Why are Feminists Surprised Their Daughters are ****s?

Why are Feminists Surprised Their Daughters are ****s?

August 11, 2010

"We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order."
Protocols of Zion, 16

by Henry Makow, Ph.D.


In a recent article "Outraged Moms, Trashy Daughters" by Anne Kingston, (Macleans, Aug 16, 2010) mothers lament that their daughters now see "empowerment" in terms of pleasuring males.

While the feminist mothers saw power as financial independence and rejected female "objectification," their daughters accept the pornographic message of pop music and advertising. In the words of one mom, they "believe their purpose in life is to be sexual beings who please men."

"A blow job is like shaking hands," said another mom. "Their attitude is: 'We're emancipated, we're liberated, we're in control. They see [it] as power; I see it as giving their power away."

Yes but: Who taught girls they could have sex outside of courtship, love and marriage?

Feminists did. Feminism brainwashed young women to see husbands as oppressors and family as bondage. There was no longer any reason to restrict sex to love and marriage.

Understandably, feminists don't want to admit their teachers have betrayed them. Feminism was created by elite social engineers to reduce population and undermine marriage and family.

Even while they wring their hands, feminists are blinded by their ideology. (The article veers off into a discussion of how feminism is still relevant.)

The words "love," "marriage," "husband" and "family" do not appear in the article. No wonder they can't understand the problem and what to do about it.

Both mothers and daughters are victims of deliberate social subversion. A woman's career used to be wife and mother. She consecrated her sexuality for the man she loved, the father of her children, her protector and provider.

Young women today are up a creek. They don't know how to be women and men don't know how to be men. But one thing that hasn't changed is - men don't marry ****s. These girls are going to be left high and dry once their sex appeal has faded.

They obsess on looking beautiful but don't know that true beauty comes from within, from a spiritual purity. This means rejecting all coarse influences and behavior. It means focusing on what is good, true, human and inspiring.

In the past, men had to prove their love and commitment before they could have sex. As a result, women were cherished and given a lifelong role (mother, wife) that satisfied their deepest emotional needs.

Now they have been reduced to amateur prostitutes and corporate widgets.

"I don't meet many girls who feel good about themselves, even though they are totally gorgeous," one social worker says.

How could they ... giving their bodies to strangers who dump them?

Girls figure they must give away sex or boys will get it from other girls. That's like saying, "if I don't let muggers rob and beat me, other girls will."

The other word totally absent from this article is "father." Girls could get love, self respect and guidance from their fathers. But I'm guessing their feminist mothers drove their fathers away.

It's not too late for girls to learn to be women again. There can be no sex without courtship and love. If other girls want to give it away, let them suffer the consequences.

Girls can become feminine again by making marriage and family their first priority. If they refocus, they can regain the path to fulfillment and happiness.

[link removed]

Good article.

Salam

Thanks for the article

Very true... Protocols of the Zion... behind all the World's corruption... people need to understand Protocols of the Zion is real and some people still think its all hoax... well time would tell again..

I think it's a little unfair. Feminists can be extreme, but they have done good. For example, women were denied the right to vote, denied many jobs, denied in universities, were legally beaten, and the list goes on.

nousername said:

I think it's a little unfair. Feminists can be extreme, but they have done good. For example, women were denied the right to vote, denied many jobs, denied in universities, were legally beaten, and the list goes on.

Click to expand...

and then feminists came to the rescue and saved the women by telling them to compete with men and to shun real femininity which is to be loving and caring mothers......sure they fought for women's rights but that was not their biggest aim , these feminists don't have anything feminine about them and their biggest aim was to break up the family system....a system whereby the father is the provider and the mother rears the kids....but a conman or a con-woman must entice you somehow to achieve their agenda and that's what they've done...they've sold women disease enshrouded in the finest chocolate

and now nobody knows their role....men are not acquainted with their responsibilities and women are confused and think family life is a life sentence

I Thank Allah for islam which set out everything and gave everyone their rights before any women with bobbed hair and trousers came to the scene to talk about the sameness of men and women when clearly Allah created us differently both physiologically and psychologically . Alhamdulilah

by Real Women of Canada

Canadian Women Prosper at Expense of Men/Families



In 1986, the federal government passed the Employment Equity Act, which targeted the hiring of four designated groups: women, aboriginals, visible minorities and the disabled.

At the time this bill was drafted, men dominated the public service with 58% of the jobs and more than 95% of the executive jobs.

Not any more. There has been a tremendous flip flop in these figures, with women now holding 55% of all jobs in the public service and about 43% of the executive positions.

Although women are still clustered in the clerical and administrative jobs in the public service, what is amazing is that there are now more women than men in the "knowledge" occupations, with numbers doubling in executive, computer, scientific and other professional fields between 1996 and 2006.

To her credit, Maria Barrados, president of the Public Service Commission, has stated that in view of these statistics, it's time to reconsider whether women be granted preferential treatment as they did in the past.

61% of university graduates are now women, and, as a result, women are making tremendous strides - not just in the public service, but in other areas as well.

For example, women are starting small businesses at twice the rate of men. Women entrepreneurs now hold ownership in about 45% of Canadian small and medium enterprises and are providing 1.7 million jobs in Canada, as well as contributing more than $18 billion to the country's economy.

WHAT ABOUT MEN?

Where does this leave men? Why are they not graduating from university in at least equal numbers as women? Why are women dominating the traditional male fields of medicine and law? Why were 63.7% of the high school dropouts in 2004 - 2005 males? What is happening to young men?

It's time to take a serious look at this strange new phenomenon, which is leading to profound changes in society.

REASONS FOR MALE DROP-OUT

Unfortunately, one of the main reasons for this change in behaviour in men is that feminist theory has had a hard, ruthless grip on education. Young men are now given second place to females who are given priority, encouragement, and advantages.

In effect, young men are no longer encouraged to succeed but, instead, are being forced to pay, by neglect, for the supposed past discrimination against women.

Also, young men are no longer encouraged to assume the traditional role of husband, father and provider for the family. Why should they bother? Why commit to marriage, when one can have an enjoyable sex life and companionship without ever assuming responsibility for that relationship?

Further, men today are being held responsible for domestic violence, when studies show that women are equally responsible for it. Why are men forcefully removed from their homes, based on assumptions only, with no evidence, that the male is an abuser? Why are fathers required to pay child support, but there is no requirement that mothers provide the father access to their children for whom he is paying that support?

As so long as feminists are permitted to promote the absurd premise that women are "victims", who require affirmative action and other privileges, the situation for men and society will continue to deteriorate.

This is one of the reasons why the Status of Women [Department] must be abolished. Either that, or, at the very least, an agency must be established for the "Status of Men" so that they, too, can have a voice at the cabinet table to point out the heavy discrimination and downright mistreatment they receive in today's society.

http://www.henrymakow.com/canadian_women_prosper_at_expe.html

feminists eh

always nice to read how ridiculous they are

forgot to add theres nothing wrong with working and going to university....its good but motherhood must not be neglected

nousername said:

I think it's a little unfair. Feminists can be extreme, but they have done good. For example, women were denied the right to vote, denied many jobs, denied in universities, were legally beaten, and the list goes on.

Click to expand...

Any woman who stood up against oppression is to be commended of course. I greatly admire and respect strong courageous women, they are role models just like our sahabiyaat.

However, when i think "feminist", I dont think of revolutionaries who steered women away from oppression, I really doubt even those women called themselves "feminists", instead I think of women who think they have no need for a man, that they are totally independent and behave in shameless rebellious ways

Abdullahii said:

and then feminists came to the rescue and saved the women by telling them to compete with men and to shun real femininity which is to be loving and caring mothers......sure they fought for women's rights but that was not their biggest aim , these feminists don't have anything feminine about them and their biggest aim was to break up the family system....a system whereby the father is the provider and the mother rears the kids....but a conman or a con-woman must entice you somehow to achieve their agenda and that's what they've done...they've sold women disease enshrouded in the finest chocolate

and now nobody knows their role....men are not acquainted with their responsibilities and women are confused and think family life is a life sentence

I Thank Allah for islam which set out everything and gave everyone their rights before any women with bobbed hair and trousers came to the scene to talk about the sameness of men and women when clearly Allah created us differently both physiologically and psychologically . Alhamdulilah

Click to expand...

You do know that women are allowed to work in Islam...:shade:

If you don't your wife to work, you need to state that before marriage.

Abdullahii said:

forgot to add theres nothing wrong with working and going to university....its good but motherhood must not be neglected

Click to expand...

oh missed that. Yep nothing like motherhood. I would find it ridiculous for a woman to work or study full time whilst having a child. But nothing wrong with part time.

Abdullahii said:

Why are Feminists Surprised Their Daughters are ****s?



The other word totally absent from this article is "father." Girls could get love, self respect and guidance from their fathers. But I'm guessing their feminist mothers drove their fathers away.

Click to expand...

With feminists of today men are too blame for everything for certain men like one who wrote this rant women are to blame for everything. How about some self-responsibilty. While I agree with the point of the article it's full generalizations and poor word choices.
Salam

im going to try my best to refrain from commenting my real thoughts of this thread.

The other word totally absent from this article is "father." Girls could get love, self respect and guidance from their fathers. But I'm guessing their feminist mothers drove their fathers away.

Click to expand...

maybe the father just didn't want to show love for his daughter. some fathers are abusive, not only to their daughters but to their wives as well (children sometimes cant love or respect the "abuser" parent). some men hate the fact that daughters are born, and will threaten his wife if she doesn't bare him a son (since when was it up to humans to determine the gender of their child) in some cultures daughters are a shame...in other cultures abortion of a female fetus is practiced . generally speaking, parents always treat their sons better then their daughters. females/daughters are generally treated as inferior...

and feminists have children? i thought most feminists are homo (due to their hating of men)...

i agree with the above poster. i agree with sentiments of the article but its not completely the women who are to blame. out right ridiculous.

Feminism brainwashed young women to see husbands as oppressors [...]

Click to expand...

i think husbands themselves did a very good job of that before anyone did.


is Henry Mawkow a chauvinist? it would be interesting to get some sort of biography/background on this person...is he gay by any chance? I think even alot of men wouldn't agree with his views.

Feminism has many shapes and forms. Essentially the only thing all feminists have in common is the goal of empowering women's rights which is something Islam brags about all the time. The Prophet was a feminist of his time period; Muslims who say Islam 'liberates' women are feminists; there is no one kind of feminism. The OP is guilty of misunderstanding feminism & over generalizing that misunderstanding.

i thought most feminists are homo (due to their hating of men)...

Click to expand...

LOL hahaha ;D

^it wasnt meant to be funny. isnt that the case? :hiding: