General

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hamas
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 14
  • Views Views 3K
H

Hamas

Esteemed Member
Messages
130
Reaction score
23
Gender
Male
Religion
Islam
Assalamu Alaikum Everyone,

Can someone help me please? Its just a bit of grammer.

Now lets say somebody presented to me a report of some sort and i thought it wasnt in detail

Can i say the report was not breakdown in detail or do i say the report was not broken down in detail?

which one is correct? are they both correct?

JazakAllah :)
 
Hey thanks for that.

Can i have other members opinions too please? :)

JazakAllah
 
It's "not broken down in detail"

Broken = past tense
Breaking = Present tense
Break = Future tense
 
So to summarise, it is:

'the report was not broken down into detail'
 
Muezzin said:
So to summarise, it is:

'the report was not broken down into detail'
Click to expand...

Im still in doubt, i think to say "the report has not been breakdown into details is also correct and can be used, no?

Can someone help me please?
 
Hamas said:
Im still in doubt, i think to say "the report has not been breakdown into details is also correct and can be used, no?

Can someone help me please?
Click to expand...

That's wrong. There's no such thing as that statement. You have mixed past tense in with future tense.
 
England said:
That's wrong. There's no such thing as that statement. You have mixed past tense in with future tense.
Click to expand...

Are you sure? 100%? Thank you :)

How come nobody else is helping me?

Becaues you dont know? :D
 
Hamas said:
Can i say the report was not breakdown in detail or do i say the report was not broken down in detail?

which one is correct? are they both correct?
Click to expand...


i would say :D

da tin wernt in no detail :p

naa lol it should be broken down, but you should re phrase like

"once the report was broken down, it was evident that there was not enough detail"

:shade:
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top