Have a look at this Islamiphobic *****: Pamela Geller's Subway Advertisement

  • Thread starter Thread starter جوري
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 38
  • Views Views 6K
جوري

جوري

Soldier Through It!
Messages
27,759
Reaction score
6,095
Gender
Female
Religion
Islam
[h=1]MTA Rejects Pamela Geller's Subway Advertisement That Calls Muslims 'Savages' (PHOTO)[/h] The Huffington Post Christopher Mathias
First Posted: 9/22/11 03:57 PM ET Updated: 9/22/11 04:11 PM ET





sGELLERlarge300-1.jpg
Pamela Geller





digg reddit stumble





Pamela Geller, New York City's most vocal Islamophobe, is having a rough week.
Not only is Palestine asking for statehood up in Midtown, but that pesky "Ground Zero Mosque" Park 51 Community Center she fought so hard to prevent from opening, held its first exhibit Wednesday night.
And as if that wasn't enough for the right-wing blogger, now the MTA won't even put up her advertisement!
Last week, in response to a subway ad calling for the end of US military support to Israel, Geller submitted this to the MTA:
GELLERADVERTISEMENT-1.jpg

Geller made the papers when she said she'd sue if the MTA refused to put up the advertisement, calling it "a free speech issue."
And now, well, the MTA's refusing to put up her advertisement.
Geller was notified of the ad's rejection Thursday and the rejection letter, which she's posted on her Atlas Shrug blog in an entry titled, "IT'S OFFICIAL: PRO-JIHAD MTA BANS PRO-ISRAEL ADS, RUNS ANTI-ISRAEL ADS", explains that Geller's ad "contains language that, in our view, does not conform with the MTA’s advertising standards regarding ads that demean an individual or group of individuals..." A call to the MTA confirms that her ad didn't pass muster.
And the MTA has a good point. As Gothamist sarcastically notes: "Yeah! Why is everyone shocked at the word "savage?" Or the phrase "war between the civilized man and the savage?" It's not as if that phrase has ever been used in history to suppress minorities or advance theories of white supremacy. Nope."
Geller, who's done this kind of thing before, is keeping her promise and is preparing to sue the MTA. She writes:
The pro-jihad MTA is refusing my ad for the word "savage." Just so you know, I will be suing, with the aid of my inestimable legal team, David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise of the Thomas More Law Center. We are what? 4-0, now? Tarazi lawsuit roundly defeated, check. Detroit/SMART Transit on "Leaving Islam" bus ad lawsuit, check. MTA on the Ground Zero Bus ads lawsuit, check. Miami Transit for "Leaving Islam" bus ads lawsuit, check. I will say this until someone in those clueless ivory towers of the sharia-compliant MTA understands this. "Savage" is accurate. The pro-jihad MTA cannot ban the the truth, particularly in the political arena...
​
In the spring of 2010, as part of her "Leave Islam" campaign, Geller paid $10,000 to put this advertisement on city buses:
LEAVEISLAM-1.jpg

And in the summer of 2010, during the "Ground Zero Mosque" controversy she helped spearhead, she successfully scared the MTA into keeping up this
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/mta-rejects-pamela-geller_n_976235.html
 
I am not particularly bothered by her not sure why, normally I would be outraged but she seems like an irrelevant has-been not sure who's funding her suits and adverts? ... but as they say any publicity is good publicity .. we've to thank her and that other Quran burning lusus for increasing the number of converts.. so long as they do it from their own pocket :shade:

:w:
 
Last edited:
best thing you can do is leave these sort of people in obscurity, adverts can only sell what your buying.
but i guess thats the world for you, you make the celebrities.

the last thing she wants is fatwah's on her head.. well its either that or american idol.
be aware of what you promote, walking away from people like her leaves them in the company of those that are inclined towards her standpoint.

and if you stand with her to argue then lose the argument but promote your religion.. we're not women beaters lol

argue in the best of ways right?
and who can beat free advertising?
 
:sl:

While I don't agree with the building of the Community Center at Ground Zero (time and place, people. Time and place), I don't agree with wingnuts like this either.

People like this are best left ignored. When they realize that nobody is paying attention to them, they'll go away. It's just like the little toddler that throws a wobbler. When nobody pays attention, they get bored and go do something else.
 
Salaam,

This is upsetting :hmm: Oh well. At least we know this woman clearly isn't intelligent enough to even know what a fatwa is ;D
 
King of Nines said:
While I don't agree with the building of the Community Center at Ground Zero (time and place, people. Time and place), I don't agree with wingnuts like this either.
Click to expand...
That property always belonged to Muslims though, it isn't that they up one day & said let's rub this in their faces. Not that there's anything to rub anyway given 911 was an inside job!
 
abz2000 said:
civilized people wear clothes, and don't fornicate like donkeys
Click to expand...
:haha: no you got it backwards.. I even saw one episode when the clothes taker off(er) was wondering whether her nudy pics were tasteful, her mother yes mother told her 'you're empowering women everywhere'
perhaps the definition of dignity differs in western culture? Where I come from also known as 'the birth place of civilization' clothed women were women of dignity, power and class & the naked ones were known as wh ores or poor scullery maids.. but what do us 'Savages' know?
 
ßlµêßêll said:

That property always belonged to Muslims though, it isn't that they up one day & said let's rub this in their faces. Not that there's anything to rub anyway given 911 was an inside job!
Click to expand...

It's a matter of zoning. Nobody would have made a fuss over building a church or a synagogue or any other place of worship there. It's really just a building, after all.
 
ßlµêßêll said:

That property always belonged to Muslims though, it isn't that they up one day & said let's rub this in their faces. Not that there's anything to rub anyway given 911 was an inside job!
Click to expand...

:sl:

Well I'm not ready to go that far with it, but I don't agree with the "official story" of 9/11 and am embarrassed and angry that the government is still trying to deceive everyone with this charade of "Al Quaeda and OBL did it". It insults my intelligence every time I hear some talking head mention Al Quaeda and OBL when talking about 9/11.
 
King of Nines said:
:sl:

While I don't agree with the building of the Community Center at Ground Zero (time and place, people. Time and place), I don't agree with wingnuts like this either.
Click to expand...

:wa:

I agree. I don't want the community centre built near a strip club.
 
I didn't want it there either but given their insolence I am all for it.. The property however belongs to Muslims whether they like it or not, it isn't like they're asking the city to fund it!

:w:
 
Tragic Typos said:
:wa:

I agree. I don't want the community centre built near a strip club.
Click to expand...

:sl:

Well I wasn't aware of that part, but yeah, now I don't want it there for that reason too.

And that is some tasty looking pizza... Cheeeeeeeeeeeeese!!!
 
notice how last year they staged the "ground zero mosque" protests and the lamestream media managed to totally avoid the ever growing 9/11 truth rallies around the corner,


this is what they report instead:


this year they declare high alert and the police refuse to allow people with an "investigate 9/11" t-shirt anywhere near the vicinity.

[video=youtube;8ECskyNzY5s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8ECskyNzY5s#![/video]
 
Last edited:
Is she a porn star? (no pun intended)

It's quite funny how these Islamophobes work: someone can be jailed for reading Shaykh ul-Islam ibn Taymiyyah's (rahimahullah) work on political subjects but people like her roaming freely who incite hatred, calling for hatred and terrorism, and inspire other people to carry terrorist acts.
 
MSalman said:
Is she a porn star? (no pun intended)

It's quite funny how these Islamophobes work: someone can be jailed for reading Shaykh ul-Islam ibn Taymiyyah's (rahimahullah) work on political subjects but people like her roaming freely who incite hatred, calling for hatred and terrorism, and inspire other people to carry terrorist acts.
Click to expand...

I suspect that's how she funds her hatred by wh oring herself can you think of a better way?.. hate speech is freedom of speech in their book, just not applicable to Muslims though.. will have the FBI knocking on your door and chasing you in some remote areas of Yemen with drones and oh for much lesser like questioning who's the terrorist, as Tony Bennett found out in the past couple of days..

:w:
 
ßlµêßêll said:
I didn't want it there either but given their insolence I am all for it.. The property however belongs to Muslims whether they like it or not, it isn't like they're asking the city to fund it!

:w:
Click to expand...

I agree; I'm all for the center. Anything to irk ignorant bigots....
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top