Your children is in trouble!

[xboxisdead]

Any Muslim parent(s) who take their children to non-Muslim public school in my humble opinion is an enormous child abuser and I have zero sympathy to them if their children become atheist, non-Muslim or leave fold of Islam. This is what they are teaching in school right now. They are having animation cartoons to teach children about masturbation, how it feels good to touch yourself and it is normal to masturbate. The Shaytan system is working to remove innocence of children at very young age. Remove innocence and you destroy society full-force:

Attachment 7191

Attachment 7192

Attachment 7193

Attachment 7194

Attachment 7195

The day where only mothers raise their children and the husband goes and bring the baccon is over. It is obligatory on the father to be protector and have equal if not majority of the upbringing of his children. Get BABA bear protection activated. The fathers need to know 100% of their children friends, what they like, hate, what they are learning, who is teaching them and he have to go teacher/parent meeting every time there is one available. The father need to be open so that his kids can be open and tell him everything in their lives and not be Hitler to them. It is time both parents unite against an evil force that is coming to destroy our children. This above is the cartoon what they are teaching your children and soon they will make adults have sex with children under header of education and learning.

[IslamLife00]

SubhanAllah. Only over 10 years ago, they arrested the author of "The Pedophile's Guide". Now they are allowing this for children...


"The Pedophile's Guide" author Phillip Greaves was arrested on obscenity charges

[xboxisdead]

It is getting worse. Monsters like that Attachment 7196 are real. It just they don't have to look like that and they are coming at our children. They arrested him because he is white and male. If he was black and female they would not dare arrest him. It is the most corrupted, pathetic, stupid, insane, liberal, shaytaan illogical system ever. Nothing about non-Muslim system makes sense and everything about non-Muslim is wrong. The prophet peace be upon did tell us that whatever the non-Muslim do, do the opposite. If you noticed sister in the cartoon they use black-female to spread this filth. Because if it comes from a black-female...khalas...everyone must submit and agree. This is a complex system where eventually they make having sex with little children legal. Give it time sister. You will find a grown-up 40 year old woman falling in love with a five year old and having intimacy with a five year old. Maybe this old woman want to marry a five year old girl?? It will go this route. Soon you will see a 50 year old man having sex with a five year old boy or girl publicity and people will walk pass them and do nothing. It will become normalized. This is the road we are headed. Already woman can walk naked just to challenge people to see if they will say anything under guise of women liberation and freedom. It is a disgusting world. Sister, we live in such corrupted system that a salah man or woman will be considered boring. That is the level of evil are infesting the hearts of people.

[keiv]

Pedophilia originally meant having interests / relations with prepubescents. It seems the term is now interchangeable with other words and I think people, Muslims especially, should be careful in throwing that term around. The secularists and hypocrites of the west will arrest a person who has relations with a 17 year old and society will consider them sick minded and a pedophile, despite both parties consenting to it. As soon as they hit that magic number of 18, they are free to do as they please. Believe it or not, some are even trying to argue that 18 is too young, so maybe in the future, people will look back at us today and consider us to be sick people because we allowed 18 year olds to get married. Similar to how people today look back in history and complain about how our grandparents/great grandparents got married young and how wrong it was.

Islam tells us what is permissible and what isn't. No need to look at the hypocrites and secularists for guidance or influence.

Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, you can participate in the discussions and share your thoughts. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and make new friends.
Sign Up

[xboxisdead]

Some might say in the future 20 year old is too young, then 25 year old, then 35 year old, then 40 year old, then 50 year old, then 60 year old, then 70 year old, then 80 year old....I find this insulting. Maybe one day it is illegal and a crime to have sex period and marriage is a criminal felony that will result in life in imprisonment and procreating is a crime. Anyone who agrees to those terms mentioned above is a Mushrik. Anybody believe that marriage should be on 18 year old or above and marrying or having sex before age 18 is haraam and a crime is a mushrik.

[xboxisdead]

Forcing homosexuality

[IslamLife00]

I don't remember exactly but it was on the news. 50 yo woman married to a 6 yo boy. I would think a 6 yo boy is still a prepubescent?
Can't find it anymore, it's been so long, hopefully I got the boy's age wrong.
In a lecture about Dajjal, it is said one of the possible meanings of the word dajjal is someone who mixes pure truth with utter filth.
The people who are allowing this, are doing it for Dajjal. They are destroying innocence in such a horrible filthy disgusting way.

[xboxisdead]

I don't remember exactly but it was on the news. 50 yo woman married to a 6 yo boy. I would think a 6 yo boy is still a prepubescent?
Can't find it anymore, it's been so long, hopefully I got the boy's age wrong.
In a lecture about Dajjal, it is said one of the possible meanings of the word dajjal is someone who mixes pure truth with utter filth.
The people who are allowing this, are doing it for Dajjal. They are destroying innocence in such a horrible filthy disgusting way.

She is attracted to children. Sick. That boy is not ready for consumption yet. Would you eat a fruit that have not went ripe yet? It is at the beginning stage of growth...right after flower pollination you want to pluck it and eat it? O_O That boy cannot lead a house, is not ready to be responsible for a wife, he does not have money yet, he cannot pay mahir yet and even his body is not ready to make babies. He will be looking at her as if she is his mother and want to go to school, play, and he need to be trained himself. He doesn't know the difference between right and wrong. At that stage, the boy need to be with his father. His father needs to teach him how to be a man, role of a man, etc. That boy can't even protect her from criminals should they come smashing into the house. That woman is sick.

[xboxisdead]

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/1493...ng-young-women <-- this how you do it...not like that 50 year old woman. Besides...I weep for that six year old boy, he will be screwed up when he have sex at age 6 with an old used up woman. A man at age 20 would not want to marry a woman of age 50. Heck a man of age 45 would not want to marry a woman of age 50. Heck, a man of age 50 would not want to marry a woman of age 50. Alright, maybe a man of age 60 would marry a woman of age 50. Where are the parents to protect that six year old boy from screwed up outlook of women??

[IslamLife00]

I can't remember exactly if the parents said anything or did anything about it. The wedding happened, and no objection from anyone is mentioned in the news.
Most people commented were disgusted, of course, but as for the woman's family and the boy's family, I don't remember reading any objection from them.
The crazy thing is not that unusual the child's family is actually involved in the crime, either they are among the perpetrators, or they allow/enable the pedophiles to do it to their children/grand children, or they abandon them so they become easy target to the pedophiles.

One example in this video :




The horrifying account of a British girl who was trapped for 12 years in a brutal satanic cult, run by her grandmother.
Teresa, now 15, went to live with her grandmother when she was two.
She tells Leslie of the bizarre rituals and the systematic sexual abuse which became part of her everyday life.

[xboxisdead]

I know it stings like a hornet needle to majority of women out there, but the truth have to be told. Child molestation, rape, abuse, school dropout, depression, suicide, violence, drugs, alcohol, teenage pregnancy, anti-social behavior, unable to formulate long term relationship, unable to focus, attention deficit disorder, difficulty learning, unable to keep long term jobs, blah, blah is the result of single moms. Any woman who screams, "I don't need a man. I can do it on my own. I am a father and a mother. I can raise children on my own. Do children need a father?" Then have children on purpose alone without a father, after knowing all these facts and have the audacity to fight the stats and say "Not all"...in my opinion: should be beheaded. That is right. I said it. Because that woman have single handedly destroyed a life on purpose. Killed a human being on purpose. She is in my opinion a criminal. Most of what you described above sister and what happens to these children comes from (single) mothers (majority of the time). There is also stats proofs that single mothers breed homosexual boys and masculine girls. Ever wondered why Allah created male? The above reasons mentioned is one of many, many, many reasons why male is created. Allah does not create for fun or without purpose. That cult no doubt that many children have entered, comes from single moms.

[xboxisdead]

This is an update about teaching children mastrubation:

Last fall, parents at the posh, $55,000-per-year Dalton School got wind of their first-graders being taught sex education lessons that included masturbation.

They complained to school administrators, but were told they had simply “misinterpreted” what Dalton’s now-notorious “health and wellness” educator Justine Ang Fonte — who last month led a controversial and explicit “porn literacy” workshop at another elite prep school — was teaching.

But after The Post’s exposé last week on the porn class, Dalton parents “bombarded” the school with more complaints about Fonte’s curriculum, sources told The Post.

The Post viewed video of a cartoon Fonte used in one of her sex ed classes for 6-year-olds showing little kids talking about “touching themselves” for pleasure.

The Dalton School
Dalton parents “bombarded” the school with more complaints over the school’s sex education curriculum.
“Hey, how come sometimes my penis gets big sometimes and points in the air?” asks the little boy in the cartoon, leading to an explanation of what an “erection” is.

The boy nods and says, “Sometimes I touch my penis because it feels good.”

Then the little girl character chimes in: “Sometimes, when I’m in my bath or when Mom puts me to bed, I like to touch my vulva too.”

Fonte has reassured parents that she does not use the word “masturbation” in class, and that her lessons teach kids not to touch themselves in public.

Justine Ang Fonte
Justine Ang Fonte led a controversial and explicit “porn literacy” workshop at another elite prep school.
They are also taught lessons about “consent.” While one mother conceded that teaching the concept of consent can be valuable in protecting children from abuse, another said telling kids that that their own parents or grandparents should not touch them without first asking for permission is extreme.

“Literally parents are supposed to say to their kids, May I hug you?” one parent said.

One mother said another parent told her, “I’m paying $50,000 to these a–holes to tell my kid not to let her grandfather hug her when he sees her?”

Fonte’s lessons for first-graders also include subjects such as gender assigned at birth, gender identity and gender expression.

“Kids have no less than five classes on gender identity — this is pure indoctrination,” a Dalton mother said. “This person should absolutely not be teaching children. Ironically, she teaches kids about ‘consent’ yet she has never gotten consent from parents about the sexually explicit, and age-inappropriate material about transgender to first-graders.”

“We are furious,” a third Dalton mother told The Post. “We were horrified to learn this was shown to our first-grade 6- and 7-year-old kids without our knowledge or consent. But it’s so hard to fight back because you’ll get canceled and your child will suffer.”

The second Dalton mother said, “I’m not against all sex education but it’s not cool to keep parents in the dark about it.”

How bodies are private
-this is the video.
Fonte has reassured parents that she does not use the word “masturbation” in class, and that her lessons teach kids not to touch themselves in public.
The parents spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are afraid of retaliation.

The second mom hit back at Dalton administrators who she said are playing mind games with parents and not fessing up to what’s really going on in classrooms. The school has said that only a “small group” of parents complained about Fonte’s class last fall and that they “misinterpreted” the content. At the same time, however, the school quietly removed the video about kids touching themselves from the curriculum.

“We are not ‘confused.’ We are in fact just seeing very clearly for the first time what a ‘progressive’ education really means at Dalton,” the mother said. “The fact that the school then gaslit parents into thinking we are confused is abysmal.”

How bodies are private
-this is the video that
Fonte’s lessons for first-graders also include subjects such as gender assigned at birth, gender identity and gender expression.
Fonte’s work at the school is reportedly funded by a $450,000 grant given to Dalton in 2012 by hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Foundation. Ackman’s ex-wife Karen is on the Dalton board of trustees.

“What we are seeing across the country is that many schools have lost sight of the purpose of education, and are hiding curriculum and teaching materials from parents,” a spokesman for FAIR, the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism, told The Post.

Last week The Post reported on Fonte’s workshop, “Porn Literacy: An intersectional focus on mainstream porn,” at Columbia Grammar & Preparatory School. The often-explicit slide presentation and lecture to the 120 co-ed juniors included how porn takes care of “three big male vulnerabilities”; statistics on the “orgasm gap” showing straight women have far fewer orgasms with their partners than gay men or women; and photos of partially nude women, some in bondage, to analyze “what is porn and what is art.”

Fonte’s presentation included a list of the most-searched pornographic terms of 2019, including “creampie,” “anal,” “gangbang,” “stepmom” and more.

How bodies are private
-this is the video
They are also taught lessons about “consent.”
Shortly after The Post published the Columbia Prep story last week, its head of school, Dr. William M. Donohue, sent a conciliatory email to school parents saying that the “content and tone of the presentation did not represent our philosophy, which is to educate our students in ways that promote their personal development and overall health, as well as to express respect for them as individuals. … It was unfortunate that we did not better inform ourselves of the speaker’s specific content in advance. I apologize … Going forward we will certainly learn from this experience.”

Fonte has not responded to repeated requests from The Post for comment.

A Dalton spokesman said, “As part of Dalton’s comprehensive Health curriculum for students, a lesson on Gender & Bodies included two evidence-based and age-appropriate videos approved for students 4 years and older. These videos align with nationally recognized methodologies and standards. We consistently review our Health curriculum, making sure that the content is developmentally appropriate and, if necessary, we adapt our curriculum accordingly. We will continue to listen carefully to parent feedback, respond thoughtfully to community concerns, and develop lessons that are in the best interest of our students, respect our community’s values, and correspond with best practices.”

[keiv]

Some might say in the future 20 year old is too young, then 25 year old, then 35 year old, then 40 year old, then 50 year old, then 60 year old, then 70 year old, then 80 year old....I find this insulting. Maybe one day it is illegal and a crime to have sex period and marriage is a criminal felony that will result in life in imprisonment and procreating is a crime. Anyone who agrees to those terms mentioned above is a Mushrik. Anybody believe that marriage should be on 18 year old or above and marrying or having sex before age 18 is haraam and a crime is a mushrik.

In today's world, identifying as a male or female is frowned upon it seems. A scenario like what you described would not surprise me at all if it were to ever happen.

This may be more of a western issue, but on the topic of age, I think part of the problem is that we treat teenagers as irresponsible kids instead of treating them as young adults. We don't teach them any valuable lessons and all we do is throw them in a school somewhere for the next 18 years of their life to be taught what the system wants them to learn. When they come home, we throw electronics in their faces and let the internet raise them that way we don't have to. By the time they finish school, they have little practical knowledge for the essential things in life. So to many people, a 15, 16, 17, or even 18 year old may seem too young, and from a psychological point of view, they're probably right, but only because we (parents and society) allowed it.

Everything starts at home. Dysfunctional families lead to dysfunctional societies.

[IslamLife00]

I couldn't finish reading your update, it's just too disgusting.

As for single moms, it's one of the reasons Islam is important. Allah doesn't only prohibit something, but also prohibit what will lead to it.
Like the prohibition of zina not only limited to intercourse but also there is zina of the eyes, the tongue etc and even there is prohibition in regards to opposite gender that is non mahram.

I heard that many times, that women can live without men. Of course it's possible, but not when it comes to raising child/children.
It's not possible to earn income and raise a child/children on her own, it can't be easy even for single father.

A child is not something you can work hard and pay for. A child is a soul that Allah entrust them to raise. There will be accountability between souls on Judgement Day as well.
It's too late I guess, but I'm afraid if they learn this at such a young age, what will happen when puberty hits?

Now I understand the hadith that mentions people will be fornicating like donkeys and the Hour will come upon them

[xboxisdead]

I couldn't finish reading your update, it's just too disgusting.

As for single moms, it's one of the reasons Islam is important. Allah doesn't only prohibit something, but also prohibit what will lead to it.
Like the prohibition of zina not only limited to intercourse but also there is zina of the eyes, the tongue etc and even there is prohibition in regards to opposite gender that is non mahram.

I heard that many times, that women can live without men. Of course it's possible, but not when it comes to raising child/children.
It's not possible to earn income and raise a child/children on her own, it can't be easy even for single father.

A child is not something you can work hard and pay for. A child is a soul that Allah entrust them to raise. There will be accountability between souls on Judgement Day as well.
It's too late I guess, but I'm afraid if they learn this at such a young age, what will happen when puberty hits?

Now I understand the hadith that mentions people will be fornicating like donkeys and the Hour will come upon them

A man can live without woman too. AN experiment proven possible when living in Saudi Arabia and had no relationship with the opposite sex. In fact, 42 years, still no woman in my life. I am still alive. So both sexes can live without the other.....aand.....the point here is what, exactly? Just because you can, you do it? Alright, we can live without eyes, ears, hands, legs, too. Why not go blind, deaf, and unable to walk and use your hands. Just because something can be done, it shouldn't. Besides...women who can live without men and do anything they want...are non-Muslims. Muslim women who can live without a man still require care by wali, whether Islamic state or not (family). And those women who are non-Muslim who scream they don't need a man and can live without one, are relying on the state to take care of them coming from other men who pay them taxes. IN the end, women who scream they don't need men and cannot live without him they will be amongst the people who Allah will not look at them. In the end of all that, the child have more rights than men and women selfish desires. The child have right to a mother and a father under Islamic marriage.


By the way, a child's need of father can't be replaced by materialistic things. A child's need of a father is the male energy, physically and mentally that ONLY A MAN CAN PROVIDE. NO WOMAN CAN REPLACE THAT and any woman who attempt to challenge this is a cursed woman who wish to be masculine. She will not be appraised by Allah for this, but cursed by him. GENDER ROLE is a law ordered by Allah...NO GENDER IS ALLOWED TO CROSS THE LINE TO THE OTHER SIDE. Hate it? Then leave Islam. Simple.

[IslamLife00]

This world is becoming sicker and sicker. I know it's wrong but I can't help it, I don't like living this dunya anymore, it's becoming unrecognizable.

More and more of the end-time hadiths come true, or at least now I can see it how it will play out.

[xboxisdead]

This world is becoming sicker and sicker. I know it's wrong but I can't help it, I don't like living this dunya anymore, it's becoming unrecognizable.

More and more of the end-time hadiths come true, or at least now I can see it how it will play out.

Yup.

[Karl]

Liberals and their mainstream media juggernaut are actually pushing ANTI paedophilia, not pro paedophilia. Not only that, they refer to "paedophilia" even when a young person is really a young adult rather than a child anyway.

[Karl]

I agree that it's crazy to send offspring to an atheist state run school, and I forbid my offspring to go there, hence why I home school. However, my personal concern isn't about "sex" as sex is just a normal and natural instinct in all living sentient beings anyway. More so, my concern is with Cultural Marxist values in general which if anything includes ANTI paedophilia, NOT PRO paedophilia! Liberals are by their inherent nature extremely ANTI paedophilic, and the state run school system while it teaches that perversions such as "LGBTQ+" are "good" and to be encouraged and embraced, it nonetheless indoctrinates anti youth-sex, anti young marriage, neurotic paranoia about youthful sex and "stranger danger" mentality when it comes to children and young adults themselves, particularly if they are under the arbitrary age of 16/18. 6+6+6 (number of the beast) ads up to EIGHTEEN which does suggest that AOC=18 maybe has it's origins in Satanism.

Liberals moan on and on and on about "teenage pregnancy" even though the second decade of life is the BEST TIME for a woman to have her babies! Liberals utter insane phrases such as "babies having babies" even though "babies having babies" or "children having children" is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE. Theses feminists and other loony leftists only make fools of themselves. The liberal mainstream media (which is allied to the state run school system) is also saturated with emotionally-intense ultra-neurotic anti- paedophilia and anti-hebephilia propaganda, in TV, radio etc. One well known TV example (of many) being "SVU", created by Jewish producer, Dick Wolf.

It is also a complete myth that children are "innocent". The concept of "Childhood Innocence" does NOT have its origins in Islam at all, but instead in the Western Progressivist, atheist male-hating feminist Suffragettes of the Victorian era.
You could perhaps speak of childhood ignorance or naivety, in some children more than others, but "childhood innocence"? That is something that belongs to wishful thinking and is purely ideological. It simply doesn't exist except in the mind of a deluded collectivist Marxist .

As a father and a staunch parental sovereigntist I am fiercely opposed not only to all feminist/atheist/Marxist ''education" but also the "AOC" laws that they impose. Instead, it is MY decision and my decision alone when I allow my offspring to have sex. It may be at ANY age BUT I want them MARRIED first. So for me the prerequisite is MARRIAGE, NOT "age". And NO outsider has any right at all to dictate to me otherwise!

[Karl]

This may be more of a western issue, but on the topic of age, I think part of the problem is that we treat teenagers as irresponsible kids instead of treating them as young adults.

Absolutely!! You have by far the best posts in this thread and I completely agree. It could even be an understatement to say that teenagers are treated like "irresponsible kids". I actually think the juvenilization of teenagers has become so bad to a point that they are now often treated like infants/preschoolers. It's totally pathetic and due to full-blown liberal feminist mentality. It's gotten completely out of control. I remember at 12 I was a fully grown young man and most other students in my class were as well. We were not only physically fully grown but psychologically mature too and we would frown on and laugh at immature late developers.

It really annoys me that liberals like to troll and blame their own ilk for "promoting paedophilia" when in fact it is the ZOG Western liberal tyranny ITSELF that is responsible for the COMPLETE OPPOSITE (i.e the intense demonization of perfectly normal and healthy youthful sexuality). Anti paedophilia and anti hebephilia is simply chock-a-block in the liberal mainstream media!, and yet there are those who wish to tell us in our face that liberalism is "pro" youthful sex?? I mean, REALLY? Who are they actually trying to fool here??