× Register Login What's New! Contact us
Page 26 of 26 First ... 16 24 25 26
Results 501 to 514 of 514 visibility 57149
  1. #1
    Array Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73

    Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam (OP)


    Salaam

    Event: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Recent events from the Middle East have placed the Muslim community in Britain in the public eye once more with their every word and action coming under microscopic scrutiny by the media and politicians. This is only the latest chapter in an ideological attack that has been ongoing for significantly longer.

    Whereas the attacks on Islamic concepts of war, political governance and the unity of Muslim lands are nothing new, they have now increased on an unprecedented scale in the wake of the rise of ISIS and its declaration of a Caliphate. The matter is not about supporting or opposing the version of a Caliphate as demonstrated by ISIS but rather the criminalisation of Islamic political thought and ideology. The concepts of jihad, shariah and khilafah are not the exclusive possession of ISIS but core Islamic doctrines subscribed to by almost one third's of the world's population. It is telling that the government's treatment of ISIS is similar to its treatment of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hizb-ut Tahrir, and the Taliban, despite the enormous differences of belief and methodology between the groups.

    The Islamophobic nature of the criminalisation of those who believe in fighting in Syria against Assad is underlined by the lack of concern for British Jews who fight in the Israeli Occupation Forces, particularly at times where they are engaged in war crimes and other atrocities, such as the recent attack on Gaza.

    On the flips side, Muslims who wish to aid their brothers and sisters through the provision of humanitarian aid via aid convoys are having their homes raided, being harassed by the security services and are effectively being accused of engaging in terrorism. Charities are having their bank accounts closed without explanation and are coming under investigation by the Charity Commission simply for being involved in crisis zones like Gaza and Syria. Witch-hunts such as the Trojan Horse hoax and the mass hysteria over issues of the niqab, halal food and conservative Muslim values demonstrate that the criminalisation is spreading beyond Middle Eastern politics. Individuals and organisations within the Muslim community who have been speaking out against these policies are now under attack. They have had their organisation, business and bank accounts arbitrarily closed. Even their children's bank accounts have been closed. They are maligned in the media as terrorist sympathisers, extremists and jihadists. Some have even been imprisoned.

    The common element across all these cases is that those targeted cared for the oppressed and for those who are suffering. They have been criminalised because they cared.

    Join CAGE at this series of events around the country to unite the Muslim communities against this criminalisation of our faith, our beliefs, our mosques and organisations, and our leaders. The following regional events will take place with the large conference taking place on 20 September at the Waterlily in London.

    Sunday 14 September - 6pm

    Pakistani Community Centre, Park Hall, London Road, Reading RG1 2PA

    Jamal Harwood
    Dr Adnan Siddiqui
    Dr Uthman Lateef
    Anas al-Tikriti
    Taji Mustafa
    Wednesday 17 September - 7pm
    East Pearl Banqueting Centre, Longsight, Manchester
    Ibrahim Hewitt
    Abdullah Andalusi
    Jahangir Mohammed

    Friday 19 September - 6.30pm

    Muslim Student House (the Daar), Moseley, Birmingham

    Dr Uthman Lateef
    Ismail Adam Patel
    Abdullah Andalusi
    Dr Abdul Wahid
    Fahad Ansari

    http://www.cageuk.org/event/it-crime-care

  2. #501
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Report bad ads?


  3. Report bad ads?
  4. #502
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Another update. Brown Sahibs of the British establishment doing what they do best.



    The Quilliam Foundation has called for the Islamic hudood laws to be abolished.

    In a new report, the controversial “counter-extremism” organisation says the reforms would help defeat “ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Jamaat-e-Islami, Muslim Brotherhood and Khomeinist ideology.”

    Quilliam released the report shortly after Saudi Arabia abolished flogging from their penal code – a move Quilliam applauded.

    In its report, Quilliam says hudood punishments are not required by Islamic law. This goes directly against the mainstream Islamic position that the laws (which include the cutting of the hand and the death penalty) are timeless as long as they are implemented correctly and in the right context.

    Mainstream Islamic scholars say that the harsh punishments are rarely implemented in a proper Islamic system, but do exist as the ultimate deterrent for the worst crimes.

    Usama Hasan, co-author of the Quilliam report said: “Islamists seek to challenge democratic and secular states by arguing that these are not legitimate because they do not carry out floggings, amputations and other cruel punishments.

    “Violent Islamist groups resort to the application of hudood precisely in order to prove the legitimacy of their rule. It is for this reason that unspeakably barbaric punishments were such a prominent feature of the rule of ISIS in Syria.

    “However, the key theological sources which underpin the Sharia make it clear that the approach favoured by Islamists ignores certain of the higher objectives of Islamic law: the promotion of forgiveness and rehabilitation, including the waiving of punishments. The Islamist approach to corporal punishment is a distortion of the Islamic approach to criminal justice.

    “Severe corporal punishment was a feature of all societies in the 7th century. It represented a necessity within a nomadic society, which could not imprison and rehabilitate criminals. However, by the 19th century, the Ottoman Caliphate had abolished such punishments, because they were considered to be neither necessary nor appropriate.

    “An approach to Sharia, premised upon its fundamental objectives, both promotes human rights and the honouring of those international agreements which Muslim-majority states have signed. Islamic jurisprudence supports the evolution, modification and repeal of hudood laws in our age because these are outdated and contradict the essential Islamic principles of justice and mercy.”

    Since its foundation in 2007, Quilliam has campaigned for an “Islamic reformation.” It has received millions in funding from the British government and conservative groups. And it has also targeted many British Muslim organisations and activists, including 5Pillars, accusing them of extremism.

    https://5pillarsuk.com/2020/05/04/qu...-be-abolished/

    Hah!



    More discussion.





    Last edited by Junon; 05-05-2020 at 08:20 AM.

  5. #503
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Like to share.

    Blurb

    Shaykh Tahir Wyatt's speech, "Confronting Extremism" broadcasted on C-Span August 7th, 2017.



  6. #504
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Another update.


  7. Report bad ads?
  8. #505
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    This is a little different but relevant.


  9. #506
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Last edited by Junon; 06-06-2020 at 01:18 PM.

  10. #507
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam


  11. #508
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Another update, the 'moderate' Islam project continues.




  12. #509
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Another update.

    Muslims need to create their own social media platforms

    Muslims are facing unprecedented censorship and pressure from social media companies and that’s why we must urgently create our own platforms, argues 5Pillars editor Roshan Muhammed Salih.

    Social media used to be great. Those of us who didn’t have a voice on the mainstream media could, at last, express ourselves freely on platforms which attracted millions of people.

    This was a godsend for small media companies like 5Pillars. We really believed that through sheer hard work and editorial know-how we could build a community platform that would genuinely represent the priorities and concerns of British Muslims. A platform that would say all the things that the mainstream wouldn’t.

    And how would we drive traffic to that platform? Mainly by posting our content on social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

    And indeed for several years it was great. With the mainstream media either demonising Muslims, ignoring them or trying to choose who should speak for us or not, a gaping hole was left for people like us who were determined to tell the community’s stories unfiltered.

    So there’s no doubt that platforms like Facebook and, to a lesser extent, Twitter and YouTube have played a huge role in the growth of our website, as they have for countless others. And in doing so they have helped minority communities find a voice for themselves which is so lacking in the mainstream.

    What’s more, it isn’t just about getting the stories out there. Social media sites have also allowed platforms like ours to fundraise to support the journalism that we are doing. Advertisers will naturally gravitate towards online sites with huge traffic flows so social media has offered us the ability to directly appeal for funds to people who follow us.

    So with the chance to build a business and reach millions of people, what’s not to like?

    Fake News

    Sadly, a few years ago things began to change and this change seems to have coincided with the mainstream media and politicians heaping pressure on the likes of Facebook to censor alternative opinions. This was done, of course, not under the banner of “censorship” but under the premise of cracking down on “fake news.”

    The Department for Education is now even setting up its own “rapid rebuttal unit” to tackle so-called fake news in the media. It’s said to be one of the first department-specific teams in government to challenge “misinformation at the source” and rebuff “misleading content” before reaching the mainstream.

    But I’m one of the few journalists who has always been sceptical about the fake news furore because I believe that the main disseminator of fake news has always been the mainstream media itself. After all, these are the people who manufactured consent for the Iraq war, and for the Tory Party victory in the General Election following a prolonged demonisation campaign against Jeremy Corbyn over antisemitism. And I could go on and on.

    Ultimately we must remember that fake news in the mainstream media is far more significant than fake news in the alternative media because it has the ability to reach far more people and create far more impact. So in my view the fake news crisis was not actually about stopping fake news; rather, it was about reasserting the dominance of the mainstream media.

    The fact is that the mainstream media is heavily distrusted by the British public and is shedding audiences. A recent YouGov poll for Sky News found that two-thirds of the public don’t trust TV journalists, and almost three-quarters don’t trust newspaper journalists. On top of this, the viewing and readership figures for the traditional media is plummeting in a multi-channel and online world.

    But rather than take a good, long hard look in the mirror and admit that this is because of false reporting, the targeting of minorities, and the parroting of the Establishment line, journalists have instead decided to bury their heads in the sand and blame “conspiracy theorists” in the alternative media instead.

    Anyhow, the constant barrage of propaganda about the dangers of fake news seems to have had an effect on the social media giants who’ve responded by censoring alternative views.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Article ends - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Islamic alternatives?

    The truth is that social media giants such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have way too much power and our dependence on these platforms makes us vulnerable to being censored.

    The American social media giants are no longer the saviours of alternative journalism; in fact they have destroyed the journalistic model for so many news organisations by hoovering up online advertising and pulling the editorial plug when they see fit.

    So we have a few choices in front of us.

    Firstly, we could simply persevere with the social media behemoths which is what we are doing at the moment. This is a very tempting course of action because we already have major platforms on them which we have invested a lot of time, money and effort into. But it also means that we will have to self-censor in the hope of staving off that inevitable day when we are kicked off permanently. And let’s face it, what’s the point of doing what we do if we are prepared to self-censor?

    Secondly, we could seek to migrate to other platforms which are not based in the West. Both China and Russia have massive social media platforms although most cater for Chinese or Russian speakers so the English language audience is just not present there yet. Moreover, what’s not to say that China and Russia won’t censor us one day too? In fact, I’m sure you would get censored on a Chinese platform if you started criticising China’s repression of the Uyghurs.

    Thirdly, the Muslim world could give some serious thought to creating its own social media platforms. I understand that this is a gargantuan task given that the American social media giants have such a head start; not to mention the divisions within the Muslim world itself. But I do believe there is a compelling reason to create such platforms (the lack of freedom of speech and Islamic values on the U.S. platforms) whereas in the past none existed.

    I, for one, am willing to migrate immediately to a Muslim-led social media platform if a credible one could be created. And I believe millions of others would be ready to do the same. It would be a task which could take years, even decades, to accomplish and see flourish. But it is all about controlling our own destiny and taking it out of the hands of our potential enemies. And if it were to happen, believe you me I wouldn’t miss the likes of Facebook one little bit.

    https://5pillarsuk.com/2020/06/23/mu...dia-platforms/

    You can agree or disagree with his views but this is unacceptable, and highlights the need for independent media and tech.

    Last edited by Junon; 06-24-2020 at 08:18 AM.

  13. Report bad ads?
  14. #510
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Like to share.

    Blurb

    In this much anticipated episode of the Blood Brothers Podcast, Dilly Hussain speaks with the founder of Alasna Institute and the Muslim Skeptic blog Daniel Haqiqatjou.

    The podcast begins with a brief overview of Daniel’s recent online debate with the prominent atheist YouTuber Ridvan, better known as the ‘Apostate Prophet’.

    The public speaker then explains his issues with Muslim leaders he describes as “compassionate imams” – scholars and students of knowledge who allegedly propagate a compromised Islam which conforms to secular liberalism.

    The crux of the podcast looks at Daniel’s areas of disagreement with the Yaqeen Institute of Islamic Research, an organisation he was previously employed by, and the various disagreements and concerns he has with the organisation’s contributors.






    Related.





    Last edited by Junon; 06-30-2020 at 09:07 AM.

  15. #511
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam


  16. #512
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam


  17. #513
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Another update.

    Blurb

    Why is France linking protests over racism, unemployment and inequality to separatism? And what does it mean for the country's minorities?


  18. #514
    Junon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,473
    Threads
    319
    Reputation
    6035
    Rep Power
    73
    Likes (Given)
    459
    Likes (Received)
    526

    Re: Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam

    Salaam

    Another update.



    [Important Thread]: The Terrorism Act 2000 and the Uighurs. 1

    Monday saw the 20th anniversary of the enactment of the Terrorism Act 2000. To mark this lamentable occasion @UK_CAGE produced a detailed report on its malignant effects over the duration of its operation. PLEASE do read and share it. Link:





    I want to turn my attention now to China and her genocide of the Uighurs in order to demonstrate just how insidious a piece of legislation the Terrorism Act 2000 is (hint: READ MY ARTICLE).

    The Act defined terrorism as the use (or threat of use) of action (meaning serious violence to persons or serious damage to property) against a government or international governmental organisation (e.g. UN, NATO) for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or...
    ...ideological cause.

    When the Bill was debated at least one MP (David Lidington, the former Conservative MP for Aylesbury) raised the age old conundrum of "one man's terrorist, another man's freedom fighter". How would the legislation resolve it?

    Then Home Office minister, Charles Clarke assured the House of Commons that given that any prosecution under TACT 2000 had to be approved by the Director of Public Prosecutions (currently @Max HillQC ) one needn't worry about supporting "righteous causes" e.g. the Kurdish...

    ...rebellion under Saddam. Because the DPP would use their discretion and decided not to prosecute you, even if technically those actions WERE terrorism by the letter of the law. Leaving aside the fact that this violates the principle of "legal certainty" whereby the legal...

    ...consequences of any given action should be determinable in advance of their being carried out, it effectively confers upon the DPP (and ultimately the Attorney General) the power to decide what is and isn't terrorism upon a whim. A whim that is invariably decided by...

    ...the political expediencies of Her Majesty's Government at that moment in time. So, for example, if they are pro-Kurdish at the time you most likely won't be prosecuted. If they are pro-Saddam at the time (as in the 1980s) then you almost certainly will be.

    Fast forward 7 years to 2007 and the Court of Appeal (R v F). A Libyan dissident had been convicted of downloading (inter alia) bomb making manuals in order to aid groups seeking the overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar al-Gaddafi. He appealed claiming the overthrow of such...

    ...Gaddafi's regime didn't fall under the definition of "terrorism" given that it was a brutal, unrepresentative authoritarian government. He argued, effectively that he was supporting "freedom fighters" not "terrorists" despite their activities falling within the Act's...

    ...catch-all definition of terrorism. The Court in its Judgement demurred from this interpretation and determined that any government that is internationally recognised falls within the ambit of TACT 2000, despite how dictatorial and abusive it might be. It stated that:

    "...the legislation [The Terrorism Act 2000] does not exempt, nor make an exception, nor create a defence for, nor exculpate what some would describe as terrorism in a just cause. Terrorism is terrorism, whatever the motive of the perpetrators."

    And so it dismissed the appeal. So the assurances provided by Charles Clarke turned out (entirely predictably) to be hollow and empty. But furthermore a mere four years later the UK government would provide military support to the very same people! Yes, that's right...

    ...now that HMG's political stance towards Gaddafi had changed (because of course they didn't know he was a murderous thug back in 2007) it was no longer terrorism to support armed groups attacking his government. So even though it came under the definition of the Act...

    ...nobody would be prosecuted for carrying out such terrorist activities anymore. Lol.

    Ok, so how does this tie into the Uighurs? Well I'm sure you've noticed the sudden outpouring of neoconservative tears for the plight of this Muslim ethnic group in China's far western region. Declarations of genocide are now bellowing forth from people who for years didn't...

    ...utter a word (despite these atrocities being public knowledge for about 5 years now). They didn't care about the genocide of the Rohingya Muslims or the suffering of the Palestinians either. But now China's ascendancy threatens Western economic hegemony the Uighurs...

    ....present a useful tool to exert pressure on Beijing. Anyway, tying it in to TACT 2000....any people facing genocide sure have the right to physically (yes that's right, I mean violence) resist? Except under TACT such resistance would constitute terrorism. Yes, that's...

    ...right...to resist one's own genocide under this law would be classed as "terrorism". That' how sick and disgraceful it is. So if tomorrow the Uighurs were to rise up and say we won't accept to be lead like sheep into concentration camps anymore, for our women to be forcibly...

    ...sterilised...for our children to indoctrinated into hating our religion and culture...for Han Chinese men to be billeted upon our womenfolk whose men are in said camps...and for our mosques to be demolished or turned into bars...and we will fight the regime perpetrating...

    ...these genocidal policies upon us...as British Muslims if we were to say "we stand with them and support their righteous struggle" we would be committing a terrorist offence. Yes, really.

    What's worse is that given the decision to prosecute is in the hands of the DPP, the authorities could selectively prosecute some whilst giving a pass to others. So for example were I to call for jihad against the Chinese regime I would more than likely end up...

    ...in HMP Belmarsh (the UK's main prison for terrorist offenders). Were a certain nasty individual who spends his time denigrating Islamic practises and posting insulting imagery of the Prophet (saw) to do the same nothing would happen...because he sings the tune...

    ...those in power want to hear. I don't.

    It's important to bear in mind that China's genocidal policy vis-a-vis the Uighurs is actually nothing more than PREVENT taken to its logical conclusion. They have long tried to "reform" Islam, to induce the Uighurs to abandon their Islamic beliefs and practises.

    Because they see Islam as "the problem" - just like neocons like @DouglasKMurray. Islam in the eyes of the Chinese authorities is inherently violent and subversive and so if its votaries won't voluntarily abjure it then more forcible means must be employed. Sure their methods...

    ...are exponentially more crude and brutal than anything PREVENT has, or (hopefully) ever will, employ but the thinking is the same. When @Amanda _spielman makes evident in her parliamentary cross questioning by Muslim MP Shabana Mahmood her disdain for the hijab and...

    ...her very obvious desire to deracinate Muslim children she exemplifies this same mindset. If you stand against the genocide of the Uighurs then you have no choice but to stand against PREVENT also.

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...135494656.html


  19. Hide
Page 26 of 26 First ... 16 24 25 26
Hey there! Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Syria, Gaza and the Criminalisation of Islam
Sign Up

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
create