten his continued rule if he lets Iranian forces set up shop near Israel’s border, they should know they’re also threatening Russia — as well as Israel’s new strategic partner in the presidential palace in Damascus.

All rebels deserve to be punished according to the measure of their rebellion, and Allah is the True King of the Dominion of the heavens and the earth.

What is happening in Syria is a genocide against Muslims

It's amazing how Assad and his idiotic supporters claim to support him because he is "Anti-Israel", when the reality is, yes any and every Muslim would oppose Israel and their transgressions in Palestine, on that same note we would also condemn actions taken against our Ummah anywhere and everywhere regardless of race,class and ethnicity. So why is it when a Rafidi or Nusayri murders our brothers it is okay but a Jew it isn't? This is the hypocriasy shown when it comes to the Jahils, Murtadin, and Munafiqeen when it comes to Assad whilst ignoring the Shia lienage to Judaism (Ibn Saba). If you think Assad is clean of oppression you are wrong, and if you think he is going to destroy Israel you are not only wrong but stupid as well. No he has no intentions to retake Golan, next for those of you who don't know history you would know of his father's crimes in the 1980s from murdering thousands of Muslims in Aleppo and Hama to how they besieged Palestinians with their Rafidi allies like the Amal Movement, and the crimes of the Nusayri Assad clan against our Palestinian brothers and sisters didn't end in the 80's just this year in 2018 Bashar continued the legacy of his father in harming Palestinians by brutally assaulting the Yarmouk Camp in Damascus using seige and starve tactics, barrel bombs, countless cowardly airstrikes and various assaults without regard for civlians, the situation in the Yarmouk Camp was so bad that a Murtad so called "Islamic Scholar" who praised Bashar condemned him for his ruthless sadistic brutality, and when the Nusayri army entered the Yarmouk camp Palestinians certainly weren't celebrating they left, and those who survived the brutality of Assad's Nusayri Army and their cowardly "Tiger Forces" led by the Nusayri Russian asset Suheil Hassan, they were left in a state of displacement, homelessness, and sorrow. The Palestinians of the Yarmouk Camp who foolishly counted on Assad and his fiery "Anti-Zionist" rhetoric were not targted by Israel, ISIS, the FSA, HTS or anyonr but Bashar it was Bashar the so called anti-Zionist who utilitzed the strongest of his forces and the most of Russia's coward aerial forces to slaughter them in their camp just like how his father besieged the Palestinians he supposedly supported in Lebanon in the 80s with his Rafidi allies from the Amal Movement, May Allah Damn the Nusayris and Assad and give victory to those whom he opposes.