Reasons To Nuke The USA

Muslim Woman said:

I seek refuge in Allah (The One God) from the Satan (devil) the cursed, the rejected

With the name of ALLAH (swt) -The Bestower Of Unlimited Mercy, The Continously Merciful


Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh (May the peace, mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you)

&&&

Reasons To Nuke The USA

By Yamin Zakaria



According to the doctrine of pre-emptive strike which the US has adopted since 9/11, it too can be subjected to a pre-emptive nuclear strike, as it poses a threat to other peaceful nations of the world.




The US has a sordid track record for using such weapons against civilians and it has constantly maintained a large stockpile of such weapons of mass destruction, and continuously develops them. There are additional reasons to nuke the US, however I have decided to highlight only seven.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17163.htm

===

Click to expand...

What you say does make sense.

But, the first major question would be where could you strike that would prevent retaliation? The US military has no central location. Each of the Branches of the military are capable of acting independently. A very large amount of the US retaliatory force is not located in the US. That which is located in the US is scattered throughout all 50 states.

Destruction of the Federal government will not create total anarchy as each state is capable of functioning on it's own. Plus the Federal government is not dependent on any single leader and the forces that do control the Federal government are seldom if ever in one location. To attack the US would be similar to attacking 50 separate countries at the same time.

Many can come up with justification for a pre-emptive first strike, but I would question the wisdom of anybody doing that.

The next problem is nearly every country in the world has a very large invested interest in the US. For most countries the US is either their biggest source of goods or their biggest customer for their exports.

Reasons not to nuke the USA.

USA, Britain too has nukes and I'm sure other countries would retaliate also.

title is kinda disturbing ffended: lool
makes me feel like considering what everyone must be thinkin ;D

Tayyaba said:

title is kinda disturbing ffended: lool
makes me feel like considering what everyone must be thinkin ;D

Click to expand...

I think it is a good title as this is a subject I am certain has been on peoples minds. It is always best to keep things out in the open as quite often open honest dialogue will bring about some understanding. Maybe not agreement, but understanding.

Out of Americas 300,000,000 residents the majority are not as the media portrays us to be. You may read in the paper that last year one million Americans committed crimes, and that some how over shadows the other side of the story that last year 299,000,000 Americans did not commit any crimes.

There is no such thing as a typical American. In fact there isn't even a such thing as a typical Texan. In fact we don't even have a typical Texas city.

San Antonio is more like Seville Spain than it is to Waco Texas. Waco Texas looks more like Birmingham Alabama than it looks like Dallas, Dallas is much more like NYC than it is like El Paso. and so on.

Each of our 50 state have little similarities to each other. Hawaii does not look a thing like Massachusetts, not only is the scenary different, the cultures are vastly different. Alaska is much more like Finland than it like Florida.

So it is with all of America, stereotyping is not fair no matter what direction it is done.

Perhaps threads like this can help remove some stereotypes.

Reasons not to attack the USA:

You would assure your own destruction.

As for the supposed reasons for nuking the USA, there is a system in place of which the U.S. is the central part. Many people don't really understand how much the Western democracies and economic systems keep the world turning. Yes, many 3rd World nations do not reap the benefits of the global market, but as Winston Churchill mentioned in his "History of the English Speaking Peoples", when the Western civilization does eventually pass away, as all civilizations must, it will be dearly missed.

England said:

Reasons not to nuke the USA.

USA, Britain too has nukes and I'm sure other countries would retaliate also.

Click to expand...

I would nuke everyone until the human race becomes extinct.

Philosopher said:

I would nuke everyone until the human race becomes extinct.

Click to expand...

But that approach would most likely endanger aardvarks and other blameless creatures.








I doubt if that is an option at this time. Our only option is to place our trust in Allah(swt) and pray that all of mankind will wake up.



Death holds no fear or threat to those who believe and have faith, but it is a tremendous punishment to wish upon those who are blind.

Woodrow said:

But that approach would most likely endanger aardvarks and other blameless creatures.








I doubt if that is an option at this time. Our only option is to place our trust in Allah(swt) and pray that all of mankind will wake up.



Death holds no fear or threat to those who believe and have faith, but it is a tremendous punishment to wish upon those who are blind.

Click to expand...

Humans are too stupid and arrogant to live. We are a waste of air and space.

Philosopher said:

Humans are too stupid and arrogant to live. We are a waste of air and space.

Click to expand...

We also make a lot of noise, are not a major food source for any animal and we probably smell bad to most animals.

But, that does not remove the fact that Allah(swt) had a purpose in creating us, and we are the only creatures that can complete that specific purpose.

I really do not think nuking U.S will achieve anything by destroying countless of life, whatever the evil of U.S maybe.
I am sure if their was such plan, the plan has to be that U.S is nuke sufficiently that their is hardly any life left.

If their was any bases located outside U.S I doubt they will have a home to go back to after it has been nuked.

I love the usa. Would never live anywhere else. No matter what I hear about it.

Woodrow said:

What you say does make sense.

But, the first major question would be where could you strike that would prevent retaliation? The US military has no central location. Each of the Branches of the military are capable of acting independently. A very large amount of the US retaliatory force is not located in the US. That which is located in the US is scattered throughout all 50 states.

Destruction of the Federal government will not create total anarchy as each state is capable of functioning on it's own. Plus the Federal government is not dependent on any single leader and the forces that do control the Federal government are seldom if ever in one location. To attack the US would be similar to attacking 50 separate countries at the same time.

Many can come up with justification for a pre-emptive first strike, but I would question the wisdom of anybody doing that.

The next problem is nearly every country in the world has a very large invested interest in the US. For most countries the US is either their biggest source of goods or their biggest customer for their exports.

Click to expand...

Are you serious? It makes sense? You must be nuts, thinking nuking anyone or anything "makes sense".

rebelishaulman said:

Are you serious? It makes sense? You must be nuts, thinking nuking anyone or anything "makes sense".

Click to expand...

It mads sense during WWII.

this is a crazy thread....why aren't the moderators of this forum saying anything. nuking the US means that many Muslims will also die. last time I heard there are approximately 7 million Muslims in this country. The Deen of Allah is spreading here. The area I live in has 3 Madrassah.
In general, nuclear bombs should not be used against any country.
this makes me so angry...:anger:

thank you sister, I was waiting for someone to say that.

rebelishaulman said:

Are you serious? It makes sense? You must be nuts, thinking nuking anyone or anything "makes sense".

Click to expand...

Did you bother to read the entire post or just the first sentence? He goes on to explain how impractical, well near impossible it would be.

b'shalome

Skillganon said:

I really do not think nuking U.S will achieve anything by destroying countless of life, whatever the evil of U.S maybe.
I am sure if their was such plan, the plan has to be that U.S is nuke sufficiently that their is hardly any life left.

If their was any bases located outside U.S I doubt they will have a home to go back to after it has been nuked.

Click to expand...

The logistics of trying to bomb the US to that point is staggering. If it could be accomplished by using 1 bomb for every 1,000 square miles of land surface That would take 9,634 bombs. Keep in mind Russia had over 30,000 nuclear weapons aimed at the US at one point, but they never reached the point where they felt they could achieve sufficient advantage to risk a first strike.

Most of the world thinks of the US as a country in terms of the country they live in. But, the reality is it would be much closer to think of it as 50 separate countries, although they all are United together.

As I said earlier it does make sense for people to think it would be fair to Nuke the US. This comes about because of what much of the world's perception of the US is. The country is seen as a land of great wealth, much extravagance and arrogance.

The world can not afford warfare in terms of military conquest. The world is ir need of conquest by truth, peace and love. Bombs are not going to solve any problems.

Some people do want to nuke the US and it is understandable that some people feel that way. But, the reality is it is not a workable solution. On the surface it makes sense for many people. But the overall effect would be to turn the people who would do so, into being the very same as what they are against. Everybody seems to agree that power and wealth corrupt, but at the same time it seems that many of those same people want it for themselves. As that is the type of power structure it would take for a government to have the initiative and ability for a first strike.

Total destruction of the US would only bring about a temporary change in the world balance. It would just mean that another nation would seize the immediate power gap and achieve world dominance. The game would be the same, except the players will have changed. Maybe for the worse.

The nuke :-[ will not affect the environment too :? Our earth its quite ill and the ecologic parts from states could not ask the army to become more ecological:? Like give up to their arms which affect the environment.