Liberal and se cular democracy is often called as a western system. It seems like liberal secular democracy exists in Europe since its beginning, like there was no other system in Europe before. The thing is that liberal secular democracy is just as typical to Europe as secular democracy is typical to Turkey.
Non-westerners should bare in mind that since the reformation (XVI century A.D) Europe was radically divided into two groups of states - catholic, latin and protestant, mostly german. The protestant states embraced democracy naturally as liberal democracy is a child of reformation (desecralization of politics, and the idea that the political power comes from the "people" (not from God) was born in calvin nations of Holland and Switzerland). In protestant (mostly german) states were also born - liberalism, deism( as a result of protestant pantheism), communism, socialism and national socialism ( as a result of the deification of a state in heglism). So non western people should know that all those "western" doctrines come from protestant (mostly german) states.
Meanwhile, the catholic states haven't embraced the blasphemous idea of liberal doctrine peacefully. The French Revolution and Napoleon has brought by sword and fire the revolutional and republican ideas across catholic, latin Europe - Italy, Austria, Spain, Poland, Hungary. John Jacques Rousseau, the main doctriner of the French Revolution was a calvinist, protestant.
What system had catholic, latin caountries, before the age of Napoleon and so called "Spring of the people" (1848)? It was a metaphisycal syatem called the Social Reign of Christ. It had a form either of monarchy (more common) or a aristocratic republic (less common, mostly in Italy). Catholic king had a title of the God's lieutenant. According to this metaphisycal system - the political power comes only from God, not from the people. This theocratical and metaphisycal system of reigns formed fully in the times of Medieval (which is definitely the main target of black propaganda by the atheists, masons and jews).
Big mistake made often by the critics of latin monarchy is that it is simply a tyrannical rule of one men who in free time beats peasants with a whip. This is wrong. All catholic kings agreed that there is one King higher than them - Christ the King. All kings were obliged to listen to pope as the higher institution. Monarchy wasnt a totalitarian system since king was restricted by divine natural laws - religion, family, tradition, justice and posession.
Why a christian (catholic, orthodox and honest protestant) shouldnt support liberal democracy? Simply because liberal democracy isnt achristian or prechristian system but it is antichristian system. It was created mostly by masons with the help of some jews and protestants (mostly calvinists and anabaptists). Liberal democracy in large parts of Europe was imposed by the blood of christian martyrs who were defending the Social Reigns of Christ the King. Liberal democracy in XIX century was a doctrine supported almost only by fierce anti christians, masons, atheists and some jewish groups (It is not a coincidence that one of first laws created by French Revolution and Bolshevik Revolution was to give the jews a citizen's and politicalrights. In Portugal, Spain, France, Austria, liberal democracy brought blasphemous reigns of materialism, atheism and capitalism/socialism (which are two sides of same coin).
Non-westerners should bare in mind that since the reformation (XVI century A.D) Europe was radically divided into two groups of states - catholic, latin and protestant, mostly german. The protestant states embraced democracy naturally as liberal democracy is a child of reformation (desecralization of politics, and the idea that the political power comes from the "people" (not from God) was born in calvin nations of Holland and Switzerland). In protestant (mostly german) states were also born - liberalism, deism( as a result of protestant pantheism), communism, socialism and national socialism ( as a result of the deification of a state in heglism). So non western people should know that all those "western" doctrines come from protestant (mostly german) states.
Meanwhile, the catholic states haven't embraced the blasphemous idea of liberal doctrine peacefully. The French Revolution and Napoleon has brought by sword and fire the revolutional and republican ideas across catholic, latin Europe - Italy, Austria, Spain, Poland, Hungary. John Jacques Rousseau, the main doctriner of the French Revolution was a calvinist, protestant.
What system had catholic, latin caountries, before the age of Napoleon and so called "Spring of the people" (1848)? It was a metaphisycal syatem called the Social Reign of Christ. It had a form either of monarchy (more common) or a aristocratic republic (less common, mostly in Italy). Catholic king had a title of the God's lieutenant. According to this metaphisycal system - the political power comes only from God, not from the people. This theocratical and metaphisycal system of reigns formed fully in the times of Medieval (which is definitely the main target of black propaganda by the atheists, masons and jews).
Big mistake made often by the critics of latin monarchy is that it is simply a tyrannical rule of one men who in free time beats peasants with a whip. This is wrong. All catholic kings agreed that there is one King higher than them - Christ the King. All kings were obliged to listen to pope as the higher institution. Monarchy wasnt a totalitarian system since king was restricted by divine natural laws - religion, family, tradition, justice and posession.
Why a christian (catholic, orthodox and honest protestant) shouldnt support liberal democracy? Simply because liberal democracy isnt achristian or prechristian system but it is antichristian system. It was created mostly by masons with the help of some jews and protestants (mostly calvinists and anabaptists). Liberal democracy in large parts of Europe was imposed by the blood of christian martyrs who were defending the Social Reigns of Christ the King. Liberal democracy in XIX century was a doctrine supported almost only by fierce anti christians, masons, atheists and some jewish groups (It is not a coincidence that one of first laws created by French Revolution and Bolshevik Revolution was to give the jews a citizen's and politicalrights. In Portugal, Spain, France, Austria, liberal democracy brought blasphemous reigns of materialism, atheism and capitalism/socialism (which are two sides of same coin).
