National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger.
It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975.
It was originally classified,
but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s.
The basic thesis of the memorandum was that*population growth*in the*least developed countries*(LDCs) is a concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk*civil unrest*and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development. The policy gives "paramount importance" to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries.
This is to control rapid population growth which the U.S. deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the "U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad", and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United States.
It recommends that U.S. leadership "influence national leaders" and that "improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, and USAID."
Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests:*
India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines,Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil.
These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all*world population*growth.The report advocates the promotion of education and*contraception*and other population control measures, stating for instance that "No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion".
It also raises the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures.
Some of the key insights of report:
"The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries [see National Commission on Materials Policy, Towards a National Materials Policy: Basic Data and Issues, April 1972].
That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries.
Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States. …*
"Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.
Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth" [Chapter III, "Minerals and Fuel"].
"Populations with a high proportion of growth. The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the 'establishment,' 'imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other-often foreign-influences blamed for their troubles" [Chapter V, "Implications of Population Pressures for National Security"].
"We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs.
Caution must be taken that in any approaches in this field we support in the LDCs are ones we can support within this country.
"Third World" leaders should be in the forefront and obtain the credit for successful programs.
In this context it is important to demonstrate to LDC leaders that such family planning programs have worked and can work within a reasonable period of time." [Chapter I, "World Demographic Trends"]
The report advises, "In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."
Abortion as a geopolitical strategy is mentioned several dozen times in the report with suggestive implications.
The so called citizen politicians on the take while these criminals flush pharmaceutical waste straight into rivers, it appears purposefully sometimes, also live in those countries, but most of them get made in the process and probably wouldn't drink tap water unless you gave them a few crore or put a gun to their head.
Drugs flushed into the environment could be cause of wildlife decline
New studies show antidepressants causing starlings to feed less and contraceptive drugs reducing fish populations in lakes
used in birth control pills wiped out fathead minnows in lakes used for experiments
in Ontario, and seriously disrupted the whole ecosystem.*
Damian Carrington@dpcarringtonMonday 13 October 2014*00.01*BST
..... A few dramatic examples of wildlife harmed by drug contamination have been discovered previously, including male fish being feminised by the synthetic hormones used in birth-control pills and vultures in India being virtually wiped out by an anti-inflammatory drug given to the cattle on whose carcasses they feed.....
Inter-sex frogs have also recently been found in urban ponds contaminated with wastewater.
Also checking out philip battenberg's (his royal virus) comments on population should give you an idea of how citizen friendly they are.
Some of us haven't a clue how bad the plan for a new world order was.
Allah has provided some counters to the scheme, but His help is only at it's most powerful when the populations turn to Him.
They've basically milked the economy of the planet until the majority of resource aquiring credit vouchers are concentrated in the hands of the usurers and they know that the time for the usury based economies to implode is close at hand. They expect riots and fear the outcome of an empowered citizenry taking it all back by throwing off the shackles of falsehood.
"We shall have*world government*whether or not we like it.
The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent."*
-- James Paul Warburg - In an address to the U.S. Senate, July 17th, 1950*
Sad thing is that some slaves think they're free.
You either admit that you're a bondman/bondwoman of God, or you reap the consequences of slavery to usurers.
There will indeed be a one world government unless this world ends before it's inception. It is inevitable when considering the history, facts, and the present phase .
The only question is whether it wil be khilafah/presidency upon the path of prophethood or khilafah/presidency upon the path of usury.