/* */

PDA

View Full Version : Diverse Problems for Islam



Traditio
01-11-2015, 12:32 AM
Hello! I am a new poster here. I am a Ph.D. student in philosophy, and I tend to spend most of my time with medieval Christian and ancient Greek philosophy. I only have a superficial knowledge of Islam (though I have read Avicenna's Metaphysics of the Healing), and I was hoping that you guys could provide an Islamic perspective on certain problems that I raise. So, I'll give you what I think are very potent proofs for Islam's falsity, and I am hoping that you, if you are able, will be able to show me why these proofs don't work.

1. From what I understand, you guys believe that angels have bodies made of light, and that these things called "djinn" have bodies made of fire. But they're invisible. Fire and light are per se (essentially) visible. Isn't it a flat out contradiction to believe in invisible fire people?

2. Granted that it's not a contradiction to believe in invisible fire people, I have a further question about their bodies. I am assuming that, since they have bodies, they are therefore animals (body-soul composites). Are their bodies complex (made up of a diversity of organs), or are they relatively simple (for example, in the sense that a camp-fire is relatively simple...that is, not made up of individual "parts," so to speak, but is just one fire)? If they are complex, then how on earth does that work? What would it mean to have an eye or an ear made of light or fire? If their bodies are simple, then how are they able to see, hear, etc? The senses require complex bodily organs. If they don't sense, then what's the point of their having bodies?

3. From what I understand, you guys believe that martyrs enjoy bliss in a bodily paradise, where they shall indulge their carnal appetites for food, drink and sexual intercourse...without their bodies? How do you suppose that is supposed to work? Avicenna's answer is that good philosophers bypass these carnal delights altogether and partake of intelligible delights, whereas the ordinary, run of the mill Muslims who, nonetheless, lived good lives will enjoy these carnal delights...by imagining them. But this is, of course, false. Imagination requires bodily organs, and your martyrs are not currently united to their bodies. We can be quite sure of this. If you doubt this, go and check. I assure you, their bodies are still in (or on) the ground and, even if intact, are quite lifeless. So, in short, how are your martyrs supposed to eat the heavenly super fruit when they have neither mouth, tongue, throat nor stomach? How are they supposed to enjoy their 72 virgins when they have no reproductive organs?

4. Related to 3, granted that your bodily paradise actually existed, why on earth would that be the goal of Muslim striving? Why would your martyrs want that? We eat in order to keep ourselves alive as individuals, and sexual relations are to keep the species alive. Why should someone desire food or sexual intercourse when he has achieved immortality?

5. Supposing that your martyrs desired such a reward, wouldn't they rather deserve Hell? This would mean that they prefer carnal delights to God, who alone is to be loved and adored as a final end, and who alone is the ultimate "goal" of the rational creature.

6. And speaking of Heaven and Hell, how do Muslims propose to escape the fires of Hell? Even a single serious sin turns us away from God, makes us enemies of God, and merits everlasting punishment. You'll presumably tell me that God is merciful, but I'll reply that He is Justice Itself. Pray as much as you want, but if there is nothing to counterbalance the infinite debt of punishment that you have merited through your sins, then you have no escape from His righteous indignation.

7. Is it true that Mohommed says that it's sometimes OK to tell a lie? If so, he knew that telling a lie is always wrong, right?

Thanks in advance.
Reply

Login/Register to hide ads. Scroll down for more posts
Hulk
01-11-2015, 03:59 AM
If you want to prove that Islam is false, it's very simple, just prove to us that God is not One.

Your list of questions, which generally shows your lack of knowledge, isn't really worth entertaining and doesn't really do much in it's attempt to prove Islam false.
Reply

Traditio
01-11-2015, 04:16 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
If you want to prove that Islam is false, it's very simple, just prove to us that God is not One.

Your list of questions, which generally shows your lack of knowledge, isn't really worth entertaining and doesn't really do much in it's attempt to prove Islam false.
Actually, that's the precise reason that I wanted to post the problems on a Muslim board. I don't know that much about Islam, but when I do hear things about Islam, it's invariably ridiculous. So, I can only come to the conclusion that:

1. Islam is just obviously false and its adherents just have no excuse for themselves or
2. I'm working from a complete misunderstanding of what you guys actually believe.

So, for my list of questions, where I am misrepresenting you (unintentionally, mind you) would you be willing to tell me what you actually do believe? For example, the questions about djinn come from an actual conversation that I had with a female Muslim undergraduate. I had been reading about how djinn are the basis for the popular "genie" concept (like, genie in a lamp), and I chanced actually to talk to a Muslim, and asked her about them. She said "Oh, djinn. Yeah, like, know how angels are made of light, and men are made of dirt? Well, djinn are made of fire," and she continued from there by saying that she's invisible.

And the 72 virgins and carnal paradise is popular "knowledge," and it's not even a recent thing. In the Summa Contra Gentiles, St. Thomas talks about how Mohommed offers believers carnal pleasures in the afterlife, and Kant criticizes "Mohommed's paradise" in the Critique of Practical Reason.

But the Quran isn't really high on my reading list (I have too much other stuff to get to first), and it's not like I really have Muslim experts, so to speak, among my friends and associates.

I was hoping to learn first hand what you guys actually think about these things?
Reply

Traditio
01-11-2015, 04:46 AM
Addendum to previous post: I can also add Avicenna to the list of people who thought that Mohommed promises believers carnal delights (as per my reference to the final books of the Metaphysics of the Healing). It's not without reason, I think, that Averroes (a Muslim philosopher) held the opinions that he did about the relationship between religion and philosophy (religion is a system of convenient stories to keep the masses in line; philosophy actually gets at reality).
Reply

Welcome, Guest!
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
MuslimInshallah
01-11-2015, 06:11 AM
Greetings Traditio,

Mmm, you said: But the Quran isn't really high on my reading list (I have too much other stuff to get to first)

(smile) But this is the first resource to look for answers to questions regarding Islam!

(smile) Can you imagine if a person came to you and started asking you random stuff about, say, Thomas Aquinas, and -hey- did he really levitate? And how could that be true? Because why would he need to escape through the window, why not just fly away…? And what is a saint, really, anyway? … and said to you that she couldn't be bothered to actually read your uninteresting philosophy books… Or is that theology? Or -hey- what's the difference anyway?... but could you please answer all her questions? …

What would you say? Could you really have a very fruitful discussion? Might you not suggest she get a little grounding in what she wanted to discuss, and order her thought a little?

(smile) Yes, you have a complete misunderstanding of what we believe. (gently) Based on some little snippets of hearsay and impressions of non-Muslims and translations of works that discuss elements that you don't understand the foundations of, you feel you know enough to ask some clever questions. I respect that you have a good grounding in your particular field, but if you want to approach God, you need to take your cap off and feel our human humbleness before His Infinite Love and Glory. (smile) As we all should (though too often we all are much too arrogant, you know. (twinkle) I know I am, for sure).

Please consider reading the Quran. Of course, you'll only be able to access it in an English translation for now, but these do give the honest seeker insights. (smile) I have found that when you seek God, He Makes it possible to find Him according to your abilities.

(smile) And then perhaps we could discuss about more arcane matters, if they are truly important to you.

May God, the Oft-Forgiving, have Mercy on us all.
Reply

h-n
01-11-2015, 08:42 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Hello! I am a new poster here. I am a Ph.D. student in philosophy, and I tend to spend most of my time with medieval Christian and ancient Greek philosophy. I only have a superficial knowledge of Islam (though I have read Avicenna's Metaphysics of the Healing), and I was hoping that you guys could provide an Islamic perspective on certain problems that I raise. So, I'll give you what I think are very potent proofs for Islam's falsity, and I am hoping that you, if you are able, will be able to show me why these proofs don't work.

1. From what I understand, you guys believe that angels have bodies made of light, and that these things called "djinn" have bodies made of fire. But they're invisible. Fire and light are per se (essentially) visible. Isn't it a flat out contradiction to believe in invisible fire people?

2. Granted that it's not a contradiction to believe in invisible fire people, I have a further question about their bodies. I am assuming that, since they have bodies, they are therefore animals (body-soul composites). Are their bodies complex (made up of a diversity of organs), or are they relatively simple (for example, in the sense that a camp-fire is relatively simple...that is, not made up of individual "parts," so to speak, but is just one fire)? If they are complex, then how on earth does that work? What would it mean to have an eye or an ear made of light or fire? If their bodies are simple, then how are they able to see, hear, etc? The senses require complex bodily organs. If they don't sense, then what's the point of their having bodies?

3. From what I understand, you guys believe that martyrs enjoy bliss in a bodily paradise, where they shall indulge their carnal appetites for food, drink and sexual intercourse...without their bodies? How do you suppose that is supposed to work? Avicenna's answer is that good philosophers bypass these carnal delights altogether and partake of intelligible delights, whereas the ordinary, run of the mill Muslims who, nonetheless, lived good lives will enjoy these carnal delights...by imagining them. But this is, of course, false. Imagination requires bodily organs, and your martyrs are not currently united to their bodies. We can be quite sure of this. If you doubt this, go and check. I assure you, their bodies are still in (or on) the ground and, even if intact, are quite lifeless. So, in short, how are your martyrs supposed to eat the heavenly super fruit when they have neither mouth, tongue, throat nor stomach? How are they supposed to enjoy their 72 virgins when they have no reproductive organs?

4. Related to 3, granted that your bodily paradise actually existed, why on earth would that be the goal of Muslim striving? Why would your martyrs want that? We eat in order to keep ourselves alive as individuals, and sexual relations are to keep the species alive. Why should someone desire food or sexual intercourse when he has achieved immortality?

5. Supposing that your martyrs desired such a reward, wouldn't they rather deserve Hell? This would mean that they prefer carnal delights to God, who alone is to be loved and adored as a final end, and who alone is the ultimate "goal" of the rational creature.

6. And speaking of Heaven and Hell, how do Muslims propose to escape the fires of Hell? Even a single serious sin turns us away from God, makes us enemies of God, and merits everlasting punishment. You'll presumably tell me that God is merciful, but I'll reply that He is Justice Itself. Pray as much as you want, but if there is nothing to counterbalance the infinite debt of punishment that you have merited through your sins, then you have no escape from His righteous indignation.

7. Is it true that Mohommed says that it's sometimes OK to tell a lie? If so, he knew that telling a lie is always wrong, right?

Thanks in advance.
Your not the first "Christian" who comes and asks questions befitting of an Atheist (also the questions that you pose go against Christianity too). But here are the following answers;-

1. We are made out of clay, but you can't tell that anymore, we are flexible and have blood pumping through our veins. So the Jinn people were made out of fire, they don't resemble fire just as we don't resemble clay. They look like people, it as per Christianity they also accept the existence of devils, that they cannot see either. Also in science, we cannot see all types of light. Allah only gives us knowledge which is beneficial and that helps us, if he was going to just talk about how things are made, and what they are like-then where would we find the time to talk about living a good life??? Of course it is not a problem to learn about things, that is what we can do in this world, but God is testing us, which will be judged on the Day of Judgement, so your not going to go to Paradise because you know what a whale shark looks like, but that by what good deeds you do.

Also here is an old thread about devils;-

http://www.islamicboard.com/general/...62-devils.html

2. Then why don't you say that about angels??? Not everything is about body and soul, it is rather that they have one body. Therefore when a human does evil, their soul becomes ugly-you cannot see this in this world due to their physical bodies, in regards to the devils, as there is not believed to be a soul, when they become evil, there physical forms turn ugly. They are openly evil in their world. Whereas in this world people hide behind good intentions.

3. As per Christianity, God created Prophet Adam peace be upon him's body in and he enjoyed eating with his wife-did he not famously eat an apple-as per Christian belief?? The reward in the hereafter is also physical, Paradise is already in existence, it is not in this world (its is not a dream, an illusion it is a real place). So then what are you saying that everything that you enjoy in this world is wrong?? Then you can go so far and say what is the point of being MAle or female in the next world either, we still retain our own sex identity. Being able to socialise with others is a priviledge, and have relations with, these don't go away ie your relatives. Then are you saying what God has allowed in this world has become a sin in the next??? How is it that Mary giving birth to Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is an abnormal thing in the next world?? How is it that marriage, a good, blessed thing, just doesn't exist in the next world??

Also actually there are Christians who think they will become like angels in the next world-where do they claim this from???

4 & 5. We strive to be successful in the hereafter, which means having God pleased with us, if it was our only goal to get married and eat food in the next world, do you honestly think that we would be praying 5 times a day, fasting in the month of Ramadan, spending savings to go to Mecca, give to charity? Because by definition you are saying that the Muslims are materialistic, where materialistic people don't have much discipline, neither would they be willing to die in the name of Allah, but rather stay and enjoy the life of this world.

What is actually bizarre where you get some Christians say that they are going to to rule over others ie like Jehovah's witness, why would you need to rule over someone, when people are only enjoying their lives in the next world?

You yourself lie by saying that people only eat to survive and have sex to procreate, so if you where presented with delicious, sweet dishes, you would only choose the bland because it is sufficient??? You really expect people to believe that people only have sex to procreate?? So that then means if they only wanted 2 kids, and if the wife was successful in getting pregnant straightaway, they only have had sex twice in the whole of their lifetime??? ^o)

6. God didn't say he created a new religion when he sent all the Prophets. So the message to worship the one God, remember the Day of Judgement, Paradise and Hell was the same message given by the Prophets Noah, Moses, Job, Jonah, David, Solomon, Muhammad peace be upon them etc.

If we did not have Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, it is only obvious that we would not have been helped for the Christians for saying that God has taken himself a son (committing idol worship), and the Jews for also changing religion for saying that there is no Hell.

So as above to be successful is by following the Quran and the ways of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him (we don't differentiate between the Prophets, it is rather that we had benefit by his teachings).

7. It is important here for you to provide more details instead of just saying that you heard so an so say this, well then question them on what?? You can't just go around making broad statements in this regard. When Prophet Ibrahim peace be upon him smashed the idols leaving the larger one, when the people questioned him, he said it was the large idol that smashed all the smaller ones, to teach, to prove. So what are you then going to say that he was wrong??

You talk about philosophy that it gets to the truth-when does it??? It brags about questioning things to make a show that your some sort of intellectual but are far from it. No Prophets were philosophers.

For example;-

Prophet Noah peace be upon him didn't say to the people I "think" there is a God, but he said there is one.
Prophet Noah peace be upon him didn't say to the people I "think" there is a Day of Judgement, but that there is one.
Prophet Noah peace be upon him didn't say to the people I "think" there is a Paradise, but that there is one.
Prophet Noah peace be upon him didn't say to the people I "think" there is a Hell, but that there is one.


God has provided this message that there is one God, the Day of Judgement, Paradise and Hell, which he told the Prophets (hence also known as messengers of God) to give this message to the people, he never said that people need to spend ages when they don't know when they are going to die to find out the truth, when God has allowed the truth to be known and stand out from falsehood.

You were not there when God created the angels, neither do you yourself understand if you just sat and thought about the Jinn (as you need this information from those who understand)-so therefore philosophy doesn't lead to truth, as you require God to present this knowledge to the Prophets.

So back to your thread title, no we don't have any problems in Islam, as per what God stated the people who can lay claim on the Prophet Ibrahim peace be upon him are those that follow after him, we worship the one God, sacrifice animals just as he did (where the Jews have confirmed that he built many houses of worship and the Kaaba in Mecca is one of them). You can't present yourself as a thinker anyhow, if your just going to post waffle by uneducated people and contradict your own beliefs.
Reply

M.I.A.
01-11-2015, 11:44 AM
i think you kinda dodged a bullet there... no mention of how unrealistic the idea of god is.. or mention of god at all really.

apart from that its like many a thread on the forum.


well il take the same route apparently, scientifically speaking there are many ideas on how the world could literally be a computer simulation.. or other amazing concepts.

in terms of angels and demons and all things in between, you dont have to look towards religion... they are mentioned and described and even given character too in literature and media throughout history.

but you seem terribly grounded so im not sure you could rewire yourself to see the world any differently.

:)
Reply

czgibson
01-11-2015, 01:09 PM
Greetings Traditio,

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Actually, that's the precise reason that I wanted to post the problems on a Muslim board. I don't know that much about Islam, but when I do hear things about Islam, it's invariably ridiculous. So, I can only come to the conclusion that:

1. Islam is just obviously false and its adherents just have no excuse for themselves or
2. I'm working from a complete misunderstanding of what you guys actually believe.
You've asked some clever questions, and I hope you get some sensible answers soon. I've seen plenty of people try a similar approach over the years, and it's become clear that most respondents are just thinking about these things on a completely different level.

You'll get told that you're ignorant, that you don't know what you're talking about and that you don't know what Muslims really believe. When, in fact, as you can tell from the replies so far in this thread, the posters haven't really understood your questions in the first place.

Peace
Reply

Hulk
01-11-2015, 05:08 PM
Even for an atheist, if he wants to disprove Islam, all he has to do is to prove that there is no God.

Regardless of what you think of his questions, the bottom line is that it does nothing to the central core message of Islam. A person can be a muslim even if he only has basic knowledge of the existence of angels, the hereafter, ultimately what makes him muslim is his belief that God is One. So if you really one to disprove Islam then all you have to do is attack it's core. These questions, which claim to be "proof of the falsity of Islam" are mere red herrings.
Reply

Traditio
01-11-2015, 05:57 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
Even for an atheist, if he wants to disprove Islam, all he has to do is to prove that there is no God.

Regardless of what you think of his questions, the bottom line is that it does nothing to the central core message of Islam. A person can be a muslim even if he only has basic knowledge of the existence of angels, the hereafter, ultimately what makes him muslim is his belief that God is One. So if you really one to disprove Islam then all you have to do is attack it's core. These questions, which claim to be "proof of the falsity of Islam" are mere red herrings.
I am afraid that you are mistaken. I am not an atheist; as a Catholic, I fully admit that God exists and is one, and that there are angels (I do, however, deny that angels naturally have bodies; angels are finite intellectual, spiritual substances). If I wanted to know that God is One, I have no need of Mohommed. Plato said that roughly a thousand years before Mohommed. If I wanted to know that angels exist, then, again, I have no need of Mohommed or Islam. Christianity teaches that.

You don't have to be a Muslim to believe that God exists and is Unity Itself. You don't even need religious revelation to know that. I can know that through the exercise of natural reason.

In addition to this truth, you also believe many other things:

1. That He made a special revelation to Mohommed.
2. That He authorized Mohommed to make war, to assassinate, etc.
Reply

Hulk
01-11-2015, 06:36 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
I am afraid that you are mistaken. I am not an atheist; as a Catholic, I fully admit that God exists and is one, and that there are angels (I do, however, deny that angels naturally have bodies; angels are finite intellectual, spiritual substances). If I wanted to know that God is One, I have no need of Mohommed. Plato said that roughly a thousand years before Mohommed. If I wanted to know that angels exist, then, again, I have no need of Mohommed or Islam. Christianity teaches that.

You don't have to be a Muslim to believe that God exists and is Unity Itself. You don't even need religious revelation to know that. I can know that through the exercise of natural reason.

In addition to this truth, you also believe many other things:

1. That He made a special revelation to Mohommed.
2. That He authorized Mohommed to make war, to assassinate, etc.
I was making that statement in general and wasn't referring to you as an atheist.

Ah, so are you saying that you are in agreement with Islam's core message? That God is One? And that any concept that is other than "God is One" is incorrect?

I don't find it necessary to even refute whatever claims you may have made (burden of proof is on the one making claims anyay) but I would like to remind you of one forum rule, accusations of Islam without proof will not be tolerated. I personally have little patience for people who are irresponsible with their words and offer nothing of intellectual value.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
(I do, however, deny that angels naturally have bodies; angels are finite intellectual, spiritual substances)
Is your conclusion that angels do not have bodies based on your scripture or something you came up with yourself?

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Christianity teaches that.
Do you believe that God is One, OR that God is Three?
Reply

Traditio
01-11-2015, 07:18 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
I was making that statement in general and wasn't referring to you as an atheist.
Fair enough.

Ah, so are you saying that you are in agreement with Islam's core message? That God is One? And that any concept that is other than "God is One" is incorrect?
Catholics, Jews, Muslims and even the Neoplatonists are in complete agreement about this. I quote from Lumen Gentium: In the first place amongst these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind."

I don't find it necessary to even refute whatever claims you may have made (burden of proof is on the one making claims anyay) but I would like to remind you of one forum rule, accusations of Islam without proof will not be tolerated. I personally have little patience for people who are irresponsible with their words and offer nothing of intellectual value.
With all due respect, I say right in the OP that I only have a superficial knowledge of OP. If I have ascribed doctrines to Islam which is not a part of Islam, it was my hope that I would be corrected with a true account. After all, how would I deceive a Muslim about Muslims believe? :p

So, tell me: do you believe in invisible fire people?

Is your conclusion that angels do not have bodies based on your scripture or something you came up with yourself?
It's a plain truth of natural reason. There is a natural "gradient," so to speak, in the natural order:

1. Purely corporeal creation (rocks, minerals, etc).
2. Living corporeal creation (plants).
3. Sensitive living corporeal creation (animals).
4. Rational sensitive living corporeal AND spiritual creation (man).
5. ______________________
6. God (infinite, uncreated, incorporeal/spiritual reality).

Midway between 4 and 6 there's a gap: finite, created incorporeal/spiritual reality. Those are angels.

If you imagine that there are invisible fire people or invisible light people, you aren't describing demons or angels or djinn or anything else. You're describing people with impossibly different kinds of bodies.


Do you believe that God is One, OR that God is Three?[/QUOTE]
Reply

Traditio
01-11-2015, 07:19 PM
My apologies, I just realized that I didn't answer your last point: I believe that God is one in essence/substance and being, but that, within the One God, there is a plurality of subsisting relations which do not divide the one essence/being of God.
Reply

Hulk
01-11-2015, 08:02 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Catholics, Jews, Muslims and even the Neoplatonists are in complete agreement about this. I quote from Lumen Gentium: In the first place amongst these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind."
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
I believe that God is one in essence/substance and being, but that, within the One God, there is a plurality of subsisting relations which do not divide the one essence/being of God.
Are you referring to the Trinity? Where it is believed that Jesus is God, The Father is God, and the Holy Spirit is also God? If that is what you believe then there is a difference when I say that God is One and when you say God is One.


format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
With all due respect, I say right in the OP that I only have a superficial knowledge of OP. If I have ascribed doctrines to Islam which is not a part of Islam, it was my hope that I would be corrected with a true account. After all, how would I deceive a Muslim about Muslims believe?

So, tell me: do you believe in invisible fire people?
The proper etiquette of someone who is aware of his own lack of knowledge is to approach a subject humbly, not come into a forum saying "I believe I have proof why your religion is false.". You're wasting people's time. I have little patience for people who form questions based on assumptions.

Angels are beings of light that are created by God with the sole purpose of serving Him. Unlike humans, they do not have carnal desires which means that by their nature they cannot disobey God. We know that generally they are outside the realm of our empirical perceptions.

So when you say that it is a contradiction that they are beings of light yet they are invisible, it is plain incorrect.

When we say that we cannot see them does that mean that they are invisible the way The Invisible Man (or any other character that can be invisible) cannot be seen? Does it mean that we might one day be walking around and accidentally bump into an angel? Of course not. As I mentioned, we know that they are beings of light and are generally not perceivable to us through empirical means. You're committing an equivocation fallacy by equating the invisible and that which is outside our realm of perception, so your argument has already broken down.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
It's a plain truth of natural reason. There is a natural "gradient," so to speak, in the natural order:

1. Purely corporeal creation (rocks, minerals, etc).
2. Living corporeal creation (plants).
3. Sensitive living corporeal creation (animals).
4. Rational sensitive living corporeal AND spiritual creation (man).
5. ______________________
6. God (infinite, uncreated, incorporeal/spiritual reality).

Midway between 4 and 6 there's a gap: finite, created incorporeal/spiritual reality. Those are angels.

If you imagine that there are invisible fire people or invisible light people, you aren't describing demons or angels or djinn or anything else. You're describing people with impossibly different kinds of bodies.
The one using the term "invisible light people" and "invisible fire people" here is you, which you seem to came up with yourself. The problem with your response here is that you are saying that "through reason" you can know that angels spiritual beings, but that is actually not possible because you won't even know that angels existed if it weren't revealed to you through scripture, so how then can you claim to be able to know what sort of beings angels are through reason alone?

-----------
Back to the nature of God, you say that you believe God is One. But, if I were to ask you whether you believed that Jesus is God, would you say yes? If I asked you if The Father is God, would you say yes? If I asked you if the Holy Spirit is God, would you say yes? If you said yes to all three, then your belief would be God is Three, not God is One.
Reply

h-n
01-11-2015, 08:20 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
I am afraid that you are mistaken. I am not an atheist; as a Catholic, I fully admit that God exists and is one, and that there are angels (I do, however, deny that angels naturally have bodies; angels are finite intellectual, spiritual substances). If I wanted to know that God is One, I have no need of Mohommed. Plato said that roughly a thousand years before Mohommed. If I wanted to know that angels exist, then, again, I have no need of Mohommed or Islam. Christianity teaches that.

You don't have to be a Muslim to believe that God exists and is Unity Itself. You don't even need religious revelation to know that. I can know that through the exercise of natural reason.

In addition to this truth, you also believe many other things:

1. That He made a special revelation to Mohommed.
2. That He authorized Mohommed to make war, to assassinate, etc.
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
I am afraid that you are mistaken. I am not an atheist; as a Catholic, I fully admit that God exists and is one, and that there are angels (I do, however, deny that angels naturally have bodies; angels are finite intellectual, spiritual substances). If I wanted to know that God is One, I have no need of Mohommed. Plato said that roughly a thousand years before Mohommed. If I wanted to know that angels exist, then, again, I have no need of Mohommed or Islam. Christianity teaches that.

You don't have to be a Muslim to believe that God exists and is Unity Itself. You don't even need religious revelation to know that. I can know that through the exercise of natural reason.

In addition to this truth, you also believe many other things:

1. That He made a special revelation to Mohommed.
2. That He authorized Mohommed to make war, to assassinate, etc.
Again you go against the teachings of God, and contradict your own religion-Catholics believe that God is one of three, that he has taken himself a son-so you commit idol worship.

God is one meaning that there is no one like him, he doesn't have any parents or any children.
If there were other Gods, how can they keep their thoughts, actions hidden when the the God of the Worlds knows all?? So there is only one God. A God isn't created.

You claim again that angels don't have bodies, when what on earth do you think happens when the Archangel of Death comes and takes people away??? He has a form. And when the people are gathered on the Day of Judgement, after people have been resurrected. So instead of posting jargon, show people where it says that you have factual evidence knowing about angels. But the Christians say that the devil is a fallen angel, and that he procreates-but you are saying now he doesn't have a body. The devils follow people around and not only do they tell them to do bad, but they are able to effect the health of people-do you honestly think that when the devils follow people around, that they never touch a human?? The angels they don't just pass through people's bodies because they are made out of light, they are physical, where they touch and hold things. When the angel was asked to bring the substance to create Man he was able to do it-the substance didn't pass through him, the angels will be smiting people's backs on the Day of Judgement if they are going to Hell. The angels have the task of moving the wind etc. The angels visited Prophet Lut, Ibrahim peace be upon him etc in physical form in this world.

Paradise itself is a garden-are you now telling us that Catholics don't believe in a Paradise?? That there are no physical trees, birds, that they are all just an array of light???



You talk about Plato, talk about philosophy, lie about that your beliefs, your all over the place and at the same time, your obvious agenda is to try and discredit Islam and you have nothing. Why talk of Plato and reject the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, does it say from your religious teachings that Plato is a Prophet of God??

It is a fact that without the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, the middle east would have looked worse, you would have just built a mega tourist attraction. Prior to the arrival of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, Mecca etc was a mess, with idol worship, drinking and lewd conduct, the Jews and the Christians did not sort this out, as they changed their religion. As mentioned earlier we follow the teachings of all the Prophets, so if you accuse us of having a different religion when we follow the Prophet Ibrahim peace be upon him, it is obviously yourselves that are not following the teachings of the Prophet Ibrahim peace be upon him to worship the one God (which is where he does not delegate to anyone the judging on the Day of Judgement. Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is not all seeing, or all hearing he is a Man.

Now without bringing in factual evidence about angels or anything else of substance where you mentioned, you now decide to attack us with something else, this is the way of evil, they used to go up to the Prophet to try and discredit him, when he gave an answer that they knew was correct, they didn't admit to it, but asked another question, and the answer was again right, then they would ask another (again to try and discredit him), and then walk away displeased after they couldn't find any faults.

The Jews were left wandering around the desert because they refused to fight, at the time of Prophet Moses peace be upon him. As per the teachings even in Judaism, we are allowed to have capital punishment for people who murder, people who commit adultery etc, it is also here that people who fought against the Muslims (who debar the Muslims from the way of worship), we are permitted to fight back. As per the teachings of the Prophet.

So if you say that assassination and fighting is wrong, then you are saying that when King David peace be upon him was wrong when he slew Goliath. ^o)

Why did the Christians start the crusades???? Frankly they shouldn't be fighting for anything, if the Muslims were alive at the time of the Prophet Jesus peace be upon him we would not have stood idly by. It is a fact that the people were afraid of the authorities so God allowed the evil doers to be fooled by their own evil, let them think they had killed him, same thing happening with evil leaders, who think that because they are starting wars, that they are in control-it is the way of Satan, that he misleads many, and they think that nothing will happen to them, that they forget the next world.

Anyone can see by what you wrote, you are all over the place and at the same time bizarrely stating that you exercise natural reason-which everyone has-because when the Prophets came to deliver a message, they didn't sit down to discuss it with the people. So Prophet Noah peace be upon him didn't sit and hold conferences with people to discuss how they felt about worshipping the one God, instead he told them to repent, and worship the one God, remember the Day of Judgement, Paradise and Hell.

Also without making broad statements ie that God is "unity itself"-what do you mean by that?? We are not united with God, we are seperate beings just as the dog, the swine is not a part of the divine Creator-so you need to be careful of what you say, and I say this incase you meant it this way.

I'm not always on forums, but I value that people don't know when they are going to die, and if you cared about people so much, then you need to stop wasting people's time in way of trying to discredit Islam-do you honestly think that we haven't heard it all before??? Whilst at the same time as trying to present yourself as a learnt person, well you are not. I would imagine the normal thing to do was to search the forum, read instead of believing that we have no answers, that when you post a question, apparently we are going to be so dumbfounded that we are automatically going to leave Islam. We are the best people as we forbid evil and enjoin when in the past the people;-

- accusing King David of committing a sin
- accusations that Prophet Lut peace be upon him drank and awful lie about his daughters,
- upset the Prophet Moses peace be upon him by taking a golden calf (they now blame this on his brother),
- upset the Prophet Moses peace be upon him again by asking for different types of food,
- refused to fight and left wandering around the desert,
- told a lie by saying that King Solomon peace be upon him taught people magic
- rejected the Prophet John peace be upon him
- rejected the Prophet Jesus peace be upon him
- the Christians feared the authorities, even though Prophet Jesus peace be upon him had a table of food spreadth from Heaven (NOTE HERE -REAL FOOD FROM HEAVEN!!), created a bird out of clay and by Allah's permission became alive). As with all the Prophets, it was about remembering God and fearing him and not the authorites, hence why the magicians at Pharoah's court repented, and they had their hands and feet chopped off-but the were steadfast and have made it successfully in the next world.
- rejected the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him.

So as above, we are a religion perfected, Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is not going to be critical of us of worshipping the one God, we are not going to Hell for doing so, where Prophet Jesus peace be upon him also worships God Al-Mighty who has no son and neither does he share his rule with anyone. Also note here, when Prophet Jesus peace be upon him comes back he will be ASSASSINATING THE ANTI-CHRIST!! Here again is another example of where God approves to kill the evil doers in certain circumstances. Unless your going to contradict yourself again??? :bump1:
Reply

h-n
01-11-2015, 08:27 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
My apologies, I just realized that I didn't answer your last point: I believe that God is one in essence/substance and being, but that, within the One God, there is a plurality of subsisting relations which do not divide the one essence/being of God.
Mentioning something about God is an important, and serious issue, so here you are saying he is one and then saying that he is related with others which doesn't change that he is the one God. That is an awful thing to say about God. Instead of making again broad sweeping statements need to clarify by what you mean by relations-to whom-as all we know is that about the trinity.
Reply

Traditio
01-11-2015, 08:30 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
Are you referring to the Trinity? Where it is believed that Jesus is God, The Father is God, and the Holy Spirit is also God? If that is what you believe then there is a difference when I say that God is One and when you say God is One.
Undoubtedly. You and I both agree that God is one in being/essence, and that God, insofar as He is God, is not divided or many in any way. However, I wish to stop short here and say that this is all that we can know by natural reason. God, insofar as He is in Himself, is wholly unknown to us. In the words of Iamblichus, God is pante arreton (wholly unknown), at least with respect to us. Is it possible that, when it comes to the inner life of God, that there is some way in which, even though being ineffably one, he is also, at least in some respect, triune? Naturally speaking, we can't know. That's hidden from us. It might be revealed, however. The Muslim will say "no," but I will say "yes," but only insofar as the persons of the Trinity are subsisting relations. Note that the nature of a relationship doesn't "divide" the substance in which it inheres.

Nor is this entirely unreasonable. Since God is Wisdom Itself and Love Itself, it is fitting that there should be something triune about God. Note that in knowledge, we may distinguish: 1. the lover, 2. the love and 3. the beloved; likewise, in knowledge, we may distinguish: 1. the knower, 2. the knowledge and 3. the known. In God's act of knowing and loving Himself, I believe that this one act of knowledge and love are expressed in the interpersonal relationships of the Most Blessed Trinity. The Father loves the Son; the Son is loved by the Father; the Holy Spirit is the subsistent Love which unites Father and Son in the unity of the Divine Essence.

But note that there is here one God who knows and loves Himself, not three Gods who know and love each other.

The proper etiquette of someone who is aware of his own lack of knowledge is to approach a subject humbly
Fair point. I can see how my OP was rhetorically offputting. Mea culpa (my fault). :(

Angels are beings of light that are created by God with the sole purpose of serving Him. Unlike humans, they do not have carnal desires which means that by their nature they cannot disobey God. We know that generally they are outside the realm of our empirical perceptions.
This is very interesting to me. I don't believe that I've heard this claim before. You believe that angels necessarily are good, and that angels cannot be bad? And in support of this, you claim that they have no carnal desires. Do you further claim that carnal desires alone are the root of all sins?

So when you say that it is a contradiction that they are beings of light yet they are invisible, it is plain incorrect.

When we say that we cannot see them does that mean that they are invisible the way The Invisible Man (or any other character that can be invisible) cannot be seen? Does it mean that we might one day be walking around and accidentally bump into an angel? Of course not. As I mentioned, we know that they are beings of light and are generally not perceivable to us through empirical means. You're committing an equivocation fallacy by equating the invisible and that which is outside our realm of perception, so your argument has already broken down.
Do you assert that djinn and angels have the five senses (sight, touch, taste, smell, hearing)?

The problem with your response here is that you are saying that "through reason" you can know that angels spiritual beings, but that is actually not possible because you won't even know that angels existed if it weren't revealed to you through scripture, so how then can you claim to be able to know what sort of beings angels are through reason alone?
We can know problematically through reason that, if angels exist, then they are incorporeal, spiritual substances. Of course, in order to know that angels actually do exist, we need divine revelation. Strictly speaking, there are no effects that we can observe that necessarily bring us to believe in angels.
Reply

Sojourn
01-11-2015, 09:01 PM
Peace be with you Hulk,

format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
If you want to prove that Islam is false, it's very simple, just prove to us that God is not One.
If polytheism were true then Islam would be false but conversely, if monotheism is true, it doesn't mean Islam is true. One can believe in the oneness of God and not be persuaded in believing that Muhammad was a prophet.

And this may be a bit too far off topic, but the idea of the Quran being Allah's uncreated and eternal word does make it sound like it somehow exists apart from Allah and yet still bears divine attributes. This is an address to your oneness statement about God.
Reply

Sojourn
01-11-2015, 09:14 PM
Peace be with you Hulk,

format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
Are you referring to the Trinity? Where it is believed that Jesus is God, The Father is God, and the Holy Spirit is also God? If that is what you believe then there is a difference when I say that God is One and when you say God is One.
Without delving into a comparative religion discussion I hope you will allow me to briefly address this. The Trinity is an affirmation that God, God's Word, and God's Wisdom all constitute one Divine Being. And so if you understand what the Trinity really is you may as Muslim say it's false, but you can't say it's polytheism because by definition it affirms the oneness of God.

And I'll leave it at that!

Pax et bonum
Reply

confused43
01-12-2015, 06:13 AM
i am wondering what you mean by prove god is not one ? i know nothing about Islam, or the people that believe, in Allah, but with all the things happening in the world today i somewhat fear what i do not even understand, can you please enlighten me as to why all these terrible things are happening , i really just really want to understand what the Islam want , from the world or even in general, forgive me if you find me stupid , i may well be but i am asking for you to help me understand these things happening if you can
Reply

h-n
01-12-2015, 08:23 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by confused43
i am wondering what you mean by prove god is not one ? i know nothing about Islam, or the people that believe, in Allah, but with all the things happening in the world today i somewhat fear what i do not even understand, can you please enlighten me as to why all these terrible things are happening , i really just really want to understand what the Islam want , from the world or even in general, forgive me if you find me stupid , i may well be but i am asking for you to help me understand these things happening if you can
Here a few basic things about Islam;-

1. We follow the same message which were given by the Prophets Noah, David, Solomon, Moses, Ibrahim peace be upon them-to worship the ONE GOD, remember the Day of Judgement, Paradise and Hell.

We call God, Allah, to accept that he is one, means that he is not connected with anything. Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is the last Prophet chosen by God. God also gave us the stories of the previous Prophets, as of course they belong to him and the message is all and the same.

We absolutely reject that Prophet Jesus peace be upon him will be judging people on the Day of Judgement, he is not all seeing and all hearing. God is not just a stage builder for the Day of Judgement, he is also the judge-part of the 10 commandments that there is only one God. (people who like to quote trinity, treat us like we live in another world, when it is said by Christians themselves, that they don't get it either). They are told just to accept Prophet Jesus peace be upon him as their saviour, regardless of what makes sense, this is idol worship, where people in the past created idols, and people were just told to accept them without question, just accept it, just accept it.

As the people feared the authorities at the time of Prophet Jesus peace be upon him, even though he had a table spreadth of food from heaven, it showed that they were not loyal (if they couldn't fight then, then they shouldn't be fighting for anything). So God allows evil doers to be fooled as the wealthy think that they are doing well. Prophet Jesus peace be upon him was taken to Heaven, he didn't come back in this world-why should he come back when people were not loyal?? The magicians at Pharoah's court had their feet and hands chopped off and died, in the history of this world, the religious have been persecuted, they remained steadfast, which is what people should have done. Prophet Jesus peace be upon him spoke to people when he was a baby and everything he did, people still feared the authorities.

2. This world is only temporary and everything that we do, is for the one Day that we have not even lived yet-the Day of Judgement, this is our only goal to be successful in the hereafter, where people are close to God and enjoy Paradise (which is not in this world, but a seperate place). Where there are gardens, mansions, and trees, where people are able to understand the language of the creatures.

3. As per the Day of Judgement we accept that people will not be able to care about each other on that Day, not a Mother for her child etc. All faces are turned to God to be judged. It is only people's records with God's mercy that can help them. So the evil doers who led others astray, will be disowning each other, even though they were staunch supporters of each other.

So as per the Day of Judgement-it shows that the Muslims are NOT going to spend time sucking up to people, gaining attention, as they cannot help you on the Day of Judgement. We do not wish to waste the time of others, as of course people can die at any time.

So even children who have died do not care even if an adult feels sympathy-because if they are on the path to Hellfire, they care not. The dead do not interfere with the tests of people.

4. To be religious also entails leading a religious life, that doesn't mean that we are restricted in working in many fields and doing art work etc. This is where we worship the one God, pray 5 times a day, fast in the month of Ramadan, visit Mecca, provide the poor their due. Now the Prophets in the past prayed to God, the angels themselves praise and ask for God to help so and so. They even go up to God's throne. The Kaaba in Mecca has been created by Prophet Ibrahim peace be upon him (where the Jews accept that he created many houses of worship). Just as angels visit God and wish to go around his throne if they could, we treat the Kaaba as the central place to worship to God. (here we do not worship the Kaaba), where the Jews also treat the wailing wall and pray in front of it.

The angels visit those who worship God, so many angels visit places of worship (who worship the one God only -which means accepting him only as our saviour and not anything to do with the Prophet Jesus peace be upon him).

We fast as the Prophets have done aforetime, charity is of absolute importance, being kind to others and taking care of people.

5. As above we are servants of God, just as the angels are servants of God, the Christians like to say they are children of God, when that is wrong, and God said if you were why does he punish you, or allow people to have problems?? Even the Archangel Gabriel is not a child of God but a servant.

6. Regardless of what people are stating, and some Muslims, our goal is not to take over the world, but to live and die as a Muslim. Never did God say that we were to take over the world, that we need to make sure that everyone becomes a Muslim.

It is rather that when people accepted Islam, they wished to live under Islamic rule, you can't just take over a country and start islamic law-when muslim way of life is for Muslims.

7. We accept that Prophet Jesus peace be upon him will be returning, where people will not be worshipping him, neither will be be resurrecting all the people in the history of this world. he will be in this world for 40 years, were there is reference that he will getting married, where neither will his wife be treated as some sort of saviour.

This will occur during what we call the Major signs of the Day of Judgement. Prophet Jesus peace be upon him will not be distracting anyone from the rememberance of the Day of Judgement (where no Prophet has failed to do so). So for people to say that the world will all be perfect for like 1000 years, or whatever is wrong, are they then saying that no one will be tested with any issues??? That no one needs to think about death?? Prophet Jesus peace be upon him will die. After the beast will come who will mark people's foreheads, whether they are good or bad. After the sun rises from the other side, no one can repent, change. Satan is not locked up (but rather less corruption ie no countries as you see today, no internet, no telephone (the Prophet Jesus peace be upon him will not be appearing on TV etc) there will be less people in this world. After the sun rises, the after the sound is heard signifying the commencement of the Day of Judgement.

8. What we believe is happening today, is no different to those who supported the homosexuals, they didn't want to side with the Prophet Lut peace be upon him, as they feared being berated, so they did not stand with the Prophet Lut peace be upon him. The homosexuals even said (quote in the Quran, that this Prophet wishes us to be GOOD-unlike in this world now due to people and media making excuses and hiding behind respectful intentions-when they are far from it). So the Muslims are being attacked as the religious were attacked, as we do not accept their way of life, being in the year 2015 doesn't make it acceptable.

There are issues where countries are full of greed, and wish to attack countries to take over, they have so far attacked Niger, Somolia, Yemen, Libya, Pakistan etc. Of course the governments don't explain to people of what they are doing there in the first place. There is also an issue with Israel (where they allow gay pride there) where there is belief that 9/11 was an inside job, as the zionists were fighting the Muslims on their own, they wished to make it everybody's else's war, so to get people to become anti-Muslim. Typical evil doers and jealous people, where they wish that everyone else had nothing.

The majority of Muslims are just carrying on with their lives, were we have tolerated others by not making cartoons etc of them. So here we are not asking for anyone for anything, expect that they should not be bombing etc.

We are the only people following in the ways of the Prophet, where we do not differentiate, we just had the benefit of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him-and its a no brainer, if we didn't have him we would be useless in this world and the next.

So we do live in peace, where people ie in France cannot accuse the Muslims of stopping them having sex outside of marriage etc. We wholeheartedly believe that yes the anti christ will be arriving (which is after these countries as you see them today), so people can choose to believe or to treat themselves like people in the past, where they thought they would continue, when God destroyed people for accepting homosexuality etc.

So from all the above we basically live our lives by the next world, as I would not wish to stand with the evil doers (thereby showing that I rather sided with people who were lewd etc rather then listening to the Prophets). Even those that died, regret getting along with the evil doers, and wish they could come back into this world and go against them. If you can't say it on the Day of Judgement, then don't say it at all.
Reply

confused43
01-12-2015, 08:53 AM
HEY , HI, I just wanted to say what you have said actually makes much sense to me i don't believe much of the bible , i believe there is a god just not really sure which one at this point, but at this point i really don't feel so stupid, can i private message you , i would like to ask you some other things please
Reply

h-n
01-12-2015, 09:00 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by confused43
HEY , HI, I just wanted to say what you have said actually makes much sense to me i don't believe much of the bible , i believe there is a god just not really sure which one at this point, but at this point i really don't feel so stupid, can i private message you , i would like to ask you some other things please
If you mean myself, then yes you can private message me.
Reply

Hulk
01-12-2015, 01:05 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by confused43
i am wondering what you mean by prove god is not one ? i know nothing about Islam, or the people that believe, in Allah, but with all the things happening in the world today i somewhat fear what i do not even understand, can you please enlighten me as to why all these terrible things are happening , i really just really want to understand what the Islam want , from the world or even in general, forgive me if you find me stupid , i may well be but i am asking for you to help me understand these things happening if you can
The crux of the Islamic faith is that there is only one God and that He alone should be worshipped. If one can prove that that is false then Islam crumbles, regardless of how much sense everything else in it might make.

If you don't mind perhaps you can open a new thread for your queries? You might be able to put forth your words better in it without unrelated issues getting in the way.
Reply

Sojourn
01-13-2015, 01:59 AM
Peace be with you,

format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
The crux of the Islamic faith is that there is only one God and that He alone should be worshipped. If one can prove that that is false then Islam crumbles, regardless of how much sense everything else in it might make.
Phrasing it this way almost makes it sound like Islam is synonymous with monotheism, but that of course is not the case. Most of us here are monotheists, and that includes us Christians who acknowledge the trinity. I don't mean to be nitpicking the flow of your statement but it's not sound.
Reply

Hulk
01-13-2015, 02:38 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Sojourn
Phrasing it this way almost makes it sound like Islam is synonymous with monotheism, but that of course is not the case. Most of us here are monotheists, and that includes us Christians who acknowledge the trinity. I don't mean to be nitpicking the flow of your statement but it's not sound
I'm sure you would agree that it would be wrong to say that our concept of the Oneness of God is the same, though Christians also believe that they believe that God is One. So when it comes to Christianity and Islam, a person who is interested in learning about them would undoubtedly find that the most important would be their concept of God.

I think you would probably agree that a christian cannot be a christian unless he believes in the Trinity, similarly a muslim cannot be muslim unless he believes that God is One.

Do note that I do not stop at saying "There is only one God.", I also say "He alone should be worshipped.".

There are some who would say that they believe in only one God, but when it comes to worship, things other than God come in; whether it is in a form of an idol or a human being, etc.
Reply

Sojourn
01-13-2015, 04:01 AM
Peace be with you,

format_quote Originally Posted by Hulk
I'm sure you would agree that it would be wrong to say that our concept of the Oneness of God is the same, though Christians also believe that they believe that God is One. So when it comes to Christianity and Islam, a person who is interested in learning about them would undoubtedly find that the most important would be their concept of God.
I would say we simply have different concepts of God, despite both of us being monotheists. Now even though you may stress monotheism as you understand it, even Islamic belief concerning the Quran comes very close to what we believe about Jesus. I have heard and read Muslims describe the Quran as Uncreated and Eternal, a rather remarkable set of statements to attach to a book. Now the question I naturally have is what then is the relationship of the Quran with Allah? It is the speech of Allah, according to Islamic belief, but is the speech of Allah separate from Allah? If not, how then is the Qur'an distinct? You see, if one probes into this deeper, we're really not that different in the end.

Pax et bonum
Reply

h-n
01-13-2015, 06:28 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Sojourn
Peace be with you,



I would say we simply have different concepts of God, despite both of us being monotheists. Now even though you may stress monotheism as you understand it, even Islamic belief concerning the Quran comes very close to what we believe about Jesus. I have heard and read Muslims describe the Quran as Uncreated and Eternal, a rather remarkable set of statements to attach to a book. Now the question I naturally have is what then is the relationship of the Quran with Allah? It is the speech of Allah, according to Islamic belief, but is the speech of Allah separate from Allah? If not, how then is the Qur'an distinct? You see, if one probes into this deeper, we're really not that different in the end.

Pax et bonum
What your doing is actually bizarre, as your listening to some Muslims to say that we are all the same, just like we can pick out with Christians. The Quran has been created by God, whoever said it was uncreated, where did Islam ever teach that? (listening to some Muslims-that you probably can't name isn't good enough). God spoke the words, the MEANING of the Quran ie when God says he is ONE, that he is uncreated, is always been and always ever will be (which you broke the rule here on the 10 commandments that there is only one God.

You cannot have different concepts about the one God, Christianity is pure and simple idol worship-you say that Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is your saviour-he is NOT, you say that he will be judging you on the Day of Judgement-when is not all seeing or all hearing. There are sins etc that when good people repent, will not be made known to others and they certainly don't wish for people to know. They always know that God always knows, but now you are saying that a Man will know too.

You even say that the son is the father, the father is the son etc. frankly its disgusting. Here to say that God, Lord of the Worlds is a son, and the father is the son etc. is pure evil. Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is a Man, who drank (not wine), and ate, went to the toilet and slept. When at church is there not a service that this is bread is the body of Christ as you put it and drink wine that you say is the blood of Christ-so here you are treating him as a savior and saying he is one of three but that you are consuming him (CANNABILISM PERFORMANCE)?? When you die do not some people of your religion say that this body that we have is vile??? That God will replace it with a better one?? So what are you saying that the body of Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is vile too??

God is one -where 100% he is not connected with anyone, no one created him (where he created Archangel Gabriel and Prophet Jesus peace be upon him later).

To say that we are similar is an offensive thing, it is unacceptable-who are you to say that we are the same??? When Muslims and Christians in the history of this world have denied that. Even those Muslims that you say said such a thing-did you bother to ask them if they thought that our religions are the same?? As you should have done and asked the very people who say such things, instead of asking people who have nothing to do with what they say. Instead of picking and choosing who you wish to listen to-in turn who you wish to agree with. Which is what the USA does, finds so called Muslims who are willing to listen to their tripe.

We follow after all the Prophets, where ie Prophet Moses peace be upon him worshipped the one God-never did they say that he is one of three (even though Prophet Jesus peace be upon him came after, the Prophets were aware of who would come after them), neither did they say that God is one of two, as the Archangel Gabriel was already created. So you need to refrain from saying on a islamic forum that you and I worship the same God, when you take Prophet Jesus peace be upon him as your saviour.
Reply

BlueOwl358
01-13-2015, 10:04 AM
Ooh, long questions with long paragraphs and multitudes of questions, the kind of questions I like to reply.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
1. From what I understand, you guys believe that angels have bodies made of light, and that these things called "djinn" have bodies made of fire. But they're invisible. Fire and light are per se (essentially) visible. Isn't it a flat out contradiction to believe in invisible fire people?
Yes, Angels, and Jinn, are beliefs held in Islam as creations of Allah. However, restricting the capabilities of God by just the simple amount of knowledge we have is nonsense. The Creator knows science way more than the created. But just for the sake of fun, methanol fires are invisible and have no visible flame nor smoke.

You can search it up on Google, methanol fires. The 1981 Indianapolis 500 had one of these, someone got lit on fire by an invisible fire.

There you go, invisible fire with absolutely no smoke. And also, another thing Islam teaches, is that Jinn are made from fires that have no smoke. Also, as for invisible light, visible light isn't the only part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and infrared light is one example, which is also invisible. Now, I do not know the precise details of other creation, and they may not even be truly invisible, as they do have visible forms, but the point is, the statement that all forms of light and fire are visible is false.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
2. Granted that it's not a contradiction to believe in invisible fire people, I have a further question about their bodies. I am assuming that, since they have bodies, they are therefore animals (body-soul composites). Are their bodies complex (made up of a diversity of organs), or are they relatively simple (for example, in the sense that a camp-fire is relatively simple...that is, not made up of individual "parts," so to speak, but is just one fire)? If they are complex, then how on earth does that work? What would it mean to have an eye or an ear made of light or fire? If their bodies are simple, then how are they able to see, hear, etc? The senses require complex bodily organs. If they don't sense, then what's the point of their having bodies?
How will the day be when some non-Islamic scientist actually meets an Angel. lol. I have absolutely no idea, cause I am just a human who doesn't know what invisible beings look like since they are invisible and no one told me. Other then that Angels are huge, fill the horizon, and have wings. But I have not studied them.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
3. From what I understand, you guys believe that martyrs enjoy bliss in a bodily paradise, where they shall indulge their carnal appetites for food, drink and sexual intercourse...without their bodies? How do you suppose that is supposed to work? Avicenna's answer is that good philosophers bypass these carnal delights altogether and partake of intelligible delights, whereas the ordinary, run of the mill Muslims who, nonetheless, lived good lives will enjoy these carnal delights...by imagining them. But this is, of course, false. Imagination requires bodily organs, and your martyrs are not currently united to their bodies. We can be quite sure of this. If you doubt this, go and check. I assure you, their bodies are still in (or on) the ground and, even if intact, are quite lifeless. So, in short, how are your martyrs supposed to eat the heavenly super fruit when they have neither mouth, tongue, throat nor stomach? How are they supposed to enjoy their 72 virgins when they have no reproductive organs?
No bodies, where did you hear that? That has no basis, all people in heaven and hell will have bodies. The people of heaven will be in their thirties at the hight of 90 feet tall. Simple answer for long question.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
4. Related to 3, granted that your bodily paradise actually existed, why on earth would that be the goal of Muslim striving? Why would your martyrs want that? We eat in order to keep ourselves alive as individuals, and sexual relations are to keep the species alive. Why should someone desire food or sexual intercourse when he has achieved immortality?
That is also very simple. Although food is eaten to keep us alive, that is not the only reason and any human should know that. Haven't you eaten a giant delicious serving of, well, anything, just for the enjoyment? I mean, I know more people eat strawberries for their taste and enjoyment than nourishment. Just because you can live forever, you would wanna keep out of strawberries? I mean dude! STRAWBERRIES! Immortality does not remove the wish for desire and pleasure, just, not dying, being in perfect health and fitness with all organs working at an awesome rate.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
5. Supposing that your martyrs desired such a reward, wouldn't they rather deserve Hell? This would mean that they prefer carnal delights to God, who alone is to be loved and adored as a final end, and who alone is the ultimate "goal" of the rational creature.
Who says they desire such a reward, all they want to do is to please God, and they aim for that pleasement, way more than anything else. Muslims aim for heaven to have the greatest reward, God being happy with them, and that is the single most important goal, any other physical reward is a lesser reward. You can read up Hadith Qudsi 40 online, it is a long Hadith so I won't bother, but the point is, martyrs do not prefer carnal delights and their whole point of allowing themselves to be killed is for God, so your statement is also.... Without basis.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
6. And speaking of Heaven and Hell, how do Muslims propose to escape the fires of Hell? Even a single serious sin turns us away from God, makes us enemies of God, and merits everlasting punishment. You'll presumably tell me that God is merciful, but I'll reply that He is Justice Itself. Pray as much as you want, but if there is nothing to counterbalance the infinite debt of punishment that you have merited through your sins, then you have no escape from His righteous indignation.
On the authority of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said that the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said: When Allah decreed the Creation He pledged Himself by writing in His book which is laid down with Him: My mercy prevails over my wrath. It was related by Muslim (also by al-Bukhari, an-Nasa'i and Ibn Majah).

Humans can not judge justice and define it. Only God can, he decides all things and the proper punishment for all things. And his Justice says he will forgive anyone of anything other than polytheism.

Anas (radhiallahu anhu) said that he heard the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alaihi wa-sallam) say: “Allah the Exalted said: “O son of Adam! As long as you invoke Me and plead to Me, I will forgive you whatever you have committed, and I will not make much of it. O son of Adam! If your evil deeds reach the borders of the sky, and then you ask Me for forgiveness, I will forgive you. O son of Adam! If you bring forth the earth full of errors, then you meet Me while you do not associate anything (or anyone) with Me, I will bring forth for you its full of forgiveness.” [At-Tirmidhee (Shaikh Albanee rendered it as Hasan)]

Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “I swear by Him in whose hand is my soul, if you were a people who did not commit sin, Allah would take you away and replace you with a people who would sin and then seek Allah’s forgiveness so He could forgive them.” [Sahīh Muslim (2687)]

God did not create humans to be perfect, he made them imperfect. He made us so we could ask his forgiveness, and that is the entire reason why humans were made and are better than angels. God created us so He can show us His glory, not that we can show our nothingness to him.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
7. Is it true that Mohommed says that it's sometimes OK to tell a lie? If so, he knew that telling a lie is always wrong, right?
827

Saying Mohommed is disrespectful. Arabic is a language where a slight variation can have a completely opposite meaning, and sometimes a negative and insightful one.

All deeds are based on intention, if a deed is for bad intent, it will be written as a bad deed, if it is for a good intent, it will be written as a good dead.

It is narrated on the authority of Amir al-Mu'minin (Leader of the Believers), Abu Hafs 'Umar bin al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him), say: "Actions are according to intentions, and everyone will get what was intended. Whoever migrates with an intention for Allah and His messenger, the migration will be for the sake of Allah and his Messenger. And whoever migrates for worldly gain or to marry a woman, then his migration will be for the sake of whatever he migrated for." Related by Bukhari & Muslim

Now, in some cases, inventing information is allowed if it is for a good intention.

Narrated Um Kulthum bint Uqba: That she heard Allah's Apostle saying, "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." (Bukhari: Book #49, Hadith #857)

But lying, and all things that are absolutely lies, wrong, in no way true regardless of anything, and is judged to be a lie, is a sin and the sign of a hypocrite. But saying someone looks great is, because of common sense, just a compliment and not a lie, can't be said to be bad.

That was relatively simple. Diverse problems for Islam? No. Diverse problems for humans who can't comprehend? Yes.

The invisible methanol fire lighting up someone from the Indianapolis was cool. I mean it is an invisible fire burning someone!:skeleton: So if you can believe in visible fire people, you can definitely believe in invsible fire people.
28
Reply

BlueOwl358
01-13-2015, 10:47 AM
Oh, and after that, comes the rest of the giant conversation which seems to be hard to track. Monotheism is synonymous with Monothiesm, and thus a belief of monotheism is synonymous with Monothiesm, and thus, a belief of extremely strict monotheism can't be any more synonymous with monotheism. A trinity is not any more Monothiest then a Trimurti, which is what the Hindu religion believes in. Hindus believe in three personifications of the supreme truth, with the three having different roles and consciousness, no different then Trinitarian Christianity. But the question is, how can multiple consciousness coexist in thought, action, decision, and all emotion despite one of them being a human and obviously open to sin. How can you be capable of sin in one consciousness and sinless in the other. One essence cannot be divided into three consciousnesses, because a human soul can lie, and is limited in all aspects including thought, reason, thought, emotion, and everything, a divine one is not.

A divine and pure and supreme essence, can not become lower in level and pureness into an impure essence and still be divine.

As for the relation between God's scripture and God Himself, the relation is no different then this text right here that I have typed and me and my consciousness. It is one-level and I am alive. It is a conveyance of what I have said, but it is not physically me.

Both religions believe in a supreme, all powerful God, and are thus monotheistic, but the difference is that Islam believes that nothing else can be as supreme, or all powerful in essence as that of God, but Christianity does. Christianity believes that God makes a human who he intentionally made capable of sin, have the same essence as himself, and that God, makes his own ultimate essence lower itself into an un-ultimate, impure, sweaty, hairy, tiny, human.
0


0
Reply

tearose
01-13-2015, 11:28 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by h-n
The Quran has been created by God, whoever said it was uncreated, where did Islam ever teach that?
As-salaamu 3laikum sister, this is not correct, kindly read this: http://islamqa.info/en/10153

However, the analogy being made between this and the Trinity is utterly false.
Reply

Sojourn
01-13-2015, 01:29 PM
Peace be with you H-n,

format_quote Originally Posted by h-n
What your doing is actually bizarre, as your listening to some Muslims to say that we are all the same, just like we can pick out with Christians. The Quran has been created by God, whoever said it was uncreated, where did Islam ever teach that?
I was as amazed as you when I first heard it, and I discovered it is a fundamental part of Asharia aqeedah, even Imam Hanbal was whipped for refusing to say the Quran is created!

You cannot have different concepts about the one God, Christianity is pure and simple idol worship-you say that Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is your saviour-he is NOT, you say that he will be judging you on the Day of Judgement-when is not all seeing or all hearing. There are sins etc that when good people repent, will not be made known to others and they certainly don't wish for people to know. They always know that God always knows, but now you are saying that a Man will know too.
I would like to address your points here but unfortunately it would probably run close to "clarifying Christianity" which this section of the forum is not about. Let me just say that we simply believe as Jesus taught us, see John 5:22-23 as just one example. And I'll leave it at that.

You even say that the son is the father, the father is the son etc.
No, *you* say that, and are now both putting words in our mouth and attacking your misconception of what we believe. We believe the Father is distinct from the Son. Again, I can't go into details.

Pax et bonu,
Reply

Sojourn
01-13-2015, 01:31 PM
Peace be with you Tearose,

format_quote Originally Posted by tearose
As-salaamu 3laikum sister, this is not correct, kindly read this: http://islamqa.info/en/10153

However, the analogy being made between this and the Trinity is utterly false.
This is really the discussion that I think is worth having, why do you believe the analogy is false? Why is it ok to say the Quran is uncreated and eternal but wrong for us to say that the Son is uncreated and eternal?

Pax et bonum
Reply

M.I.A.
01-13-2015, 01:53 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by confused43
i am wondering what you mean by prove god is not one ? i know nothing about Islam, or the people that believe, in Allah, but with all the things happening in the world today i somewhat fear what i do not even understand, can you please enlighten me as to why all these terrible things are happening , i really just really want to understand what the Islam want , from the world or even in general, forgive me if you find me stupid , i may well be but i am asking for you to help me understand these things happening if you can
IMO, terrible things happen because people allow them too.. They work towards them often unknowingly or knowingly.

Take for instance the Paris shootings, nobody says its not a bad thing... Could it have been prevented yesterday or the day before.

Almost certainly. Not through intelligence and intervention.. Although it is there for as long as can be.

But through a fear of god and an understanding that we all cause ripples in the pond.. Something one can go through life never quiet seeing.

Islam is not only the one ness of god, it would be a short book if it were. It is about the entirety of ones life.

I'm not saying all things can be avoided by being careful, prudent and respectful.. Or that those who oppose you will be any different.. I just think damage limitation is key.

Not everyone can live in a similar mindset and neither do I expect them too.. Each and every person develops a character through willingness or through circumstance.

In the scheme of things, nobody knows what series of events they set into action and how the consequences play out.. If that's fait or poor planning I have no idea.

After figuring out what the oneness of god is all about you will probably direct your attention to what guidance actually is.
Reply

h-n
01-13-2015, 02:21 PM
Sojourn,

I can only apologise, as I didn't know of course not going to know what all other Muslims say, I have given an explanation on my response to tearose.

It is something that needs then to be left for the Day of Judgement, but at least people can see that we don't just idly accept Islam, because our parents have told us to. But I personally am not happy that people go so far as making Islam complicated, when God did not do such a thing. There are unfortunately issues where I have met Muslims who wish to treat Islam as a physics degree-where a physics student has the right to walk down the street and know that not everybody has learnt what he/she have learnt. There are Muslims who wish to do the same with religion over complicate it, when we are only here for a short amount of time, even a Jew was asked once what is the meaning of your religion, of course to worship God, but basically treat people how you wish to be treated.

There are going to be differences, but as Muslims we try and refrain from taking it so far and arguing about it, as being concerned about the hereafter. It is not right that people argue about God-then here take it to God on the Day of Judgement and leave it to that, as there are answers to questions that can only be given by him. (so useless wasting the short time of people).

Thank-you for your time.
Reply

M.I.A.
01-13-2015, 03:06 PM
I don't think its complicated, that's the beauty of it.. A person is and does long before any forthaught enters there mind..

But if things were simple then the persuit of knowledge would only lead to a single answer. How far that answer develops is complicated..

Take for example science, the laws have always been the same.. Only our understanding of them has improved with time.

Its the persuit of the question until you can make sense of it, pondering upon things.. Although even that is no guarantee of an accurate answer.

As you correctly stated ours is but a grain of sand in an hour glass.

One of those things that furthers belief in god.

But the reality of the situation is if there is any point in trying to affect the situation and to what end.
Reply

Traditio
01-13-2015, 07:31 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by h-n
Your not the first "Christian" who comes and asks questions befitting of an Atheist (also the questions that you pose go against Christianity too). But here are the following answers;-
1. My apologies for not getting around to answering you sooner.

2. You are mistaken. My objections don't arise in the context of Christianity.

A. I think that angels and demons don't have bodies. I think that they are finite, incorporeal, spiritual, intellectual substances. They don't naturally have bodies. As such, they occupy a middle place in the heirarchy between human beings (spiritual and corporeal) and God (spiritual, infinite and uncreated). Claiming that there are rational animals composed of fire or light or air or...to sum up, anything other than primarily of earth...is simply unreasonable and unnecessary.

B. I think that God does not promise a carnal reward in the afterlife. What He offers is the face to face vision of Himself, the Supreme Good. A carnal reward would be an excellent reward for us...if we were pigs, and the best thing about us were our animality. But we aren't. We are human beings with reason and will. We are persons, intellectual universes of knowledge and love, and have a natural longing for infinite being, truth and goodness which only the face to face vision of God can satisfy, but which only God can freely offer to us by grace (which, I say, He has made possible by grace through Jesus).

Yes, it's true that, after the final resurrection, we will get our bodies back again, either to join our souls in unending punishment, or else, in everlasting glory. But for all that, the chief pains of Hell will not be bodily, nor will the real delights of Heaven be bodily. The chief pain of Hell is the loss of God and knowing that you will never see God because of your own sins. The pleasure of Heaven is knowing and loving God face to face, in being caught up in His love and clinging to Him forever. Yes, this delight will overflow into the body as well, but the delight of seeing God face to face is intellectual, not carnal.

C. I think that it's always wrong to lie. As Jesus says, Satan is the father of lies, whereas God is Truth Itself.

We are made out of clay, but you can't tell that anymore, we are flexible and have blood pumping through our veins.
This makes sense in the context of the ancient theory of the four elements. If we assume that theory, then it's still evident that we are primarily made of earth. Our bodies are apparently held together by solid, firm stuff. But it makes no sense to speak of an animal made of fire, air or water. That stuff doesn't "stay put," so to speak.

So the Jinn people were made out of fire, they don't resemble fire just as we don't resemble clay.
Again, this is just wrong. If you read books II and III of Aristotle's De Anima (On the Soul), Aristotle think that it's pretty obvious that our bodies are made up of a great deal of earth (if you want to call it "clay," then that's fine). We are made up of a great deal of firm, solid stuff that stays put, plus a suitable admixture of the other elements (air, fire and water) to enable us to sense and interact with our environment.

They look like people
I thought that they're supposed to be invisible?

it as per Christianity they also accept the existence of devils, that they cannot see either.
I don't think that we can see the demons (fallen angels) because they don't naturally have bodies. Incorporeal realities aren't sensible.

Also in science, we cannot see all types of light.
Fair enough. I thought the invisible fire/light people, and it occurs to me that this doesn't work. I believe that, after the resurrection, the bodies of the ****ed will be tormented by a fire that doesn't give off any light. Why? In order to torment both the senses of sight (with darkness) and touch (with fiery pain).

which will be judged on the Day of Judgement, so your not going to go to Paradise because you know what a whale shark looks like, but that by what good deeds you do.
This is another objection I have to Islam. Do you really think that you can "earn" your way to Heaven?

2. Then why don't you say that about angels??? Not everything is about body and soul, it is rather that they have one body. Therefore when a human does evil, their soul becomes ugly-you cannot see this in this world due to their physical bodies, in regards to the devils, as there is not believed to be a soul, when they become evil, there physical forms turn ugly.
Let's get this straight. Are you telling me that, whereas human beings are composed of body and soul, demons and angels, even though they have bodies, don't also have souls?

3. As per Christianity, God created Prophet Adam peace be upon him's body in and he enjoyed eating with his wife-did he not famously eat an apple-as per Christian belief??
There are different things I could say about this, but I'll rest here: that there's a disproportion between man's beginning (what man is capable of and given by nature) and end (that to which he is called as his final perfection).

The reward in the hereafter is also physical
If you are correct, then there can be no rewards or punishments until the final resurrection. Unless you want to say that they have different bodies now, and will be given another set of bodies at the resurrection, which is just patently wrong (for reasons Aristotle gives in the De Anima). That involves the error of thinking that any soul can go into any body. That's wrong. My soul naturally is suited to actuated my body! Note here that we find a correlate of this in the Christian faith. Jesus didn't "hop" from one body to another. No! When Jesus appeared to his apostles, the tomb was empty.

Contemplate that.

So then what are you saying that everything that you enjoy in this world is wrong??
Even in this life, not all delights are bodily. Plato makes this point outstandingly in the Symposium and in other places, Plotinus fastens onto it excellently. Yes, there are beauties and pleasures of bodies and of the senses. But don't these pale in comparison with the beauties and pleasures of good and morally fine ways of life? With the beauties and pleasures of thoughts and sciences? Of contemplation of divine things?

The greatest pleasures are contemplative, not carnal.

Then you can go so far and say what is the point of being MAle or female in the next world either, we still retain our own sex identity. Being able to socialise with others is a priviledge, and have relations with, these don't go away ie your relatives. Then are you saying what God has allowed in this world has become a sin in the next??? How is it that Mary giving birth to Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is an abnormal thing in the next world?? How is it that marriage, a good, blessed thing, just doesn't exist in the next world??
In this life, it is fitting for human beings, as animals, to eat and drink (to preserve their bodies) and to get married and have children (in order to keep the human race going). But these things have no place in the next life. For the ****ed, it would be would be inconsistent with their punishment. For the Blessed, it would be unnecessary and superfluous: they have attained true immortality. They have attained the original, the reality, of which marriage and the begetting of children here is but a dim reflection and shadow.

Also actually there are Christians who think they will become like angels in the next world-where do they claim this from???
I have a vague idea of what you're talking about, but not entirely. Would you explain the question more?

We strive to be successful in the hereafter which means having God pleased with us, if it was our only goal to get married and eat food in the next world, do you honestly think that we would be praying 5 times a day, fasting in the month of Ramadan, spending savings to go to Mecca, give to charity? Because by definition you are saying that the Muslims are materialistic, where materialistic people don't have much discipline, neither would they be willing to die in the name of Allah, but rather stay and enjoy the life of this world.
Yes, this doesn't make any sense to me. How can a Muslim, in one and the same breath, claim that Allah wants him or her to restrain himself in this life, but also offers him a reward of everlasting gluttony and debauchery in the next? Or am I misunderstanding the claim?

What is actually bizarre where you get some Christians say that they are going to to rule over others ie like Jehovah's witness, why would you need to rule over someone, when people are only enjoying their lives in the next world?
I'm not a Jehovah's witness.

You yourself lie by saying that people only eat to survive and have sex to procreate, so if you where presented with delicious, sweet dishes, you would only choose the bland because it is sufficient??? You really expect people to believe that people only have sex to procreate?? So that then means if they only wanted 2 kids, and if the wife was successful in getting pregnant straightaway, they only have had sex twice in the whole of their lifetime??? ^o)
Food and drink are naturally ordered to survival. Sex is naturally ordered to bearing children. Of course, people go to excess. The fact of the matter is that people have disordered and unruly desires and appetites. Humanity is fallen because of original sin.

If we did not have Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, it is only obvious that we would not have been helped for the Christians for saying that God has taken himself a son (committing idol worship)
I'm afraid that you don't understand our doctrine. How do you understand this claim, that "God has taken himself a son"? What do you think we mean by it?
Reply

Traditio
01-13-2015, 07:32 PM
My apologies, one of my words got censored. I wasn't intending to use a bad word. For the censored word, you may instead read "the condemned (that is, those who are lost forever in Hell).
Reply

h-n
01-13-2015, 11:19 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
1. My apologies for not getting around to answering you sooner.

2. You are mistaken. My objections don't arise in the context of Christianity.

A. I think that angels and demons don't have bodies. I think that they are finite, incorporeal, spiritual, intellectual substances. They don't naturally have bodies. As such, they occupy a middle place in the heirarchy between human beings (spiritual and corporeal) and God (spiritual, infinite and uncreated). Claiming that there are rational animals composed of fire or light or air or...to sum up, anything other than primarily of earth...is simply unreasonable and unnecessary.

B. I think that God does not promise a carnal reward in the afterlife. What He offers is the face to face vision of Himself, the Supreme Good. A carnal reward would be an excellent reward for us...if we were pigs, and the best thing about us were our animality. But we aren't. We are human beings with reason and will. We are persons, intellectual universes of knowledge and love, and have a natural longing for infinite being, truth and goodness which only the face to face vision of God can satisfy, but which only God can freely offer to us by grace (which, I say, He has made possible by grace through Jesus).

Yes, it's true that, after the final resurrection, we will get our bodies back again, either to join our souls in unending punishment, or else, in everlasting glory. But for all that, the chief pains of Hell will not be bodily, nor will the real delights of Heaven be bodily. The chief pain of Hell is the loss of God and knowing that you will never see God because of your own sins. The pleasure of Heaven is knowing and loving God face to face, in being caught up in His love and clinging to Him forever. Yes, this delight will overflow into the body as well, but the delight of seeing God face to face is intellectual, not carnal.

C. I think that it's always wrong to lie. As Jesus says, Satan is the father of lies, whereas God is Truth Itself.



This makes sense in the context of the ancient theory of the four elements. If we assume that theory, then it's still evident that we are primarily made of earth. Our bodies are apparently held together by solid, firm stuff. But it makes no sense to speak of an animal made of fire, air or water. That stuff doesn't "stay put," so to speak.



Again, this is just wrong. If you read books II and III of Aristotle's De Anima (On the Soul), Aristotle think that it's pretty obvious that our bodies are made up of a great deal of earth (if you want to call it "clay," then that's fine). We are made up of a great deal of firm, solid stuff that stays put, plus a suitable admixture of the other elements (air, fire and water) to enable us to sense and interact with our environment.



I thought that they're supposed to be invisible?



I don't think that we can see the demons (fallen angels) because they don't naturally have bodies. Incorporeal realities aren't sensible.



Fair enough. I thought the invisible fire/light people, and it occurs to me that this doesn't work. I believe that, after the resurrection, the bodies of the ****ed will be tormented by a fire that doesn't give off any light. Why? In order to torment both the senses of sight (with darkness) and touch (with fiery pain).



This is another objection I have to Islam. Do you really think that you can "earn" your way to Heaven?



Let's get this straight. Are you telling me that, whereas human beings are composed of body and soul, demons and angels, even though they have bodies, don't also have souls?



There are different things I could say about this, but I'll rest here: that there's a disproportion between man's beginning (what man is capable of and given by nature) and end (that to which he is called as his final perfection).



If you are correct, then there can be no rewards or punishments until the final resurrection. Unless you want to say that they have different bodies now, and will be given another set of bodies at the resurrection, which is just patently wrong (for reasons Aristotle gives in the De Anima). That involves the error of thinking that any soul can go into any body. That's wrong. My soul naturally is suited to actuated my body! Note here that we find a correlate of this in the Christian faith. Jesus didn't "hop" from one body to another. No! When Jesus appeared to his apostles, the tomb was empty.

Contemplate that.



Even in this life, not all delights are bodily. Plato makes this point outstandingly in the Symposium and in other places, Plotinus fastens onto it excellently. Yes, there are beauties and pleasures of bodies and of the senses. But don't these pale in comparison with the beauties and pleasures of good and morally fine ways of life? With the beauties and pleasures of thoughts and sciences? Of contemplation of divine things?

The greatest pleasures are contemplative, not carnal.



In this life, it is fitting for human beings, as animals, to eat and drink (to preserve their bodies) and to get married and have children (in order to keep the human race going). But these things have no place in the next life. For the ****ed, it would be would be inconsistent with their punishment. For the Blessed, it would be unnecessary and superfluous: they have attained true immortality. They have attained the original, the reality, of which marriage and the begetting of children here is but a dim reflection and shadow.



I have a vague idea of what you're talking about, but not entirely. Would you explain the question more?



Yes, this doesn't make any sense to me. How can a Muslim, in one and the same breath, claim that Allah wants him or her to restrain himself in this life, but also offers him a reward of everlasting gluttony and debauchery in the next? Or am I misunderstanding the claim?



I'm not a Jehovah's witness.



Food and drink are naturally ordered to survival. Sex is naturally ordered to bearing children. Of course, people go to excess. The fact of the matter is that people have disordered and unruly desires and appetites. Humanity is fallen because of original sin.



I'm afraid that you don't understand our doctrine. How do you understand this claim, that "God has taken himself a son"? What do you think we mean by it?

1. Then as I am not always around forums, if you don't always get a reply-you'll need to continue to do your own research. Also your or over the place, asking questions like an atheist, then using Christianity to say what you believe-with no religious understanding of the basics, so happy to use the term Christianity, so its normal to reply with why are you asking such and such when this is even agreed by Christianity etc.

2. A-You use the word "think"-we are not interested in what you think-either give us factual evidence which you have non on what angels are, I have provided details that they have bodies and don't just float around but are physical beings carrying on the duties of God.

B. Here you use the word "think", again provide factual evidence, when I the proof is that Prophet Adam peace be upon him got thrown out of Paradise that he was enjoying with his wife.

C. Again does Aristotle or Plato have revelations from God-are they Prophets?? I don't care at all what they think.

Are you saying that God cannot create something out of fire and light? As that is itself going against the fact that God is All-Powerful. He is able to make fire stay and do what he wishes to it, it is a fact that the Jinn are made out of fire.

Can you see the devils now?? No you can't.
Can you see the angels right now? No you can't
Can you see God right now? No you can't

Just because you can't see something in this world, of course doesn't mean that they don't exist.

The devils exist with physical bodies, they can come into this world too. Just because you cannot see something that doesn't mean that it exists as a whisp of light, Paradise is a physical world.

How many times you denied the above, by saying you don't "think"-well that is not good enough.

It is a fact that people do good deeds and earn a place in Paradise with God's mercy. Why is this so wrong??? How should people's reward be earned, then why should people go to Hell??

The jinn are known to change shape, there are some who can quickly cover large distances, why do you assume that everything else is working at a starting point of how humans are made?? The jinn existed before human. If you think again this is flawed, that they are made out of fire, you need to give factual evidence, not what some people who are not Prophet came up with.

Again where is your religious documents, proof, are you saying that it doesn't say in the bible that there is a Paradise??? Where does it say that Paradise has been destroyed, where does it say that it wasn't a good enough reward??

Again bring religious documents to support your views. The soul can also see, here and feel. We see the angel of death when he takes our soul. There is punishment in the grave-which you need to read up on seperately. So the soul is not dead and lifeless. But the fact is that we will be resurrected back into our bodies. People will have the reward that they have earned after the Day of Judgement. A soul is actually something that we have little information about-so if to question something that you have no hope of further information, doesn't mean that your clever but foolish. We are not expected to know everything that God knows.

Prophet Jesus peace be upon him didn't appear to the apostles, it was Satan who led them astray. Why would he come back after the people rejected the authorites?? They left him and thought he went through an act of being killed and now you say he came back, its ridiculous. After all he done for them, he spoke when he was a baby, had the table of food spreadth from Heaven, no-the people had already too much and they were not good enough. Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is believed to be taken to Heaven, body and soul, he will not be getting a new body made for him when he returns back into this world, two angels will be bringing him down to Damascas-where Muslims will be waiting for him.

You say "beauties and pleasures of good and morally fine ways of life? With the beauties and pleasures of thoughts and sciences? Of contemplation of divine things?

The greatest pleasures are contemplative, not carnal."

Here the statement as above is broad and actually meaningless as you have not an example, but a thought, so where is it, where is the religious proof of what you will have in the next world and how you will live. Will you not be speaking to another human ever again?? Will you not be speaking to an angel?? Will you not even be speaking to creatures, whether they be birds or lions?? So what is that you will be doing?? As everything that God creates is an act of him mercy, we are the created and we enjoy what our Lord provides. So instead of making broad statements, you need to note down more detail on what and how you will be living in the hereafter, backed with religious documents.

We never said that the wicked would be getting married or having children, but they will be getting drinks of boiling water, and eating pus, and foul things. They wished to devour interest, and gossip etc, and live by consuming what isn't there's then what they took was evil and foul and foul is what they get in the hereafter.

Then you state;-

They have attained the original, the reality, of which marriage and the begetting of children here is but a dim reflection and shadow.

Again as previously it is a broad statement, which is meaningless, marriage is a blessed thing, you need to provide more details, ie will anyone be communicating with each other? what would former husbands/wives be saying to each other?? what then would children be doing around their mothers-or are you saying that they will treat them as if they mean nothing to them??

There are Christians today, who believe that they will become angel like, if you say that this isn't true, but anyway by what you are stating, you think you are going to be angelic like. We are humans not angels. We are part of Mankind, God created us well.

So you say that you disbelieve that the former Prophets ie King David peace be upon him fasted?? Even in judaism fasted, it is showing that we value God. Do you see the majority of Muslims as obese that we consume more food then is necessary?? Do you see us involved in running our lives by sex?? The fact is that you have provided no religious documents, or admit that the bible actually states there is a Paradise.

Again need to show religious proof, of what you say, people just don't get married to have children, they get married because they love each other. Are you then saying that when people love each other, that is not going to be anything of value in the next world??

I do understand, you say that Prophet Jesus peace be upon him is a son of God. Whatever you like to quote ie the son is the father, the father is the son etc. It is idol worship. Plenty of Christians don' understand it either-if you deny this, when I know its true, will just have to see what you say about it on the Day of Judgement.

--------

What this is rather showing is the claim of INDEPENDENCE that people like to live by. They think they don't need anyone's help or that they are independent from others, then they wish to reject that they have anything to do with anyone else in the hereafter because of ARROGANCE. It is a huge lie that people like to live by, and wish to see themselves as. So to ultimately say that you are not going to be living in Paradise, need to associate yourself with others, isn't because their is something wrong with it or goes against your religious beliefs, but rather that you don't wish it, so to be away from people.

There are many people in the west now who think they can do what they like, that no one can tell them what to do. There was even a case of an old woman telling teenage girls to quieten, and she was beaten by them. Anytime you mention some sort of advice, its who the hell do you think you are.

When they buy something, they have the attitude "because we paid for it", it somehow absolves all responsibility to society. For example buying a bottle of milk for a pound-do you really think that sufficiently pays for that bottle of milk?? What about all the work the farmer puts into it?? This is where you thank God and help other people.

This "because we paid for it" attitude is were people just by their produce and some (not all) don't help and give anything back. Because they have little interaction with people, ie buy their products at supermarkets, instead of growing crop and needing help of others, they view themselves arrogantly as independent.

So you just spent your time talking questioning things as an Atheist, using then Christian jargon ie the trinity, then talking about Plato and Aristotle and largely by what you "think" (all over the place). God has clearly given the message, so why would we need to think about what you think when you don't have any revelations by God, God did not speak to you from a burning bush, he didn't send any angel to give you a message, neither have you ever seen one. You have provided borad meaningless statements to the factual ones given by myself, with no real information from yourself on how people will be living and really what they will be doing.

This is where people who accept the one God, the Day of Judgement, Paradise and Hell cannot be corrupted, are sincere in their intentions, if you take out one, you know that person has not the best intentions, here you take out Paradise for arrogance. We can only live as humans, which was not deplorable for Prophet Jesus peace be upon him to do so, neither was it awful for his Mother.

Either repent and become a Muslim, or stay as you are that is your choice of course, but what can be different is not posting your meaningless jargon on what you "think". As you can understand, people are not going to base facts and on what God says on what you think, when he has already revealed the truth, and where you have not brought a shred of religious verse to say that Paradise will not exist etc.

We will see each other on the Day of Judgement, and if you have chosen not to repent, so remember that everything that you write and say, isn't about my responses, but of how God All-Mighty will be responding to them.
Reply

tearose
01-14-2015, 09:05 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Sojourn
This is really the discussion that I think is worth having, why do you believe the analogy is false? Why is it ok to say the Quran is uncreated and eternal but wrong for us to say that the Son is uncreated and eternal?
Peace be upon you Sojourn,

It is correct to say that the Qur'an is uncreated because it is the Words of Allah. Words cannot exist separately from the speaker (to paraphrase the fatwa I linked to earlier). Speech is one of the Attributes of Allah. However, Jesus (peace be upon him), to whom you incorrectly refer as the son, was a created human being, and so there is no basis to refer to him in the way you have mentioned.

However, when a human being recites the Qur'an, their voice is created, but the words they are reciting are uncreated. Perhaps you were confused about that.
Reply

Futuwwa
03-03-2015, 06:07 PM
The original post is based on too many arbitrary, unsubstantiated assumptions to be in need of refutation. That which can arbitrarily be asserted can be dismissed out of hand.
Reply

Zafran
03-03-2015, 07:19 PM
salaam

Reading the original post just shows why so many members didnt bother answering - nothing about God or the prophetic tradition, only speculative knowledge that isn't even important. Heaven as a place of lust??? not about the presence of God?? seriously. More bothered about the rewards then God?

anthropomorphic talk about Jinns and Angels because everyone draws them as humans? Even though nobody has seen their form?

Lying??

come on.
Reply

جوري
03-04-2015, 02:08 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
7. Is it true that Mohommed says that it's sometimes OK to tell a lie? If so, he knew that telling a lie is always wrong, right?
Glad I started with the end statement, a summation of what preceded.. guess you're publishing your brilliant research in this paper?
Two scientific journals accepted a study by Maggie Simpson


No, he never said that- perhaps in christian mythology he did, they often makeup things to feel better about their self-immolating middle eastern mangod.. If they lie about everything else I suppose nothing is left but Christianity, still as I said to the other troll, Odin and Thor are an easier selling point..
Glad you're doing PhD in philo guess we'll be finding you at Mcdies flipping burgers :)



format_quote Originally Posted by czgibson
You've asked some clever questions,
still a tiny man wanting to be a big fish in a small pond, might it inject you with much needed testosterone. You stand on your self made mountain to see how small people are, but that is how they see you too a small man!
Aren't you too old and too miserable to hang on to a remote forum after all these years? get a woman, eat chocolate enjoy your meaningless life, I can't imagine what you're hoping to accomplish here? Enjoy your delusions and let others enjoy theirs!

all the best
Reply

greenhill
03-04-2015, 02:47 AM
Hi Traditio,

Your OP is about 3 things essentially.

1) The invisible beings
2) About Heaven and Hell
3) The conduct of Muhammad (saw)

In most cases that I have read relating to these kinds of question is that it is centered around certain abstract information people have collated.

We have to remember that first, Islam is not a new religion. It has been in existence since the first man, Adam (pbuh) and all subsequent prophets had the same duty to call people to the worship of Allah.

I think the question on the invisible beings have been addressed?

On the matter of heaven and hell, first of all it is not us who can determine in any way who goes where. We can only pray for Allah's mercy. The question is then how do we strive to get His Mercy?

You mentioned about martyrs and how their bodies are still intact in their graves (and how it relates to their enjoyment of paradise). Well, they are not as yet in paradise. All humanity will be awaken from their graves on Judgment Day. Until then, they rest in their graves. They are not as yet judged for their actions. What I have learnt is that in the grave, you are questioned on your faith (whether you were a muslim or not).

But the question you asked, a clever one, is related to the intention. Ie. I do not do x,y and z (as being things Allah has forbidden) but I do intend a,b and c (as being things Allah will be pleased about) so that I do not roast in hell but instead enjoy the benefit of heaven. This then becomes (according to the analogy) that I did not do it because I love Allah but more as a result of me being afraid of spending an eternity in hell. Wrong reasons? That I was not sincere about my choice? This is what I am trying to get at with regards to the 'abstract' form of questioning.

We are given choices, and the path we take is based on our reasoning and desires and not from absolute knowledge. If we can all get absolute answers on the existence of God, then where is the 'choice' for people to decide? This is the real test. So, we first have to believe in Allah and then it would be hard to disassociate the rewards and the punishment aspects from the following of faith. It is part and parcel. Allah has said in many parts of the Quran how to gain His favors and what the rewards are and also how to gain His wrath and ways to seek forgiveness. Just because we are given guidelines what to do (or not do) and we follow it, does that mean we are insincere and only doing it to seek the benefits, hence should not be given any good out of it but instead punished?

On how do we escape the fires of hell? It ultimately rests with the Mercy of Allah. But we can help ourselves along the way.
1) Islamic monotheism
2) Do what Allah commands of us and leave out what He dislikes (there's a lot that goes here)
3) Continuously seek His forgiveness and guidance
4) Bear with patience the test and trials heaped on you (as this also helps wash away sins)

On your final point, regarding what the prophet (saw) said, (there are others that people have brought up) I think it has been touched on so I won't say anything more..

:peace:
Reply

Zafran
03-04-2015, 03:08 AM
Salaam

There are many problems with his original posts and his rebuttals. He seems to rely on Aristotle and Plato as if they are messengers of God. He also seems to think that anything to do with eating and drinking and having sex is ultimately "carnal", so any of that in heaven is shocking for him even though those things are in our human nature as intellectual and spiritual pursuits are. Its why we have a law to keep them in check and used in right avenues.

Lastly he thinks lying is wrong in all cases - really? if there were 100 Jews hiding under someones house and the Nazis Knocked on their door - that person should tell the Nazis the truth???

If your christian friends and family were in danger would you not lie to save them???

The rest about Jinns and Angels is as i said speculative at best, As the Quran says you've been given little knowledge.

peace
Reply

جوري
03-04-2015, 03:13 AM
^^^ tuqya isn't a part of Islam that's a Shiite invention the ******* child of Christianity!
i think folks confuse omission of information during war for lies - That being said, Id personally have no problem ratting some people out.

:w:
Reply

keiv
03-04-2015, 03:15 AM
"invisible fire people"

That's pretty much where I stopped reading. A response to you longer than one line would be a waste of time.
Reply

Traditio
07-24-2015, 05:25 AM
You know, one of the most jarring things for me, as a Christian, is it seems as though you Muslims think that you can somehow "earn" heaven, that your own good works somehow "deserve" a reward from God. I find myself wondering; is there any room for grace (i.e., unmerited divine favor) in what is, effectively, a Pelagian cult (and here, I do not mean this in the pejorative sense, but in the etymological sense)?

Ultimately, I think I never can agree with your prophet, since I can never agree that I ever, of my own account, can merit favor in God's eyes, or else, if I have sinned, make up for my sins by my own power. Whatever good I can do, I owe that to God. Whatever evil I do, whenever I violate God's laws, I make myself an enemy of God, irretrievably and irredeemably guilty, deserving of His righteous punishment, rightfully excluded from His society because of my crimes against His Holy Law.

But, I hear from the Muslims, "wait until Ramadan, and give charity, and you will get multiples more merit than had you donated otherwise." As though my works were anything more than sheer refuse in the sight of a Supremely Holy and Just God, to whom I owe my all, and whom I have offended because of my sins.

I know through philospohy that I can never merit Heaven, for his is nothing but the vision of God Himself, to which there always remains a natural disproportion given my nature, and from which I have, because of my sins, an unbreakable hindrance. Because of my sins, because I have offended a God of infinite majesty, because I have violated the Law of the infinitely Just God, had I done this only once, I would deserve Hell forever.

How, then, can I but sigh in sorrowful pity when the Muslims tell me that I can buy my way out through good deeds?

If Jesus hasn't died on the Cross and risen from the dead, all is lost. Such is, I think, as much as St. Anselm says in Cur Deus Homo (Why God [became] a man). The verdict is already written. The gavel has already sounded. We are guilty. We must pay the price.

Here, we must consider the parable of the workers of Matthew 20. The workers are paid no more, no less, for their work. Why? Because a penny is all that the owner has to give. The owner represents God, and the penny, the beatific vision, i.e., the sight of God Himself seen face to face. What more can God give than Himself? And none of us deserve that. We only gain it because He is generous.
Reply

جوري
07-24-2015, 10:31 AM
1- who cares?? Truly
2- Islam doesn't deny original sin- it renounces the idea that such a sin can't be forgiven -
Not sure why eating a forbidden fruit in your mind is more bad than God impregnating a young girl with himself and then dying later in some orchestrated debacle!

please stay Christian and hopefully more people mull over the decision of converting - Muslims aren't lacking in number they lack in quality!

best,
Reply

Futuwwa
07-24-2015, 02:21 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
You know, one of the most jarring things for me, as a Christian, is it seems as though you Muslims think that you can somehow "earn" heaven, that your own good works somehow "deserve" a reward from God. I find myself wondering; is there any room for grace (i.e., unmerited divine favor) in what is, effectively, a Pelagian cult (and here, I do not mean this in the pejorative sense, but in the etymological sense)?
Funny that, I always thought we were supposed to be an Arian cult.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
I know through philospohy that I can never merit Heaven, for his is nothing but the vision of God Himself, to which there always remains a natural disproportion given my nature, and from which I have, because of my sins, an unbreakable hindrance. Because of my sins, because I have offended a God of infinite majesty, because I have violated the Law of the infinitely Just God, had I done this only once, I would deserve Hell forever.
God saves or condemns who he wants, and doesn't care about your philosophical meandering about what anyone is deserving of. You speak about philosophy as it represents some kind of objective and certainly knowable reality above God, and which even God is bound by. A rather strange frame, if God is both omnipotent and the ultimate cause of everything.
Reply

MuslimInshallah
07-24-2015, 04:32 PM
Greetings Traditio,

(smile) I'm afraid you have some rather strange ideas about Islam. (sigh) Though Muslims have lost a lot of knowledge and I am sure you could find some who believe the most astonishing things. For instance, I've met people who, though Muslim, were educated at Catholic schools in their countries (a legacy of colonialism), and I've actually been told by them that certain Catholic beliefs are Islamic beliefs! And I have met those raised without much education in their faith in their supposedly Islamic countries, who believe what anti-Islamic propagandists say about Islam. It's rather sad.

In short, no, no one earns Paradise. None of us really deserves it, even the most pious of prophets. We all get there by Divine Grace, through His Compassion and Mercy. But we are expected to put our efforts in. And what exactly we will attain when we get to Paradise depends on how we have lived our lives. (smile) I like to use the following analogy: imagine an unborn child: if this child grows as much as he can during his time in the womb, in a healthy environment, he is much more likely to do well after birth. So are we humans like this in the Next Life. What we do during our time here influences the likelihood we will do well in the Next life. Not because we deserve it, but because God is Kind and Forgiving.

(smile) I'm afraid I don't have time at present to look at all your points. But I would urge you again to look at the Qur'an. You are no doubt much versed in Catholic lore. But if you want to truly access an Islamic vision of God, the Qur'an is The Source, par excellence.


May God, the Gentle, Lift you ever closer to Him.
Reply

Abu Ametullah
07-26-2015, 11:21 AM
And only because there is something what you can't understand it doesn't mean its is not existing. You made it your self to eayse, there is a lot proves that Islam is the trues. And your focusing on something you can't understand. No one of us understand every singe part of the whole universe but still it is existing.:statisfie
Reply

Abz2000
07-26-2015, 01:24 PM
there is no problem with Islam, if there is a problem anywhere, it is with us - or our limited perception.
Let us repent to God and submit to Him before it is too late.
Reply

M.I.A.
07-26-2015, 03:51 PM
OP seems to have started from a faulty position...

The concept of angels and jin are not exclusive to Islam and probably predate it within abrahamic pbuh monothiesm..


Secondly how can any human answer such questions?

Except through speculation and philosophical viewpoints..


Imo mankind is often a vessel.. The things you put inside it manifest as darkness and light..

Although if you get time you should read the qurans account of Moses pbuh and his meeting with a guided stranger.
Reply

Insaanah
07-26-2015, 04:08 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
You know, one of the most jarring things for me, as a Christian, is it seems as though you Muslims think that you can somehow "earn" heaven, that your own good works somehow "deserve" a reward from God. I find myself wondering; is there any room for grace (i.e., unmerited divine favor) in what is, effectively, a Pelagian cult (and here, I do not mean this in the pejorative sense, but in the etymological sense)?

Ultimately, I think I never can agree with your prophet, since I can never agree that I ever, of my own account, can merit favor in God's eyes, or else, if I have sinned, make up for my sins by my own power. Whatever good I can do, I owe that to God. Whatever evil I do, whenever I violate God's laws, I make myself an enemy of God, irretrievably and irredeemably guilty, deserving of His righteous punishment, rightfully excluded from His society because of my crimes against His Holy Law.

But, I hear from the Muslims, "wait until Ramadan, and give charity, and you will get multiples more merit than had you donated otherwise." As though my works were anything more than sheer refuse in the sight of a Supremely Holy and Just God, to whom I owe my all, and whom I have offended because of my sins.

I know through philospohy that I can never merit Heaven, for his is nothing but the vision of God Himself, to which there always remains a natural disproportion given my nature, and from which I have, because of my sins, an unbreakable hindrance. Because of my sins, because I have offended a God of infinite majesty, because I have violated the Law of the infinitely Just God, had I done this only once, I would deserve Hell forever.

How, then, can I but sigh in sorrowful pity when the Muslims tell me that I can buy my way out through good deeds?

If Jesus hasn't died on the Cross and risen from the dead, all is lost. Such is, I think, as much as St. Anselm says in Cur Deus Homo (Why God [became] a man). The verdict is already written. The gavel has already sounded. We are guilty. We must pay the price.

Here, we must consider the parable of the workers of Matthew 20. The workers are paid no more, no less, for their work. Why? Because a penny is all that the owner has to give. The owner represents God, and the penny, the beatific vision, i.e., the sight of God Himself seen face to face. What more can God give than Himself? And none of us deserve that. We only gain it because He is generous.
You seem to be under the impression that Muslims buy their way to heaven, and the former being the case, you are misinformed. Rather, I think some self-introspection is due:

Islam recognises God's power to forgive with just His Will. Some of the other religions seem to claim that forgiveness requires a purchase price and if we can't pay it, somebody else has to pay it on our behalf. In Islam, forgiveness comes without a purchase price or any type of sacrifice. We do not/cannot: buy, sacrifice for, earn or steal it. It comes freely when we sincerely ask for forgiveness and truly repent, accepting God's will. As to salvation, that comes from the Mercy of God, and nobody else, nor from any institution.

"Narrated Abu Huraira (May Allah be pleased with him):

Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The deeds of anyone of you will not save you (from the (Hell) Fire)." They said, "Even you (will not be saved by your deeds), O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)?" He said, "No, even I (will not be saved) unless and until Allah bestows His Mercy on me."

Ref Sahih al Bukhari 6463

If Jesus hasn't died on the Cross and risen from the dead, all is lost.
From a salvation point of view, according to current day Christianity, yes.

In Christianity, because of Adam (peace be upon him) eating from the tree, humans became imperfect, and not only Adam (peace be upon him), but all subsequent generations have to bear a punishment from God, fell out of grace with God, mankind's relationship with God was severed, they are born into a state of sin, and death entered the world.

The only thing that can rectify all of that, is a perfect sacrifice, i.e. the sacrifice of what they perceive to be a perfect man. Through what they perceive to be his death and resurrection, they believe that that broken relationship is repaired and that man is reconciled with God. Salvation and reconciliation with God can only be achieved through the crucifixion and acceptance of Jesus (peace be upon him) as their saviour, who they believe died for their sins, and to give them eternal life.

The favourite Christian line from the bible, "For God so loved the world..." when scrutinized, if you take it right back to why "...He gave his only son", doesn't add up though.

It shows a God who will not forgive, punishes other people for a sin they didn't commit, cuts off his relationship with them, makes them fall out of His grace, and makes them born into a state of sin, and then has an innocent man (who actually is Him) begotten, then killed in a torturous death to repair all of that.

Compare with Islam:

God forgave Adam (peace be upon him), and guided him, and has sent guidance for us all, and can forgive us all, freely, when we repent sincerely and ask sincerely, resolving not to repeat past mistakes, and does not expect perfection from us, but simply for us to worship Him alone without any associates, persons or parts to His Exclusive Divinity, and to not ascribe divinity to anybody or anything else, and to do our very best and try our very hardest with all our heart, body and soul, to love and obey Him and the messengers He sent. His Mercy opening the doors to salvation and paradise.

6. And speaking of Heaven and Hell, how do Muslims propose to escape the fires of Hell? Even a single serious sin turns us away from God, makes us enemies of God, and merits everlasting punishment. You'll presumably tell me that God is merciful, but I'll reply that He is Justice Itself. Pray as much as you want, but if there is nothing to counterbalance the infinite debt of punishment that you have merited through your sins, then you have no escape from His righteous indignation.
God is indeed Most Just, which is why nobody carries the sins of another. He doesn't make innocent people die for the sins of others. That is supreme injustice ascribed to God.

We are each responsible for and accountable for our own deeds, good or bad, and for the choices we make in life, each choice having a consequence. Nobody else is responsible for them or carries them away. No innocent person is made to suffer or die for other's sins. Babies are not born in a state of sin, but a state of innocence and purity. There is no concept of original sin, nor of God expecting perfection which cannot be achieved, nor of a broken relationship with God that requires reconciling, nor of ****ation requiring a saviour. Forgiveness is directly from God. Prayer is directly to God. God is the God of all, even of those who don't believe in Him.

In Islam, as Adam (peace be upon him) asked for forgiveness and was forgiven, so we too ask for Allah's forgiveness for our sins, as He loves for us to turn to Him in repentance, and loves forgiving. This forgiveness comes freely, just by Allah's will, when we sincerely ask for forgiveness and truly repent. Forgiveness does not require any type of sacrifice by God. Both Adam and Eve repented and were forgiven by their Merciful Lord; and indeed Adam was then chosen to be the first person to receive guidance from Allah, was honoured by Allah, and is counted among all the other Prophets of Islam. While guidance and the right way has been shown to us, we, as humans, have the freedom to choose, to err, and to repent sincerely, and should we do so, we will find Allah Forgiving. For all in the posterity of Adam, the door of returning to the right path is always open, prior to death.

If Jesus hasn't died on the Cross and risen from the dead, all is lost.
Taking your statement at face value, beliefs left as is, it is indeed. But the door to the right path and repentance is always open, before the angels come for one's soul. It's not too late. Whoever repents, will find Allah Most Pardoning and Forgiving. I hope you will study Islam, ask questions, open your heart and mind to it. I hope you will ponder and reflect, and re-evaluate and reassess the basis for your own beliefs and doctrines. And it is that to which all people are invited by the Qur'an. I hope you will read Brother Muhammad's responses to some of your other posts, here: http://www.islamicboard.com/clarific...ml#post2852193 . Your beliefs regarding God, and which faith you follow, are the biggest, most serious and most important decisions you will ever make, as this life will end one day for all of us, and our position regarding God and His messengers is what makes or breaks our hereafter, which is forever. You owe it to yourself, to not regret in the hereafter, when it'll be too late. Do not view Islam by media portrayals, nor by the actions of some Muslims, but by its message. Study it from its authentic sources and speak to sincere knowledgeable Muslims. We tend to be busy in our lives, but please make the time for it. It'll be the most important thing you ever do.

To end, some quotes from the Qur'an:

"Indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is the straight path." (Spoken by Jesus. 3:51 , 19:36 and 43:64)

And say, "Praise be to Allah, who has no son and no partner in His Dominion... (17:111 part)

Worship Allah exclusively, and do not associate others in His Divinity... (4:36, part)

This is a clear message for mankind in order that they may be warned thereby, and that they may know that He is only One God, and that those of understanding may take heed.(14:52) Say, "O mankind, the truth has come to you from your Lord, so whoever is guided is only guided for [the good of] his soul, and whoever goes astray only goes astray to the detriment of it.." (10:108 part) And fear a Day when you will be returned to Allah. Then every soul will be compensated for what it earned, and they will not be treated unjustly. (2:281)

Peace.
Reply

Abz2000
07-26-2015, 09:40 PM
some of what sister Insaanah described is in the bible itself - ezekiel 18.
traditio, please understand that the bible is full of information (some of which has been lost or changed) pointing towards what was to ultimately be confirmed by God's final Messenger may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.
if you had bothered to read for yourself, the impossibly gymnastic style thinking of the indoctrinated teacher wouldn't have affected you, it's so simple.

i haven't a clue as to why mention of paradise and hell have been substituted for "death and life" but the gist of the message is clear:

1The word of the LORD came unto me again, saying,

2What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?
3As*I live, saith the Lord GOD, ye shall not have*occasion*any more to use this proverb in Israel.*
4Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.

5But if a man be just, and do that which is lawful and right,*
6Andhath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath defiled his neighbour's wife, neither hath come near to a menstruous woman,*
7And hath not oppressed any,*but*hath restored to the debtor his pledge, hath spoiled none by violence, hath given his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a garment;
8He*that*hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase,*that*hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity, hath executed true judgment between man and man,*
9Hath walked in my statutes, and hath kept my judgments, to deal truly; he*is*just, he shall surely live, saith the Lord GOD.

10If he beget a son*that is*a robber, a shedder of blood, and*that*doeth the like to*any*one of these*things,
11And that doeth not any of those*duties, but even hath eaten upon the mountains, and defiled his neighbour's wife,*
12Hath oppressed the poor and needy, hath spoiled by violence, hath not restored the pledge, and hath lifted up his eyes to the idols, hath committed abomination,*
13Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him.

14Now, lo,*if*he beget a son, that seeth all his father's sins which he hath done, and considereth, and doeth not such like,*
15That*hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbour's wife,*
16Neither hath oppressed any, hath not withholden the pledge, neither hath spoiled by violence,*but*hath given his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a garment,*
17Thathath taken off his hand from the poor,*that*hath not received usury nor increase, hath executed my judgments, hath walked in my statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity of his father, he shall surely live.*
18As for*his father, because he cruelly oppressed, spoiled his brother by violence, and did*that*which*is*not good among his people, lo, even he shall die in his iniquity.

19Yet say ye, Why? doth not the son bear the iniquity of the father?
When the son hath done that which is lawful and right,*and*hath kept all my statutes, and hath done them, he shall surely live.
20The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

21But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.*
22All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live.*
23Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD:*and*not that he should return from his ways, and live?

24But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity,*and*doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked*man*doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die.*

25Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal.
Hear now, O house of Israel; Is not my way equal? are not your ways unequal?

26When a righteous*man*turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and dieth in them; for his iniquity that he hath done shall he die.*

27Again, when the wicked*man*turneth away from his wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive.*
28Because he considereth, and turneth away from all his transgressions that he hath committed, he shall surely live, he shall not die.


29Yet saith the house of Israel, The way of the Lord is not equal.
O house of Israel, are not my ways equal? are not your ways unequal?

30Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the Lord GOD. Repent, and turn*yourselves*from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin.*
31Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?*
32For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn*yourselves, and live ye.
13.*Every man's fate We have fastened on his own neck: On the Day of Judgment We shall bring out for him a scroll, which he will see spread open.
14.*(It will be said to him:) "Read thine (own) record: Sufficient is thy soul this day to make out an account against thee."
15.*Who receiveth guidance, receiveth it for his own benefit: who goeth astray doth so to his own loss: No bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another: nor would We visit with Our Wrath until We had sent an apostle (to give warning).
16.*When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We destroy them utterly.
17.*How many generations have We destroyed after Noah? and enough is thy Lord to note and see the sins of His servants.

Quran Chapter 17 The Children of Israel/The Night Journey
Reply

Traditio
07-27-2015, 08:39 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Insaanah
You seem to be under the impression that Muslims buy their way to heaven, and the former being the case, you are misinformed. Rather, I think some self-introspection is due:
This could be ignorance on my part, but it seems as though it seems that you guys are constantly talking about a direct correlation between good deeds and a "reward" in the afterlife based on those good deeds. E.g., if you do such and such a thing during Ramadan, you get 4 times the reward. It's as though you Muslims think that your afterlife is going to be based on some kind of "balance" between your good and evil deeds. Of course, I could be misunderstanding this, but it seems as though you think that your "reward" in the afterlife is going to be based on God rewarding you because of how good your life was, and you will receive this reward for this reason. "I deserve it. Look how well I lived, how much I prayed, how much I gave in charitable donations, etc."

For the Christian (and according to true philosophy), as stated, this simply is nonsense. There is no proportion between our deeds and the "reward" in question. There is an infinite disproportion between man and God.

Islam recognises God's power to forgive with just His Will. Some of the other religions seem to claim that forgiveness requires a purchase price and if we can't pay it, somebody else has to pay it on our behalf. In Islam, forgiveness comes without a purchase price or any type of sacrifice. We do not/cannot: buy, sacrifice for, earn or steal it. It comes freely when we sincerely ask for forgiveness and truly repent, accepting God's will. As to salvation, that comes from the Mercy of God, and nobody else, nor from any institution.
This is a contradiction. God is Justice Itself. If His Justice demands that He exact punishment, then the Divine Will cannot contradict the Divine Justice. After all, God is One, right? [Is this not the very thing that you Muslims never tire of repeating?] A single mortal sin (i.e., a single deliberate act which violates God's Law) brings with it an infinite merit for punishment, involves a complete turning away of the sinner away from God and towards a creature, and demands exclusion from God's Kingdom. And there is nothing that we can possibly do to make up for it. We owed it to God not to have done it in the first place, and anything that we might do afterwards to make up for it, is already owed in justice. It gains us no merits, no forgiveness. Justice, all other things being equal, and there being no other relevent considerations, demands that God exact the punishment which is owed. Your hope in God's mercy, as stated, is groundless and in vain. God. Is. Justice. Such is, I think, as St. Anselm describes in Cur Deus Homo (Why God [became] a Man).

From a salvation point of view, according to current day Christianity, yes.
No, no. In fact. "And if Christ be not risen again, your faith is vain, for you are yet in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17).

Every mortal sin involves wholly turning your back on God. It is a violation, a breach of His Law. It heaps on us infinite merit for condemnation and retribution. Nothing we can do can make up for it, and God will not simply "shrug off" our crimes. He is the Supremely Just Judge. If Jesus has not won for us infinite merits on the Cross, if He has not paid the ransom for our sins, if blood and water has not spilled out of His Sacred Heart, if He has not died and risen from the dead for our salvation, then we have nothing to balance the scales of justice, and God will do what is Just. We must pay for our sins.

In Christianity, because of Adam (peace be upon him) eating from the tree, humans became imperfect, and not only Adam (peace be upon him), but all subsequent generations have to bear a punishment from God, fell out of grace with God, mankind's relationship with God was severed, they are born into a state of sin, and death entered the world.
It's not even the sin of Adam that I'm primarily concerned with. It's my sins that really have me concerned. Consider the strict and narrow requirements of morality (not, of course, the morality of your prophet, but of what we can know by natural reason; consider the demands of temperance, justice, prudence and fortitude), and consider all of the times that you yourself have violated them. Consider all of the times that you have failed "to love the Lord, thy God with all of your heart, mind and strength, and your neighbor as yourself." Today. This week. This month. This year. Your entire life. Add it up. And consider that you have no way of making up for it (consider Luke 7:42).

The only thing that can rectify all of that, is a perfect sacrifice, i.e. the sacrifice of what they perceive to be a perfect man. Through what they perceive to be his death and resurrection, they believe that that broken relationship is repaired and that man is reconciled with God. Salvation and reconciliation with God can only be achieved through the crucifixion and acceptance of Jesus (peace be upon him) as their saviour, who they believe died for their sins, and to give them eternal life.
Jesus Christ, Divine Mercy Itself, being fully God and fully man, offered up a sacrifice which justly could not be exacted from Him. Being sinless and not deserving of death, He was put to death for our salvation. Being God, the merits He won were infinite. Being man, He won those merits on man's behalf, thereby balancing the scales of justice for all who are incorporated into His body through Divine Charity, i.e., the indwelling of the Holy Ghost, who is Charity/Divine Love Itself.

If that hasn't happened, we are still dead in our sins with absolutely no hope of redemption, and we have the grim assurance that our debts will be collected in due time.

It shows a God who will not forgive, punishes other people for a sin they didn't commit, cuts off his relationship with them, makes them fall out of His grace, and makes them born into a state of sin, and then has an innocent man (who actually is Him) begotten, then killed in a torturous death to repair all of that.

God. Is. Justice.
Contemplate that, and you may realize how hollow your assertion "It shows a God who will not forgive" sounds. Furthermore, God didn't cut off His relationship with us. We cut off our relationship with Him, i.e., by sinning. I don't merely mean the original sin of Adam; I mean, in addition, our personal sins, i.e., the ones for which we are personally responsible. Every time you violated God's law, every time you deliberately did something significantly morally wrong, you yourself have made yourself an enemy of God. You have irretrievably, irredeemably, with no hope of going back, turned your back on God and denied God as the highest object of your love and as your Lawgiver and Lord.

In order to rectify this, a special action of God, i.e., the infusion of Divine Grace, vis-a-vis the charity of the Holy Ghost, is necessary. But you don't deserve it. Not in the least. You deserve the opposite. You deserve to be left to your own sins, to your own wretched desires (I mean no offense; for wretched, miserable and perverted are the hearts of men). You (and I, for among sinners, "I am the first") deserve to pay for your crimes forever and receive punishment without end in Hell. That is what Justice demands. And. God. Is. Justice.

Compare with Islam:

God forgave Adam (peace be upon him), and guided him, and has sent guidance for us all, and can forgive us all, freely, when we repent sincerely and ask sincerely, resolving not to repeat past mistakes, and does not expect perfection from us, but simply for us to worship Him alone without any associates, persons or parts to His Exclusive Divinity, and to not ascribe divinity to anybody or anything else, and to do our very best and try our very hardest with all our heart, body and soul, to love and obey Him and the messengers He sent. His Mercy opening the doors to salvation and paradise.
In other words: the Islamic God isn't Just. But a God who is not Just is not God.

God is indeed Most Just, which is why nobody carries the sins of another. He doesn't make innocent people die for the sins of others. That is supreme injustice ascribed to God.

We are each responsible for and accountable for our own deeds, good or bad, and for the choices we make in life, each choice having a consequence. Nobody else is responsible for them or carries them away. No innocent person is made to suffer or die for other's sins. Babies are not born in a state of sin, but a state of innocence and purity. There is no concept of original sin, nor of God expecting perfection which cannot be achieved, nor of a broken relationship with God that requires reconciling, nor of ****ation requiring a saviour. Forgiveness is directly from God. Prayer is directly to God. God is the God of all, even of those who don't believe in Him.
1. Original sin doesn't imply personal guilt for those born of Adam.

2. If the Islamic God does not expect perfection, then once again, the Islamic God is not God. Thus is displayed the true wisdom of the Christian Faith, for Jesus counsels: "Be you therefore perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Matthew 5:48). Does the Islamic God not expect perfection in our moral conduct? Does He not expect us to adhere to the "straight and narrow" path of right living? But this is owed in Justice. If God does not expect it, then God is not Just, for Justice Itself demands it. And. God. Is. Justice.

In Islam, as Adam (peace be upon him) asked for forgiveness and was forgiven
In expectation of Jesus' sacrifice. The Old Testament patriarchs were forgiven and saved through the blood of Jesus, our paschal sacrifice.
Reply

greenhill
07-27-2015, 10:33 AM
So we have moved on from the OP to the subject of heaven.

I wished the quoted response had the poster info so I can see where it came from and sequence as some rebuttal seemed at tangents.

You repeated many times that God.Is.Justice. The Muslims believe in Allah, the name, His Name. To know Him, know His Names. The foremost two ir-Rohman and ir-Roheem. And both names reflect a 'forgiving (and caring?) nature. Allah has many other names (97 other). So Allah is not just about Justice. Now He is the Most Forgiving, All Seeing, Hearing, Dispenser of Affairs, Sustainer etc and when the time comes for judgment, there will be justice, as Allah is also a Judge Most Fair.

I'm still grappling with trying to address your rather detailed dissection of abstract points about heaven and how impossible it is to get there. :hmm:

I'll stop here for now because typing on this phone is a real pain...

:peace:



What is the underlying message in all what we are trying to say is that we should never be presumptuous.
Reply

Abz2000
07-27-2015, 03:14 PM
it's easy to get to heaven anyways.
ryanair, easyjet, emirates, turkish airlines are among a few that can help.
getting to the gardens of Paradise requires a little more effort though.

seems like the translators of the new testament got lost in translation somewhere- or maybe assumed the since Jesus was waiting the duration in heaven before completing the task that it must've been the same thing.
God knows.

God makes a clear distinction in the Quran,
rijzan min al samaa doesn't mean "(abomination/punishment of destruction) from paradise", it means "(abomination/punishment of destruction) from the sky.

i saw satan appearing as lightning from the heavens (luke 10:18) ("baraq o bama" in hebrew) also doesn't mean satan appearing as lightening from paradise.
bama means high place/stage/elevated place apparently.

O Allah, please protect the Muslims from obama's drones.
Reply

Traditio
07-27-2015, 05:16 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by greenhill
I wished the quoted response had the poster info so I can see where it came from and sequence as some rebuttal seemed at tangents.
It's all coming from the previous post by Insaanah.

You repeated many times that God.Is.Justice.
Well, there are two reasons for that. 1. I thought it was an important point to hammer in. 2. Rhetorically, I thought it sounded good when read aloud.

The Muslims believe in Allah, the name, His Name. To know Him, know His Names. The foremost two ir-Rohman and ir-Roheem. And both names reflect a 'forgiving (and caring?) nature. Allah has many other names (97 other). So Allah is not just about Justice. Now He is the Most Forgiving, All Seeing, Hearing, Dispenser of Affairs, Sustainer etc and when the time comes for judgment, there will be justice, as Allah is also a Judge Most Fair.
But "God is one," isn't He? Isn't this the very thing of which Muslims never tire of repeating to Christian? Do you insist on nothing else more vehemently? "God is one." I agree. God is The One Itself, and I take my start from what Plato says in the Parmenides: "The One is not many." If, then, we are to refuse to divide the One (and Muslims, at least seemingly, insist that we must not divide or multiply the One God), how, then, can you expect me to be impressed when you speak of 99 names of God, as though one attribute of God possibly could "cancel out" or "outweigh" another?

No, I affirm emphatically: "The One is not many," and "God is One." If, therefore, we predicate a pure perfection positively of the One God, we must not be deluded by language into thinking that it is one thing for God to be God and another thing for God to be that which we predicate of Him. You say that God is merciful? I agree, but understand: it is not one thing for God to be God, another thing for God to be merciful. God is Mercy Itself. The very essence of God is Mercy. [To deny this would be to divide the One God.] And likewise on with all other pure perfections: God is wise, good, true, beautiful, loving? Yes, but even moreso: God is Wisdom Itself, Goodness Itself, Truth Itself, Beauty Itself, Charity Itself.

Therefore, is God just or not? To deny this would be blasphemy. But if you affirm it, then you must agree with me: "God is Justice Itself." It is not one thing for God to be God, another thing for God to be just. The very nature of God is Justice. Will you tell me that God's Justice is merciful? I'll agree with you, and so will the multitudes of the souls in Hell who have been condemned forever because of their sins, for God is merciful even to them: He prevented them from heaping up even greater guilt upon themselves while they lived.

If God is Justice Itself, I say, then what you Muslims have said cannot be true. Unless Christ has died and risen from the dead, unless the blood of Jesus has been shed to pray the price of our sins, God cannot be "all forgiving," for He is Justice, and Justice is not all-forgiving (unless there be just occassion for it). Justice renders to each precisely according to his due. It does not say: "Well, here are your crimes, but look at all of these good things that you have done, so I'll overlook them." No. Justice, all else being equal, and there being no other relevent concerns, requires that you be given the due punishment for every single one of your crimes against God's Holy Law (any serious one of which merits everlasting punishment). You are guilty, and God is Justice. Contemplate that.

Again, I urge you and the rest of you Muslims: consider the gravity of any one of your sins. Consider the purity of the Law that you have violated. Consider the Infinite Majesty of the God that you have offended. And seriously consider the weight of your sins. What do you justly deserve?

I'm still grappling with trying to address your rather detailed dissection of abstract points about heaven and how impossible it is to get there. :hmm:
I have a more detailed account of this in the "Jesus was a Muslim" thread, in my extended posting under the heading "Islam." There's a quote from a metaphysics lecture of mine.
Reply

Abz2000
07-27-2015, 07:57 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
If God is Justice Itself, I say, then what you Muslims have said cannot be true. Unless Christ has died and risen from the dead, unless the blood of Jesus has been shed to pray the price of our sins, God cannot be "all forgiving," for He is Justice, and Justice is not all-forgiving (unless there be just occassion for it). Justice renders to each precisely according to his due. It does not say: "Well, here are your crimes, but look at all of these good things that you have done, so I'll overlook them." No. Justice, all else being equal, and there being no other relevent concerns, requires that you be given the due punishment for*every single one*of your crimes against God's Holy Law (any serious*one*of which merits everlasting punishment). You are*guilty, and God is*Justice. Contemplate that.
maybe you're unfamiliar with the term "repentance"?
maybe "he came to preach the forgiveness of sins" has been forgotten.

Know that God can change the dimensions of the heavens and the earth in order to forgive a person if He sees sincerity in the person's will to walk aright.

Most of us know by now that God revealed the guidance to Prophet Muhammad pbuh in truth, however the seperatism and self glory, the selfish contumacy, jealousy and arrogance is causing a barrier between themselves and forgiveness, know that Iblis (one of those "fire people") did the same thing.
you can play with all these hypothetical arguments all you like but it won't make a difference to God. "me fire him clay - unfair to make me prostrate" etc.
When God says you prostrate to clay, you do it. Now that He has permanently forbidden you, you refrain.
If you made foolish mistakes in between, then repent, and repent every time.
Submission to God requires humility and acceptance of His wisdom.
He's at the top of the chain of command, and remains there.

your reasoning that Christ died to bear your sins doesn't hold water anyway.
1. he didn't die
2. he told you to repent.
3. the book you claim to follow says that he told people who were weeping "worry about your own children".
4. those among the children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed by Christ.
5. God confirmed in the Quran that the man was neither killed, nor crucified - the sabotage and excessive and haphazard plotting and planning of the criminals ended up undoing themselves and opening the door to a miraculous intervention. (not that God can't intervene anyway, just that He usually plays them at their game as He did with Pharaoh).
Reply

Traditio
07-27-2015, 10:49 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
maybe you're unfamiliar with the term "repentance"?
maybe "he came to preach the forgiveness of sins" has been forgotten.
Considered solely by itself as a merely human act, repentance is absolutely worthless with respect to atoning for sins. What you do after you have committed a crime is irrelevent to whether or not you are guilty of that crime.

Consider the following discourse between a judge and an arsenist:

Judge: Did you burn down the building?
Arsenist: Yes, but I felt really bad about it. In fact, I apologized afterwards and offered to make restitution, and resolved no longer to burn down buildings.
Judge: But, to be clear, you did burn down the building?
Arsenist: Yes.
Judge: So you admit that you are guilty of the crime in question?
Arsenist: No, no, I was guilty, but then I repented.

What do you suppose would happen next?

Know that God can change the dimensions of the heavens and the earth in order to forgive a person if He sees sincerity in the person's will to walk aright.
God is Justice Itself. He cannot be unjust or act unjustly. Justice implies giving to each exactly his due. Repentance doesn't change what you deserve for the crime from which you have repented. Yes, apologize. Make restitution. Resolve no longer to commit such crimes/sins. It would be worse for you, it would make you a worse human being, if you had not done these things. But it doesn't diminish your guilt, your just merit for retribution/punishment, even a little bit (since you should never have committed the crime/sin in the first place), and God. Is. Justice.

If you tell me that you believe otherwise because your prophet has said so, then I'll tell you that your prophet is mistaken and has spoken poorly about the Supremely Just Judge.

I don't need your prophet to know what justice is, what it implies or that God is Justice Itself. These things are evident to philosophical reason. If he disagrees with them even a little, then he disagrees with the plain truths of natural reason, and he speaks erroneously.

Here, of course, you should object: "But Traditio, you believe that, on Good Friday, Mercy triumphed over Justice." And I'll agree: "Yes, because Divine Mercy (i.e., the Word Incarnate) has paid the price of Justice." God's Mercy necessarily must be Just.

your reasoning that Christ died to bear your sins doesn't hold water anyway.
1. he didn't die
2. he told you to repent.
3. the book you claim to follow says that he told people who were weeping "worry about your own children".
4. those among the children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed by Christ.
5. God confirmed in the Quran that the man was neither killed, nor crucified - the sabotage and excessive and haphazard plotting and planning of the criminals ended up undoing themselves and opening the door to a miraculous intervention. (not that God can't intervene anyway, just that He usually plays them at their game as He did with Pharaoh).
Let us suppose, for a moment, that you deny that Jesus died on the cross for our salvation. That doesn't change my previous arguments at all. Even if Jesus has not died for us, there is no forgiveness of sins apart from Him. Either He has died for us, or else, we are all doomed because of our sins against God. You deny the former? Then you must grant the latter. In the words of St. Augustine: "Either mercy or justice." Your prophet erroneously attempts to deny both horns of the dilemma, but such cannot be admitted.

What St. Paul says, in the following quotation, is no great religious revelation. It's something which should be patently obvious to anyone: "And if Christ be not risen again, your faith is vain, for you are yet in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17).
Reply

Abz2000
07-28-2015, 12:21 AM
look mate, you are foolish to knowingly disrespect the final Messenger of God pbuh when he conveyed God's commands as instructed and did his best in the process.
secondly, either paul was a Roman shill or he was just a bit confused, or someone wrote a lot of wrong things about him.
i didn't tell him to eat pig, nor to tell people it's legal.
neither did i tell him to forbid circumcision, nor to claim that the law of God was void.
the test of the law at the time and the suspicious virgin birth was to show those lost sheep that they were erroneously putting letter over spirit and removing their hearts from God.

Many shall come unto me that day saying lord lord did we not prophesy in your name and cast out evil spirits?
and i shall say: i never knew you depart from me, i never knew you, you criminals.
Reply

Zafran
07-28-2015, 04:09 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Considered solely by itself as a merely human act, repentance is absolutely worthless with respect to atoning for sins. What you do after you have committed a crime is irrelevent to whether or not you are guilty of that crime.
No not if the person/state/God forgives you for the crime. Thats what forgiveness is - If you want a blood sacrifice then that's not forgiveness its the opposite.

From your post you don't understand what forgiveness is and Justice is.

I Steal money from you
You find me
Get Your money back

JUSTICE

I steal money from you
You find me
You Forgive me

FORGIVENESS.

As the verse in the Quran reminds us

24:22
"Let not those among you who are endued with grace and amplitude of means resolve by oath against helping their kinsmen, those in want, and those who have left their homes in Allah's cause: let them forgive and overlook, do you not wish that Allah should forgive you? For Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."

Amen to that.
Reply

Traditio
07-28-2015, 04:35 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Zafran
No not if the person/state/God forgives you for the crime. Thats what forgiveness is - If you want a blood sacrifice then that's not forgiveness its the opposite.
It's forgiveness with respect to us. We weren't owed a savior. Once again, the words of St. Paul come to mind:

"But God commendeth his charity towards us; because when as yet we were sinners, according to the time, Christ died for us; much more therefore, being now justified by his blood, shall we be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son; much more, being reconciled, shall we be saved by his life" (Romans 5:8-10).

That may or may not be sufficient explanation and defense with respect to your point on my part, but my reply may be rather "clipped." If I've been too concise, feel free to ask for further explanation.

From your post you don't understand what forgiveness is and Justice is.

I Steal money from you
You find me
Get Your money back

JUSTICE
That's not justice. You should never have stolen money from me in the first place. Not only am I owed my money back, but you are owed punishment for the crime that you have committed.

Once again, justice is the virtue according to which each is given according to his due (as Plato says), and this is effected by instantiating proportional equality (as Aristotle says).

I steal money from you
You find me
You Forgive me

FORGIVENESS.
This works in the case of the individual (and even there, there's a question of what's really "going on," so to speak). In the case of the State, it works less well. Should the judge in my previous dialogue "forgive" the arsenist, even if the owner of the building is willing to drop the charges? No. What is called for is the strict administration of justice. I don't care how sorry the arsenist is. I don't care if he's made retribution. I don't care if he's apologized. He needs to go to prison for a long time. That is what he deserves, if he does not deserve even more than that. He has violated the order of justice with respect to the political community, and he must pay for his crimes. Even after he's made his apology, felt remorseful and made restitution, the scales of justice still are tipped against him. He still deserves to be punished (and this is, let us note, still merely in the human order).

Furthermore, note that, in your examples, you've opposed justice and forgiveness, asserting that each requires something different. In the case of God, this scarcely can be admitted. Once again, do you not insist that "God is One"?

Necessarily, if God forgives, justice thereby will have been satisfied. Once again, the Muslim claim is that God forgives in spite of justice. I claim that God forgives by effecting justice. Do you see why I consider the Muslim claims on the matter scarcely credible?

[And note, here, incidentally, how obvious false the protestant doctrine of "inputed righteousness" is. The protestants claim that Jesus' blood somehow "covers over" our sinfulness, and God declares us righteousness in spite of the fact that we are sinners. The Catholics, on the contrary, believe that God, actually makes us righteous, vis-a-vis the grace of the Holy Ghost, which we believe is transformative, and for this reason, judges His completed handiwork righteous. In other words, the protestants claim that Christians are judged righteous in spite of the fact that they aren't. Catholics believe that God judges a saint righteous because God has made him righteous. The Protestant insists on mercy in spite of justice (and, may I add, makes of God a liar and a fraud). The Catholic insists that justice is effected even in the mercy of God.]
Reply

Abz2000
07-28-2015, 07:20 AM
and i saw the woman (wh0re) drunk with the blood of the saints........(book of revelation).

yup, the idea of drinking blood seems to have got the transgressors intoxicated.
makes me think of vampires, vlad dracul and pyrophilia.
Reply

Traditio
07-28-2015, 07:53 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
and i saw the woman (wh0re) drunk with the blood of the saints........(book of revelation).

yup, the idea of drinking blood seems to have got the transgressors intoxicated.
makes me think of vampires, vlad dracul and pyrophilia.
Tell me, Abz, what if I treated the Quran in this way? What if I selected verses, completely out of context, completely ignoring the traditional interpretation of those verses, simply in order to make Islam appear ridiculous? Would you be in the least convinced by this? Or would you roll your eyes and pity me because of my ignorance, because of my baseness, and because of my clear lack of any insight, understanding or education in the manner?
Reply

Traditio
07-28-2015, 08:08 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Abz2000
look mate, you are foolish to knowingly disrespect the final Messenger of God pbuh when he conveyed God's commands as instructed and did his best in the process.
You understand that I can't admit this, yes?

secondly, either paul was a Roman shill or he was just a bit confused, or someone wrote a lot of wrong things about him.
i didn't tell him to eat pig, nor to tell people it's legal.[/quote[

Are you familiar with Plautus, by chance?

pquote]neither did i tell him to forbid circumcision
St. Paul never said that circumcision is forbidden. He simply asserted that it's not necessary for salvation. But if you draw, I say, such an erroneous belief from your prophet, then, so say I, are multiplied the proofs that your prophet was no prophet. If he didn't understand the teachings of Christianity, and yet dared to speak of it, how could he have been a messenger of God?

nor to claim that the law of God was void.
Neither Jesus nor St. Paul ever claimed any such thing, nor do Catholics now believe such a thing. We correctly understand that the Mosaic Law may be divided into three sets of precepts: Moral, judicial and ceremonial. The ceremonial precepts have been fulfilled in the coming of Our Lord. The judicial precepts no longer apply, since the Jewish State is no longer "a thing," so to speak, for Christians. Just as the laws of Germany don't apply to Americans, the laws of the Jews don't apply to Christians. But the Moral Law, i.e., the law of right conduct, always applies, and we Christians do not repudiate it in the least. In fact, it is only through Jesus, through the sending of the Holy Ghost, that it is fully possible to live out even the moral precepts of the Law, for they are grounded in love: and the Holy Ghost is Charity Itself.

On the contrary, it is the Muslims who reject the laws of morality, you people, I say, who assert that it is ever OK to lie. You people, I say, who fail to understand the marriage is between ONE man and ONE woman, for even in the beginning, Our Lord tells us, "they became one flesh." You people, I say, who fail to understand that divorce...-Sigh.-

You Muslims, you act as though you desire to bring back the Law of Moses, and more besides. Yet you completely fail to understand what the Law of Moses was for, what it was that Moses was attempting to convey at God's command. And you ignore the fact that the Law testifies to Our Lord. You want to appeal to the Old Testament prophets? You want to appeal to Abraham? Then I will remind you of what the father of our faith said:

"And he took the wood for the holocaust, and laid it upon Isaac his son: and he himself carried in his hands fire and a sword. And as they two went on together, Isaac said to his father: My father. And he answered: What wilt thou, son? Behold, saith he, fire and wood: where is the victim for the holocaust? And Abraham said: God will provide himself a victim for an holocaust, my son. So they went on together" (Genesis 22:6-8).

Consider, Isaac, forced to the carry the very wood upon which he is to be sacrificed, but Abraham, in his faith, though he has been commanded to sacrifice His one, only begotten son, tells Isaac that God will provide the sacrifice. How can you not think of Our dear Lord Jesus Christ, carrying the wood of His own cross, the Only Begotten One, up the hill of Calvary, the One Sacrifice that God has provided for our sins?

You believe in Abraham? Abraham had faith, albeit implicity, in Jesus. You appeal to Moses? He wrote of Jesus, and testified to Him. The paschal sacrifice signifies Jesus.

You claim that the Old Testament or the New testifies to your prophet? Then you are mistaken. The Old Testament testifies to Jesus. The cerimonial precepts of the Old Law foreshadow the coming of Our Lord.

The Law has been fulfilled in Jesus, for the ceremonial precepts foreshadowed His sacrifice at Calvary.
Reply

Abz2000
07-28-2015, 08:08 AM
would've been more harnonious had you refrained from ignorantly/purposefully trying to push the ramblings of an ex?-roman agent (who never knew and disbelieved in Jesus up until and after his ascension, then killed many believers before claiming to have seen a disputed vision) over the teachings of a messenger of God in the process of being utterly and unnecessarily disrespectful. Repent.

Biochemist David Dolphin speculated in a 1985 speech that erythropoietic porphyria cases may have been the basis for vampire legends, due to the sufferers' sensitivity to light and strange appearance.
He also suggested that people with porphyria may have craved and ingested blood in the belief that it would alleviate their symptoms and that they have an aversion to garlic......"*

After all, heme is what the body is ultimately craving for when an attack occurs.
When encountering the supernatural, consider the evidence because it usually provides an alternately plausible explanation. Have a safe All Hallow's Eve, and remember that those vampires may be nothing more than ordinary people experiencing distress.
Have a treat on me.
edit: the post you made in the meantime seems geared towards effecting an emotional response in order to bring one down to a level of bickering and side taking based on banalities.
like something out of the last temptation - mind you the encounter with Paul in that base movie was almost prophetic.

i would take the time to respond if i was obliged to or believed anything positive would come out of it.

Those who witness no falsehood, and, if they*pass*by futility, they*pass*by it with*honourable*(avoidance);.
Quran 25:72
Reply

greenhill
07-28-2015, 04:06 PM
You seem very intent on crime and punishment. Either on or off. Almost robotic and prone to system error. What you have failed to put into consideration are the complexities of life. We are a learning creature. By right, we should be trying to improve our spiritual self and in the process make mistakes, pushed to crimes but make amends from having learnt the hard way, so to speak. If I destroy property, I rebuild, replace, perhaps also in other ways that the the wrong could be at least evened out, and something which you have not considered (hence on/off statement earlier) that it may be put to experience and making a mistake. Don't repeat it. The second time may not be viewed so kindly.

Also to consider, we are Allah's creatures. It cannot be that he put us here with everything set for us to be doomed. That from the time we hitmaturity to death we are not allowed to make any mistakes, to grow and learn? No opportunity for seeking forgiveness and repentance? That there is no hope for us human to find within our own capacity through intentions and deeds a road to salvation? The world is rather bleak the way you've painted it.

:peace:
Reply

Traditio
07-28-2015, 07:02 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by greenhill
You seem very intent on crime and punishment. Either on or off.
Yes. I don't think that you're fully grasping what a mortal sin is. A mortal sin is not a simple mistake. It is not simply human weakness. It is a deliberate act or failure to act in direct violation of the Law of God. It is a deliberate act or failure to act which greviously violates morality or divine law. A mortal sin is a crime against God. Either you have violated the law or you have kept the law. There is no in between.

For example: Either you deliberately and intentionally did commit adultery, or else, you were faithful (at least in intention) to your wife. There is no in between. To which you'll tell me (as, e.g., from Aristotle): "But I thought the woman was my wife. It was dark. It sounded just like her. She looked just like her. She had my wife's ID. I took reasonable steps to make sure that it was my wife, and I was mistaken through no fault of my own." And I'll answer: "Then you have not deliberately and intentionally violated fidelity to your wife. You intended to be faithful and made a simple mistake, which is not a sin/crime."

When we are talking about sin, there are two, and only two, options: Did you break the law of God (i.e., by intentionally/deliberately doing or not doing something contrary to the law) or not?

Which is, let us note, why I'm simply not impressed when the Muslims talk as though there is some kind of balancing act between good and evil deeds. No. A mortal sin is a crime against God. No number of good deeds, no kind of repentance (insofar as a merely human act), etc., can make you less guilty if you have committed a crime/sin against God.

Almost robotic and prone to system error. What you have failed to put into consideration are the complexities of life. We are a learning creature. By right, we should be trying to improve our spiritual self and in the process make mistakes, pushed to crimes but make amends from having learnt the hard way, so to speak. If I destroy property, I rebuild, replace, perhaps also in other ways that the the wrong could be at least evened out, and something which you have not considered (hence on/off statement earlier) that it may be put to experience and making a mistake. Don't repeat it. The second time may not be viewed so kindly.
If you deliberately and intentionally vandalize the property of someone else, in full knowledge that you ought not, it's not enough to rebuild, replace, apologize, etc. You have violated the order of peace and trust between citizens. You have violated the order of the political community. You have broken the law of the State and deserve retribution/punishment for your crime over and above any simple restitution which you might owe.

Also to consider, we are Allah's creatures. It cannot be that he put us here with everything set for us to be doomed. That from the time we hit maturity to death we are not allowed to make any mistakes, to grow and learn? No opportunity for seeking forgiveness and repentance? That there is no hope for us human to find within our own capacity through intentions and deeds a road to salvation? The world is rather bleak the way you've painted it.

:peace:
The world as I've painted it is the only way that we can consider the world if Jesus hasn't died and risen from the dead, if there are no sacraments of the Church to incorporate us into the body of Christ, against Whom there is no judgment, if the the blood of Jesus has not been spilled, "blotting out the handwriting of the decree that was against us, which was contrary to us," if Jesus has not "taken the same out of the way, fastening it to the cross" (Colossians 2:14). A mortal sin is a crime against a God who is Justice Itself, Majesty Itself, Holiness Itself and Law Itself. It is a crime against a Supremely Holy, Just and Impartial Judge who cannot be deceived, and before the "eyes" of whom all crimes and all guilt openly are displayed, before whom we have no excuses. It is no wonder that the Pslamist sings to God as he does: "If thou, O Lord, wilt mark iniquities: Lord, who shall stand it" (Psalms 129:3 in the Douay Rheims/Vulgate; Psalms 130:3 in modern editions).

Thus does St. Peter write: "And if the just man shall scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear" (1 Peter 4:18).

There are two, and only two, options. Either God Himself has paid for us the price of justice, or else, we will have to pay it without end in Hell. Either Incarnate Divine Mercy, or else, Divine Justice. Either God Himself has become a man to be our Savior, or else, Justice Itself will condemn us for our sins. There is no third option. Either way, your faith in God's mercy, as described by your prophet, is in vain.
Reply

Abz2000
07-28-2015, 07:43 PM
Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him) said:I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) saying, "I swear by Allah that I seek Allah's Pardon and turn to Him in repentance more than seventy times a day."[Al-Bukhari]

.وعن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال‏:‏ سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول “والله إني لأستغفر الله وأتوب إليه في اليوم أكثر من سبعين مرة‏"‏ ‏(‏‏(‏رواه البخاري‏)‏‏)‏‏

.‏Sunnah.com reference*:*Book 20, Hadith 2Arabic/English book reference*:*Book 20, Hadith 1870Report Error*|*Share


Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him) said:The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "By the One in Whose Hand my soul is! If you do not commit sins, Allah would replace you with a people who would commit sins and seek forgiveness from Allah; and Allah will certainly forgive them."[Muslim].

وعنه رضي الله عنه قال‏:‏ قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏:‏ ‏*"‏والذي نفسي بيده لو لم تذنبوا، لذهب الله تعالى بكم، ولجاء بقوم يذنبون فيستغفرون الله تعالى فيغفر لهم‏"‏ ‏(‏‏(‏رواه مسلم‏)‏‏)

‏‏.‏Sunnah.com reference*:*Book 20, Hadith 3Arabic/English book reference*:*Book 20, Hadith 1871Report Error*|*Share



Allah says: “Say: O my Servants who have transgressed against their souls! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: for Allah forgives all sins: for He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” [Sûrah al-Zumar: 53]

This verse speaks about those who repent. It tells us that any sin, no matter how major, is expiated by sincere and proper repentance.*There are conditions for repentance to be sincere and proper. The first of these is that the penitent person desists from the sinful act. The second is that he feels deep and genuine regret for having committed the sin. The third is that he resolves in his heart never to return to the sin again. Finally, if the sin caused a transgression against the rights of another person, he needs to do his best to make amends.*

When Allah sees this sincere repentance from one of His servants – a servant who truly turns to his Lord in fear and hope – He not only forgives the sin, but replaces those sins for good deeds to the servant’s credit. This is from Allah’s infinite grace and munificence.*

Allah says: “Unless he repents, believes, and works righteous deeds, for Allah will change the evil of such persons into good, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful,” [Sûrah al-Furqân: 70]*

Allah says this right after mentioning the sins of polytheism, murder, and adultery. However, this blessing is only for one who have faith, whose repentance is sincere, and who strives to work righteous deeds.*Allah’s generosity is so far-reaching, that we are not only forgiven through our specific repentance for each sin that we commit, but we can attain forgiveness simply through our constant appeals Allah to forgive us.*Another way that we attain Allah’s forgiveness is through the performance of good deeds.

Allah says: “Establish worship at the two ends of the day and in some watches of the night. Lo! Good deeds annul evil deeds. This is reminder for the mindful.” [Sûrah Hûd: 114]*

Some scholars are of the view that his verse is only speaking about the forgiveness of minor sins, and that major sins need specific repentance. They cite the following verse in support of this interpretation:*

Allah says “If you shun the most heinous sins which you are forbidden, We will do away with your small sins and admit you to a gate of great honor.” [Sûrah al-Nisâ’: 31]*

They also cite a number of hadîth, including the hadîth related by `Uthman that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Any Muslim who offers the prescribed prayer, doing justice to its motions and to the humility that it requires, it will expiate for the sins that preceded it, as long as the person did not commit a major sin.” [Sahîh Muslim]*

However, Ibn Taymiyah and a number of other scholars consider the verse “Good deeds annul evil deeds” to be general in meaning. It applies to all sins, major and minor. Even if a person’s good deeds do not expiate for the sin directly, there can be no doubt that those good deeds weigh in the balance of deeds on the Day of Judgment in a person’s favor. Whoever has his good days outweigh his evil deeds on that Day will attain salvation.*

Allah says: “The balance that day will be true: those whose scale (of good) will be heavy will prosper, and as for those whose measure (of good deeds) is light, their souls will be in perdition, for that they wrongfully treated Our signs.” [Sûrah al-A`râf: 8-9]*

Ibn Mas`ûd said: “People will be take into account on the Day of Judgment. Whoever has a single sin to his account more than his good deeds will enter the Fire. Whoever has a single good deed to his account greater than his sinful deeds will enter Paradise.”*

Then Ibn Mas`ûd recited Allah’s words: “…those whose scale (of good) will be heavy, will prosper”.*Then he said: “Indeed, the balance will weigh an atom’s weight one way or another.”*

Allah also forgives us our sins through the difficulties that we face in life. When we are stricken with illness or suffer from circumstances, we will earn forgiveness if we bear them patiently seeking Allah’s reward.*Allah forgives our sins on account of the supplications that others make to Allah asking for our forgiveness, including our funeral prayers.

We earn forgiveness through the charity we gave in our lives that continue to provide benefit to others after our deaths. We earn forgiveness if we have pious children who beseech Allah on our behalf.*A Muslim’s sins are likewise forgiven through the punishment he may receive in the grave. Those sins are also forgiven by the intercession that the Prophet (peace be upon him) will make on that day, and then by the intercession those who are granted intercession. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “My intercession is for those who committed major sins from among my followers.”*

Above and beyond all of this is the mercy of the Most-Merciful Lord who pardons on that Day all sins as He pleases, as long as the person meets Him worshipping Him alone without ascribing to Him any partner.

http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-299-3181.htm
Al-Tirmidhi HadithHadith 1579********Narrated by Shaddad ibn Aws and as-Sunabihi

Shaddad and as-Sunabihi told how, when they went to visit an invalid,
they said to him, "How are you this morning?"
He replied, "I am quite comfortable this morning."
Shaddad told him to rejoice that his evil deeds had been atoned for and his sins remitted,
for he had heard Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) declare that Allah who is Great and Glorious says,

"When I afflict a servant of mine who is a believer and he praises me for the affliction I have brought upon him, he will rise from that couch of his as sinless as he was the day his mother gave birth to him."

The Lord, Who is Blessed and Exalted, will say, "I fettered and afflicted my servant, so record for him what you were recording for him when he was well."

Ahmad transmitted it.


1And he entered into a ship, and passed over, and came into his own city.

2And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed:

and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy;

Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee.*

3And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This*manblasphemeth.*

4And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts?*
5For whether is easier, to say,*Thy*sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk?*
6But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.*
7And he arose, and departed to his house.
8But when the multitudes saw*it, they marvelled, and glorified God, which had given such power unto men.

9And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.
10And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples.*
11And when the Pharisees saw*it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners?*
12But when Jesus heard*that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.*
13But go ye and learn what*that*meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice:
for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.


Matthew 9
Found in:*110 Ahadith Qudsi (Sacred Hadith)
Hadith no: 12

Narrated: Abu HurairaI heard Allah's Messenger (PBUH) saying:
There were two fraternal persons among the Children of Israel.
One of them was engrossed in committing sins while the other was devoted to worship.
The devotee used to see his fellow committing sin and advise him: Desist from doing so.
One day when he found his fellow committing sin. He said to him: Avoid it.
His fellow said: Leave me alone. Have you been sent out as a vigilant on me.
The devotee said: By Allah, He will neither forgive you nor admit you to Paradise.

When they died, they were gathered before the Lord of the worlds.
Allah asked the devotee: Were you assured of knowing Me or were you having power over what was in My Hands?
Then He said to the sinner: Go and enter Paradise by My Mercy; and ordered the angels about the devotee: Lead him to Hell.

(This Hadith is sound and reported by Abu Da'ud in his Sunan).

After narrating the Hadith, Abu Huraira commented:
By Him in Whose Hand my soul is: One word spoken by the devotee ruined his good deeds in the world as well as in the Hereafter. *

This Hadith signifies that no body should claim whether one would enter Paradise or step into Hell because the verdict here, is for Allah Who is All-Omnipotent over every thing, will decide whatever He likes.
A righteous person is required to do good and avoid evil for the sake of Allah only and advise others with the same.
He should not say such words as to challenge the authority of Allah.
Moreover, it is wrong to feel desperate from the Mercy of Allah.*


Isaiah 43:25*- I, [even] I, [am] he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins.

and since you like quoting paul - here's a little gift for ya:

Romans 3:23*- For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Reply

Zafran
07-28-2015, 11:01 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
It's forgiveness with respect to us. We weren't owed a savior. Once again, the words of St. Paul come to mind:
You mean in respect to Paul - thats great but as you can see most of the Muslims here dont agree with the blood sacrifice as a form of forgiveness - Our idea of Justice and forgiveness are very different as well.

your basically wasting your time here as this argument has been re done a lot of time on this forum.

format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Necessarily, if God forgives, justice thereby will have been satisfied. Once again, the Muslim claim is that God forgives in spite of justice. I claim that God forgives by effecting justice. Do you see why I consider the Muslim claims on the matter scarcely credible?
Your not grasping the ideas of forgiveness or Justice. The state has forgiven many people throughout history - the lockerbie bomber is just one example.

It really doesn't matter how scarcely credible you think Muslim claims are - I don't think your credible at all especially when you don't know the difference between Justice and forgiveness. Is that really going to change anything?

Your wasting your time.
Reply

greenhill
07-29-2015, 12:57 AM
You have put 'justice' as the predominant point. You like the way it sounds then conjure up conjecture to your point and concluded that to have 'Justice' every action that is a sin must be met with justice. Hence there is no room for forgiveness.

So what you are saying is that because you are stuck on the justice aspect, then there can be no 'Forgiveness'. So to believe in what you claim then God in your eyes is ONLY about Justice. No, He Has many other characteristics and the Most important ones are ir-Rohman and ir-Roheem despite what you want to believe about God Is Justice. He is not just about Justice.

About mortal sin, there is still room for forgiveness despite the potential for being punished if we do not repent or our repentance is not accepted.

Also curious, then how do you consider 'non mortal' sins? Is that something still with your concept of justice where awaiting justice to be served and there is no room for forgiveness?

:peace:
Reply

umairlooms
07-29-2015, 07:45 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
Hello! I am a new poster here. I am a Ph.D. student in philosophy, and I tend to spend most of my time with medieval Christian and ancient Greek philosophy. I only have a superficial knowledge of Islam (though I have read Avicenna's Metaphysics of the Healing), and I was hoping that you guys could provide an Islamic perspective on certain problems that I raise. So, I'll give you what I think are very potent proofs for Islam's falsity, and I am hoping that you, if you are able, will be able to show me why these proofs don't work.

1. From what I understand, you guys believe that angels have bodies made of light, and that these things called "djinn" have bodies made of fire. But they're invisible. Fire and light are per se (essentially) visible. Isn't it a flat out contradiction to believe in invisible fire people?

2. Granted that it's not a contradiction to believe in invisible fire people, I have a further question about their bodies. I am assuming that, since they have bodies, they are therefore animals (body-soul composites). Are their bodies complex (made up of a diversity of organs), or are they relatively simple (for example, in the sense that a camp-fire is relatively simple...that is, not made up of individual "parts," so to speak, but is just one fire)? If they are complex, then how on earth does that work? What would it mean to have an eye or an ear made of light or fire? If their bodies are simple, then how are they able to see, hear, etc? The senses require complex bodily organs. If they don't sense, then what's the point of their having bodies?

3. From what I understand, you guys believe that martyrs enjoy bliss in a bodily paradise, where they shall indulge their carnal appetites for food, drink and sexual intercourse...without their bodies? How do you suppose that is supposed to work? Avicenna's answer is that good philosophers bypass these carnal delights altogether and partake of intelligible delights, whereas the ordinary, run of the mill Muslims who, nonetheless, lived good lives will enjoy these carnal delights...by imagining them. But this is, of course, false. Imagination requires bodily organs, and your martyrs are not currently united to their bodies. We can be quite sure of this. If you doubt this, go and check. I assure you, their bodies are still in (or on) the ground and, even if intact, are quite lifeless. So, in short, how are your martyrs supposed to eat the heavenly super fruit when they have neither mouth, tongue, throat nor stomach? How are they supposed to enjoy their 72 virgins when they have no reproductive organs?

4. Related to 3, granted that your bodily paradise actually existed, why on earth would that be the goal of Muslim striving? Why would your martyrs want that? We eat in order to keep ourselves alive as individuals, and sexual relations are to keep the species alive. Why should someone desire food or sexual intercourse when he has achieved immortality?

5. Supposing that your martyrs desired such a reward, wouldn't they rather deserve Hell? This would mean that they prefer carnal delights to God, who alone is to be loved and adored as a final end, and who alone is the ultimate "goal" of the rational creature.

6. And speaking of Heaven and Hell, how do Muslims propose to escape the fires of Hell? Even a single serious sin turns us away from God, makes us enemies of God, and merits everlasting punishment. You'll presumably tell me that God is merciful, but I'll reply that He is Justice Itself. Pray as much as you want, but if there is nothing to counterbalance the infinite debt of punishment that you have merited through your sins, then you have no escape from His righteous indignation.

7. Is it true that Mohommed says that it's sometimes OK to tell a lie? If so, he knew that telling a lie is always wrong, right?

Thanks in advance.
Frankly, not a great question. I hate answering OVERLY inquisitive questions as they USUALLY lead to even more deeper questions.
Regardless, I will try.
DISCLAIMER : I am a muslim

Points 1 are 2 are self explanatory, your premise of comparing their 'bodies' to that of humans is the issue. We do not claim to know anything about them from Quran and Sunnah, just like we do not know why man is NOT DISSOLVED IN WATER for example.

Point 3. Our day of judgement is the day of resurrection, we would be brought back to life.

Point 4. Paradise is a reward, your premise if that of evolutionary biology, which again is not the basis of Salvation

point 5. Why would any pious person want pain of hell and not pleasure of heaven. there is no contradiction to loving God and having pleasure of paradise as it is the reward for the pleasure of Allah.

point 6 In islam, we would only be saved from hell fire through Allah's mercy. We can only try. It is mentioned in the prophets sayings that even he would require Allahs mercy

point 7 There was a game of deception during a troubled battle time in Medina, but i dont understand the question
Reply

umairlooms
07-29-2015, 07:52 AM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
You know, one of the most jarring things for me, as a Christian, is it seems as though you Muslims think that you can somehow "earn" heaven, that your own good works somehow "deserve" a reward from God. I find myself wondering; is there any room for grace (i.e., unmerited divine favor) in what is, effectively, a Pelagian cult (and here, I do not mean this in the pejorative sense, but in the etymological sense)?

Ultimately, I think I never can agree with your prophet, since I can never agree that I ever, of my own account, can merit favor in God's eyes, or else, if I have sinned, make up for my sins by my own power. Whatever good I can do, I owe that to God. Whatever evil I do, whenever I violate God's laws, I make myself an enemy of God, irretrievably and irredeemably guilty, deserving of His righteous punishment, rightfully excluded from His society because of my crimes against His Holy Law.

But, I hear from the Muslims, "wait until Ramadan, and give charity, and you will get multiples more merit than had you donated otherwise." As though my works were anything more than sheer refuse in the sight of a Supremely Holy and Just God, to whom I owe my all, and whom I have offended because of my sins.

I know through philospohy that I can never merit Heaven, for his is nothing but the vision of God Himself, to which there always remains a natural disproportion given my nature, and from which I have, because of my sins, an unbreakable hindrance. Because of my sins, because I have offended a God of infinite majesty, because I have violated the Law of the infinitely Just God, had I done this only once, I would deserve Hell forever.

How, then, can I but sigh in sorrowful pity when the Muslims tell me that I can buy my way out through good deeds?

If Jesus hasn't died on the Cross and risen from the dead, all is lost. Such is, I think, as much as St. Anselm says in Cur Deus Homo (Why God [became] a man). The verdict is already written. The gavel has already sounded. We are guilty. We must pay the price.

Here, we must consider the parable of the workers of Matthew 20. The workers are paid no more, no less, for their work. Why? Because a penny is all that the owner has to give. The owner represents God, and the penny, the beatific vision, i.e., the sight of God Himself seen face to face. What more can God give than Himself? And none of us deserve that. We only gain it because He is generous.

bro..thats too long of a post, and too much hating. you lose genuine critical readers mid way.
seriously
Reply

greenhill
07-29-2015, 02:22 PM
I still dont understand why you have such a fatalistic view of human and heaven. Heaven was created not for God but for us. . . if we pass the test of our life on Earth. So, the test must be passable. Why set the bar so high that no man can pass? Then if the test is so that everyone fails, where is the justice in that? No! You can pass! Pray that Allah recognises your efforts and grants you His mercy. It is not an easy one and becomes harder the closer we are to the hussle and bussle of the modern world where the temptation to stray is very great.

What is jarring to you with regards to your comment about what your muslim friends tell you regarding ramadan is very similar to what is said about the Sunday confession. Commit sins on the weekdays and have it washed off with the confessions... But you know, deep down inside, that it is not the purpose. The confession is an act of repentance and should be remorseful that the sin is not repeated and you go on to becone a better person. Likewise Ramadan. We should be already all that (as a result of the last ramadan that should have help inculcate these good traits in us) and merely step up the deeds and seek forgiveness in that holy month where we are challenged from our hunger, patience etc. so that we humble ourselves and seek Allah''s favours through our endeavour.

:peace:
Reply

umairlooms
08-11-2015, 11:45 AM
turkish proverb

--when you talk too much, there is bound to be a lot of bull--

I have no clue where this thread is going
Reply

Futuwwa
08-11-2015, 11:54 AM
Nowhere, apparently. Seems like Traditio got banned. Did someone decide to ban him, or does that automatically happen if your reputation goes too low?
Reply

UnNaMeD__
08-11-2015, 01:26 PM
We are made out of clay, but you can't tell that anymore
Clay or soil? I thought soil?
Reply

Pygoscelis
09-03-2015, 08:48 PM
format_quote Originally Posted by Traditio
You know, one of the most jarring things for me, as a Christian, is it seems as though you Muslims think that you can somehow "earn" heaven, that your own good works somehow "deserve" a reward from God. I find myself wondering; is there any room for grace (i.e., unmerited divine favor) in what is, effectively, a Pelagian cult (and here, I do not mean this in the pejorative sense, but in the etymological sense)?
Why do you find it jarring. I find that to be one of the things about Islam I far prefer to Christianity. How can the concept of faith or grace trumping works be anything but unjust and arbitrary?

I also very much appreciate that Islam doesn't share the concept of vicarious redemption with Christianity. That you should escape paying for your own wrongdoing by celebrating the torture and death of an innocent man... is disturbing to anybody who doesn't grow up Christian.

Ultimately, I think I never can agree with your prophet, since I can never agree that I ever, of my own account, can merit favor in God's eyes, or else, if I have sinned, make up for my sins by my own power. Whatever good I can do, I owe that to God. Whatever evil I do, whenever I violate God's laws, I make myself an enemy of God, irretrievably and irredeemably guilty, deserving of His righteous punishment, rightfully excluded from His society because of my crimes against His Holy Law.
That says more about your God than it says about you. That god would create you so you are sure to fail to live up to his standard, or even make you with "original sin" so you don't even have the chance.... is a very peculiar concept. That you should be punished infinitely for a finite wrong is also very peculiar reasoning. How is such a God just and good?

How, then, can I but sigh in sorrowful pity when the Muslims tell me that I can buy my way out through good deeds?
When Islam encourages good deeds, Islam is awesome and great. Can you really say otherwise? When Christianity encourages people to think they can find foregiveness through accepting a human sacrifice... that sounds a lot less promising.

If Jesus hasn't died on the Cross and risen from the dead, all is lost. Such is, I think, as much as St. Anselm says in Cur Deus Homo (Why God [became] a man). The verdict is already written. The gavel has already sounded. We are guilty. We must pay the price.
You mean Jesus paid it for you, right? You don't pay for your own wrongs in Christianity. You have a convenient scapegoat.
Reply

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up
British Wholesales - Certified Wholesale Linen & Towels | Holiday in the Maldives

IslamicBoard

Experience a richer experience on our mobile app!