format_quote Originally Posted by
Al Sultan
Now what does "Quran is from the future rather than the past" mean ? We're in the future and people are proving the Quran wrong (scientifically) and that's what I'm worried about...
..its not been proved wrong?
i think the link you provided may actually be from a muslim.. from what i have gathered.
it speculates that the knowledge contained in the quran is either vague..applying more generally or has previously been "revealed" to other nations..
which it may have been, if you take it that it also mentions previous prophets pbut or people's or narations or stories..
what is the difference? should it not contain this knowledge?
..
...
from the future..
at the end of time or judgement day, allah swt awaits..
thats who sent it.. who always sent it..
if it differs by the end of time then it will only do so because our understanding changes..
however that happens.
and although the science and ethics and morality and conduct within it.. may not be new..
the attributing of it to a supreme creator.. is
..also not new. o_0
the difference is that the link cannot reconcile the quranic scientific miracles as an approach way to understanding or belief..
it is only a small part of the book, although a lot of people spend there entire lives in the pursuit of this small part..
which in itself is all encompassing.
the quran may be a way of achieving competency in all manner of things..
although the beauty of it and our own faults are expose by it.
billions of people all lead on there own paths..
although guidance and misguidance are available in abundance..
probably..