Excerpt:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/...g-george-floyd

Derek Chauvin found guilty of murdering George Floyd

Former Minneapolis police officer Chauvin is found guilty on three counts of murdering George Floyd.

Defence lawyer Eric Nelson, left, and defendant, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, on Monday, April 19, 2021, at the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis, Minnesota [Court TV via AP, Pool]

20 Apr 2021


The jury in the murder trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin found him guilty on Tuesday in the killing of George Floyd last May.

The 45-year-old Chauvin was found guilty of charges of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.


US reacts to guilty verdict in Chauvin trial: Live NewsGeorge Floyd: Minneapolis, US cities brace for Chauvin verdict

After a three-week trial and 10 hours of deliberation over the past two days, the 12-person jury, consisting of six white and six Black or multiracial men and women, concluded that Chauvin was guilty of all three charges.

Chauvin’s bail was immediately revoked and he was escorted out of the courtroom with his hands cuffed behind his back. He will face sentencing in eight weeks and could be sent to prison for decades.

In this image from video, former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin, centre, is taken into custody as his attorney, Eric Nelson, left, looks on, after the verdicts were read at Chauvin’s trial, April 20, 2021, at the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis, Minnesota [Court TV via AP, Pool]Crowds gathered in Minneapolis cheered as the guilty verdict was read, Al Jazeera’s Creede Newton reports.


Shouts of “Say his name! George Floyd!” and “Guilty on all three!” were heard among the crowd.

“Justice for Black America is justice for all of America,” the Floyd family’s attorney Benjamin Crump said in a statement, the Reuters news agency reports. “This case is a turning point in American history for accountability of law enforcement and sends a clear message we hope is heard clearly in every city and every state.”

A woman waves a Black Lives Matter flag as she drives by the Hennepin County courthouse following announcement of guilty verdicts for George Floyd’s killing [Creede Newton/Al Jazeera]

Prosecution was convincing

Prosecutor Steve Schleicher argued that Chauvin, who is white, used excessive force while detaining the 46-year-old Floyd, who was Black, after arresting him for allegedly using a counterfeit $20 bill to buy cigarettes. The prosecution was able to convince the jury that Chauvin, who pressed his knee on Floyd’s neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds, was responsible for Floyd’s death.

“Random members of the community, all converged by fate at one single moment in time to witness something, to witness nine minutes and 29 seconds of shocking abuse of authority, to watch a man die,” Schleicher said in his closing arguments on Monday, adding that Chauvin’s “use of force was unreasonable. It was excessive. It was grossly disproportionate.”

“This wasn’t policing. This was murder,” he said.

Play Video

The prosecution called 38 witnesses and played video of Floyd’s death on May 25, 2020, dozens of times over its 11-day presentation.

“This result is not surprising at all. As the trial went forward, it seemed that every witness was putting a further nail in the coffin of the defendant,” Mike Padden, a Minneapolis lawyer, told Al Jazeera after the verdict was read.

“The defence never had any viable defenses. You are seeing the magic of video. Video doesn’t lie.”

Chauvin’s defence lawyer, Eric Nelson, failed in planting seeds of reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors by arguing that there were other underlying conditions – specifically, his drug use and pre-existing health issues – that resulted in Floyd’s death. Nelson also argued that Chauvin acted “as any reasonable police officer would”.

“Throughout the course of this trial, the state has focused your attention on nine minutes and 29 seconds. The proper analysis is to take those nine minutes and 29 seconds, and put it into the context of the totality of the circumstances that a reasonable police officer would know,” Nelson said during his closing arguments.

“In this case, the totality of the circumstances that were known to a reasonable police officer in the precise moment the force was used demonstrates that this was an authorised use of force, as unattractive as it may be. And this is reasonable doubt.”

Play Video

It is expected that Chauvin will appeal the verdict and, following closing arguments on Monday, Judge Peter Cahill suggested he may have a case, thanks to public commentsfrom Democratic Representative Maxine Waters, who told a crowd of protesters “we’ve got to get more confrontational” if Chauvin was found not guilty.

Nelson had asked for a mistrial, arguing Waters’ comments could have influenced the jury. Cahill rejected that request but suggested that Waters “may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned”. He called her comments “abhorrent” and “disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch”.