/* */

PDA

View Full Version : Taqlid in the time of Sahaba.



Tawangar
03-07-2012, 07:15 AM
:sl:

Ibn al Qayyim said in his aforementioned book ('Ilam al Muwaqqi'in):

Al Sha'bi said: "Whoever it pleases to have confidence in issuing decrees (qada'), let him take the opinion of 'Umar."

Mujahid said: "When people differ in anything, look at what 'Umar did and adopt it."

These are clear texts from al-Sha'bi and Mujahid on taqlid.

Ibn al Qayyim said in his aforementioned book:

Tawus said: "I met seventy of the Companions of Allah's Messenger (saws) and when they disagreed on something, they would stop at the opinion of Ibn 'Abbas."

Muhammad ibn Jarir said: "There was none (among the Sahaba) who had known companions who codified his fatwa and his positions in fiqh (jurisprudence) besides Ibn Mas'ud and he would leave his position and his opinion in favor of the opinion of 'Umar and he would (at times) come close to differing with him in some of his positions and would then go back on his own opinion in favor of his opinion."

Al-Sha'bi said: "`Abdullah would not perform qunut" (supplication) [in the Fajr prayer], and he said: "Had 'Umar performed Qunut, `Abdullah would have performed Qunut."

He also said:
Al-A'mash said regarding Ibrahim [al-Nakha'i]: "He would not divert from the opinion of 'Umar and `Abdullah (ibn Mas'ud) when they agreed and when they disagreed, the opinion of 'Abdullah was more appealing to him because it was more subtle."

He said on page 5:
Those of the Companions of Allah's Messenger (saws) from whom fatwa was preserved are some one hundred and thirty souls that range between men and women and the mukhthirun (those who issued fatwa in large numbers) from them are seven: 'Umar ibn al Khattab, 'Ali ibn Abi Talib, 'Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, A'isha, mother of the believers, Zayd ibn Thabit, 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas and 'Abdullah ibn 'Umar.

These texts show you the way of taqlid was prevalent amongst the Sahaba and Tabi'in to such a degree that some mujtahids imitated some others from them, let alone those unqualified for ijtihad. Rather, the Prophet (saws) instructed them to do taqlid when he commanded them to follow the Sunnah of the righteous Caliphs. Rather, Allah commanded them to do taqlid when He said: "Ask the People of Remembrance if you do know know." (16:43)

Thus, the statement that taqlid is an innovation (bid'ah) that appeared in the fourth century or an innovation that appeared in the sixth century is concealment of the truth (kitman) and the truth is that taqlid is an inherited practice from the time of Allah's Messenger (saws) to this time of ours, and is established from the texts some of which we cited and some of which we left out, fearing prolixity.

Taken from Al Din al Qayyim of 'Allama Habib Ahmad Kairanwi.

Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
azc
04-30-2018, 04:41 PM
Informative thread.....!
Reply

Mahir Adnan
05-01-2018, 04:00 PM
https://islamqa.info/en/23280

Imitation (taqleed), following the evidence (daleel) – and was Ibn Hazm a Hanbali? - islamqa.info
How can a person not make taqleed and still at the same time follow the teachings of one of the imams hanafimaalikishaafi and ahmad bin hanbalmay allahs.w have ...
Reply

azc
05-01-2018, 08:29 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Mahir Adnan
https://islamqa.info/en/23280

Imitation (taqleed), following the evidence (daleel) – and was Ibn Hazm a Hanbali? - islamqa.info
How can a person not make taqleed and still at the same time follow the teachings of one of the imams hanafimaalikishaafi and ahmad bin hanbalmay allahs.w have ...
Taqlid is indispensable for following all branches of our religion. Believing in fallible personalities without any dalil, almost in all situations, becomes binding upon us, however, Level of taqlid may differ.

Taqlid isn't confined in 4 imams. Its vast scope encompasses muhaddisin, imams of ilm al rijal, mufassirin, ahle qirat, historians etc as well.
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
talibilm
05-02-2018, 01:09 AM
:sl:

I believe its one of the tests to his righteous believers which had been even to the sahabas as Allah 's words http://legacy.quran.com/67/2 anyhow ought & will happen to see what did they do , did they follow the Calipha or their own ego etc

Some hadith like this has further info about this

ADVICE OF PROPHET TO BE KEPT IN MIND ALWAYS AND TO FOLLOW IT.

Dawud :: Book 40 : Hadith 4590
Narrated Irbad ibn Sariyah:

AbdurRahman ibn Amr as-Sulami and Hujr ibn Hujr said: We came to Irbad ibn Sariyah who was among those about whom the following verse was revealed: "Nor (is there blame) on those who come to thee to be provided with mounts, and when thou saidst: "I can find no mounts for you."

We greeted him and said: We have come to see you to give healing and obtain benefit from you.

Al-Irbad said: One day the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) led us in prayer, then faced us and gave us a lengthy exhortation at which the eyes shed tears and the hearts were afraid.

A man said: Apostle of Allah! It seems as if it were a farewell exhortation, so what injunction do you give us?

He then said: I enjoin you to fear Allah, and to hear and obey even if it be an Abyssinian slave, for those of you who live after me will see great disagreement. You must then follow my sunnah and that of the rightly-guided caliphs. Hold to it and stick fast to it. Avoid novelties, for every novelty is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.


INCIDENT OF SALAH ITSELF

Muslim :: Book 19 : Hadith 4374 It has been narrated on the authority of Abdullah who said: On the day he returned from the Battle of Ahzab, the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) made for us an announcement that nobody would say his Zuhr prayer but in the quarters of Banu Quraiza (Some) people, being afraid that the time for prayer would expire, said their prayers before reaching the street of Banu Quraiza. The others said: We will not say our prayer except where the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) has ordered us to say it even if the time expires. (When he learned of the difference in the view of the two groups of the people, the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) did not blame anyone from the two groups.



SAME ISSUE but DIFFERENT order OF NABI :saws:


Dawud :: Book 13 : Hadith 2381 Narrated AbuHurayrah: A man asked the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) whether one who was fasting could embrace (his wife) and he gave him permission; but when another man came to him, and asked him, he forbade him. The one to whom he gave permission was an old man and the one whom he forbade was a youth.
Reply

azc
05-02-2018, 02:06 AM
^ plz See, following hadith defines taqlid shakhsi in khairul quroon:

Bukhari: Volume 2, Book 26, Number 813 :

Narrated by 'Ikrima
The people of Medina asked Ibn Abbas about a woman who got her menses after performing Tawaf-al-Ifada. He said, "She could depart (from Mecca)." They said, "We will not act on your verdict and ignore the verdict of Zaid." Ibn Abbas said, "When you reach Medina, inquire about it." So, when they reached Medina they asked (about that). One of those whom they asked was Um Sulaim. She told them the narration of Safiya (812).
Reply

MuhammadHamza1
05-02-2018, 04:10 AM
You said that Sahabah did Taqleed.They were merely following those who had more knowledge than them.Now.This is the main point.Consider one of the Companions Sahabah were following was proved to be wrong on one matter by another Sahabi who had more knowledge than him in that matter.Would the Sahabah not follow the second SAhabi then?They surely would have.
But this is not what you people do.We Salafis say that it is permissible to follow one madhab out of the four,but when the opinion of another madhab is strong,you must take the second madhab.What is so difficult about this?Just like the first example I gave.
NOW HERE IS MY QUESTION.WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH WHAT I HAVE SAID?
Reply

azc
05-02-2018, 05:05 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by MuhammadHamza1
You said that Sahabah did Taqleed.They were merely following those who had more knowledge than them.Now.This is the main point.Consider one of the Companions Sahabah were following was proved to be wrong on one matter by another Sahabi who had more knowledge than him in that matter.Would the Sahabah not follow the second SAhabi then?They surely would have.
But this is not what you people do.We Salafis say that it is permissible to follow one madhab out of the four,but when the opinion of another madhab is strong,you must take the second madhab.What is so difficult about this?Just like the first example I gave.
NOW HERE IS MY QUESTION.WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH WHAT I HAVE SAID?
See post #6. People of madina didnot follow what Hz ibn abbas ra told them, rather, they preferred to follow what Hz ibn thabit ra opined about the matter. It evinces of taqlid shakhsi.

What you have said, I respect this opinion of yours of following better ruling out of 4 madhab, provided that it's not subjected to talfiq based on desires or whims.

But I don't think this taqlid thing is confined in 4 madhab only, rather, we are muqallid of muhaddisin as well.
Reply

MuhammadHamza1
05-02-2018, 07:07 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
See post #6. People of madina didnot follow what Hz ibn abbas ra told them, rather, they preferred to follow what Hz ibn thabit ra opined about the matter. It evinces of taqlid shakhsi.
Taqlid Shakhsi is permissible for a person who does not have knowledge.
What I am saying is that why do Muqallids stick to one madhab only?Why do they not take the opinion of another madhab when the opinion of that madhab is stronger?
Reply

azc
05-02-2018, 08:31 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by MuhammadHamza1
Taqlid Shakhsi is permissible for a person who does not have knowledge.
What I am saying is that why do Muqallids stick to one madhab only?Why do they not take the opinion of another madhab when the opinion of that madhab is stronger?
What I quoted is involvement of people of madina in taqlid shaykhsi of Hz zaid bin thabit ra.
So question arise why they were involved in taqlid shakhsi..?
Were they ignorant of knowledge of deen...?

And what you are saying is related to 4 madhab. IslahaALlah I'll discuss it later.
Reply

Abz2000
05-04-2018, 10:30 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
What I quoted is involvement of people of madina in taqlid shaykhsi of Hz zaid bin thabit ra.

So question arise why they were involved in taqlid shakhsi..?
Although the q was adressed to another member, i intend no disrespect or rudeness by interjecting and believe it's best to answer if one believes they can shed light on a topic and is allowed to speak -

the simplest and most truthful to best of knowledge answer is usually best, though it's sometimes good to elaborate. Hence fuzzy logic is required.


Why use logic?


Allah informed the angels who trusted Him that His knowledge overwhelmed their God-given logical conclusions, they then bowed to Adam after a knowledge (plus logic?) presentation, iblis the ignorant racial supremacist disagreed and used flawed and unstable logic proving that Allah does not suffer purposeful and selectively ignorant fools too well. Hence TRUTHFUL KNOWLEDGE and it's application is what sustains logic, with Wisdom being the actual resultant measure from the human perspective. Also access to truthful (accurate) data and efficient sandboxing and defining of doubtful and false data (like a good and wholesome virus definitions database) is required for good conclusions and decisions. That's why sound minded, knowledgeable, experienced, and truthful adults are usually consulted about affairs of moment where wisdom is required instead of consulting less knowledgeable children who work on high binary logic, (although a truthful and innocent child is more reliable than a deceitful, greedy, corrupt and unwise adult (e.g the boy who heard ibn ubay and was confirmed by Allah).
......Therefore - truthfulness, wisdom, and good judgement (logic) are sought and must somehow be combined and complicated decisions must be made - especially where both consultants are trustworthy - sometimes FUZZY.

The video embedded below is a presentation of situational apparent fuzzy logic reasoning in contrast to easy clear-branching binary logic.
(The human brain which also receives inspiration takes many shady variables into account hence processes them in a different manner to computers).-
Still all of this data is being regularly calculated and re-calculated at lightning fast speeds and that's what those people's brains were doing regularly.



- these respected people were not practising taqleed of abu jahl or abu lahab or any dead person -but were the type who were prepared (purposefully so) to stand against themselves if necessary, and since they trusted that the opinion of zayd :ra: was the most knowledgeable and sound opinion, better than their own and anybody elses, they accepted it in a wise manner.
The system they had built with Allah's messenger and only with Allah's help was a just, truthful, and well functioning leadership structure, and the best method of resolving differences and uniting on issues was by delegating decisions where disputes were taking place to accepted wise leaders whom they trusted and valued as having good intellect and judgement and the ability to argue with their counterparts in an amicable manner and to unite sincerely on the best choice whilst taking possible and probable outcomes into consideration. The people who sincerely and justly accepted zayd :ra: 's reasoning did not prevent or hinder ibn abbass :ra: from appealing and arguing his opinion against that of zayd's and it seems from their curiousity and questioning that they were eager to learn.
Also the opinion/ruling of zaid was already standing, and the opinion of ibn Abbas (they didn't usually do contrary rulings but heard and obeyed unless they believed that the new opinion was better and worthy of being accepted as a ruling IN ALLAH'S OPINION.
The people of the sabbath were not suffered well for their illogical disputes and foolish egotistic arguments - the new breed knew better and took responsibility and solved things in a dignified and just manner.


format_quote Originally Posted by azc
Were they ignorant of knowledge of deen...?
Absolutely not. Some had more knowledge, intellect, and judgement than others, and since these people were trained in deduction and wisdom via the Quran and the Messenger, they knew better than to practice anarchy - the system wasn't broken and didn't need to be fixed - a smooth and sound decision i would say.


format_quote Originally Posted by azc
And what you are saying is related to 4 madhab. IslahaALlah I'll discuss it later.


They lived and died in their age in a generation that is now past, they will be responsible for their deeds and us for ours, these ages come under the umbrella of the final messenger's age which continues. Allah, the truth, and the situation, do not come under their umbrella, they were wise students and then accepted guides who had their eyes, ears, minds, and hearts open whilst they were alive and were dwelling on earth and people were able to consult them. Their problems, methods, and judgements are available to us for study, but they have no governmental enforcement authority over us (as they had during their tenures) and to say that they do would be shirk even if their judgements were being enforced today by SOMEONE ELSE who is alive.
We cannot lay consultation on their shoulders, nor responsibility for implementation of any decision since they will deny anybody's worship of them on the day when the truthful will benifit from their truth therefore our reference points may be many but the focal point must be Allah - the Author of truth and the laws which govern our universe.

The paths previously walked upon are many and some are very blurry where much grass has grown, the Prophet :saws: drew it, it's the straight, humble and truthful one and the only way we're going to get safely to the end is by looking for it instead of following another dead (albeit wise) person's footsteps regardless of where they went wrong or meandered, a person who themself sought the straight path in their day, maybe it was a park then and now it's a barracks.

Allah who is most wise knows best, i believe that's where our hearts and minds should looking when measuring and deciding the location of the path, looking at the 4 imams' maps should be helpful, but no guarantee we'll find it drawn perfectly accurately though since they didn't have the blueprint then and definitely don't have it now.


ANNUIT COEPTIS???
Who is HE???


I have often seen the hadith in question used in explanation of Quran 9:31.

9:31 They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah , and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him.

Once while Allah's Messenger was reciting this verse, 'Adi bin Hatim said, "O Allah's Messenger! They do not worship them." Allah's Messenger said, "They certainly do. The scholars and monks have made lawful things as unlawful and unlawful things as lawful, and the Jews and Christians followed them; and by doing so they worshipped them."
While searching for the source of this hadith, I came across a different narration (Jami' Tirmidhi 3106, graded hasan by Albani) of apparently the same situation, which states,

…He also said, "They did not worship them, but if they made anything lawful for them, they adopted it as lawful. And when they made anything unlawful, they adopted it as unlawful for themselves."
How authentic is this first hadith? Also, any references to which compilations it can be found in, and if it was ever narrated in any other forms (be they weaker or stronger), would be appreciated.
share improve this question
asked
Jun 27 '12 at 17:04

goldPseudo♦
9,223●9●37●98
1 Answer
order by
up vote
5
down vote
This is my amateur research. Ibn Kathir says in his book Tafsir ibn Kathir in the chapter on Surat Taubah:

[ وَقَوْلُهُ ] ( اتَّخَذُوا أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَرُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ وَالْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ ) رَوَى الْإِمَامُ أَحْمَدُ ، وَالتِّرْمِذِيُّ ، وَابْنُ جَرِيرٍ مِنْ طُرُقٍ ، عَنْ عَدِيِّ بْنِ حَاتِمٍ - رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ - أَنَّهُ لَمَّا بَلَغَتْهُ دَعْوَةُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - فَرَّ إِلَى الشَّامِ ، وَكَانَ قَدْ تَنَصَّرَ فِي الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ ، فَأُسِرَتْ أُخْتُهُ وَجَمَاعَةٌ مِنْ قَوْمِهِ ، ثُمَّ مَنَّ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - عَلَى أُخْتِهِ وَأَعْطَاهَا ، فَرَجَعَتْ إِلَى أَخِيهَا ، وَرَغَّبَتْهُ فِي الْإِسْلَامِ وَفِي الْقُدُومِ عَلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - فَقَدِمَ عَدِيٌّ الْمَدِينَةَ ، وَكَانَ رَئِيسًا فِي قَوْمِهِ طَيِّئٍ ، وَأَبُوهُ حَاتِمٌ الطَّائِيُّ الْمَشْهُورُ بِالْكَرَمِ ، فَتَحَدَّثَ النَّاسُ بِقُدُومِهِ ، فَدَخَلَ عَلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - وَفِي عُنُقِ عَدِيٍّ صَلِيبٌ مِنْ فِضَّةٍ ، فَقَرَأَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - هَذِهِ الْآيَةَ : ( اتَّخَذُوا أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَرُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ ) قَالَ : فَقُلْتُ : إِنَّهُمْ لَمْ يَعْبُدُوهُمْ . فَقَالَ : بَلَى ، إِنَّهُمْ حَرَّمُوا عَلَيْهِمُ الْحَلَالَ ، وَأَحَلُّوا لَهُمُ الْحَرَامَ ، فَاتَّبَعُوهُمْ ، فَذَلِكَ عِبَادَتُهُمْ إِيَّاهُمْ . وَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - : يَا عَدِيُّ ، مَا تَقُولُ ؟ أَيُفِرُّكَ أَنْ يُقَالَ : اللَّهُ أَكْبَرُ ؟ فَهَلْ تَعْلَمُ شَيْئًا أَكْبَرَ مِنَ اللَّهِ ؟ مَا يُفِرُّكَ ؟ أَيُفِرُّكَ أَنْ يُقَالَ : لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ؟ فَهَلْ تَعْلَمُ مِنْ إِلَهٍ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ؟ ثُمَّ دَعَاهُ إِلَى الْإِسْلَامِ فَأَسْلَمَ ، وَشَهِدَ شَهَادَةَ الْحَقِّ ، قَالَ : فَلَقَدْ رَأَيْتُ وَجْهَهُ اسْتَبْشَرَ ثُمَّ قَالَ : إِنَّ الْيَهُودَ مَغْضُوبٌ عَلَيْهِمْ ، وَالنَّصَارَى ضَالُّونَ . (source)
So we learn that this hadith is in Musnad Ahmad, Jami' at-Tirmidhi and ibn Jarir at-Tabari's book.

I was able to locate the hadith in Jami' at-Tirmidhi (number 3095):

عَنْ عَدِيِّ بْنِ حَاتِمٍ قَالَ أَتَيْتُ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَفِي عُنُقِي صَلِيبٌ مِنْ ذَهَبٍ فَقَالَ يَا عَدِيُّ اطْرَحْ عَنْكَ هَذَا الْوَثَنَ وَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقْرَأُ فِي سُورَةِ بَرَاءَةٌ اتَّخَذُوا أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَرُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ قَالَ أَمَا إِنَّهُمْ لَمْ يَكُونُوا يَعْبُدُونَهُمْ وَلَكِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا إِذَا أَحَلُّوا لَهُمْ شَيْئًا اسْتَحَلُّوهُ وَإِذَا حَرَّمُوا عَلَيْهِمْ شَيْئًا حَرَّمُوهُ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَرِيبٌ لَا نَعْرِفُهُ إِلَّا مِنْ حَدِيثِ عَ

https://islam.stackexchange.com/ques...worship-hadith


When the Messenger of Allah died, Hazrat Abu Bakr was in his house in Sunh. They gave him the bad news. Hazrat Abu Bakr, who felt as if one part of his part broke off, went to the house of the Messenger of Allah quickly.

He lifted the cloth that covered the blessed face of the Messenger of Allah in terror and astonishment. His face was in the form of embodied light. He bowed down and kissed the Prophet’s bright and luminous forehead three times. He uttered the following words in tears:

“O Messenger of Allah! Your death is as clean and graceful as your life.”[2]

Then, he consoled the household of the Prophet.

Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar

After leaving the house of the Prophet, Hazrat Abu Bakr went to the Mosque. He heard Hazrat Umar say, “The Messenger of Allah did not die.” Thereupon, he said,

“Whoever worships Muhammad (pbuh) should know that Muhammad (pbuh) died. Whoever worships Allah should know that Allah is Hayy (immortal).”[3]

Then, he recited the following verse:

“Muhammad is no more than a Messenger: many were the Messengers that passed away before Him. If he died or was slain, will ye then turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah; but Allah (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve him) with gratitude”

https://questionsonislam.com/article...h-prophet-pbuh




115. Allah said: "I will send it down unto you: But if any of you after that resisteth faith, I will punish him with a penalty such as I have not inflicted on any one among all the peoples."
116. And behold! Allah will say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah.?" He will say: "Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest what is in my heart, Thou I know not what is in Thine. For Thou knowest in full all that is hidden.
117. "Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say, to wit, 'worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up Thou wast the Watcher over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.
118. "If Thou dost punish them, they are Thy servant: If Thou dost forgive them, Thou art the Exalted in power, the Wise."
119. Allah will say: "This is a day on which the truthful will profit from their truth: theirs are gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal Home: Allah well-pleased with them, and they with Allah. That is the great salvation, (the fulfilment of all desires).
120. To Allah doth belong the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is therein, and it is He Who hath power over all things.

From Quran, Chapter 5, The table spread.






Here's a practical demo of how such logic sometimes works:

Reply

MuhammadHamza1
05-04-2018, 01:24 PM
Using the HAdith you quoted is not evidence at all.Perhaps they followed him rather than ibn abbas because they might have thought that he was not knowledgable in this matter than the other sahabi.This is a possibility is it notWhen this possibility exists,this hadith cannot be used as evidence.
Also,I repeat taqlid e shalhsi is permissible for laymen.A am looking forward to your reply.
Reply

azc
05-11-2018, 06:36 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by MuhammadHamza1
Using the HAdith you quoted is not evidence at all.Perhaps they followed him rather than ibn abbas because they might have thought that he was not knowledgable in this matter than the other sahabi.This is a possibility is it notWhen this possibility exists,this hadith cannot be used as evidence.
Also,I repeat taqlid e shalhsi is permissible for laymen.A am looking forward to your reply.
Perhaps they followed him rather than ibn abbas because they might have thought that he was not knowledgable in this matter than the other sahabi.
When they thought of Hz Ibn Abbas ra lacking in knowledge in this matter then why......? ...why they asked him the ruling in this matter....?

Plz see the hadith again.
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 04:37 AM
@Abz2000 :

Do you know that authenticity of hadith depends on blind taqlid of muhaddisin...?

And all of us are involved in it.
Reply

Abz2000
05-12-2018, 08:25 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
@Abz2000 :

Do you know that authenticity of hadith depends on blind taqlid of muhaddisin...?

And all of us are involved in it.
I haven't a clue as to who might have told you that.
Truth is truth and error is error, the Muhadditheen were human and subject to error, so truth will always override error. This is not a way of life where your priests tell you that god has one eye or multiple arms and legs (and some might say it's probably a woman with two dudes hiding behind her or sumfing shifty like that ;) ) and you just accept it out of respect for your ancestors in case you belie them and "hence" call them stupid and then be made to wear a dunce hat in the corner of the classroom. You seek the truth, and the truth is what sets you free no matter what your background and who your scholars are - since scholars are students and not the authors of truth.

According to the munaafiq jews and sellout scholars subject to rome who were accustomed to switching words and names from their correct places, and who also had an addiction to perverting rulings of muhadditheen and rebelling against Allah whilst attempting to deceive Allah and the believers by pretending to please Him with song from their mouths, Mary should have been stoned, however, according to God who revealed the scripture and knew what they disclosed as well as what they hid, they themselves were in the process of making themselves worthy of stoning for their perversive lies, deceptions, corruption, and pretended appeasement of God for the sake of unjust exploitation and diversion of the masses.

How would you react if it happened today?
Flogging perhaps? Or maybe a more contextual and just holistic view of the situation and an attempt to understand our situation and what Allah wants and is warning us about?


Intentionally in this context means believing it to be untrue/highly doubtful, therefore if someone with a muhaddith certificate tells me something which i believe or know to be a lie, i will not be able to shift the burden of blame of my consequent wrong actions on him/her based on that lie unless i am under some sort of compulsion beyond what i can reasonably bear in Allah's sight.

Hadith No: 109
From: Sahih Bukhari. Chapter 3, Knowledge
Narrated/Authority of Salama
I heard the Prophet saying, "Whoever (intentionally) ascribes to me what I have not said then (surely) let him occupy his seat in Hell-fire."
Report Mistake | Permalink


Hadith No: 108
From: Sahih Bukhari. Chapter 3, Knowledge
Narrated/Authority of Anas
The fact which stops me from narrating a great number of Hadiths to you is that the Prophet said: "Whoever tells a lie against me intentionally, then (surely) let him occupy his seat in Hell-fire."
Report Mistake | Permalink

Hadith No: 110
From: Sahih Bukhari. Chapter 3, Knowledge
Narrated/Authority of Abu Huraira
The Prophet said, "Name yourselves with my name (use my name) but do not name yourselves with my Kunya name (i.e. Abu-l Qasim). And whoever sees me in a dream then surely he has seen me for Satan cannot impersonate me. And whoever tells a lie against me (intentionally), then (surely) let him occupy his seat in Hell-fire."
Report Mistake | Permalink

Hadith No: 107
From: Sahih Bukhari. Chapter 3, Knowledge
Narrated/Authority of Abdullah bin Az-Zubair
I said to my father, 'I do not hear from you any narration (Hadith) of Allah s Apostle as I hear (his narrations) from so and so?" Az-Zubair replied. l was always with him (the Prophet) and I heard him saying "Whoever tells a lie against me (intentionally) then (surely) let him occupy, his seat in Hell-fire.
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 10:20 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
I haven't a clue as to who might have told you that.
Truth is truth and error is error, the Muhadditheen were human and subject to error, so truth will always override error. This is not a way of life where your priests tell you that god has one eye or multiple arms and legs (and some might say it's probably a woman with two dudes hiding behind her or sumfing shifty like that ;) ) and you just accept it out of respect for your ancestors in case you belie them and "hence" call them stupid and then be made to wear a dunce hat in the corner of the classroom. You seek the truth, and the truth is what sets you free no matter what your background and who your scholars are - since scholars are students and not the authors of truth.

According to the munaafiq jews and sellout scholars subject to rome who were accustomed to switching words and names from their correct places, and who also had an addiction to perverting rulings of muhadditheen and rebelling against Allah whilst attempting to deceive Allah and the believers by pretending to please Him with song from their mouths, Mary should have been stoned, however, according to God who revealed the scripture and knew what they disclosed as well as what they hid, they themselves were in the process of making themselves worthy of stoning for their perversive lies, deceptions, corruption, and pretended appeasement of God for the sake of unjust exploitation and diversion of the masses.

How would you react if it happened today?
Flogging perhaps? Or maybe a more contextual and just holistic view of the situation and an attempt to understand our situation and what Allah wants and is warning us about?
Is it permissible for the student of knowledge to suffice with the declarations of the scholars of the past as to whether a saying of the Prophet, صلى الله عليه وسلم, is weak or authentic? For example, he reads the checking ofHaafidhal-Iraaqi where he says, “Thishadithis authentic.” So is it permissible for him to suffice with that and the same with Imaam Ahmad or other than him?

Shaikh al-Albaani: “This matter resembles blind following in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). It is sufficient for the student of knowledge to listen to and act upon an opinion of one of the Imaams who are followed, and by that I do not only mean the four [famous ones], since there are more, by the Grace of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic.

We say:[This is so] since it is not possible for all students of knowledge to be on the same level of ability in discerning the truth in those matters where the people have differed. So it is enough for the student of knowledge to implement the aayah,“So ask those who know the Scripture if you know not.”[Surah an-Nahl (16): 43]

So if there are people of knowledge who are alive then he should ask them and embrace their answer, and if there is not a scholar who is alive for him to question, and he knows that a certain scholar from those who are followed has a certain opinion then he can follow him. And in this he is safe from any reproach or blame even if in reality the opinion that he followed is a mistake because he has implemented what was mentioned in theaayahas being obligatory upon him,“So ask those who know the Scripture if you know not.”

But this is based upon certain premises–there is one condition to this, which is that it is not evident to him that the opinion he is following is a mistake. And knowing whether the opinion he is following is incorrect or not can be done by the student doing some personal research if he has the capability of doing so, or it can become known by the direction of another scholar whom he trusts and in whose knowledge he trusts. What is important is that it is permissible for the student of knowledge to blindly follow a scholar if the mistake [in that opinion] is not clear to him and he himself is not capable of clarifying whether [the chosen opinion] is correct or incorrect …”

“Likewise, totally, is the answer regarding the student of knowledge, he finds an Imaam from the Imaams of the Muslims or a preserver of hadith who authenticates hadith and declares others to be weak, then it is sufficient for this student of knowledge to follow this verifier [who declares hadiths to be authentic or weak] as long as two conditions are met, just as we have mentioned regarding the issue of [blind following] infiqh
https://thealbaanisite.com/2011/02/2...0%2C3087551865
Reply

Abz2000
05-12-2018, 10:27 AM
@azc i must've edited my post as u were typing, there is a small update there that should explain what i meant.
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 10:47 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
@azc i must've edited my post as u were typing, there is a small update there that should explain what i meant.
Bro, fact is that believing in all branches of Islamic sciences depends on taqlid or blind following of esteemed imams of concerned field of knowledge.

Fiqh: 4 imams
hadith: muhaddisin
tafsir: mufassirin
qira'at: ahlul qira'at

etc

They are the link between us and prophet s.a.w

e.g.

No hadith can be proven authentic until muhaddisin are trusted without any dalil.
Reply

MuhammadHamza1
05-12-2018, 03:27 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
Bro, fact is that believing in all branches of Islamic sciences depends on taqlid or blind following of esteemed imams of concerned field of knowledge.

Fiqh: 4 imams
hadith: muhaddisin
tafsir: mufassirin
qira'at: ahlul qira'at

etc

They are the link between us and prophet s.a.w

e.g.

No hadith can be proven authentic until muhaddisin are trusted without any dalil.
Mentioning the Muhadiseen is not suitable here.Because we have the rule that in case of a hadith,the view of the Jamhoor or majority of the Muhadiseen is accepted.Not one Muhadith.In which case you would have called it Taqlid but not when the veiw of MAjority is taken.
Also.My question stands.Why do the Muqallids not follow the view of the other Madhab if the view of that other madhab is proven to be stronger than their madhab.

- - - Updated - - -

Blind following is the only way for Laymen.NOt for scholors.
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 03:48 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by MuhammadHamza1
Mentioning the Muhadiseen is not suitable here.Because we have the rule that in case of a hadith,the view of the Jamhoor or majority of the Muhadiseen is accepted.Not one Muhadith.In which case you would have called it Taqlid but not when the veiw of MAjority is taken.
Also.My question stands.Why do the Muqallids not follow the view of the other Madhab if the view of that other madhab is proven to be stronger than their madhab.

- - - Updated - - -

Blind following is the only way for Laymen.NOt for scholors.
[1] The famous Imam al-Haramayn Abu al-Ma‘āli Abd al-Malik bin Yusuf al-Juwayni (419-478 AH) writes in his book Al-Burhan:

“The expert scholars have agreed that the masses are obligated (‘alayhim) with following the schools of the (four) Imams who thoroughly investigated and researched, who compiled the chapters (of Fiqh) and mentioned the circumstances of the rulings.” (vol. 2, P. 1146)

[2] Shaikh al-Islam Ahmad Ibn Hajr al-Haytami writes in Tuhfa al-Muhtaj fi Sharh al- Minhaj:

“The claim the layman has no madh-hab is rejected, rather it is necessary (yalzamuhu) for him to do taqlīd of a recognised school. (As for the claim: scholars did not obligate following one school), that was before the codification of the schools and their establishment.” (Vol.12 p.491-Kitab al-Zakah)

[3] Imam al-Nawawi writes in Al-Majmu‘ Sharh Al-Muhadhdhab:

“The second view is it is obligatory (yalzamuhu) for him to follow one particular school, and that was the definitive position according to Imam Abul-Hassan (the father of Imam al-Haramayn Al-Juwayni). And this applies to everyone who has not reached the rank of ijtihād of the jurists and scholars of other disciplines. The reasoning for this ruling is that if it was permitted to follow any school one wished it would lead to hand-picking the dispensations of the schools, following one’s desires. He would be choosing between Halal and Haram, and obligatory and permissible. Ultimately that would lead to relinquishing oneself from the burden of responsibility. This is not the same as during the first generations, for the schools that were sufficient in terms of their rulings for newer issues, were neither codified nor widespread. Thus on this basis it is obligatory for a person to strive in choosing a madh-hab which alone he follows.” (vol.1 p. 93)

[4] Shaikh Salih al-Sunusi writes in Fath al-‘Alee al-Malik fil-Fatwa ‘ala madh-hab al-Imam Malik:

“As for the scholar who has not reached the level of ijtihād and the non-scholar, they must do taqlīd of the Mujtahid… And the most correct view is that it is obligatory (wajib) to adhere to a particular school from the four schools…” (p.40-41, in Usul al-Fiqh)

[5] Imam Sharani, an undisputed authority in the Shafi school writes in Al-Mizan al-Kubra:

“…You (O student) have no excuse left for not doing taqlīd of any madh-hab you wish from the schools of the four Imams, for they are all paths to Heaven…” (p.55 vol.1)

[6] Imām Shams al-Din Dhahabī (673-748 AH) writes in Siyar A‘lam al-Nubalā under Ibn Hazm Zāhirī’s comment:“I follow the truth and perform ijtihād, and I do not adhere to any madh-hab”,

“I say: yes. Whoever has reached the level of ijtihād and a number of imāms have attested to this regarding him, it is not allowed for him to do taqlīd, just as it is not seeming at all for the beginner layman jurist who has committed the Qur’ān to memory or a great deal of it to perform ijtihād. How is he going to perform ijtihād? What will he say? On what will he base his opinions? How can he fly when his wings have not yet grown?” (Vol.18, Pg.191)

[7] In the famous twelve volume Maliki compendium of fatāwā, Al-Mi‘yar al-Mu‘rib an fatāwā ahl al-Ifriqiyya wa al-Andalus wa al-Maghrib, Imam Ahmad al-Wanshirisi records the Fatwa on taqlīd:

“It is not permitted (lā yajoozu) for the follower of a scholar to choose the most pleasing to him of the schools and one that agrees the most with him. It is his duty to do taqlīd of the Imam whose school he believes to be right in comparison to the other schools.” (vol.11 p.163-164)

[8] The Hanbali scholar Imam ‘Ala al-Din al-Mardawi in his major Juristic compendium Al-Insaf, cites the statement of the famous scholar Imam Al-Wazir ibn Hubaira (died 560 ah):

“Consensus has been established upon taqlīd of every one of the Four Schools and that the truth does not lie outside of them.” (Vol.11 p.169, Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah).......
http://www.darultahqiq.com/do-i-need...llow-a-madhab/
Reply

MuhammadHamza1
05-12-2018, 03:57 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
[4] Shaikh Salih al-Sunusi writes in Fath al-‘Alee al-Malik fil-Fatwa ‘ala madh-hab al-Imam Malik:

“As for the scholar who has not reached the level of ijtihād and the non-scholar, they must do taqlīd of the Mujtahid… And the most correct view is that it is obligatory (wajib) to adhere to a particular school from the four schools…” (p.40-41, in Usul al-Fiqh)
This is what I have been saying.When one reaches the level that he can do ijtihad,there is no need for him to do Taqleed.

- - - Updated - - -

Our position is clear.
https://islamqa.info/en/21420

- - - Updated - - -

And this.
http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subs...articlePages=1
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 04:15 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by MuhammadHamza1
This is what I have been saying.When one reaches the level that he can do ijtihad,there is no need for him to do Taqleed.

- - - Updated - - -

Our position is clear.
https://islamqa.info/en/21420

- - - Updated - - -

And this.
http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subs...articlePages=1
are you a mujtahid......?

Even all the scholars aren't mujtahid.....

Do you know that level of ijtihad are also different based on level of qualifications...?

we have the rule that in case of a hadith, the view of the Jamhoor or majority of the Muhadiseen is accepted. Not one Muhadith. In which case you would have called it Taqlid but not when the veiw of MAjority is taken.
Now tell me what the majority of imams of different Islamic sciences say about taqlid of 4 imams...?

In the entire Islamic history we have no famous personality who ever objected on taqlid or stopped the people from following 4 imams.

If you haven't read history then read, you will see only shia, mutazila and other deviant sects prior to ahle zawahir like ibn hazm, qazi shawkani besides ibn qayyim etc questioned on this matter. And even then, they were in minority.

So here, do you accept the decision of majority or not...?
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 04:57 PM
Levels of Hanafi Fuqaha and Scholars:

1. Mujtahidin fil Shar’a– These are those who don’t follow any other mujtahids and are the source of methods and principles to be followed by others.
These include the likes of Imam Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik ibn Ans, Imam Muhammad bin Idris Shaf’i, Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal [may Allah have mercy on them], etc.

2. Mujtahidin fil madhab– These are those who have the capability of deriving ruling (ijtihad) from the sources of Shari’a and even though they disagree with mujtahideen fil shara on certain matters but in principle (usool) they are in conformity with them.
These include the likes of Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad bin Hassan al-Shaybani [may Allah have mercy on them].

3. Mujtahidin fil Masail– These are those who derive ruling (ijtihad) in those issues (masail) regarding which there is no report from mujtahideen of the school.
These are the likes of Imam Kashaf, Imam Tawahi, Shams al-Ai’ma Abul Hassan Karkhi, Shams al-Ai’ma Halawai, Shams al-Ai’ma Sarakhsi, Imam Bazdawi, Imam Qadi Khan [may Allah have mercy on them], etc.

4. Ashab Takhrij– This group does not have authority for ijtihad. They just clarify what are not clear in their school books based on other texts of their imams .They very rarely draw some rulings from the nas, when there is none.
Example of this level would be Imam Bazzazi, Imam Abu Bakr al- Jassas and Abu Abd Allah al-Jurjani [may Allah have mercy on them].

5. Ashab Tarjih– This group distinguishes between different narrations within the madhab and decide on those opinions which are better and more accurate than the others among the opinions and reports made in their school.
Example of these would be Imam Marghinani [author of Hidaya], Imam Abul Hassan Ahmad Qudoori, Muhaqqiq mutlaq Imam bin Humam [may Allah have mercy on them], etc.

6. Ashab Tamyiz– This level of muqallid scholars are able to distinguish between strong and weak opinions within the school as well as Zahir al-Riwayah and Nawadir.

They include the likes of Imam Abul Fadl Abdullah bin Mahmud [author of Mukhtar], Taaj al-Sharia Mahmud Mahbubi al-Bukhari [author of Wiqaya], Imam Muzaffaruddin Ahmad bin Ali [author of Majma al-Bahrain], Imam Abul Barakaat al-Nasafi [author of Kanz], as well as Imam ibn Nujaym al-Hanafi [may Allah have mercy on them all].

7. SimplyMuqallids– These are those who simply memorized the majority of the hukms and problems and their solutions in their schools of thought.
Many faqihs after 800 A.H. are in this group such as Allamah Ibn `Abidin [may Allah have mercy on him].

Taken from Majuma al-Fatawa of ‘Allamah Abd al-Hayy Lakhnawi and Usul al-Fiqh of Dr. Yusuf Ziya Kavakci.
.......

Shafi’i Classification:

Imam al-Nawawi, Imam Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Ibn Hajar al-Makki [may Allah have mercy on them] and other Shafi`i scholars classified the faqihs in the following manner:

1. Mujtahid al-Mutlaq:
a. Mustaqil: He is a mujtahid in Shari`a.The leaders of the four madhabs belong to this classisfication and are experts in their fields.

b. Muntasib: He is free in the madhab. He follows the methodology of his School, but is free in al-furu’ ( detailed issues of fiqh).
They include the likes of Imam al-Qaffalal-Saghir, Imam al- Haramain, Imam Ghazzali, Imam Abu Ishaq al-Shirazi, Imam Abu Ali al-Marwazi [may Allah have mercy on them].

2. Mujtahid al-Muqayyad:

a. Mujtahidin madhhab: They make ijtihad only in their madhabs.

b. Mujtahid fi ‘l-Fatwa: This group of mujtahids are those who give fatwa by preferring one of the opinions expressed in their madhab. Shafites do not come down to accept the other levels of scholars as faqihs.......
https://sunnahmuakada.wordpress.com/...0%2C9099212860
Reply

Abz2000
05-12-2018, 06:03 PM
I believe that people are obligated to follow what they believe is true and who they believe is being honest with them until there is trusted authority that is able to enforce a just and current standard. Or else their arguments have no more force with the people than that of the various debaters at hyde park corner.

Anyways, it's usually the imams such as ibn taymiyyah who went through different schools of thought until content that they were nearest to what they believed to be the most correct and truthful way.
Salman al Phaarisee is a good example of a person who kept an inquisitive mind and was ready to listen.
Reply

azc
05-12-2018, 07:01 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
I believe that people are obligated to follow what they believe is true and who they believe is being honest with them until there is trusted authority that is able to enforce a just and current standard. Or else their arguments have no more force with the people than that of the various debaters at hyde park corner.

Anyways, it's usually the imams such as ibn taymiyyah who went through different schools of thought until content that they were nearest to what they believed to be the most correct and truthful way.
Salman al Phaarisee is a good example who kept an inquisitive mind and was ready to listen.
Whether or not you follow 4 madhab or any particular group of scholars or do self study to follow this deen is entirely your personal matter but the ages long tradition of ummah can't be challenged by us, the random people who aren't even scholars.

Ibn taimiyya himself was a mujtahid.
Reply

Abz2000
05-14-2018, 01:00 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
Whether or not you follow 4 madhab or any particular group of scholars or do self study to follow this deen is entirely your personal matter but the ages long tradition of ummah can't be challenged by us, the random people who aren't even scholars.

Ibn taimiyya himself was a mujtahid.
How then did this "ages long tradition" give way to secular wavesurfing? Can we accept the fact that there was stagnation and lack of will to keep hiring new judges, jurists, and lawyers who were respected as the four imams were in their time when caliphs, monarchs, and governers took their counsel and usually rubber-stamped their opinions into law books.

Are all the youth of today to be expected to uniformly accept a ruling (or choose an avatar to fuse with) because it was made by a wise person who interpreted Islam over a thousand years ago according to the knowledge he had access to - or because all knowledge we can sift is regularly being sifted and interpreted by trustworthy and knowledgeable scholars who live and rule under Allah's shade - even if they come to the conclusion in any given situation that the opinion of one of those four scholars was the best?
Also how can you convince anyone of the truth of your way if you tell them to rely only on the opinions of one person who interpreted what he could by Allah's leave centuries ago (would you not wonder loudly if someone from another way of life gave you that type of logic?)

The only seals set on their opinions were implemented by those in rulership authority when Adam's flesh and Adam's bone ruled by Allah's word from the throne :shade:

Allah never set any seal on their opinions and their opinions currently stand only as examples to be measured with the rule of truth.


We can see from the amounts invested in islamic schools (which is often minuscule in comparson to secular schools) that there is definitely a huge contrast between abu haneefa and ahmad ibn hanbal et al :ra: 's atmosphere and that experienced by students and scholars today. The caliph would consult them, request their presence at court debates and discussions, and rule according to the best opinion available, some were even lashed for their staunch loyalty to certain opinions and refusal to make public proclamations as puppets.

Depends heavily on what you mean by laymen or random people.

I believe ibn taymiyyah :ra: was - and a skilled one at that - although some passionately referred to him as "the heretic from Harraan" :)


Still - it's easier to follow one of the four when there's no just rulership to look up to and obey when we need to say "sami'naa wa atua'naa" - but it's also a testament to the sad situation we are in in that we follow them in the form of opinion alone and not ruling, since the ruling is usually administered by atheist rome and her "partners in "the" region".

It's a bit shocking isn't it that people of knowledge are dragged away by people of ignorance, but it's a logical outcome of a scenario where the knowledgeable person is restricted to providing legislation based on interpretation of truth by 2nd century jurists, whilst the ignorant one has fox news and other highly stimulating (in many ways) material blaring in the living rooms and minds of the jury who see the "U.S partner's" law as a living law and the concept of "king" and "blasphemy" has become a little blurred or is made to appear inverted to the perverted.



“Say: The angel of death, who is set over you, will take your souls. Then you shall be brought to your Lord.” [32:11]


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...s_SWuwVNz-XB9S

Or was ya lookin' at da woman in da red dress???


13. Behold, Luqman said to his son by way of instruction: "O my son! join not in worship (others) with Allah. for false worship is indeed the highest wrong-doing."
14. And We have enjoined on man (to be good) to his parents: in travail upon travail did his mother bear him, and in years twain was his weaning: (hear the command), "Show gratitude to Me and to thy parents: to Me is (thy final) Goal.
15. "But if they strive to make thee join in worship with Me things of which thou hast no knowledge, obey them not; yet bear them company in this life with justice (and consideration), and follow the way of those who turn to me (in love): in the end the return of you all is to Me, and I will tell you the truth (and meaning) of all that ye did."
16. "O my son!" (said Luqman), "If there be (but) the weight of a mustard-seed and it were (hidden) in a rock, or (anywhere) in the heavens or on earth, Allah will bring it forth: for Allah understands the finest mysteries, (and) is well-acquainted (with them).


Think, will the four imams defeat the dajjal or will solid truth and adherence to it do so?
A flag for each imam? Who will join which imam's group? will there be a law for apostasy from one to the other to prevent opportunist bandwagon jumping?

Or maybe a flag for each of the rightly guided caliphs? Or each prophet, or nation? Muslims really don't have 80 different banners do they? They have one God and they unite, live, and die upon one word whenever they can and all the rest of the sects can melt away, dissolve completely, or go to hell.



Ans:
Shotto Tottobodayok
Reply

MuhammadHamza1
05-14-2018, 03:32 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
are you a mujtahid......?

Even all the scholars aren't mujtahid.....

Do you know that level of ijtihad are also different based on level of qualifications...?
I follow Mujtahids.The Salafi Scholors.And that too when I have seen clear proofs from them,as the Quran says:
"With Proofs and Evidences..."


format_quote Originally Posted by azc
In the entire Islamic history we have no famous personality who ever objected on taqlid or stopped the people from following 4 imams.
It seems you are again not reading what I wrote.I have no problem with people doing taqlid of a Fiqh.In Saudi Arabia there are a few Hanbali Scholors.What I have a problem with is why do the Muqallids not follow the opinion of the other madhab when proven that the view of that other madhab is stronger.I implore you.Why do you not do it?
Reply

azc
05-14-2018, 05:05 AM
@Abz2000 :

Doors of ijtihad aren't closed though but after the recognition of 4 madhab none has ever been considered as great as 4 imams were.

There are different levels of ijtihad, last 4 are still occupied but no scholar of this age is considered to reach the level 1,2,3.
https://sunnahmuakada.wordpress.com/...0%2C4413708917


If you think any scholar has reached the level 3 (let alone 1st one), plz tell me his name and other scholars who endorsed it.

Note: Plz don't edit your post so frequently.
Reply

Abz2000
05-14-2018, 05:38 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by azc
@Abz2000 :

Doors of ijtihad aren't closed though but after the recognition of 4 madhab none has ever been considered as great as 4 imams were.

There are different levels of ijtihad, last 4 are still occupied but no scholar of this age is considered to reach the level 1,2,3.
https://sunnahmuakada.wordpress.com/...0%2C4413708917


If you think any scholar has reached the level 3 (let alone 1st one), plz tell me his name and other scholars who endorsed it.

Note: Plz don't edit your post so frequently.
I presume from the natural circumstances that more than a few hundred people who have the same or higher level of intellect have existed in the centuries following them up until now. I would however have given that theory less weight had there been any prophecies distinguishing them.
I believe that they had good opportunities in their circumstances because the people of their age paid attention to their learned and trustworthy people and assisted them in flourishing.
The landscape today appears inverted - take for instance sheikh usama and sheikh anwar, you can see from their jawame al kalim, logical predictions, warnings, and zeal that they were distinguished amongst already distinguished families known for thinking on higher government and people management levels, but they were accused without right, hounded from city to city, murdered by criminals for their upright, honest speech and exhortations with invalid excuses such as "lest they deceive the masses", criminals such as the man with the one eyed seal and his mother who "freed" him. So yup, you can, by probing your own mind, deduce the fact that although there are none to show, there are many who've passed us by. The passing of minds such as that of einstein, darwin (yup lol), and newton amongst many others prove that far reaching and solid logical deduction is not limited to 2AH, but that circumstances and opportunities also play a vital role in budding.

I type on a phone and usually need to edit, then add bits when one part doesn't make sense with another, and that goes on. The 1/4 oz of daily mind numbing greenery phases also contributes i assume....sad i know...but relax.....all's good.... or.....at least it appears so for now.
Reply

azc
05-14-2018, 07:46 AM
@MuhammadHamza1 :

I follow Mujtahids. The Salafi Scholors.
Strange taqlid...!
You left the taqlid of great imams and began to involve in taqlid of modern age scholars.

Any ways:

Q: are all the salafi scholars mujtahid...?
Q: Who regard them as mujtahid...?

And that too when I have seen clear proofs from them,as the Quran says:
"With Proofs and Evidences..."
If non salafi scholars (They should be regarded as mujtahid as well) gives the fatwa with evidences of Quran and hadith, then, will you prefer them to follow or not...?

What I have a problem with is why do the Muqallids not follow the opinion of the other madhab when proven that the view of that other madhab is stronger. I implore you.Why do you not do it?
The same question is asked to you...
Imam al-Nawawi (Allah – Exalted is He – have mercy on him) said: “Its reason is that if it were permissible to adhere to any madhhab one wished, it would lead to collecting the concessions of the madhhabs, in accordance with one’s desires, and opting between legalisation and illegalisation, obligation and permission, and this will lead to relinquishing the noose of moral responsibility (taklif); as distinguished from the early period, because [at that time] there were no refined madhhabs that encompassed the rulings of [all] outcomes. Based on this, it is necessary for him to make effort in opting for one madhhab he will adhere to specifically.” (al-Majmu‘ Sharh al-Muhadhdhab, 1:55)

we have the rule that in case of a hadith, the view of the Jamhoor or majority of the Muhadiseen is accepted.
Why all muhaddisin belong to tabqat hanabla or tabqat shaifya or tabqat malkiya or tabqat hanafiya...?

E.g.

Imam Ibne Taymmiyah rh writes in his Fatawa Vol 25 Pp 232

“Aima of hadith like, Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmizi, Nasai and a part from them some other Muhaditheen, were also opt to follow the verdict of Imam Ahmed and Imam Ishaq, Ibn al Rawhoya’s followers are also considered among those people who take the knowledge of Fiqh from them“.

Imam Subki (rh) mentioned imam bukhari from al-Shafie School in his famous Tabaqat al Shafi’eeya pp 214

and

Ibn al Qayyim rh declared him Hanbali (A’laam Ul Muqaeen, 3/ 543)

Why...?

I regard all these imams as mujtahidin though
Reply

azc
05-14-2018, 12:58 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
I presume from the natural circumstances that more than a few hundred people who have the same or higher level of intellect have existed in the centuries following them up until now. I would however have given that theory less weight had there been any prophecies distinguishing them.
I believe that they had good opportunities in their circumstances because the people of their age paid attention to their learned and trustworthy people and assisted them in flourishing.
The landscape today appears inverted - take for instance sheikh usama and sheikh anwar, you can see from their jawame al kalim, logical predictions, warnings, and zeal that they were distinguished amongst already distinguished families known for thinking on higher government and people management levels, but they were accused without right, hounded from city to city, murdered by criminals for their upright, honest speech and exhortations with invalid excuses such as "lest they deceive the masses", criminals such as the man with the one eyed seal and his mother who "freed" him. So yup, you can, by probing your own mind, deduce the fact that although there are none to show, there are many who've passed us by. The passing of minds such as that of einstein, darwin (yup lol), and newton amongst many others prove that far reaching and solid logical deduction is not limited to 2AH, but that circumstances and opportunities also play a vital role in budding.

I type on a phone and usually need to edit, then add bits when one part doesn't make sense with another, and that goes on. The 1/4 oz of daily mind numbing greenery phases also contributes i assume....sad i know...but relax.....all's good.... or.....at least it appears so for now.
No, bro, no scholar or imam has ever reached that level of ijtihad.

Allamah Shihab Ar-Ramli (Rahmatullahi Alayh) (957 A.H.) states: “The person who has a true understanding of what ijtihaad actually means would feel ashamed before Allah from attributing it to anyone of this day and age. In fact, Ibnus-Salah (643 A.H.) and his followers stated that it had become extinct three hundred years ago. Ibnus-Salah himself passed away three hundred years ago, hence, it had become extinct about six hundred years ago.”

Allamah Munawi (Rahmatullahi Alayh) (1031 A.H.) says: The Alim of the Syrian region, Imam Ibn Abid-Dam (642 A.H.) writes after mentioning all the conditions of ijtihad: “It is hardly possible to find these conditions in any scholar of our age. Instead, there is noMujtahid-e-mutlaqon the surface of the earth today.”

During the tenth century of Islam, Imam Suyuti (Rahmatullahi Alayh), (911 A.H.) claimed to have reached the level of ijtihad. Allamah Shihab Ibn Hajar Haitami (Rahmatullahi Alayh) (974 A.H.) says: “When Imam Jalaluddin Suyuti claimed ijtihad, all his contemporaries confronted him. They presented a questionnaire to him about some issues. Therein, they stated two possible answers to each question, and said: “If you have even reached the lowest degree of ijtihad, which is ijtihad in fatwa, then you should stipulate the preferred view, substantiated with proof, in conformance with the maxims laid down by the mujtahideen.
However, he returned their questionnaire without any answer, excusing himself that he was too busy, and was therefore unable to look into those questions.” [1]

Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi (Rahmatullahi Alayh) writes in this regard: “The rejecters of taqleed object by saying: “Did the Hanafis (or muqallids) receive wahy (revelation) that ijtihad has come to an end?” However, they do not understand that it is a divine principle that the means of fulfilling every need comes into existence at the time when that necessity occurs. Rainy seasons generally occur during the months of need for rain, which vary according to the different regions. Winds also blow at times of need. Where temperatures become intensely low, animals have thicker wool; and there are countless such examples. Likewise, when there was a need for the recording of Hadith, Allah created people with phenomenal memories. Such memories are nowhere to be found today. The rejecters of the four mazaahib also, who sing slogans of following Hadith, are not able to bring forth one individual who has memorized even Sahih Al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim with their chains of narrations, as was done by the illustrious authors of these blessed books.

“In the same way, when the need arose to document the shari’ah, Allah granted many people grand talents and capabilities in fiqh and ijtihad. Now that Deen has been recorded, and its laws and fundamentals outlined, this need no longer exists. Yes, to the extent of need, some ability of ijtihad is still to be found, whereby rulings for contemporary issues are deduced, through the medium of the principles laid down by the Mujtahidin. [2]

[1]مقدمة فيض القدير ص16
[2]Who are the blind followers Pg. 50 (An excerpt fromAshraful Jawaab)
Reply

Abz2000
05-15-2018, 04:46 AM
@azc so are you thereby claiming or implying that a ceiling on intellectual capacity has been set and that the four imam's authority to legislate until the day of ressurection has been sealed by Allah beyond the graves, and that the capacity of the human brains born after that date cannot and shall not reach or rise above that threshold?

And you were not a witness to this but you accept the witness of the people who didn't make this claim? Based upon which logic?

Qul haatoo burhaanakum in kuntum suaadiqeen.


25. But it is to Allah that the End and the Beginning (of all things) belong.
26. How many-so-ever be the angels in the heavens, their intercession will avail nothing except after Allah has given leave for whom He pleases and that he is acceptable to Him.
27. Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names.
28. But they have no knowledge therein.
They follow nothing but conjecture.
And conjecture avails nothing against Truth.
From Quran 53.



And they consider the angels, who are worshippers of Allah, to be females.
Did they witness their creation ?
Their testimony shall be recorded, and they will be asked."
(Qur’an 43:16,17,19)
Reply

azc
05-15-2018, 07:01 AM
@Abz2000

See this is what I've said in post #28:

Doors of ijtihad aren't closed though but after the recognition of 4 madhab none has ever been considered as great as 4 imams were.

There are different levels of ijtihad, last 4 are still occupied but no scholar of this age is considered to reach the level 1,2,3.

If you think any scholar has reached the level 3, plz tell me his name and other scholars who have endorsed it.


Imams of past as well as almost all scholars of this age except salafis, progressive or liberal Muslims etc have this following opinion.

Ibn Khaldun (Allah – Exalted is He – have mercy on him) said:

“Taqlid in all towns came to rest on these four, and muqallids of other than them have disappeared. The people blocked the door of disagreement and its paths when the diversification of the technical terms of the sciences became extensive; and when it became difficult to reach the level of ijtihad; and when it was feared that [somebody] unqualified for it whose opinion and religion are not trusted would be ascribed to it; so they [i.e. scholars] made [their] incapacity and deficiency clear, and they directed people to taqlid of these [four], to all who are specialised therein from the muqallids, and they forbade modification of their taqlid because it would imply frivolity. All that remained after authentication of the basic texts and connecting their chains by narration is transmission of their madhhabs, and each muqallid acting on the madhhab of the one he does taqlid of from them. There is no meaning to jurisprudence today besides this. And the claim of ijtihad in this age is rejected and turned on its heel, and his taqlid is abandoned. The people of Islam have evolved into taqlid of these four Imams.”

(Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun, p. 430)

if you like some details on this issue, plz see this link
https://www.deoband.org/2012/07/gene...0%2C3114061366
Reply

Abz2000
05-15-2018, 02:51 PM
I believe that there are many people who had and have the capacity and beyond - just never the same chances, and the stagnation is due to every individual on this planet who doesn't care about how government decisions are made and is happier with caesar and khosrau and trump than Muhammad :saws: khulafaa ar-raashidoon, and other current top level scholars.

The reasoning you provided next sounds very wise, but again, a plug and not a lasting solution. These issues will have to be resolved sooner or later.

Jzk.
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!